Connect with us

Traffic & Transport

Back on track: can Burnham fix the north’s woeful rail services? | Rail industry

Published

on


For passenger rail travel, the north of England was the future, once. But since that first train from Darlington to Stockton in 1825, many have felt short-changed. As one angry passenger put it, 200 years later: “What is it about the rail industry which makes them think they can treat passengers in the north as second-class citizens?”

That complaint came from the former mayor of Greater Manchester, who frequently set out a different vision for the train services he would like. Now that Andy Burnham is in No 10, he has the opportunity to win those battles – or perhaps see them a little differently. For now, what unresolved issues could the railway expect to be pursued with greater urgency?

A new fast line from Birmingham to Manchester

“There’s frustration and angerI don’t see how you can take a plan that goes beyond the life of any individual government and basically tear it up at a party conference.” (Burnham, October 2023)

When Rishi Sunak, then prime minister, axed the northern leg of HS2 at the Conservative conference in Manchester in 2023, Burnham led the cries of betrayal. But he also started investigating alternative schemes, with two consecutive mayors of the West Midlands, for a line connecting their city regions. Building on some of the work already done, and safeguarding land acquired for HS2, the scheme that eventually emerged looked suspiciously like the old line but “quickly and crucially at a significantly lower cost”.

In January, government rail plans set out under Keir Starmer included an “intention to build” a new line connecting Birmingham and Manchester, once other northern aspirations – see below – were fulfilled.

Earlier this month, the transport secretary, Heidi Alexander, said: “When we made that announcement, what I agreed with Andy is that we would also do a study about how you address the capacity constraints on the west coast mainline between Birmingham and Manchester […] I’m fully expecting the new prime minister to tell me to put some rocket boosters under that study, perhaps to do it a bit quicker.”

Better intercity services than Avanti

“Avanti should have been left on probation. People in Greater Manchester deserve a stable, predictable rail service between here and London and it is simply not acceptable. It is one kick in the teeth after another.” (Burnham, 20 October 2023)

The triumphant arrival of Burnham as the newly elected Makerfield MP in London was highly anticipated – but, taking the Avanti West Coast train, unsurprisingly delayed. The intercity operator is significantly improved from its post-Covid nadir, with a fleet overhaul and steady restoration of the timetable, but punctuality and cancellations remain among the worst in Britain, and industrial relations issues are not resolved.

Burnham opposed the renewal of Avanti’s contract, and one way or another, he will soon have the service back in public hands. All train operations are being folded into the new Great British Railways, with Avanti expected to be renationalised in spring 2027. Continued poor results could conceivably bring that forward. A government source said: “We recognise Avanti isn’t performing and all options are on the table to improve that.”

With Burnham’s nascent No 10 North requiring parts of government – indeed, the PM himself – to shuttle swiftly between the cities, the planned change in ownership alone may not be enough.

The local government professor Tony Travers says: “The service delivery is clearly way below acceptable. Having some of the most senior people in government trying to use it will test whether it can be made better.

“It brings into very precise focus the question of whether they can improve the west coast mainline: either it can and it makes people think it should have been done before – or it can’t, and it’s an insoluble policy question.”

NPR – and the underground station at Manchester Piccadilly

“We will never accept anything other than an underground station at Piccadilly. For us, that land is the prime economic development opportunity of the north of England.” (Burnham, December 2025)

The price tag for Northern Powerhouse Rail (NPR), as set by Labour in January, is a maximum £45bn – although detailed plans have yet to be drawn up. Burnham was most associated with what is now phase 2, under the latest iteration: a largely new, faster Liverpool-Manchester line.

But the PM’s longstanding claim was that the city at the heart of NPR needed a new Manchester Piccadilly station to be built underground. Estimates given for such a station when the city was part of HS2’s plans were an extra £5bn.

Burnham maintained it was worth it. Partly, for rail reasons: allowing fast trains to cross Manchester and hence the north across the NPR route. But he also maintained that the city centre would be blighted by a “line on stilts”, as others termed it, and lose its chance for the kind of regeneration London has seen around King’s Cross.

Nonetheless, a recent public accounts committee report warned of “difficult trade-off decisions between local areas … an underground station at Manchester is expected to be more costly and could therefore reduce the budget available for additional development in other localities”.

Rather than pit himself against the claims of other cities, Burnham talked up a Crossrail-style fundraising model, with supplementary business rates paid and cities borrowing against future fares. That worked to fund the Elizabeth line in London, but as Travers points out, from a much bigger population and business base: “It would have to be a substantial payment from business rates in Greater Manchester – I am not sure it would go down well.”

Cities controlling urban rail lines

“By removing freight trains from the city centre, the railways will work better for everyone.” (Burnham, January 2025)

Last year, Burnham unveiled the next phase in his plans for Manchester’s Bee Network, the integrated transport system founded primarily on the buses that he took back under public control. By 2030, 96 national rail stations in the city region are planned to be branded in the yellow Bee livery and “brought up to an exemplar Greater Manchester standard”.

A Bee Network bus, part of Manchester’s integrated transport system. Photograph: Christopher Thomond/The Guardian

That would allow local rail services to come under the network’s fare cap, and start work “to improve reliability and implement service changes”. While the plan emphasised that Manchester would explore “opportunities to optimise both freight and passenger journeys”, the talk of removing freight trains alarmed their operators, already concerned by safeguards under the planned Great British Railways.

In Downing Street, he has emphasised the desire for more devolution and strengthening mayors’ hands. Great British Railways is also expected to be a largely devolved structure by regions, with track and train integrated.

But it is also supposed to be a “guiding mind” for the railways: balancing the needs of freight, open access, long distance and commuter services, and trying to move away from ministerial and Department for Transport micromanagement.

The power outage at a regional control centre in Manchester last week, with disruption rippling out, underlined how interconnected the whole railway remains. With devolution, GBR may be freeing itself from Whitehall and finding a new layer of political involvement to navigate.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Traffic & Transport

Seeing red when cyclists decide not to stop at traffic lights | Cycling

Published

on


Simon Jenkins is right that traffic rules can feel bureaucratic, but using Hans Monderman’s “shared space” to justify running red lights misses the entire point of Monderman’s philosophy (I’ll admit it: I’ve cycled through red lights. But Britain’s traffic laws are to blame, not me, 21 August).

Monderman didn’t champion anarchy so individuals could cherrypick which laws to follow; he suggested infrastructure be removed precisely to force collective cooperation, eye contact and mutual caution.

The moment cyclists ignore that negotiation process while vulnerable pedestrians are left unprotected, the delicate psychological balance collapses. Freedom without universal accountability isn’t shared space. It is just a system that rewards the most aggressive road user.

That is precisely why high-profile implementations like London’s Exhibition Road faced a fierce backlash and were reversed, and why the UK government eventually halted new level-surface shared-space projects: when compliance breaks down, it is blind and elderly people, and vulnerable pedestrians, who pay the price for an idealised view of human nature.
Gary Ogin
London

As a lifelong cyclist may I point out an alternative view to that of Simon Jenkins? I don’t mind red lights; they offer unplanned fartlek opportunities on a training ride, skill development in maintaining a track stand for an unpredictable length of time, and stomp intervals in getting away from them. And if I’m knackered, a nice unplanned rest and chance to take a drink. I’m not sure Jenkins’ anarchic behaviour and justification for it does much to help the case of cyclists.
Peter Anderson
Barwick-in-Elmet, West Yorkshire

I ride a bike and a motorbike, and drive a car, and on all three I stop at red lights. Cyclists who ignore traffic lights contribute to the growing antagonism towards the rest of us. Simon Jenkins should know better.
Edward Collier
Cheltenham, Gloucestershire

Four years ago, aged 83, I was knocked down by a young man on a bike. Damaged wrist. He rode away quickly after making sure I wasn’t dead. April this year, aged 87, I was knocked down on a pedestrian crossing by a black ebike. Deep wound on leg, police, ambulance, hospital. Four months later, the leg is still being treated. The rider rode off after making sure I wasn’t dead. Shame on you, Simon Jenkins.
Joan Grabham
Cambridge

Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.



Source link

Continue Reading

Traffic & Transport

UK petrol prices hit highest level in almost four years as bank holiday getaway looms | Petrol prices

Published

on


UK petrol prices have hit their highest level since 2022, piling more financial pressure on motorists before the bank holiday weekend.

