Connect with us

Traffic & Transport

‘Did Westminster just ignore buses?’ Burnham aims to shake up UK transport | Nationalisation

Published

on


Whether or not the promised land is reached via renationalisation, the man set to be next prime minister is clear what he wants transport to leave behind.

“You go from deregulation to regaining public control, it’s just unbelievable what becomes possible,” said Andy Burnham, reflecting on the bus system he transformed in Manchester. “It’s mind-blowing that deregulation was ever, ever brought in – public interest went out the window and people were cut off.”

Greater Manchester’s buses may have been an egregious example. But the road taken by Burnham as mayor could now be followed nationwide.

The railway is rapidly returning to state ownership, with most passenger train services joining Network Rail under a new Great British Railways (GBR) by the end of 2027.

.

Meanwhile, the move to public control of buses via franchising is being rolled out across much of the north: pioneered by Burnham under mayoral rights since extended by Labour government to all councils nationwide.

The yellow Bee Network pin, prominently affixed to Burnham’s lapel on Monday at his first speech as PM-in-waiting, is as proud a service medal as any metro mayor can muster.

“We put the bee on the side of the buses to denote that public control. And now we’re acting visibly, tangibly in the interests of our residents,” he told the Guardian in an interview shortly before the Makerfield byelection was called.

If his political philosophy of “Manchesterism” has changed anything to date, it is this: an essential service reshaped to deliver under elected local officials for the common good. And a simple tenet that helps connects Burnham to northern voters – if it’s good enough for London, it’s good enough for us.

Burnham said he put bees on Bee Network buses to denote public control. Photograph: Andrew Milligan/PA

The Bee Network, combining Greater Manchester’s newly franchised bus routes with the Metrolink tram system and eventually urban rail services, has consciously, stubbornly emulated a system only seen in the UK under Transport for London.

Burnham, like Sadiq Khan again in the capital, has staked a lot on keeping bus fares low – instigating a £2 single bus fare before and after the government did so nationwide, and providing free or discounted travel for young people in further education.

Mancunians have also benefited similarly from fare capping, “hopper” fares – a single fare if using more than one bus in an hour – contactless payments and night buses, all of which have helped drive up patronage by 24% over three years to 178m bus journeys in 2026.

TfL’s patronage is enough to cover the cost of operations without large public subsidy – fares pulling in £5.5bn, road charges £1.6bn and business rates £2.2bn – but it still relies on central government grants for capital investment, and its buses are cross-subsidised by Tube income.

Transport for Greater Manchester can only get so far. Fare revenue has continued to rise but funds only half the operation, £88m coming from trams and £269m from buses in 2025-26 – slightly less than the combined local and central government funding of £376m.

Buying back bus depots that once belonged to the city “stuck in my throat”, said Burnham, part of transition costs of £135m before launch in 2023. However, he said re-regulated services cost one-third less per kilometre under the Bee Network than the old regime, a “wild west” of buses plying Manchester’s streets but only cherrypicking the lucrative routes. Councils had to pay private companies to run some services and to cover discounted travel for old and young.

“They had you over a barrel,” Burnham said. I had to pay in the old world for every time a 16-year-old or 70-year-old used that bus pass – they got that fee. Now we’re just forgoing revenue.”

The Bee Network bus still outsources the running of the buses to the big bus firms of old. Photograph: James Speakman/PA

For all the symbolism, the Bee Network still outsources the running of the buses to the big bus firms of old. They now do so with the obligation to run the services that Manchester dictates, with unified branding and fares.

skip past newsletter promotion


“It has cost quite a lot in subsidy, but it could have gone wrong and it’s gone right,” said Prof Tony Travers, a local government expert at London School of Economics. “It’s a good system. When I go to Manchester now I use the tram, in the way I’d use the Métro in Paris – and that’s not true elsewhere in Britain. It’s made significant strides in creating the kind of integrated transport other European cities have.”

One step that remained barred by the Tories when Burnham opted for franchising was the ability to set up a fully publicly owned, municipal bus company, since enabled by Labour legislation last year.

Rail renationalisation goes further – but it was never far away. After the brief, disastrous Railtrack tenure at the start of privatisation in the 1990s, state-owned Network Rail has run the tracks since 2002. Problems with the franchising system saw a series of contracts axed from Virgin Trains East Coast to Northern, before Covid collapsed them all.

That meant numerous train operations were publicly owned, and the rest tightly controlled by the Department for Transport, long before Labour came to power with a promise to renationalise. The rest will follow next year, including totemic brands such as Avanti West Coast, whose intercity operations will be ever more intensely scrutinised with a No 10 split between London and the north.

In the core aims of replacing a broken franchising system, bringing the management of the track and trains together, and overhauling ticketing and fares, GBR has been a cross-party pursuit.

Most passenger train services will join Network Rail under Great British Railways by the end of 2027. Photograph: Maureen McLean/Shutterstock

It remains a work in progress. The rail minister Lord Peter Hendy, speaking to the Guardian a year after Labour’s first planned GBR renationalisation of South Western, said higher revenue could best be achieved through more local accountability for the whole railway, after a system where different players were incentivised to dodge responsibility and cost.

“If you’ve got a contract for something, the way to make money out of it is to read it carefully and find what makes you the most money, but on the railway that’s not the same as satisfying a customer,” he said.

South Western now operates with track and train under a single managing director. Hendy, a former London transport commissioner, said he wants the people in post to be able to report up any issues and money needed and simply say, “‘We’ll go off and fix it.’ And that hasn’t happened to the railway for more than 30 years.”

Whether or not control of all public transport remains TfL-style franchising or fuller renationalisation, services are likely to require significant spending to match the vision Burnham has laid out, Travers said. “Places like Leeds, Birmingham and Bristol need enormous investment to get up to Manchester standards. He explicitly mentioned rural areas, too – and it’s enormously expensive to get them anywhere near where urban services are.”

Travers noted that so much of Burnham’s reputation “is tied into the buses and Bee Network that it’s going to be harder for him to not deliver in this sphere of policy than any other”.

Burnham though, is well aware. He said: “I’ve been in politics a long time and I’ve never known anything as impactful as the Bee Network. And it makes me wonder, why did Westminster just ignore buses for all those years? Because this is something that is on every street. People see the change and they feel it.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Traffic & Transport

Uber driver takes TfL to court over ‘pain‘ caused by licence renewal delay | TfL

Published

on


An Uber driver who got into thousands of pounds of debt and feared losing his home due to delays in Transport for London renewing his licence to pick up passengers is taking on the organisation in the high court in the first challenge of its kind.

Julius Mugabo, 55, has been an Uber driver licensed by TfL since 2016. Under the Private Hire Vehicles (London) Act 1998, all minicab drivers cannot work lawfully unless TfL has carried out checks on them and issued or renewed their licences. These licences must be renewed every three years.

There are approximately 100,000 private hire drivers in London working through apps such as Uber and Bolt. According to freedom of information data obtained by the Conservatives, almost 18,000 of them have received “goodwill” payments of between £300 and £500 due to delays in renewing their licences.

“Because of all the pain I have been through, I am bringing this legal challenge to help other drivers,” Mugabo told the Guardian.

Julius Mugabo, who has launched a landmark case against Transport for London. Photograph: Supplied

Mugabo had not experienced any problems until he made a routine renewal application at the end of last year. TfL repeatedly delayed processing his renewal application, asking him to provide supporting documentation he said he had already provided.

“Even if TfL delay renewing licences, drivers like me still have to eat and pay bills. My licence expired at the end of March 2026. I only received my renewed licence recently after I started the legal action against TfL,” he said.

“Because of their delays everything in my life was a mess. I owed HMRC £3,000 in tax but because I couldn’t pay my tax bill on time the bill has gone up to £20,000 because of the interest. We didn’t lose our home but I was under so much stress and pressure. The landlord threatened to evict us because I struggled to pay the rent.”

The high court action against TfL alleges that the transport authority breached its legal duties by failing to process private hire vehicle licence renewals on time.

In a ruling granting a full judicial review hearing, Mr Justice Sweeting said the delay “caused immediate and serious consequences for [Mugabo] and his family”.

He added: “TfL accepts that the processing of the claimant’s application did not meet its usual standards.”

The Independent Workers’ Union of Great Britain (IWGB), which represents private hire drivers on apps such as Uber and Bolt, said it had many members affected by the TfL licence processing delays, and that some of drivers had fallen into debt, had lost their cars and faced eviction. It is supporting the high court challenge.

Alex Marshall, the president of the IWGB, said: “As they celebrate this ruling bringing them closer to justice, the minicab drivers who keep London moving are sending TfL a clear message: they will not be taken for a ride.

“The suffering TfL inflicted on its predominantly migrant private hire driver workforce speaks volumes about who this public institution values, and who it takes for granted. TfL could easily have acted at the earliest sign of crisis, as the first drivers lost their incomes through no fault of their own. Instead, it watched at least 17,000 others suffer the same fate.

“By the time TfL finally acted, drivers had burned through their savings, lost their houses and fallen into debts they are still working longer hours to repay. Now, thanks to drivers’ tireless fighting and campaigning, TfL will have to answer for its failures in court. We will not stop until TfL has been forced to fix this broken system for good.”

Ahmed Aydeed, of Deighton Pierce Glynn solicitors, who is representing Mugabo, said: “TfL regularly strips drivers of their livelihoods, by failing to provide renewal licences before the expiry of the previous licence. Any driver who continues to work while waiting for their renewal licence is liable for criminal prosecution.

“No one should be stripped of their ability to feed their families and pay their bills, especially during this cost of living crisis. Any public authority that does this to working-class people is not fit for purpose,” he said.

A TfL spokesperson said: “We are aware of the judicial review claim, which has been brought by one driver regarding the processing of his licence. We are awaiting the date of the hearing.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Traffic & Transport

Making the British countryside more accessible and inviting to all | Walking

Published

on


What a joy to read John Harris’s piece on the cultural changes taking place in rural areas (Walking the Peak District, I discovered a wonderful rejection of the right’s monotone vision of England, 23 August. My husband and I have walked many miles in the Peak District and we would comment on the monocultural nature of other walkers. As a headteacher, I also took groups of children to stay in Hartington Hall, where Harris stayed with his own children, and other school groups also appeared to be monocultural. We knew nothing about Black Girls Hike or Steppers UK that Harris mentions, but hope that these movements will support positive change.
Nina Young
Collingham, Nottinghamshire

John Harris rightly highlights the cost of gastropubs and boutique Airbnbs replacing budget alternatives as an issue, but overlooked another. The replacement of basic (cheap) campsites with (expensive) glamping yurts and fully serviced campervan pitches is threatening dirt-cheap summer holidays spent backpacking around the country and learning to appreciate new landscapes and peoples, from which many of us oldies benefited greatly.
Mike Coogan
Abbeystead, Lancashire

John Harris omits one critical issue that impacts participation. Public transport outside cities and towns is often poor. To places like Bellever on Dartmoor, the location of one of his favourite hostels, buses are very limited indeed.
Les Bright
Exeter

Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.



Source link

Continue Reading

Traffic & Transport

‘Without us, no wheel would turn’: the unsung heroes keeping England’s transport moving | Business

Published

on


Not many people get to park their car here – bang in the middle of Heathrow airport, on the taxiway just a stretch of grass away from where a line of passenger planes is coming in to land.

It’s close enough to see the shimmering air and smoke as nose tyres hit the tarmac. “An A380 will put down as much rubber as a car’s entire tyre,” Jack Quantick-Thorne says. He knows – part of his job is to ensure the runway team scrapes it off and patches things up overnight. And it is all recycled, he adds.

The airfield operations officer is not in the limelight much, but is one of a host of unsung workers keeping transport moving. And some jobs far from the public eye turn out to be not only essential, but surprisingly challenging.

Jack Quantick-Thorne, airfield operations officer, Heathrow

Passengers might only catch a glimpse of Quantick-Thorne from a window seat on landing, if he grabs the paddles to marshal a plane into the exact designated spot at the stand. “People just think you’re that person with the table tennis bats,” he grimaces slightly, as the Guardian requests a demonstration. “That’s like 5% of my job.”

In fact, most planes are now brought to the stand via laser-guided electronic displays. But human marshalling remains a crucial backup. Brandishing the paddles, Quantick-Thorne beckons in a taxiing British Airways arrival, the pilot peering down from the cockpit and steering 50 tonnes of plane straight towards him. The nosewheel travels bang on the guideline, stopping exactly in position for the airbridge to swing in and allow passengers to disembark.

Nerve-racking? “No. When you’ve got a really big plane, an A380, you need a second marshal right by the wheel to check it’s stopped in the right place,” he says.

Back in the car, the job continues: “I’m patrolling, I’m looking around, scanning everything – is the refueller doing his job properly, has the aircraft got chocks under its wheels?”

That includes monitoring the road system under Heathrow’s airfields, recognising every vehicle and checking any infringement: drivers here can also clock up points on their licence, if he spots them.

Officers also need to look out for wildlife – particularly birds, a serious danger for jet planes (and vice versa). How does he deal with them? We’ve got methods of dispersal,” says the airfield operations officer.

These, marvellously, turn out to be speakers on the roof of the van, which play a range of bird sounds: “If I saw a flock of starlings, if I played a starling noise, the starling would think, ‘Oh, maybe there’s a predator nearby,’ and they fly off.”

And, he demonstrates, “I’ve got common gull. Black-headed gull. I’ve got a falcon”.

Are there falcons? “No,” he explains patiently. “So you think about it from a bird’s point of view. If there’s a pigeon over there, best play a falcon so it will fly off.”

Jack Quantick-Thorne at work. Last year he had to tow the Concorde that still stands at the edge of the airfield across for an exhibition. Photograph: Graeme Robertson/The Guardian

If he now knows birds, it’s the planes that drew him here. He was previously at Nats, the air traffic control centre in Swanwick, managing the planes, but never up close. There is more to it than the paddles – but, he confesses, he takes every opportunity to use them, and records each plane that he has marshalled, including every aircraft in BA’s short-haul fleet.

Being a pilot is the dream, he admits, but the prohibitive training costs – £100,000 or more – put it out of reach. For an enthusiast, he reckons the job is the next best thing. Last year he had to tow the Concorde that still stands at the edge of the airfield across for an exhibition: “It was the first time one had moved in years – incredible to see in the rear-view mirror.”

Chris Thackaberry, network traffic controller, Transport for London

The day starts in Victoria Station House overlooking the bus terminus, a grand old building that looks considerably less so inside, where Chris’s desk is surrounded by hundreds of cardboard diversion signs.

About 500 of the capital’s 19,000 bus stops are on his patch in Westminster – home to some of Britain’s most congested streets, where dozens of bus routes cross. Roadworks are the bane of the bus and Thackaberry’s job is to keep them moving – armed with a van, pliers and zip ties.

Sometimes he can plan for roadworks months ahead. But other days are less predictable, when life suddenly blocks a route: “It could be a broken-down vehicle or a burst water main, but I’ve had windows falling out of buildings, I’ve had a collapsed horse on a bridge. I had an upside down Lamborghini in Piccadilly … I don’t know if it was sticking to the 20mph limit.”

Christopher Thackaberry, a network traffic controller with TfL, in his van. Photograph: Linda Nylind/The Guardian

His incident response van contains an orderly standing desk area and even a printer to rustle up more signs if needed, as well as spill dry sacks, ready to suck up any diesel or oil leaked over the road.

It also has two cylinders affixed to the wall containing “spit kits” – swabs to pick up any saliva aimed at staff, with clear bags to seal, ready to take the evidence to the police. “It’s just part and parcel of when you’re working in London, for anyone in uniform.”

In a sweltering Trafalgar Square, as he hunts in the midst of four lanes of traffic to hitch his cardboard signs to any available piece of spare street furniture, the complexity of the puzzle becomes clearer.

“There’s so many routes go through here, we’re fighting with ourselves for space.”

skip past newsletter promotion


Sarah, railway signaller, York

Gone are most of the signal boxes of old: these days, Britain’s railway is mostly controlled from one of 12 remote centres. From a windowless room in York, trains right down the East Coast mainline are guided on their way.

“In the old days, it was lever pulling,” says Sarah. “Now it’s a click of the mouse instead. Like a computer game scenario, but it’s real track, real trains, real people. We have to manually click, signal to signal, for every train that comes through our patch.”

Signallers have five screens at eye level showing the railway, and five above with timetables and traffic management information.

“When you first start the job, it feels so far removed. There’s no windows, it’s like a black hole in the middle of the building, but you are signalling trains from York all the way into King’s Cross. I remember thinking: ‘How many hundreds of people are on that train we’re signalling?’”

Anything from a circuit failure to a trespasser to a sick passenger on a train can hold up the lines. “Our job initially in any incident is to make the area safe – that’s first and foremost. And then we look for a workaround, to keep trains moving. The days when there are serious incidents are few and far between. But every day there’s something.”

Jamie *, public service vehicle engineer, Manchester

At Jamie’s bus depot, servicing the Bee Network, the first shift starts at 5am and the last ends at 1am, but engineers might stay through the night with a breakdown.

“In the daytime it’s routine: vehicles are inspected by law on a monthly basis,” he says. “But engineers have bus driving licences too, if a bus was to break down, often we’d take another one out to the driver to keep the service running.”

With city buses that stop and start frequently, there is typically more treatment and maintenance. And newer vehicles don’t necessarily mean less work, he says: “They bring a lot of new issues and we’re constantly learning, going back to college on courses to learn the tech.

“Electric buses haven’t made the job easier – but they and the new diesel engines are clean. Working back in the day, it was a hell of a lot dirtier, especially in depots indoors or undercover,” says the vehicle engineer.

He will check each bus’s brakes, emissions tests and inspect the nuts and bolts everywhere from the underside to the driver’s cab. “We see a lot in the press about the conditions in the cab, but we’re cleaning those buses: it’s like a greenhouse, and the heat from the engines also comes into our workshop.

“Even the drivers don’t understand what engineers do – I always say we are the forgotten people. But without us, no wheel would turn.”

Frankie *, baggage handler, Gatwick

The thing people don’t understand, explains Frankie, is that the placement of bags in the hold is not random. “It’s all done on weight distribution. You have to put baggage where you’re told – it is a very specific job, you do not deviate.”

At many airports, larger aircraft such as long-haul planes are loaded with bags already in large crates, lifted into position by machine. But short-haul flights at Gatwick are loaded manually. “An average bag is about 20kg and the average load is 90 bags off, 90 on, for three or four people. If you do eight turns a day, that’s nearly 30 tonnes your team is lifting. You get fitter – it’s like going to the gym, you end up lifting heavier and heavier bags.”

Passengers who fear for their luggage often make the job harder: “The worst thing is shrink-wrapped bags. It’s slippery, harder to hold on to, and less grip for the belt to pull up. And those straps around bags, they can get jammed in the belts and break them.

“People don’t realise how damaging it can be – and pointless. If you’re on a flight where customs do spot checks, they go for the bags that are wrapped. And there is so much CCTV and security. If I get caught opening a bag, I’d lose my job – why would I risk that?”

There are, says Frankie, more women doing the job now: “It’s getting more female-friendly. A lot of people choose this type of job to get into aviation: they want to be pilots or crew eventually, and just want to be around planes any way they can.”

* Names have been changed



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending