Connect with us

UK News

Being the best in Asia is no longer enough for Japan seeking World Cup breakthrough | World Cup 2026

Published

on


In 2002 there was a sense that Japan had slightly missed an opportunity. South Korea may have enjoyed the benefit of some favourable refereeing, but they also impressed. They were quick, technically good and tactically extremely flexible and they progressed to the semi-final of their home World Cup.

Japan did not do much wrong, topping their group before going down 1-0 to Turkey in the last 16, but the contrast with their co-hosts was inevitably underwhelming.

Although Park Ji-sung and Lee Young-pyo earned moves to PSV off the back of South Korea’s performances, and subsequently joined Manchester United and Tottenham respectively, Japan already had four players with European clubs, although one of them, Junichi Inamoto, had briefly returned to Gamba Osaka from his loan at Arsenal before leaving for Fulham. He never played a league game for Arsène Wenger, his next permanent move taking him to West Brom, where he struggled to make an impact.

The poor Japanese journalist whose job it was to cover him became a great figure of sympathy. The final question of each of Bryan Robson’s pre-match press conferences would always be him asking politely about Inamoto’s progress in training – at least until the moment, after almost two years, when he finally snapped and demanded, with despairing incredulity: “Mr Robson, why do you pick Darren Carter?”

The unspoken question for Japan was always: why? Why could South Korea have outstripped them like that? South Korea’s first attempt at a professional league, staged in 1983, had comprised largely sides representing corporations and banks, and was won by Hallelujah, a club run by evangelical Christians. It had only had a truly professional national league from 1996, by which time the glitzy JLeague, with foreign stars such as Gary Lineker, Ramón Díaz and Zico, had been running for three years.

In the past two decades Japanese and South Korean players have become increasingly familiar in European leagues, but Japan are still to make it beyond the last 16 of a World Cup, something their manager, Hajime Moriyasu, has admitted has become a mental block. In 2010, after outplaying Cameroon and Denmark in the group, they allowed themselves to be dragged into a stalemate of ferocious tedium by Paraguay, losing on penalties. They tossed away a two-goal lead against Belgium at that stage in 2018 and then, in 2022, having beaten Spain and Germany in the group, ran into Croatia with predictable consequences.

Link to profile of Takefusa Kubo

But this year, perhaps, is different. As Japan start their World Cup campaign against the Netherlands in Arlington on Sunday, it feels genuinely possible that they are not merely the best Japan side in history, but the best Asian side to play at a World Cup. Moriyasu has been in the job since 2018 and, as such, is the longest-serving Japan national manager ever. He has been bullish about Japan’s chances, talking openly of winning the competition.

Japan won six out of six in the first round of qualifying and then seven out of 10 in the second, losing just once, a remarkable achievement given the distances involved and the huge variety of opponents and conditions. But being the best in Asia is no longer enough, and a run of six successive friendly wins since, including over England and Brazil, is arguably even more important than qualifying with three games to spare, for reasons of self-belief if nothing else.

Injuries have hit them hard. The captain Wataru Endo withdrew from the squad this week, while the loss of Kaoru Mitoma to a hamstring injury sustained playing for Brighton against Wolves in May is a major blow, particularly with Takumi Minamino rupturing his anterior cruciate ligament. It says much about the development of Japanese football, though, that their absences are not seen as terminal. That Minamino has travelled with the squad to offer moral support suggests their togetherness.

Mitoma is a loss not only because of his quality but also his versatility. He could play either as one of two creators in Moriyasu’s 3-4-2-1, or at left wing-back. Keito Nakamura looks all but certain to operate wide on the left, but there are various options to play off the Feyenoord centre-forward Ayase Ueda. Takefusa Kubo was regarded as the rising star of Japanese football when he joined Barcelona’s la Masia academy at the age of 10 and signed for Real Madrid at 18. Now 25, he has settled at Real Sociedad and will probably be the right-sided creator. The role on the left, though, could go to Celtic’s Daizen Maeda or Genk’s Junya Ito, or potentially a more defensive figure such as Daichi Kamada of Crystal Palace. The depth of options is itself an indication of Japan’s development.

The group is not easy to read. The Netherlands, given a midfield that should be able to hold possession and a hugely varied forward line (they have heft in Wout Weghorst and Brian Brobbey, but also pace and subtlety in Memphis Depay, Donyell Malen, Crysencio Summerville and Noa Lang) but they have been ravaged by injuries and fatigue.

Wout Weghorst and Memphis Depay typify the varied attacking threats Japan could face against the Netherlands. Photograph: Juan Mabromata/AFP/Getty Images

Sweden were awful in qualifying but have been re-energised by an improbable messiah in Graham Potter. Tunisia exist in a state of constant paranoia and overcaution, but the appointment of Sabri Lamouchi and a much-changed squad might at least remove some gloomy memories from a miserable Cup of Nations campaign six months ago.

The group winners and runners-up face the runners-up and winners from the Brazil, Morocco, Haiti and Scotland group, which is far from straightforward. The draw could have been a lot kinder, but hope remains, with Endo this week talking of a quarter-final as a first goal.

In 1992, just before the launch of the J League, Japan announced a plan to win the World Cup by 2092. In 2005, after two appearances, they brought that target forward to 2050. For a side that has never got beyond the last 16 to speak of victory may feel premature, but there is little doubt that, at this moment, Japan have surpassed South Korea. And while Senegal and Morocco are clear contenders, if there is to be a winner from outside Europe and South America, Japan look as well placed as anybody.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

UK News

Nottinghamshire v Somerset, Leicestershire v Essex, and more: county cricket day four – live | Sport

Published

on


Key events

Tea time scores

Division One

Grace Road: Leicestershire 187 and 428 v Essex 401 and 99-2 Essex need 116 to win

Trent Bridge: Somerset 310 and 355-7dec BEAT Nottinghamshire 193 and 166 by 306 runs.

Hove: Sussex 521 BEAT Glamorgan 155 and 268 by an innings and 98 runs

Scarborough: Yorkshire 469 and 246-6dec v Warwickshire 263 and 237-5 Warwicks need 216 to win

Division Two

Chester-le-Street: Durham 377 BEAT Derbyshire 118 and 237 by an innings and 22 runs

Blackpool: Kent 178 and 332 BEAT Lancashire 87 and 283 by 140 runs

Northampton: Northamptonshire 465 v Gloucestershire 268 and 387 Northants need 191 to win

New Road: Worcestershire 265 and 191-7 v Middlesex 339 and 283-6dec Worcs need 167 to win

Share



Source link

Continue Reading

UK News

Boy, 2, seriously hurt in nursery playground car crash

Published

on



A 63-year-old woman is arrested on suspicion of causing serious injury by dangerous driving.



Source link

Continue Reading

UK News

Backlash against ‘short-termist’ UK plans to weaken EV sales targets | Electric, hybrid and low-emission cars

Published

on


The UK government’s plans to further weaken electric car targets have provoked a furious backlash from the charging industry and the electric car brand Polestar, which would lose out from the changes.

The Labour government is expected to dilute rules known as the zero emission vehicle (ZEV) mandate. Government sources have said it will reduce a target for pure electric cars from 80% of all sales by 2030 to 50%.

The Labour government had already weakened the mandate last year by introducing loopholes – known as “flexibilities” – that allow the sale of more plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), which combine an engine with a small battery.

The slower shift to electric cars would be a huge blow in particular to the charging industry, which is investing on the basis of future demand.

Greg Jackson, the chief executive of Octopus Energy, said the government had chosen “short-termist incumbent lobbying instead of the long-term future of industry”. As well as being the UK’s largest retail energy provider, Octopus is also a large player in electric vehicle leasing and charging.

“The fossil fuel market is shrinking globally and our best hope is to speed up development of electric vehicles, not go the other way,” Jackson said. “This hesitation undermines the credibility of government commitments which were supposed to give certainty to investors.”

The charging industry has invested in infrastructure on the basis of future demand for electric vehicles. Photograph: Xiu Bao/Alamy

Vicky Read, the chief executive of the industry lobby group ChargeUK, said weakening the target was an “astonishing” proposal which could cost tens of thousands of jobs in the longer term.

“The charging sector has ploughed billions into putting chargers in the ground on the basis of this policy, ahead of profitability,” Read said. “This government said it would not flip-flop like the previous did. To move the goalposts again would be exactly that – an act of self-harm denying the country a forward facing, economically prosperous industry leaving us behind the rest of the world.”

The proposal would probably mean millions more cars with petrol engines on British roads and significantly higher carbon emissions. Plug-in hybrids produce about 135g of carbon dioxide per kilometre driven on average, compared with about 166g from petrol cars, according to T&E, a thinktank monitoring transport and environmental issues. Electric cars produce zero carbon directly and have much lower associated emissions over their lifetime.

The government’s decision followed heavy lobbying by car manufacturers as well as the Unite union, which represents many workers in British automotive factories. Unite’s general secretary, Sharon Graham, described the proposed changes as “a huge victory” and said it would “protect the jobs of UK automotive workers”.

However, Anna Krajinska, the UK director at T&E, argued that allowing more plug-in hybrid sales would ultimately harm the UK industry by leaving the door open to Chinese manufacturers. China’s Chery, owner of brands including Omoda and Jaecoo, and BYD, the world’s biggest electric carmaker, have sold about 30,000 cars each in the UK this year, many of them PHEVs.

“Slowing down targets and increasing hybrid sales will destroy the UK’s automotive sector,” Krajinska said. “Only a rapid transition to battery electrics can secure the future of UK manufacturing. For that to happen targets have to remain unchanged and [the business secretary] Peter Kyle needs to deliver a coherent and robust industrial policy to transition the sector and jobs.”

A weaker ZEV mandate would also represent a blow to manufacturers focusing on electric cars. Matt Galvin, the UK managing director of the Chinese-owned electric brand Polestar, said: “Weakening these targets allows car manufacturers to decelerate development of EVs at a time when they should be doing exactly the opposite and accelerating their investment and product offering.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending