Traffic & Transport
Heathrow third runway likely to affect health of millions nearby, official report warns | Heathrow third runway
Construction of a third runway at Heathrow is likely to have significant adverse effects on the health and wellbeing of up to 3 million people living nearby, an official report has said, as the government launched the next stage of its rapid airport expansion plan.
An analysis for the Department for Transport has found that expanding London’s hub airport could have “major adverse” impacts on the health of the most local population.
Construction and operation of the third runway will worsen not just noise and air quality, but could also harm access to housing, education, healthcare, open space, and transport, the report bythe consultants Aecom said. Heathrow’s expansion will impact water quality, weaken community identity and cohesion, worsen landscapes and townscapes, and affect climate change mitigation and adaptation, it added.
The impact analysis of the new policy said construction of a third runway would likely be beneficial for jobs, income, education, skills, and training. But the report concluded: “Adverse effects are considered likely with regard to the other determinants which cover environmental and social considerations, and many of these have potential to be significant.”
While the report is expected to help shape measures to mitigate the effect on residents, it says the impacts cannot be fully offset. The DfT was approached for comment.
The disclosure came in supporting documents as the government announced another milestone in expansion, the accelerated publication for consultation of a draft national policy statement backing the third runway.
the transport secretary, Heidi Alexander, said: “Today’s consultation is a positive step towards realising the benefits of a third runway, by giving businesses, communities, and the public the chance to help shape this key project at one of the world’s most successful hub airports.
“We are determined to move quickly and responsibly to set a framework for future expansion at Heathrow that will meet the needs of local people and the country on the key issues of noise, air quality, climate change and economic growth.”
MPs will vote on whether to approve the policy, which is now known as the Heathrow Expansion national policy statement rather than covering airports nationwide.
The previous policy statement was voted through under the Conservatives after the Airports Commission judged that only one runway could be built in south-east England without breaching climate commitments. Labour has since approved expansion at London’s Stansted, Luton and Gatwick airports.
The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has been a champion of the third runway but is widely expected to leave office if Andy Burnham wins the Makerfield byelection and succeeds Keir Starmer as leader.
She said: “Growth is this government’s top priority, and we are backing the builders to get Britain moving. An expanded Heathrow would support over 60,000 good local jobs and deliver up to £42bn in benefits to the UK – strengthening vital links and improving connectivity across the country.”
Speaking at a conference in London earlier, Reeves said: “Somebody had to bite the bullet … In the last 18 months, we’ve made more progress on Heathrow than the last government made in 14 years. And I am determined that by the time of the next election, there are spades in the ground.”
Heathrow is seeking to build a 3,500-metre runway, which would require the M25 motorway being moved and the compulsory purchase of about 800 homes. The scheme, which is estimated to cost £33bn, would allow the airport to operate up to 756,000 flights with up to 150 million passengers each year.
Heathrow’s chief executive, Thomas Woldbye, said the consultation on the third runway plan represented “something Britain has often found difficult in recent years: progress”.
He added: “Our plan is privately funded by some of the largest investors in the world, widely supported by businesses, trade unions and communities across the country and it’s ready to go after years of scrutiny. We will now focus on securing planning permission and delivering this vital project.”
Paul McGuinness, the chair of the No 3rd Runway Coalition, said the expansion plans were “lurching towards farce” and there would be a “decade of destruction” around the airport in bulldozing houses and land before any runway was built.
He said airlines would be forced to pay ever higher charges and could be out-priced, adding: “No wonder an airline boss has called it HS2 all over again. It seems extraordinary that this government seems committed to repeating those mistakes.”
Celeste Hick, the policy manager at the campaign group Aviation Environment Federation, said the government was rushing policy through “with very little meaningful consultation with the very people” who would pay the price – “communities living under the flight paths and those whose homes will be destroyed or rendered uninhabitable”.
Traffic & Transport
Most of Great Britain’s major rail operators are back in public hands – is it working? | Rail industry
*Estimate based on contract expiry and government plans to nationalise every three months. Operator route maps are approximate
The majority of Great Britain’s major rail operators are now in public ownership, as the Labour government continues its efforts to make the railways “more reliable, affordable and accessible”.
The nationalisation of Govia Thameslink on 31 May represents the eleventh major passenger service to be brought back into public ownership, leaving five to go before the government’s deadline of completing every operator by 2027.
The rollout, which is resulting in an operator being nationalised roughly every three months, is gradually bringing an end to a privatised system that critics argue has been overly fragmented and focused on profit, to the detriment of passenger experience.
Several operators were already under public ownership by the time Labour were elected in 2024, having been nationalised by the Conservatives over financial woes and poor performance.
Meanwhile, Transport for Wales and ScotRail were each nationalised by the Welsh and Scottish devolved governments, in 2021 and 2022 respectively.
However, under the current transport secretary, Heidi Alexander, the Department for Transport (DfT) has accelerated the pace of nationalisation, bringing five operators on to the public books since May 2025: South Western Railway, C2C, Greater Anglia, West Midlands Trains and Govia Thameslink.
State of play, June 2026
So far eleven of the 16 major rail operators in Britain are now in public ownership:
Tap an operator to highlight routes, tap again to deselect
The government has said the remaining five will be nationalised by October 2027:
The operator that was nationalised most recently was Govia Thameslink, which took place on 31 May 2026.
The next operator set to be nationalised is Chiltern Railways, which the government says will take place in September 2026.
The nationalisations come ahead of the establishment of a new state-controlled company called Great British Railways, expected this year, which will manage rail infrastructure and services.
It has been described by the DfT as a “single directing mind” for “bringing track and train together, putting passengers and customers first, [and] rebuilding trust in the railway”.
It will soon manage most of the publicly owned operators in Great Britain, combining them with Network Rail, which owns the tracks, signals and big stations.
However, Great Britain’s trains will remain privately owned.
Industry insiders have expressed cautious optimism about Labour’s plans, highlighting the potential for Great British Railways to achieve more coordination and, in turn, greater efficiency.
However, experts have also warned that nationalisation alone may not be enough to fix all of Britain’s problems with rail, given ballooning costs.
“Irrespective of the ownership changes, the government’s got a major headache with the fact that rail is gobbling up so much public subsidy, and that’s before you get to HS2,” said Stephen Glaister, the emeritus professor of transport and infrastructure at Imperial College London and a former chair of the Office of Rail and Road.
“The government are making promises to make fares even cheaper and services even better, but both will cost more public money.”
The data available on nationalised operators so far offers a mixed picture on performance.
Several have experienced improving train punctuality and a reduction in cancellations but the performance of others has worsened over the past year.
LNER has been one of the most improved – and in June the rail minister, Peter Hendy, described the operator as a “blueprint” for wider renationalisation efforts.
Guardian graphic. Source: delay and cancellation data taken from the Office of Rail and Road. *Note: South Western Railway, C2C and Greater Anglia were nationalised by the Labour government in the latter half of the time period analysed here, while West Midlands Trains was nationalised afterwards
When will the next operators be nationalised?
Labour committed to bringing rail into public ownership in the party’s 2024 election manifesto – claiming it had come up with a way to nationalise trains “without costing taxpayers a penny in compensation”.
Instead of an “all-at-once” approach, nationalising every operator simultaneously and paying off shareholders, the government is running down the clock on existing rail contracts.
The DfT is waiting for each operator’s core contract expiry date, which allows the government to take over without compensating the private companies.
The final operator to expire in this way will be CrossCountry in October 2027 – and this is when the government says it will have completed rail nationalisation in Great Britain.
Until then, the government has set a pace of nationalising one operator in each annual quarter. Chiltern Railways is due next, in September 2026.
Labour’s current one-at-a-time approach builds off of the work of its predecessors in government. Several operators – including LNER, Northern and Southeastern – were brought into public ownership by the Conservatives from 2018 onwards.
In those cases, nationalisation was taken as an emergency measure rather than a deliberate policy – in response to financial difficulties, in the case of LNER, or because of dismal performance, in the case of Northern.
Additionally, ScotRail and Transport for Wales were brought into public ownership by their respective devolved governments, and their train operations are not expected to be merged into Great British Railways.
Labour’s strategy for the remaining operators is driven by legal reality – which experts say could be helpful given how fragmented rail in Great Britain has become.
“You can’t do it in one go,” said Marcus Mayers, the managing director of the Rail and Station Innovation Company. “If you try to merge 22 companies in one go – you don’t have the ability to build the system, to join it together that quickly.
“So you build an operation which is capable of ingesting organisations, and is capable of ingesting organisations at the rate of one every three months. That makes sense.”
Will nationalisation improve the railways?
The prime minister, Keir Starmer, has previously said his government would not be nationalising rail out of ideology but because of what it could deliver for passengers.
“We’ve tried privatisation for two or three decades and it’s a complete mess,” the Labour leader said in April 2024. “Everybody who travels on the trains has been affected by the cancellations and delay.”
Privatisation was undertaken by the Conservatives in the 1990s, after decades of falling ridership under the nationalised British Rail.
From 1948 onwards the annual number of journeys on Britain’s rail network fell consistently, from a peak of more than 1 billion a year in 1950 to a low of 0.6 billion in 1982.
After privatisation, rail journeys recovered significantly, reaching a new peak of 1.7 billion by 2017.
“Privatisation sparked a railway renaissance,” said Patrick McLoughlin, the transport secretary under David Cameron, in a speech in 2013.
However, the impact on other aspects of train travel has been more mixed.
One of the original selling points of privatisation was that competition for franchises would bring better value for the taxpayer.
While the industry remained subsidised overall, some major commuter franchises went on to pay a return.
Yet in the past few years, after huge falls in passenger numbers during the coronavirus pandemic, the amount the government pays to operators in public subsidy has ballooned to record levels.
“The government is still forking out £12bn on operational subsidy, plus HS2 is another £7bn, plus extracurricular investment projects on the existing railways,” Glaister said.
“That’s a very great deal of money in the context of the public expenditure crisis.”
Costs have risen for passengers, too. Rail fares have become less affordable since privatisation, rising faster than average earnings in the same period.
Today it costs about £8.90 to take a 50km (31-mile) journey by rail, based on how much revenue rail operators collect for each kilometre travelled on their network.
When adjusting for inflation, that same journey would have cost £7.54 in 1994.
The rising cost of rail comes amid widespread dissatisfaction with the reliability of Great Britain’s trains.
Last year was the worst year for cancellations nationally since 2015, according to statistics produced by the Office of Rail and Road.
Labour has pledged to improve reliability and affordability with nationalisation, banking on a unified Great British Railways to end what critics see as an overly fragmented system.
“It’s possible, because there’s efficiencies of integration of track and train, which might mean that problems get solved more quickly,” Mayers said.
“You may be taking out the commercial imperative to drive reliability, but you’ve also got more collaboration about how to achieve it. So it’s a fine balance, and whether it will work or not is still open for debate.”
Others are sceptical of how much more efficiency can be wrung out of the system.
“Governments frequently say: ‘Oh, we’ll make the railways more efficient, we’ll buy lots of new equipment, we’ll employ less people to do the work,’” Glaister said.
“But the industry has been trying to do that for years and years, and the regulators screw that down to the absolute bottom in their settlements. And I don’t think there’s a lot of, as it were, undiscovered efficiencies to go for.”
A DfT spokesperson said: “Through public ownership and the creation of Great British Railways, the government is fundamentally reforming how our railways are run, putting passengers first.
“Public ownership will deliver a railway that is more accountable, efficient, and reliable – resulting in greater opportunities for communities and significant growth.
“It is not a silver bullet, and issues inherited from private sector ownership will take time to root out, but we expect public sector operators – and Great British Railways once it is established – to focus relentlessly on improving reliability, punctuality and other aspects of the service that matter most to passengers, and we will hold them to account for doing so.”
Traffic & Transport
Fewer than half of commuters in Great Britain think train fare value for money | Rail fares
Fewer than half of rail commuters in Great Britain think their train fare is value for money, a national passenger survey has found.
Travellers on the CrossCountry long-distance rail service were the least satisfied overall, according to the research by the passenger watchdog Transport Focus.
The findings came alongside news that passenger journey numbers had reached a record high of 1.83bn in the last year, surpassing pre-pandemic levels for the first time.
Transport Focus said that while most passengers were happy with their journey, there was a “striking gap” between the best and the worst train operators.
Only 49% of commuters were satisfied with the fare they paid, compared with 67% of leisure travellers who regarded it as providing value for money.
Of more than 100,000 passengers questioned immediately after their journey, 87% were satisfied with their overall experience. That fell to 79% for CrossCountry customers, with the majority dissatisfied with how the train operator had dealt with delays.
CrossCountry runs long-distance trains on several routes from southern England to the north and Scotland via Birmingham. Transport Focus has urged it to improve passenger information during disruption and tackle overcrowding on services.
The Arriva-run operator said the results were “disappointing” but added: “We know we must do more to deliver the service our customers rightly deserve.”
CrossCountry is expected to be brought into public ownership next year, as the government concludes a programme of nationalisation and rail changes. Train operators and Network Rail will be integrated into a new Great British Railways, run as an arm’s-length national body reporting to the government.
Alex Robertson, the chief executive of Transport Focus, said: “These results show that it’s possible for the railway to get it right, but that this isn’t happening consistently enough. The gap between the worst and best performing operators is striking, and it also shows that disabled passengers are experiencing a worse service than everyone else.”
He said the survey showed how big a difference the handling of delays made to customer sentiment: “More than nine in 10 people will report a positive experience if a delay is handled well – a remarkably high figure given their train is late – but this falls to one in four when it isn’t. Fixing this is well within the railway’s control and should be a priority.”
Hull Trains passengers were the most satisfied with their journey at 94%, closely followed by LNER with 93%, while Lumo polled best value for money. Hull and Lumo are both open access services run independently of the Department for Transport by FirstGroup, whose chief executive is Graham Sutherland.
He said: “We’ve clearly demonstrated on the east coast mainline that having effective competition there has driven more volumes and more sustainable transport, and brought real value to customers.”
The Office of Rail and Road (ORR) said passengers made 1.83bn journeys on the railway in the 12 months to the end of March, up 6% on last year.
But about one in seven journeys were on the Elizabeth line, while the ORR said that an increasing use of split ticketing – dividing up longer journeys into several legs to exploit ticketing anomalies for cheaper fares – was also inflating the figures.
It meant the that rail fare revenuewas £12.3bn, which was still £1bn less than the pre-pandemic totals.
I enjoyed Polly Hudson’s wisdom on marriage (I know it’s taboo – but I’m a big fan of marriage, 9 June). However, I think she was fundamentally wrong when she wrote: “The haters say marriage is ‘just a piece of paper’, which is fundamentally true”. That would be like saying my degree is only the certificate. In both cases the significance is that which it points towards – something no physical object can truly capture.
Rev Martin Joss
Peterborough
Allow me, a number theorist, to lend support to Ian Harley (Letters, 10 June), and make some sense of the phrase “such fun’’ for Steve Lupton (Letters, 11 June). Many scientists start with fun and enjoyment when young, followed by agony and frustration in their research, but always sustained by the beauty and amazement of their discoveries.
Peter Shiu
Sheffield
David Smith concludes that the US president “has too much power for someone with so little connection to reality” (As Donald Trump turns 80, he faces a foe he can never defeat: Father Time. That’s a problem for us all, 14 June). Doubly worrying that the same can be said of the world’s first trillionaire.
Mark de Brunner
Harrogate, North Yorkshire
Further to Sally Goldsmith’s “Is this bus going to Jump” (Letters, 10 June), a Welsh friend who used to visit me in Manchester would say, “I’ve just seen a bus for Sale”.
Julian Dorr
Wymondham, Norfolk
In the 1970s, the Bradford Argus always called David Hockney: “The mayor of Bradford’s brother” (David Hockney obituary, 12 June).
Angela Singer
Cambridge
-
UK News4 weeks agoEx-minister Shapps quits aerospace firm over rule concerns
-
Crime & Safety4 weeks agoRyan Bridge speaks of London arrest after Oxford incident
-
UK News4 weeks agoRussian threats against Baltics ‘unacceptable’ and danger to ‘our entire union’, EU’s von der Leyen says – Europe live | Europe
-
Oxford Events4 weeks agoSalon Privé 2026 unveils first concours entries led by one-off 1952 Ferrari once owned by Juan Perón
-
Oxford News3 weeks agoOxfordshire families invited to free day of fun in Bicester
-
Crime & Safety3 weeks agoPhotos as 1979 Pontiac Firebird ‘bursts in flames’ at Tesco
-
Business & Technology3 weeks agoNew ‘high-quality’ mushroom business launched in Oxford
-
Business & Technology4 weeks agoOxford: Rare watch sold for £40k after being saved from skip