The average cost of petrol has reached 161.6p a litre, while diesel costs an average of 183.4p a litre, according to the AA breakdown company.

The last time the petrol price was so high was in November 2022, when it soared in the aftermath of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

It comes as millions of people prepare to make car journeys over the bank holiday weekend, which will be marked in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. The RAC estimates that the UK’s motorways and major roads could have the most traffic since its records began in 2015.

The services company has predicted Friday is likely to be the worst day for heavy traffic, with more than 4.1m cars expected on the roads.

Luke Bosdet of the AA said the rise in petrol prices showed that “UK pump pricing is back to its worst”. It is “too often overpriced and uncompetitive, with too many communities denied road fuel at a reasonable price”, he said.

The Competition and Markets Authority found this summer that many petrol stations were too slow to pass on cuts in wholesale prices to their customers. Photograph: Andy Rain/EPA

The UK’s competition regulator told fuel retailers this year that it would step up its monitoring of pump prices amid concern over profiteering as the US war with Iran drives up wholesale costs.

Before the US-Israeli attack on Iran in February, Brent crude – the international benchmark for oil prices – traded at about $72 a barrel. It hit a peak of $126 a barrel in April, before dipping to $71 at the start of July on hopes of a peace deal. It now trades at $89.63.

The Competition and Markets Authority found this summer that many petrol stations were too slow to pass on falls in wholesale energy prices to their customers.

A government scheme called Fuel Finder allows drivers to compare the cost of fuel offered by petrol stations across the UK. The AA found that in some areas, petrol was sold at about 10p below the national average cost for a litre on Thursday night, at stations in areas such as Aylesbury, Wembley and Gloucester.

skip past newsletter promotion


Bosdet said just one competitively priced forecourt “can often pull down the price of fuel locally, including at nearby supermarkets”.

He said: “Drivers just need to find them and go to them.”

Earlier this month the CMA said it had sent out more than 1,000 warning letters to retailers who had failed to share their prices with the Fuel Finder service.



Source link

Continue Reading

Traffic & Transport

How Britain’s railways are struggling in the heat – and can they be fixed? | Rail industry

Published

on


Britain’s railways have faced a string of heat-related problems this summer, including a derailment near Lewes in East Sussex two weeks ago that injured 30 people, and another the next day when the rear carriages of a Greater Anglia train derailed “in an upright position” at Wickford railway station in Essex, with no reported injuries.

The problems came during one of the hottest and driest summers on record, with a series of heatwaves, and drought declared across large parts of England and Wales. Britain’s railways, built for a cooler, wetter climate, have been put under pressure. Network Rail said the summer had “presented exceptional challenges to the railway”.

Here’s what we know about how heat affects the rail network and what can be done to tackle it.


What happens to railways in the heat?

Steel expands when it gets hot, and the long, welded steel sections that make up modern railway tracks are no exception. “The classic concern for railways with hot weather is that the track might buckle,” said William Powrie, a professor of geotechnical engineering at the University of Southampton.

As temperatures rise, the rails expand, but their continuous design means there is little room for movement. “If they haven’t got anywhere to go, they end up generating compressive stresses,” Powrie said. “The problem with any sort of structure which has got a compression in it is that it can fail by buckling.”

The consequences can be serious. Just two days of record heat in 2022 led to almost 7,700 cancelled trains and an estimated £30m in costs, according to a taskforce set up by Network Rail after that heatwave.

On a hot day, the rail can reach much higher temperatures than the air. Network Rail says most of the network can operate when track temperatures reach up to 46C, roughly equivalent to an air temperature of 30C. But rails have been recorded at temperatures as high as 51C.

The sleepers and ballast that rails sit on can help stop them from buckling, keeping the track in place – but long periods of heat and drought can dry the soil beneath them. That soil can shrink when it dries, a problem given it “is essentially the foundation for anything on top of it”, said Manu Sasidharan, an assistant professor of infrastructure asset management at University College London.

The weight of passing trains makes the problem worse, putting pressure on the weakened soil and causing it to settle unevenly. Whatever sits on top, including the track, “will follow suit”, Sasidharan said.

While tracks and stations have been continually updated over the decades, some embankments, tunnels and other structures date to the 1800s, when much of the network was first laid.


How do hotter countries cope?

To stop rails from buckling, engineers lay them slightly stretched, a process called pre-stressing. It means the rail has some give in it before it starts expanding in the heat.

In the UK, rails are stretched so that they do not undergo compression until the air temperature passes 27C. That figure sits between the UK’s highest and lowest seasonal rail temperatures, protecting against buckling in the summer and breaking under tension in the winter.

Other countries set that figure differently. In parts of Australia and the US, the so-called stress-free air temperature can exceed 35C. In southern Europe too, where winters rarely get as cold as in the UK, rails are designed for more heat, since there’s less risk of the rail snapping in the cold.

“If you’re looking at Italy, where you don’t really get very low winter temperatures, then you can afford to increase the stress-free temperature,” Powrie said. “The problem is the range of temperatures that we have [in the UK] … in the winter, they go into tension and that can cause the rails to break.”

One option, in theory, could be to re-stress rails between seasons, loosening and retensioning them so the stress-free temperature is set higher for summer and lower for winter, rather than fixed year-round.

Network Rail says: “In Britain, the variations in short-term weather and long-term climate mean that it is neither practical nor cost-effective to implement these measures permanently.”

Another option is to lay track on solid concrete slabs, as in some countries, rather than the more common bed of sleepers and ballast. However, slab track costs about four times as much to install as standard ballasted track, which is why it remains rare across most of the UK network.


What can be done?

One idea under discussion is raising the temperature British rails are built to withstand. The post-2022 taskforce said that on modern, well-supported track the stress-free temperature could rise from 27C to 30C.

“You might say we should actually have a different stress-free temperature in the south of England compared to, say, the north of Scotland,” Powrie said. However, higher stress-free temperature also leaves rails more vulnerable in a cold snap.

Simpler measures are already in use. Some sections of track are painted white to reduce how much heat they absorb. Network Rail says a rail painted white is typically 5-10C cooler.

Both tactics may be necessary as summers get hotter – something that will be increasingly normal amid the climate crisis. All five of the UK’s warmest summers on record have happened since 2000, according to the Met Office.

Monitoring for faults remains difficult, though. The Network Rail taskforce found that fewer than half of the track buckles recorded in 2022 had been identified before they happened.

Part of the issue is the sheer amount of data modern trains generate. Many now carry sensors that pick up rough riding or unusual vibrations, but sifting through it all is a challenge that needs to be automated, experts say.

Much, therefore, still relies on judgment rather than data – for example, a train driver detecting rough riding on one part of the line and reporting it.

As a temporary measure, speed restrictions were imposed on trains in southern Essex in the aftermath of the Wickford derailment.


Did the Lewes derailment happen because of the heat?

It’s impossible to say for sure. An interim report by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) found that a “track geometry irregularity” existed before the derailment, and said investigators had since received reports of rough riding from passengers on that stretch of line.

Sasidharan said early evidence pointed to the track itself. “The initial indication of the derailment … is that it’s a track infrastructure fault, most likely,” he said.

At the site of the derailment, the embankment is built on clay, which shrinks more than other types of soils as it dries out. The RAIB said the clay was “sensitive to variations in water content”, and there was evidence it had shifted before the derailment, though not enough to amount to a significant slip.

Powrie said the location had several things working against it at once, making it a case of what safety experts call the “Swiss cheese” theory of accidents, where one only happens when several small failures line up together.

The derailment happened on a bend – where more force is exerted on the track – and close to where the track leaves a bridge and moves on to the embankment.

Powrie said these transition points were a natural weak spot because the track had to cope with a sudden change from something rigid to ground that could shift, especially when it was dried out. “It wouldn’t surprise me if the defect turned out to be related to the dryness,” he said, “but I don’t really want to speculate.”

Network Rail has said it is “fully committed to supporting the continuing investigation and acting on any lessons that emerge from its findings”.

It said: “Safety is and will always remain our highest priority. While Britain’s railway is one of the safest in the world, when incidents like this occur it is essential that we understand exactly what happened and identify any lessons that can be learned.

“Given the complexity of the issues being examined, it is important that the independent investigation is allowed to reach its conclusions. We will continue to cooperate fully with the RAIB throughout this process.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending