Connect with us

UK News

Middle East crisis live: Trump repeats Nato criticism and claims Iran has asked for a ceasefire | US-Israel war on Iran

Published

on


What should we infer from Trump’s claim Iran has asked for ceasefire?

Peter Beaumont

Peter Beaumont

President Trump’s Truth Social post claiming that Iran’s new president had asked for a ceasefire is problematic in a number of key details.

While Iran might have a new Supreme Leader in Mojtaba Khamenei, who succeeded his father Ali who was assassinated in the opening salvoes of the war, it does not have a “new president” who remains exactly the same person as before the start of the war – Masoud Pezeshkian.

If, at a pinch one could argue that, Trump is talking sloppily about the president of a “new regime” that still remains sharply at odds with most expert analysis which suggests that far from being “less radicalized” the regime has taken a more hardline and unpredictable turn since Ali Khamenei’s killing as the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps has moved to further consolidate its power.

Even in the event that Pezeshkian is behind an undisclosed ceasefire initiative of some kind – which Iran has not commented on – it is not clear what the status that might means in terms of Tehran’s internal power dynamics where the role of Supreme Leader is viewed historically as being more powerful than the office of president.

In a phone call this week with Antonio Costa, president of the European Council, Pezeshkian suggested that Iran could end of the conflict but with the important proviso of guarantees against a repeat attack – which is one of Tehran’s key demands and which Trump may be misrepresenting.

“We possess the necessary will to end this conflict, provided that essential conditions are met, especially the guarantees required to prevent repetition of the aggression,” Pezeshkian’s office said in a statement.

When Iran has commented on contacts through the mediation of Pakistan it has been to suggest that Trump’s remarks on progress have been highly exaggerated, a familiar Trump trait both in his interventions in Middle East diplomacy and over the war in Ukraine where repeated claims of imminent breakthroughs have tended not to survive contact with reality.

Amid widespread reporting that Trump is looking for an exit strategy for a deeply unpopular war that he has already become bored with, what seems more likely is that he is trying to shape a narrative that would allow him to say the war has been won.

Share

Updated at 

Key events

Trump repeats claims of Iran ‘regime change’

Reuters has published further remarks from Donald Trump in its phone interview with the US president.

When asked if he was thinking about pulling the US out of Nato, he said: “Oh, absolutely without question. Wouldn’t you do that if you were me?”

He added: “They haven’t been friends when we needed them. We’ve never asked them for much … it’s a one-way street.”

He also expressed his hope for a deal with the new leaders in Iran after airstrikes killed supreme leader Ali Khamenei.

He again claimed that there has been a “full regime change” in Iran, adding: “I’m dealing with a very good chance that we’ll make a deal because they don’t want to be blasted anymore.

“I didn’t need regime change, but we got it because of the casualties of war. We got it. So we have regime change and the big thing we have is they’re not going to have a nuclear weapon. Nor do they want one.”

As for the enriched uranium still possessed by Iran, Trump said: “That’s so far underground, I don’t care about that.

“We’ll always be watching it by satellite.”

Share



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

UK News

FA Cup buildup, Championship action and latest on Italian turmoil: football news – live | Championship

Published

on


Key events

FA Cup: Southampton v Arsenal (Saturday, 8pm)

Eleven Arsenal players withdrew from their respective international squads. How many will be in action at St Mary’s tomorrow?

Share



Source link

Continue Reading

UK News

NHS Wales major repairs backlog nears £1bn

Published

on



The cost of fixing the most serious repairs at major hospitals alone is more than £600m, figures show.



Source link

Continue Reading

UK News

Artemis II astronauts rocket towards the moon after breaking free of Earth’s orbit | Space

Published

on


The four Artemis astronauts have fired up their spacecraft’s engine to break away from Earth’s orbit and zoomed towards the moon, a milestone that commits Nasa to the first crewed lunar flyby in more than half a century.

With enough thrust to accelerate a stationary car to highway-driving speed in less than three seconds, the Orion capsule engine blasted on Thursday the astronauts on their trajectory towards the moon, which they now will loop as part of the 10-day Artemis 2 mission.

The burn lasting just under six minutes propelled them on their three-day voyage towards Earth’s natural satellite, the first since 1972.

“Looks like a good burn, we’re confirming,” mission control in Houston said.

“The crew is feeling pretty good up here on our way to the moon,” said astronaut Jeremy Hansen. “Humanity has once again shown what we are capable of.”

The burn came one day after the enormous orange and white Space Launch System (SLS) rocket carrying the Orion capsule blasted off flawlessly from Kennedy Space Center in Florida for the long-anticipated journey around the moon.

Now the astronauts are moonbound, there’s no turning back: they are on a “free return” trajectory, which uses the moon’s gravity to slingshot around it before heading back towards Earth without propulsion.

In the event something goes wrong, the astronauts wear suits that also serve as “survival systems” – in the unlikely case of a cabin depressurisation or leak, they’ll maintain oxygen, temperature controls and the correct pressure for up to six days.

The astronauts – Americans Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover and Christina Koch, and Hansen, a Canadian – spent their first hours in space performing checks and troubleshooting minor problems on the spacecraft that has never carried humans before, including a communications issue and a malfunctioning toilet.

They began the second day of their mission by playing Green Light by John Legend and Andre 3000, Nasa said – a reference to the go signal they would soon get to fire up the engine and move towards the moon.

They also had their first workouts on the spacecraft’s “flywheel exercise device” – each astronaut will carve out 30 minutes a day for fitness to minimise the muscle and bone loss that happens without gravity.

The 10-day Artemis 2 mission is aimed at paving the way for a moon landing in 2028.

The mission marks a series of historic accomplishments: sending the first person of colour, the first woman and the first non-American on a lunar mission. If all proceeds smoothly, the astronauts will set a record by venturing further from Earth than any human before – more than 250,000 miles (402,336km).

It is also the inaugural crewed flight of SLS, Nasa’s new lunar rocket.

SLS is designed to allow the US to repeatedly return to the moon with the goal of establishing a permanent base that will offer a platform for further exploration. It was meant to take off in February after years of delays and massive cost overruns. But repeated setbacks stalled it and even necessitated rolling the rocket back to its hangar for repairs.

The current era of US lunar investment has frequently been portrayed as an effort to compete with China, which aims to land humans on the moon by 2030.

During a post-launch briefing, Jared Isaacman, the Nasa administrator, said competition was “a great way to mobilise the resources of a nation”.

“Competition can be a good thing,” he said. “And we certainly have competition now.”

The Artemis program has come under pressure from Trump, who has pushed its pace with the hope that boots will hit the lunar surface before his second term ends in early 2029. But the projected date of 2028 for a landing has raised eyebrows among some experts, in part because Washington is relying heavily on the private sector’s technological headway.

The crew wrapped up their press conference, in which they spoke about the significance of the mission, adapting to life in space, and the “spectacular” view of Earth.

The Artemis II commander, Reid Wiseman, describing the moment the crew saw Earth as a whole, said: “You can see the entire globe from pole to pole, you can see Africa, Europe, and if you look closely, the northern lights. It was the most spectacular moment and it paused all four of us in our tracks.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending