Connect with us

UK News

Trump asking Congress for symbolic expunging of his two impeachments | Donald Trump

Published

on


Donald Trump is pressing Congress to erase one of the darkest chapters of his political career, urging Republicans to pass a resolution that would symbolically nullify the two impeachments he suffered during his first term in office.

The effort, first reported by the Wall Street Journal and confirmed by a White House official, would allow Trump to claim a symbolic victory on a key grievance from his first term. But experts say it would have little legal significance, since the constitution provides no procedure for undoing an impeachment.

Trump is the first president in US history to be impeached twice. The first case, in 2019, centred on allegations that he abused his power by pressuring Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden, a political rival. He was acquitted by the Senate in February 2020.

The second followed the 6 January 2021 attack on the US Capitol, when members of Congress accused him of inciting an insurrection. He was again acquitted after leaving office.

According to the Journal, Trump and his allies are seeking a congressional resolution that would effectively expunge the impeachments from the historical record. While such a measure would carry no legal force, supporters view it as a symbolic repudiation of what they regard as politically motivated proceedings.

Any attempt to revisit the impeachments is likely to reopen some of the most contentious episodes of Trump’s political life at a moment when Republicans are preparing for next year’s midterm elections. Critics argue that the strategy risks drawing renewed attention to the very allegations the president would prefer to consign to history.

Speaking on CNN, the political commentator SE Cupp questioned the wisdom of the move. “What are you thinking?” she said. “He’s not thinking ahead. All the reasons he was impeached get dredged up again, and we’re all talking about it around a midterm election.”

Democrats duly seized on this argument. Ted Lieu, a Democratic representative from California who served as one of the House impeachment managers during Trump’s second impeachment trial, wrote on social media: “As a former impeachment manager, I plead with you to please bring up Trump’s prior impeachments.

“Let’s hold hearings, call witnesses and show videos to remind people what happened. And please make every Republican in a swing district vote on this. Thank you.”

Adam Schiff, the California senator who was the lead impeachment manager in the first impeachment trial of Trump, dismissed the effort as futile.

“There is no expunging the stain of Trump’s two impeachments,” he wrote. “Or avoiding the conclusion that the president cares little about the economic hardships of the American people. His priority is only, ever, Donald Trump.”

Trump was only the third US president to be impeached, after Andrew Johnson in 1868 and Bill Clinton in 1998. Both men were acquitted by the Senate. Richard Nixon resigned in 1974 before the House could vote on articles of impeachment over the Watergate scandal.

Since returning to office, Trump has repeatedly portrayed the impeachments as part of a broader campaign by political opponents and government institutions to undermine him.

But constitutional scholars note that the US constitution contains no mechanism for reversing or cancelling an impeachment once it has occurred. As a result, any congressional resolution would amount largely to a political statement rather than a substantive legal action.

Abigail Jackson, a White House spokesperson, defended the proposal, accusing Democrats of pursuing partisan vendettas against the president.

“Trump-deranged Democrats have spent years launching phoney attacks against the president and weaponising the government against him,” she said.

“It’s no surprise that sane individuals are recognising these sham efforts and are interested in undoing those shameful actions. President Trump remains focused on one thing: doing what’s best for the American people.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

UK News

Saudi Arabia v Uruguay: World Cup 2026 – live | World Cup 2026

Published

on


Key events

Preamble

Hello and welcome to live, minute-by-minute coverage of Saudi Arabia v Uruguay at the Miami Stadium. Saudi Arabia started the last World Cup with a stunning victory over Argentina. They’d love to do the same another South American giant tonight – not least because it would increase their chances of getting out of a World Cup group for only the second time. The first, as any football nerd worth their loneliness will know, came on their World Cup debut at USA 94.

Uruguay didn’t even qualify for that tournament. They also missed out in 1998 and 2006, but a memorable run to the semi-finals in 2010 reminded everyone of their pedigree – and their ability to attract or cause controversy.

They’ve been a fixture since then and, while it’s hard to see them adding a third triumph to sit alongside 1930 and 1950, they never leave a World Cup without making an impression. Last time around, they and Ghana managed to knock each other out of the competition.

Whatever Uruguay achieve this time round, it won’t be dull, not when they are coached by Marcelo Bielsa.

Kick off 6pm EDT/11pm BST/8am AEST

The pre-match calm in Miami. Photograph: Julian Finney/Fifa/Getty Images
Share

Updated at 



Source link

Continue Reading

UK News

Social media ban – bold and blunt, but no silver bullet

Published

on



The BBC’s technology editor Zoe Kleinman on the big changes coming down the line for young people online.



Source link

Continue Reading

UK News

Belgium v Egypt: World Cup 2026 – live | World Cup

Published

on


Key events

“It’ll take some going for Spain v Cape Verde not to be my game of the tournament,” writes James Humphries, and he’s a Scotland supporter. “I could barely watch the last five minutes, and there was a lot of involuntary yelling and clapping. Football, bloody hell.

“It’s such a pure, pleasing underdog story I’m not even unduly bothered by the sudden realisation that cape Verde may very well end up getting more points than us.”

Share



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending