Connect with us

Oxford University

Our commitment to improving health outcomes with Research Connections

Published

on


This monththe first articles publish in our new open access journal, Research Connections.  

Research Connections  is committed to improving health outcomes by publishing scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant research that supports better patient care, strengthens health systems, and actively contributes to a robust evidence base.

In his first editorial, Dr. Charles Young, Editor-in-Chief of Research Connections, says that “The status quo in healthcare must change.” He explains that healthcare research must evolve to continue to save lives and provide solutions to urgent global challenges, and that the same applies to healthcare publishing.

Dr. Young shares more on Research Connections in the video below:

About Research Connections 

Many articles submitted to journals are never published. Scientifically valid articles can be rejected by journals for many reasons – because they aren’t perceived to be novel enough, because they sit outside the scope of a journal, or because of the clarity of the language in the article.

A pattern of publishing positive results leads to a bias against null findings, and some research is never submitted due to fear it will be rejected. This can mean that high-quality, scientifically sound and clinically relevant healthcare research is not published, limiting the research base used for decision-making, ultimately impacting global patient care.

Research Connections aims to address these issues and make a real-world contribution to the scientific knowledge base, influencing healthcare policy and most importantly improving health outcomes. Submissions to the journal are assessed based on methodological strength, ethical integrity, and real-world impact – not perceived novelty.

The journal’s values include supporting a diverse, international network of authors, reviewers, editors, and readers – from all specialities and career stages – with an ethos of collaboration, education, and shared advancement.

There are many journals publishing across healthcare specialities, and we are excited to see how Research Connections contributes to healthcare research.

We are privileged to be collaborating with a growing number of prestigious journals (68 to date) to support the vision of Research Connections to improve global health. The journals of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the American Association of Immunologists, and the Journal of Nephrology are the latest to join the Research Connections network.

Publishing open access medical research is crucial for patients, healthcare professionals, researchers, and the public. Immediate, free access to and re-use of scientifically sound, peer-reviewed research promotes transparency, accelerates innovation, and leads to better-informed decisions and equitable healthcare. This is something we are proud to support. 

You can learn more about Research Connections here.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Oxford University

Expert Comment: In Claude We Trust? Evaluating the New Constitution

Published

on


Professor Yuval Shany. Image credit Ian Wallman.

On January 21, 2026Anthropic published its New Constitution for Claude – a series of Large Language Models (LLMsthat perform general-purpose generative AI functions. The Constitution – a84-page document – is presented as a foundational document that both expresses and shapes who Claude is. It also enumerates actions that Claude should refrain from undertaking (hard constraints), and identifies considerations the system should weigh when deciding whether to perform certain actions  

A few weeks after the Constitution was published, Anthropic faced two realworld situations in which its normative outer-boundaries were tested: Its showdown with the US Department of War (DoW), regarding legal limits on the utilization of Claude; and its actual use for targeting by the US military in the war in Iran.  

These developments highlight the importance of introducing strong human rights safeguards into the Constitution 

No place for human rights? 

According to the Constitution, Claude should conform to four sets of values, applied in the following hierarchical order: Safety, ethics, compliance with Anthropic guidelines and helpfulness. Put differently, Claude should strive to assist users, unless instructed by Anthropic not to do so, or if it deems the request to be unethical or unsafe.  

The Constitution also introduces a number of hard constraints – specific nogo areas, which should never be attempted, including attempting to kill or disempower the vast majority of humanity or the human species as whole or assisany individual or group with an attempt to seize unprecedented and illegitimate degrees of absolute societal, military, or economic control 

While some ethical standards enumerated in the Constitution overlap with human rights – e.g., privacy, protection from harmrule of law, equal treatment, the right to access information and political freedom – the document does not explicitly mention the term human rights. This is in contrast to the 2023 version of the constitution which referred to the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights.  

This means that many important human rightprotections that could be relevant to the operation of Claude – for example, the right to liberty, freedom of religion and the right to intellectual property – have not been clearly integrated into the Constitution.  

Anthropic vs the US Department of War 

Shortly after the promulgation of the Constitution, Anthropic was mentioned in the news in two dramatic contexts – both underscoring the importance of developing effective normative backstops.  

First, on March 2026, the Department oWar designated Anthropic a supplychain risk due to its refusal to allow the Department to use Claude for mass domestic surveillance purposes and for operating lethal autonomous weapon systemsInstead, the DoW signed a contract with OpenAI for the provision of substitute AI systems.   

As Dr. Brianna Rosen from the Blavatnik School of Government explained, the insistence of the DoW on being able to use AI systems for any lawful use left in place a governance gap, since US law (and, in fact, also international law) does not clearly ban, under all circumstances, mass surveillance or the use of autonomous weapon systems.  

Delineating the permissible scope of such extraordinary capabilities through contractual negotiations between the U.S. government and Anthropic (or OpenAI) appears to provide weaker human rights guarantees than embedding universally accepted protections directly in the AI system itself, through a Constitution or a comparable normative framework. This is especially so given the difficulties of monitoring and enforcing state compliance in sensitive domains such as national security.  

Dr. Rosen is also right to point out that the negotiating position of Anthropic on mass surveillance, which focuses on domestic surveillance only, may already fall short of international human rights standards in the field, which capture foreign surveillance too 

Secondly, it has been widely reported that Claude systems, still in use by the US military, have been employed in the war in Iran for target selection purposes. It has also been speculated – albeit without hard evidence – that the use of AI systems may have contributed to one high-profile operational mistake (the targeting of an Iranian school) by reason of reliance on out-of-date maps of the attacked area.  

Here again, questions arise as to whether the Constitution, as currently drafted, contains appropriate safeguards against reliance on AI systemin contexts involving lethal consequences.  

Arguably, a more human rights-oriented approach would include within the system’s constitutional norms an explicit requirement that any use of the AI system in armed conflict comply with the basic principles of international humanitarian law (which give effect also to human rights principles)including flagging precautionary obligations such as realtime target verification before attacks are recommended 

In this policy space, reliance on AI systems may not only result in operational mistakes; it might also perpetuate accountability gaps (enabling humans to blame outcomes on the AI)In such cases, embedding human rights by design within the AI system’s constitution which governs its operation could offer a much more effective level of protection against violations of basic individual rights.   

Read an expanded edition of this article (co-written with Dr. Noa Mor, Prof. Renana Keydar and Prof. Omri Abend) via the Institute for Ethics in AI blog. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Oxford University

Oxford tops QS World University Rankings in four subjects, named overall top for Humanities

Published

on


This makes it the UK university with the most courses ranked top in the world; the University was also ranked first in the world overall in the arts and humanities subject area, and came in the top three in four of the five broad subject areas ranked.

Oxford’s Vice-Chancellor, Professor Irene Tracey FRS, said: ‘Oxford’s strength is based on the breadth and depth of our scholarship, and these latest QS subject rankings are a powerful affirmation of that enduring commitment to support all disciplines. To see four of our subjects – Anatomy and Physiology, Anthropology, Geography, and Modern Languages – ranked first in the world is a remarkable achievement, and one that reflects the dedication of our academic community.

‘That we are the UK university with the most subjects ranked top globally speaks not only to excellence, but to the collaborative, curiosity-driven culture that underpins our fundamental and translational work.

‘I am particularly delighted that Oxford has also been recognised as number one in the world for Arts and Humanities overall. At a moment when we are launching our new centre for the Humanities alongside an ambitious Arts and Cultural Programme, this is both a timely endorsement and a reminder of the vital role that the humanities play in helping us understand ourselves, our societies, and our shared future. As a university, we honour our intellectual heritage while continually renewing it – ensuring that our teaching and research serve the world with insight, creativity, and purpose.’

Professor Dan Grimley, Head of the Humanities Division at the University of Oxford, said: ‘I am delighted that the strength of the teaching and research across our humanities subjects has been recognised by the latest QS World University Rankings. The achievement of colleagues in our Faculty of Medieval and Modern Languages to demonstrate excellence against a challenging backdrop of the decline of language teaching in schools is particularly impressive.

‘Outstanding research and expertise from the humanities is critical to tackling the major challenges of the 21st century. We also hear from our graduates and their employers that the skills they learned studying the humanities give them an advantage in navigating professional careers which are being impacted by AI in new and uncertain ways.’

Oxford’s School of Geography and the Environment (SoGE) ranked number one for the 16th consecutive year out of 251 institutions featured. Professor Giles Wiggs, Head of the School of Geography and the Environment, said: ‘Topping the QS World Rankings for Geography for an incredible 16th successive year is a remarkable achievement by everybody at the School of Geography and the Environment. Yet again, the ranking reflects the talent and dedication of our community of academic, research and professional services staff and is testament to the enduring global reach and reputation of our collaborative and multi-disciplinary science and teaching. I am extremely proud to be a part of that community.’

The Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics is placed number one for seven consecutive years, top of over 200 universities included in this year’s rankings. Head of Department Professor David Paterson said: ‘This is a terrific achievement for my colleagues and all members of the department who have made this possible. As I finish my 10-year term as Head of Department at the end of the academic year it is pleasing to see we have made this top spot for 9 out of the last 10 years. I am very proud to have been a part of this journey.’

The School of Anthropology returns to the number one spot for the 4th time in 5 years; this year 202 other institutions were compared. Head of the School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography Professor Clare Harris said: ‘I am delighted that the School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography has returned to the top spot in the QS World University rankings for Anthropology this year. This success is testimony to the excellent work of our academics, researchers, professional services staff, students and the entire school community. Congratulations to all!’

Modern Languages topped the subject ranking for the first time since 2022 this year, having been ranked second each of the last three years. 352 other universities were ranked in the subject. Head of the Faculty of Medieval and Modern Languages Professor Philip Rothwell said: ‘Modern Languages is delighted to achieve first place in this year’s QS World Rankings, and to be an integral part of the Humanities Division that also ranks first. Our placement reflects our strong research culture, global engagement as a faculty, and the outstanding educational experience and employability of our students. It is also testament to the unwavering commitment of our faculty members and staff to a broad discipline that brings together multiple ways of seeing and being in the world, and of understanding our shared humanity in its rich diversity.’

The 2026 edition of the QS World University Rankings by Subject features 55 individual subjects across five broad subject areas. This 2026 rankings provide comparative analysis on the performance of more than 1700 universities from across the globe.

Earlier this year, the University of Oxford ranked first in the world in the Times Higher Education (THE) Subject Rankings for Medicine and Computer Science. Oxford leads in Medicine for the 15th consecutive year and in Computer Science for the eighth.



Source link

Continue Reading

Oxford University

Celebrating one year of Oxford Intersections

Published

on


Oxford Intersections is our online interdisciplinary research resource, inviting academics and global experts to investigate the world’s most urgent and challenging subjects from all angles.

As we mark one year since the programme launched, we reflect on the over 300 articles we’ve published since then, covering over 250 subject areas from authors all over the world.

Intersections are organized by topic, inviting ideas from different disciplines to clash, complement, and counterpoint, prompting new viewpoints and questions. Explore some of the original content published so far in our first four topics:

AI in Society

Philipp Hacker, General Editor of AI in Society, and Chair for Law and Ethics of the Digital Society at European University Viadrina:

AI in Society investigates AI’s pervasive influence on our economic, legal, personal, and cultural spheres. It takes a unique format, in which contributors from various disciplines collaborate to chart both the promises and societal challenges of AI, with particular attention to generative AI models and their global impact. From my perspective as its General Editor, AI in Society aims to serve as a reliable reference point for ongoing debates on how to align technological innovation with fundamental rights and societal values.”

Read Philipp’s full article

Read some of the published research


Growing Up with AI: Redefining Responsible AI for Children of Generation Beta in the Majority World

Amir Rahdari

Read here


Authentic Artificial Love

Ariela Tubert, Justin Tiehen

Read here


English in LLMs: The Role of AI in Avoiding Cultural Homogenization

Mirko Farina, Andrea Lavazza

Read here

Borders

Alexander Diener, Professor of Geography at the University of Kansas, and Joshua Hagen, Dean of the College of Letters and Science, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, General Editors of Borders:

“We hope readers will engage Oxford Intersections: Borders to encounter new perspectives on a topics that is elemental to human experience and foundational to the form and function of power.”

Read more about Borders

Read some of the published research


Beyond Oral Tradition: Digitalizing Indigenous Environmental Knowledge for Climate Resilience in Africa

Dorcas Stella Shumba

Read here


Reconfiguring Borders: The Role of Conspiracy Theories in Shaping Knowledge and Information Flows in Online Discourse

Massimiliano Demata

Read here


Concepts from the Margins: Reimagining Governance and Belonging Through Border Children’s Lived Experiences

Ana Isabel Sandoval

Read here

Racism by Context

Meena Dhanda, General Editor of Racism by Context and Professor of Philosophy and Cultural Politics at the University of Wolverhampton:

“Combatting racism requires an unflinchingly analytical understanding of the roots, the history, the manifestation, the mechanisms, the proliferation, and the entanglement of its many forms within institutions and practices across all spheres of human interaction. Racism by Context has undertaken this enormous challenge by bringing into conversation cutting-edge research from different global locations.”

Read more from Meena

Read some of the published research


Hair Discrimination and the Racialization of Black Young People’s Bodies: A Critical Analysis of Racism in U.K. School Settings

Siobhan O’Neill, Karis Campion, Sweta Rajan-Rankin

Read here


Soul Circuitry: Chronicles of Cyborgian Intelligence in Afrofuturism

Nettrice Gaskins

Read here


‘You are Nathan F*cking Shelley!’: Orientalism, White Saviourism, and the Radicalization of Nate in Ted Lasso

Adam Ehsan Ali, Matt Ventresca

Read here

Social Media in Society and Culture

Laeeq Khan, General Editor of Social Media in Society and Culture and Associate Professor in the School of Media Arts & Studies at Ohio University:

“Addressing today’s most pressing challenges requires a new approach to thinking. An interdisciplinary transformative approach can advance knowledge by exploiting and harmonizing the strengths of various disciplines within a unified framework. This approach deepens our collective understanding by bringing together the disparate and sometimes contradictory perspectives of many disciplines, all of which offer valuable insights.”

Read more from Laeeq

Read some of the published research


Sharenting on Instagram: A Study of Emotional Well-Being and Child Safety

P V Chandana, Velayutham Chandrasekharan, Tamilselvi Natarajan

Read here


Gaming on Social Media: An X- and YouTube-Driven Social Network Analysis of Minecraft Conversations

Mohd Ali Samsudin, Goh Kok Ming

Read here


Functional Aspects of Ritual in Digital Religion

Antonio Salvati

Read here

What’s coming next

In addition to continually developing our published topics, in the next year we’ll be launched intersections for Environmental Change and Human ExperienceGender JusticeClimate Adaptation, and Cultures of Waste, with many more to come in the following years.

Discover the full collection here.

The post Celebrating one year of Oxford Intersections appeared first on Oxford University Press.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending