Connect with us

Business & Technology

UK firms say infrastructure gaps slow green efforts

Published

on




SOFIAH NICHOLE SALIVIO

News Editor

Technology and supply chain executives say gaps in infrastructure, data and skills are slowing sustainability efforts as UK businesses mark World Environment Day. Senior leaders from Fluke, Fluent Commerce and Blue Yonder have identified reliability, orchestration and transparency as critical fault lines.

Electric vehicle infrastructure, retail fulfilment and global logistics are under scrutiny as organisations face rising regulatory and consumer expectations. Their comments suggest a shift from headline climate pledges to deeper operational change across transport and supply chains.

In the UK electric vehicle market, charging reliability is emerging as the main concern. Industry data shows rapid growth in vehicle sales, but use of public chargers remains uneven and often frustrating for drivers.

Theo Brillhart, Technology Director, R&D at Fluke, said charging infrastructure is now falling behind consumer demand despite strong vehicle adoption. He identified reliability, maintenance and standards as the main pressure points.

“The UK was the biggest EV market in Europe in 2024, and adoption is still rising. The momentum is clear, yet at the moment, this cleaner energy option is lagging behind demand. EV charging reliability is not where it needs to be to support the growing number of consumers who are keen to invest in an EV. Instead, charging anxiety is overtaking range anxiety, with a recent Fluke survey underlining this – respondents cited charger maintenance, inoperable chargers, and software incompatibility as major hurdles. Drivers need confidence that a charger will work, and that the infrastructure behind it is dependable. Interoperability efforts are showing great progress, but technical standards alone cannot guarantee reliable access. This is why maintenance is now becoming a strategic priority. Reactive work restores service after vandalism or unexpected failures, whereas preventative approaches take this a step further by using data and analytics to identify issues before they cause outages. Consistency also depends on thoroughly trained technicians being equipped with advanced diagnostic tools and being able to work under consistent standards. Without this alignment, outcomes vary, maintenance costs increase, and the inconsistency translates to consumer frustration. As sustainable organisations try to encourage more people to make the shift, it’s evident that there is still a way to go before we can say goodbye to fossil fuels in the automotive industry. Dependable charging is essential to scaling EV adoption, and strengthening the industry as a whole. If EV charging organisations invest in futureproofing both their workforce and their infrastructure maintenance, EV adoption rates can continue to increase, bringing us one step closer to a more renewable world.”

Retailers and brands face a different tension as they balance consumer demand for fast delivery and easy returns with environmental impact. Technology suppliers say sustainability metrics now feature in most procurement processes.

Abdelkader Keddari, VP, Global Strategic Solutions at Fluent Commerce, said customers and shoppers are pushing vendors and retailers towards stricter environmental criteria, even as expectations for convenience keep rising.

“Many organisations now find themselves stuck between a rock and a hard place when it comes to balancing sustainability with business needs and innovation. Sustainability is no longer optional: all of our clients and prospects are embedding sustainable criteria into their selection of new technology solutions, and expect vendors to demonstrate clear, measurable commitments. Consumers are also increasingly concerned with their green footprint, with a third of those in the UK trying to shop “responsibly”. On the other hand, demand for fast delivery, affordable products and easy returns processes is stronger than ever. At the same time, technologies such as AI are opening up new opportunities to improve both operational efficiency and customer experience, raising expectations further. This means technology providers must not only enable sustainability for their customers, but also lead by example by demonstrating their own initiatives, from green IT practices to responsible infrastructure and more efficient resource usage. So how can businesses manage to fulfil those desires in a sustainable way? In many cases, technology becomes the key enabler to reconcile these competing priorities, especially when it is designed to drive smarter, real-time decision-making across the entire order lifecycle. The real challenge is not just visibility, but orchestration, ensuring that every order is fulfilled in the most efficient and sustainable way possible. Retail businesses that invest in modern order management software, increasingly enhanced by AI, have a much better chance of meeting their customers’ needs while improving sustainability outcomes. This software helps retailers ensure that the right products are available at the right time, reducing overproduction and the risk of waste. Beyond inventory optimisation, it enables a much more intelligent approach to fulfilment. For example, the system can automatically select the most appropriate fulfilment location based on proximity, reducing transport distances and emissions. It can also encourage customers to accept slightly longer delivery times in exchange for consolidated shipments from a single warehouse, helping to avoid split deliveries. In urban areas, fulfilment can be optimised further by enabling low-emission last-mile delivery options such as bike or electric vehicle couriers, while clearly managing customer expectations around delivery windows and availability. Finally, click and collect can be actively promoted as part of the fulfilment strategy, allowing customers to integrate pickup into their existing travel routines and eliminate the need for home delivery altogether. While these kinds of changes can make a huge difference to the sustainability of a brand, they require top-down investment into the technology to make them possible. AI should not be seen as a standalone solution, but a capability that can amplify the effectiveness of core systems. Whilst it may seem like a large investment initially, the long-term dividends in terms of the benefits to the planet and to the brand’s public reputation are invaluable.”

Supply chain leaders see similar pressure from new regulation and the shift towards circular economy models. European rules on product design and emissions disclosure are reshaping investment in logistics and warehouse systems.

Saskia van Gendt, Chief Sustainability Officer at Blue Yonder, said traditional supply chains still favour volume and linear flows, sitting uneasily with efforts to cut waste and track emissions.

“Global supply chains are built for scale, not sustainability, but that model is increasingly at odds with regulatory, environmental and commercial priorities. Overproduction remains a growing and costly challenge for businesses, leading to unsold inventory, markdowns and waste. At the same time, new regulations demand much greater transparency across supply chains, with the focus shifting toward Scope 3 emissions. The EU’s Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), for example, is pushing businesses to increase recycled content and address barriers such as costly reverse logistics. For businesses looking to operate more sustainably, the business case for circular supply chains is becoming increasingly compelling. However, many organisations still lack the infrastructure to collect, analyse and report on sustainability data at scale. Logistics and warehousing processes were designed one-directionally, meaning returns processing for recycling or reuse can be complicated. This, coupled with a lack of full supply chain transparency into where materials come from or what happens to them after disposal, means companies are missing opportunities for recovery and resource optimisation. AI-powered systems can provide end-to-end visibility across all supply chain tiers, enabling companies to trace materials, assess environmental impact and ensure regulatory compliance. These solutions also reduce the complexity and cost of reverse logistics by identifying network efficiencies, supporting the recovery and reuse of post-consumer and post-industrial materials. Technology is driving significant improvements in the way organisations can approach sustainability, getting us closer to a truly circular economy.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business & Technology

Over 100 MPs call for Thames Water to go into special administration

Published

on


One hundred and 12 members of parliament have signed an open letter to the environment secretary and Ofwat, the water services regulation authority, calling for Thames Water to be placed into special administration without delay.

Since June 2025, Thames Water creditors, a group of US hedge funds, has been negotiating with Ofwat to formally take over the utility.

READ MORE: Rare Agatha Christie books sell for nearly £20,000

Calum Miller MP made the call for the minister to meet with two landlordsCalum Miller MP (Image: Office of Calum Miller MP)

The proposed deal includes waiving fines for the water company, suspend pollution and performance targets, and raise bills for households beyond the level currently set by Ofwat.

Calum Miller, MP for Bicester and Woodstock, Olly Glover, MP for Didcot and Wantage, Freddie Van Mierlo, MP for Henley and Thame, Layla Moran, MP for Oxford West and Abingdon, and Charlie Maynard, MP for Witney all signed the list.

In total 53 Liberal Democrats signed the list, 46 Labour MPs, six independents, five Green party MPs, one from Plaid Cymru and one from the Conservative party.

Freddie van Mierlo.Freddie Van Mierlo (Image: South Oxfordshire District Council.)

The letter highlights the dangerous possibilities of the company setting its own rules would create a dangerous precedent for all of England’s privatised water companies.

Thames Water was responsible for a third of the worst pollution incidents in 2025.

The CEO of the company, Chris Weston, recently drew controversy for saying that some of the firm’s targets were beyond what they could achieve.

The comments came after he gave himself a 14 per cent pay rise to £1.163 million in the year to March, while other directors received bonuses totalling £4.1 million





Source link

Continue Reading

Business & Technology

Professor says tokenised deposits won’t transform banking

Published

on


A Loughborough University study has challenged claims that tokenised bank deposits will transform banking, arguing that many of the supposed benefits can already be delivered through existing systems.

The paper examines tokenised deposits, which represent money held in a bank account as a digital token, and questions whether they amount to a significant innovation for mainstream banking. Supporters say the model could improve the speed and automation of payments. The study argues that these outcomes do not depend on tokenisation.

Professor Alistair Milne of Loughborough Business School wrote the policy note for SUERF, a group that brings together central bankers, regulators, academics and finance professionals. He argues that banks already use computer systems and databases that can be programmed to handle many of the same tasks now being presented as new.

Debate over digital money has gathered pace as banks, policymakers and financial technology groups explore alternatives to traditional account-based systems. Tokenised deposits have emerged as one of several concepts under discussion, alongside stablecoins and central bank digital currencies. Advocates say they could help create faster payments, available at all hours and easier to link to automated instructions.

Milne’s paper takes a narrower view of what is actually new. It argues that blockchain, the record-keeping technology often associated with cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, is not necessary for most of the practical gains linked to tokenised deposits. In his assessment, conventional bank infrastructure can already support much of the same functionality without converting deposits into tokens.

“Much of the current discussion suggests tokenised deposits will transform banking. My research indicates that the technology itself is not the key issue. Most of the promised advantages can already be achieved using conventional banking systems. In many cases, tokenised deposits are better understood as a new way of packaging existing capabilities rather than a fundamentally new form of money,” said Professor Alistair Milne, Loughborough Business School, Loughborough University.

The study does not dismiss tokenised deposits entirely. Instead, it identifies a limited set of circumstances in which they may offer a clearer advantage, particularly within the operations of large international banks serving corporate clients across several markets.

Cross-border use

One of the stronger use cases, the paper argues, arises when a global company moves money between countries and currencies within the same banking group. In that situation, payments can be automated more easily because the transfer remains within one bank’s internal systems rather than moving through several institutions.

That distinction matters because payments between different banks still require interbank settlement. This brings a series of established constraints, including regulation, security checks and the management of financial risk between institutions.

The paper argues that tokenising a deposit does not remove those underlying frictions. Even if the customer-facing representation of money changes, banks must still complete the same core settlement and compliance steps when funds move across institutional boundaries.

Wider debate

The findings add to a broader policy discussion over whether new forms of digital money represent genuine structural change or simply a redesign of existing financial processes. Banks and regulators have been assessing how far distributed ledger systems can improve payments, settlement and record-keeping, especially in wholesale and cross-border markets.

Milne’s intervention is likely to resonate with those who question whether the financial sector is overstating the novelty of token-based systems. The paper suggests the real barriers to better payments are not always technological, but often lie in the legal, regulatory and risk frameworks that govern transactions between separate institutions.

The paper also highlights a divide in the digital money debate. Some proposed systems promise gains by changing the form of money itself, while others seek improvements through better integration of existing infrastructure. Milne’s argument places tokenised deposits closer to the second category.

For banks, that could shape investment decisions. If the same results can be achieved through upgrades to current databases and payment systems, the commercial case for shifting to tokenised deposits may be weaker than some advocates suggest, especially in domestic banking where established systems are already deeply embedded.

At the same time, the paper leaves room for more targeted adoption where specific operational benefits can be shown. Large multinational banks handling internal cross-border flows may still find token-based structures useful in defined cases, even if the model falls short of a broader banking revolution.

The study’s central conclusion is that the hardest parts of modern payments do not disappear simply because deposits are represented differently in software. As Milne argues, the most important constraints often emerge when money must move between institutions rather than within them.

Those frictions remain central to banking, regardless of whether a deposit is recorded in a conventional account ledger or represented as a token. The paper argues that turning deposits into digital tokens does little to remove these underlying challenges.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business & Technology

UK restaurant chain bids final farewell in emotional goodbye

Published

on


The closures, including branches in Oxfordshire, are part of the parent company Whitbread’s major restructuring plan, and will see all 106 sites shut permanently.

It was announced in April that the company would shut its remaining Beefeater and Brewers Fayre sites as part of a strategy overhaul, placing around 3,800 jobs at risk.

READ MORE: More than 100 restaurants to shut across the UK

There are Beefeaters in Cowley and Kidlington.

Now the chain has reached out to its loyal customers.

Dishes are served at Beefeater (Image: Jamie Lau)

In an email being distributed to previous diners and members of its loyalty schemes, Beefeater shared a message of gratitude, with two prominent words: ‘thank you’.

It said: “A message from your local Beefeater: We want to say a huge thank you for your custom at our Beefeater restaurants.”

It added: “As you may have seen, we have recently announced changes to our business, which is resulting in the closure of our Branded Restaurants.

“This means that on Thursday, September 10, 2026, your local Beefeater and all other UK Beefeaters will close.”

Inside Beefeater (Image: Christie Owen & Davies)

In the letter, the company also said it would close the loyalty scheme on August 31.

The restructure is part of Whitbread’s new five-year strategy, which aims to reduce costs by £250m.

The chain first launched in 1974.

The former Ock Mill Beefeater restaurant in Abingdon (Image: Andy Ffrench)

Several customers said they were “sad” to see the chain shutting sites, although they also felt the brand had gone downhill in more recent years.

One person wrote: “Until I went to university the only restaurant I’d ever been to was a Beefeater. We’d go for various family birthdays. I absolutely loved it.

“A steak or a mixed grill, which I never got at home, followed by a Knickerbocker Glory. Fantastic times. I went back a couple of years ago.

“The place looked run down. I feel sad about this, but I guess the fact I hadn’t been to one for 30 years is part of the problem.”

The Ock Mill Beefeater restaurant, linked to the former Premier Inn in Marcham Road, Abingdon, closed in 2023, and the site was bought by the Unicorn School, which is currently renovating the building for classrooms.

Dominic Paul, Whitbread’s chief executive, said earlier: “We always challenge ourselves to improve and, in light of significant cost increases in the form of business rates and national insurance, as well as the implied market discount to our inherent value, we’ve looked hard at the options open to us to maximise value creation over the medium and long-term.

“This has been a rigorous process, and we’ve approached all options with an open mind.

“Our new five-year plan builds on our strengths and drives a significant acceleration of our strategy.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending