Connect with us

Traffic & Transport

Infrastructure cuts to pay for defence will cost UK 10,000 jobs, analysis shows | Defence policy

Published

on


Keir Starmer’s decision to cut billions of pounds of infrastructure spending to pay for more defence equipment will end up costing the UK 10,000 jobs, according to an analysis of the government’s own figures.

The prime minister announced this week he was putting an extra £15bn into defence investment to revamp the country’s armed forces and boost British manufacturing.

The long-awaited defence investment plan (Dip) was designed to cement Starmer’s legacy in foreign policy and security as he prepares to depart Downing Street. But it also raised questions about where the funding would come from, given £6.8bn is being raised by unidentified cuts to departmental investment programmes and another £4.7bn is entirely unaccounted for.

The analysis, by researchers at the Transition Security Project, shows that while the extra defence investment will generate about 10,000 jobs by 2029-30, taking the money away from other sectors will cost nearly double that.

The findings cast doubt on claims by Starmer and his chancellor, Rachel Reeves, that they are boosting British jobs by reallocating large chunks of government spending to the Ministry of Defence.

Khem Rogaly, the co-author of the report, said: “The idea that military spending can provide a defence dividend is misleading: job losses will result from this latest funding settlement while the opportunity cost of military spending is sharp.

“Far more jobs are created when investing in public needs like health, education and addressing the climate crisis. This latest data suggests that the turn towards autonomous weapons and AI could also mean that military spending creates even fewer jobs per pound than before.”

Andrea Egan, the general secretary of Unison, the country’s largest trade union, said: “This timely analysis highlights how making cuts to government departments to bankroll more military spending will result in job losses. This costly and wasteful plan means extra cash for war and overseas interventions, but less for schools and hospitals.”

A government spokesperson said: “Defence is an engine for growth – supporting 272,000 jobs and over 25,000 MoD apprenticeships. The plan will back British workers, businesses and innovation, generate economic growth, create nearly 60,000 new jobs and increase defence exports.

“But we are in a new era of threat, which demands a new era of defence, and crucially our defence investment plan will energise the transformation of our armed forces to rebuild war-fighting readiness and target our resources, ensuring we are ready to face future threats.”

Starmer unveiled the Dip on Tuesday after nearly a year of internal arguments over how much extra money the military needed and where it would come from. The disagreements ended up with the resignation of the defence secretary, John Healey, just as the plan was due to be announced.

Military bosses originally asked for an additional £28bn over four years, but Starmer and Reeves eventually agreed to put in an extra £15bn, much of which will be spent on maintaining and upgrading the UK’s nuclear weapons.

The announcement prompted another row after it emerged £6.8bn was being taken from unidentified parts of other departments’ capital spending, while another £4.7bn was due to be allocated at the next budget.

The funding gap will have to be solved by Starmer’s successor as prime minister, most likely to be Andy Burnham. The new MP for Makerfield ⁠said on ​Thursday ‌he ‌was committed to ensuring ⁠defence spending ​commitments were ​properly ​financed if he ​became ‌prime ​minister.

Andy Burnham told Andrew Marr on LBC radio he would take his responsibility to fully fund the defence spending plan seriously. Photograph: Stefan Rousseau/PA

“I will take my responsibility to fully fund the defence spending plan seriously,” he told Andrew Marr on LBC radio, while also confirming he had not been made aware of the shortfall before Starmer’s announcement.

The government has said the biggest cuts will come from the energy and transport departments, both of which have high levels of capital spending. Two road improvement projects have already been stopped, while energy officials are looking at reductions to schemes such as home insulation and carbon capture and storage.

Part of the reason for boosting the defence budget, even at the expense of other departments, according to Reeves and Starmer, was to create new British jobs. The prime minister said on Tuesday: “Every pound in this plan will work twice, delivering economic growth and opportunity for the British people, and supporting more than half a million jobs by the end of the decade, as well as reinforcing our national security.”

However, the research by the Transition Security Project, which was spun out of Common Wealth, a thinktank with close links to Burnham, shows that putting money into defence creates far fewer jobs than other sectors.

According to the government’s own calculations, increasing the defence budget by £25.2bn over a six-year period will create an additional 60,000 jobs. By that calculation, every extra million pounds worth of government investment will create 2.4 direct and indirect UK jobs

Other sectors generate far more jobs per pound spent. Figures from the Office for National Statistics show every million pounds spent on transport generates 11.5 jobs, while every million pounds spent on energy and net zero creates 10 jobs.

This disparity means that taking away £2bn from other departments in 2029-30, as the government plans, will cost a total of nearly 20,000 jobs – double those generated in the defence sector.

Researchers believe the different job creation numbers may reflect the fact that defence supply chains are highly international, suggesting the government is spending billions of pounds creating jobs in other countries.

The government is spending more than £2bn, for example, on new fighter jets to carry nuclear bombs which are mainly made in the US. They also say the figures show the increasingly automated nature of high-end defence manufacturing.

The Ministry of Defence has been contacted for comment.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Traffic & Transport

Number of cloned number plates on UK roads at record high, data shows | Transport

Published

on


The number of reported “cloned” vehicles involved in offences on UK roads has reached a record high, official data shows.

More than 11,400 drivers contacted the DVLA last year after being issued with fines for offences they said they did not recognise or accept responsibility for – most of which are believed to be down to cloning, where a number plate is copied fraudulently on similar vehicles to avoid enforcement cameras.

The number of complaints about misattribution was 9% higher than in 2024 and almost double the figure recorded in 2018, according to the RAC motoring organisation, which analysed data obtained under freedom of information requests.

The rising figures underscore concerns about the number of illegal number plates in use, allowing criminals to evade detection and dangerous drivers to avoid being caught.

Although drivers should provide number plate suppliers with the V5C vehicle logbook and proof of identity, an investigation last year uncovered more than 130 official suppliers in the UK willing to sell cloned versions, which allow drivers to dodge police and congestion charges.

Cloning vehicles has left many innocent car owners having to struggle to prove they were not responsible when enforcement camera images apparently caught their vehicle committing offences.

A parallel concern is the use of “ghost” plates which are designed to be unreadable by the UK’s 18,000 automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) cameras, which enforce safety measures such as speed limits or lane closures on smart motorways.

The RAC said the UK needed to overhaul an outdated and poorly regulated number plate system. Its head of policy, Simon Williams, said: “If number plate suppliers were carrying out all the checks they’re supposed to, it would be much harder for dodgy drivers to buy cloned plates in the first place. It’s only when a fine arrives at a vehicle keeper’s home address that they realise someone else is driving around using their vehicle’s number plate illegally.”

He said that more also needed to be done to catch drivers with ghost plates, “whether that’s more police officers being equipped with handheld devices that can detect if plates are unreadable, updating ANPR cameras and introducing higher security standards for number plates and for those who produce them”.

The government last month said there would be a new nationwide crackdown on illegal number plates, with funding from the Department for Transport for a new roads policing team. A new National Roads Policing Coordination Centre would share intelligence as well as trialling new technology such as specialised goggles to detect number plates that have been designed to be unreadable by cameras.

skip past newsletter promotion


Drivers using an incorrectly displayed number plate can be fined up to £1,000.

A Department for Transport spokesperson said: “We’re cracking down on illegal number plates with significant investment in a new roads policing team and innovative tech to stamp out the scourge of cloned numberplates.

“Illegal number plates help facilitate crime, and we are supporting the police to work with the DVLA to make it easier to report these crimes and support victims through a new digital tool.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Traffic & Transport

‘A big responsibility’: Clifton Suspension Bridge master hails £7.6m renovation | Bristol

Published

on


The job does not give the holder age-old perks such as the right to drive sheep across the great structure, but the title “bridge master” does have a certain ring to it.

“I don’t tend to say I’m the bridge master when I’m at a party,” said Tristan Ralph, the current holder of the title. “But people do seem to know and bring it up. It’s a job less ordinary, isn’t it? It’s a Victorian sounding title and people are really, really interested.”

There is, however, nothing ceremonial about the title. Ralph is in charge of maintaining and running the Clifton Suspension Bridge, a UK feat of engineering, without any public money.

“It does feel a big responsibility,” said Ralph. “When the chairman of the trustees rang to say we’d like you to do it, you suddenly feel the pressure. It’s so famous and people in Bristol, quite rightly, are proud and almost possessive of it. Bristolians think: ‘It’s our bridge.’”

The bridge master – and the not-for-profit charity the Clifton Suspension Bridge Trust – have the task of maintaining the bridge “in perpetuity”. “I’m a temporary custodian,” Ralph said. “When I’m finished, I have to make sure it is handed on in just [as] good a condition or better than I inherited it.”

The project took two and a half years and involved hand-painting more than 4,000 original iron chain links and installing energy-efficient lighting. Photograph: Sam Frost/The Guardian

Ralph, a bridge engineer by profession, was speaking to mark the conclusion of a large refurbishment project that has taken two and a half years and involved hand-painting more than 4,000 original iron chain links and installing an energy-efficient lighting system. It has cost about £7.5m. “It’s been a big job,” he said. “But it’s come pretty much bang on budget, which is rare these days.”

That is important because, to many visitors’ surprise, the bridge does not receive public funding. “The upkeep of the bridge, the running of it, the salary costs and everything are all paid only by our toll money,” said Ralph. “People think that we might get something from local or central government. But, no, it’s just the toll money.”

Motorised vehicles – including motorcycles – pay £1 to cross the bridge. There is no charge for pedestrians, cyclists or horse riders. As well as being a beautiful structure, it is also a vital part of Bristol and North Somerset’s transport system.

The refurbishment was the largest in the bridge’s history. Photograph: Adrian Sherratt/The Guardian

Ralph said: “It draws the tourists in. We get visitors from hundreds of countries every year but primarily, it’s still a vital piece of local infrastructure. If the bridge wasn’t here, the difference it would make to Bristol traffic would be incredible. We average over 8,000 vehicles a day still. Maintaining it as a transport link is utterly vital.”

The end of the refurbishment does not mean Ralph can rest on his laurels and spend more time hobnobbing with members of the Bridge Owners Forum.

“In a few years, we’ll need to paint the underside of the bridge. The under-bridge gantry unit itself will be replaced over the coming years. So there’s always something. We need to keep on top of things. It’s like your house or your car. If you just ignore it, don’t do things for a couple of years, they start breaking down.”

The project came in almost on budget, which is important as the bridge’s upkeep, running and staff costs are all paid using toll money. Photograph: Adrian Sherratt/The Guardian

As in most walks of life, the climate emergency is a challenge Ralph and the trust are having to face. “We were monitoring the bridge daily in the summer with the very hot weather. And maybe if the bridge was being designed today, there would be a little bit more robustness around wind.”

The prevailing south-west wind is not usually a problem and the bridge rarely has to close but if it blows directly through the Avon Gorge it can be more difficult. “We need to keep an eye at both the magnitude of any wind events but also their frequency,” Ralph said.

The engineer admires the bridge’s designers, including Isambard Kingdom Brunel. “It’s remarkably advanced for its time.”

The bridge rarely has to close, but if the wind blows directly through the Avon Gorge it can be difficult. Photograph: Ben Birchall/PA

And there is no sign that its days are numbered, largely because the Victorians did not skimp. Ralph said: “There are three layers of chains. The original Brunel design only had two, but because it went from a timber design to a cast-iron deck, they upped it to three.

“There’s a little bit of comfort in there. Today there might be pressure to say, well, can you keep it to two, but in Victorian times they did like to add a little bit of meat on the bones.

“It doesn’t have a finite life. There’s no end date in our plans. We all just keep it going in the highest standards as we can. It’s in really good condition as long as we keep doing what we need to do, keep our attention on it and don’t let things drift. Forever is a long time but there’s no reason why we have any need to worry at the moment.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Traffic & Transport

Uber begins self-driving robotaxi trial in Manchester | Uber

Published

on


Uber has begun a trial of autonomous vehicles on the streets of Manchester as it looks to bring robotaxis to cities around the UK.

The first self-driving cars are operating, using the technology of its partner firms Pony and Verne, with whom Uber recently launched Europe’s first autonomous taxi service in the Croatian capital, Zagreb.

Uber said it was “excited to take this first step toward making this technology accessible to people across the UK”.

In social media posts, Verne said it had “started our autonomous vehicle testing in Manchester”, while Pony said there were “plans to bring robotaxis to the city” and that testing was under way.

The tests involve the company mapping the streets of the city in north-west England with a safety driver behind the wheel and no passengers.

Limited passenger services started last month in London, but with a safety driver in the front seat of cars supplied by Wayve under Transport for London’s licensing rules for private hire vehicles.

The next steps are unclear. Opposition from Uber drivers, their unions and the capital’s politicians to the rollout of robotaxis is mounting. The GMB and ADCU unions have both said thousands of drivers jobs will be lost and have called for help for those affected.

A critical report from London assembly’s transport committee this week called for the government to devolve authority over autonomous taxi services.

It said there was “considerable uncertainty about many of the claimed benefits of autonomous passenger vehicles”, and fears over the impact on public transport and congestion, as well as safeguarding and accessibility for disabled passengers.

There has been no official application to launch passenger services in Manchester so far, and the vehicles are operating under government licence via the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) and the Department for Transport.

A spokesperson for Transport for Greater Manchester said it wanted the city’s taxis to be the safest in the country.

skip past newsletter promotion


“New technologies play an increasingly important role in the growth of our city region,” they said. “But they need to be introduced responsibly, safely and with real thought about what it means for our residents.

“Although no applications have been made to operate driverless taxis in the Greater Manchester, we’re aware of potential interest from companies to do so.

“Safety will always be our top priority, and we will need strong assurances that no vehicles will operate on our roads that pose any risk to residents.”

Uber said it expected to offering robotaxi trips in as many as 15 cities worldwide by the end of 2026, mainly in the US and the Middle East.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending