Connect with us

Traffic & Transport

‘A guy did a runner in a Jaguar’: the petrol theft scandal – and the garage owners struggling to stop it | Crime

Published

on


A petrol station tucked away in the suburbs of Birmingham seems an unlikely place for a crime spree. But this garage has become a prime target for thieves. Some fuel runners are easy to spot, approaching the petrol pumps in face masks, but after a recent spate of fill-and-dashes by less conspicuous drivers, no motorist is beyond suspicion. “It could be anyone,” says Shailesh Parekh, who is on high alert, as always.

The 62-year-old owns six forecourts across Birmingham, and today I’m visiting his station in Erdington, a residential area about five miles from the city centre. Parekh remembers a time when a motorist speeding off with an unpaid-for tank was rare. So much so, it would be the talk of the station for months. Those days are long gone. Now, it’s a weekly and sometimes daily occurrence. “In the last three years, it’s been very bad,” Parekh tells me from the back office, where a monitor beams CCTV images from every inch of the forecourt.

Thefts have grown worse since the start of the war in Iran in February. In the first week of July, the station saw three fuel runners, and in June, 12 people drove off without paying. Across his six garages, says Parekh, fuel theft cost him more than £40,000 last year, and predicting who will drive off is becoming impossible.

In his experience, fuel theft used to be carried out by organised thieves or criminals on the lam, who might have stolen a car. Not now. “I had a guy all suited and booted do a runner in a Jaguar,” he says. Sometimes, thieves will wear hi-vis jackets to impersonate workmen. The day before my visit, at another of his forecourts, a man who “looked like a farmer” filled up his tank with £140 worth of petrol and “buggered off”. Parekh says thieves are becoming casually audacious. “They come right in front of you, because they have no fear.”

‘In the last three years, it’s been very bad’ … petrol theft has risen dramatically in Birmingham. Photograph: Fabio De Paola/The Guardian Photograph: Fabio De Paola/The Guardian

The issue isn’t confined to Parekh’s garages. Petrol stations have seen a 23% rise in fuel theft since the start of the Iran war, with incidents soaring from 9,089 in January and February to 11,170 in March and April, according to Forecourt Eye, a company that collects payments on behalf of about 1,000 garages around the UK. The Times estimates that more than £1.2m of fuel is being stolen from forecourts each week. Gordon Balmer, executive director of the Petrol Retailers Association, a trade body representing forecourts, says “first-time offenders” are becoming more common, with many “trying it on” due to a “combination of rising household costs and a bit of opportunism”.

The soaring levels of theft come amid rising fuel prices, which have shot up after the successive crises of Covid-19, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the Iran war. According to the RAC, prices reached a high of 199.09p for a litre of diesel in 2022, before subsiding again. From mid-February to June 2026, the cost of petrol rose from 131p to 155p per litre, while the cost of diesel rose from 141p to 176p per litre. This means that filling a 60L tank with petrol went from £79 to £93, while filling it with diesel rose from £85 to £106.

Parekh’s forecourts are fitted with “more CCTV cameras than Birmingham airport,” he jokes, but pursuing a fuel thief is usually pointless. “Half of the runners, we don’t even report them. It’s such a mission,” he says.

With CCTV footage and a licence plate number, catching the thieves should be easy, but in reality failing to pay for fuel ends up in a legal grey zone. While intentionally driving off without paying for fuel is a criminal offence, convictions are rare, especially for one-off offenders. If a motorist drives off by mistake or discovers after filling up that they cannot pay, the unpaid amount is generally treated as a civil debt rather than a criminal offence. Unless it’s pretty blatant, it’s difficult to prove that a motorist didn’t drive off in error. And if a driver has filled up and then can’t make the payment, it’s up to the forecourt owner to do what they can to recover the amount. Still, bilkers who are caught and prosecuted face up to two years in prison and a fine. One prolific fuel thief in Kent was jailed for 16 months after pleading guilty to stealing fuel from nine forecourts in 2024.

‘Half of the runners, we don’t even report them’ … fuel theft cost petrol-station owner Shailesh Parekh £40,000 last year. Photograph: Fabio De Paola/The Guardian

Not all the thieves Parekh encounters dash off after filling their tanks. Some use the pump, then come in and declare themselves penniless, leaving him with few options, because “we can’t retrieve our fuel from their tank”. Balmer says a lot of first-time offenders are doing this, because many “see it like a payday loan”. Regardless of how unpaid fuel is taken from his forecourt, Parekh says when he has reported incidents to the police, they often tell him “it’s a civil thing”. This is something Balmer has encountered too. Another station he is in contact with reported an intentional drive-off to police, who incorrectly told them it was a civil offence and there was nothing they could do.

In November 2024, Supt Fran Harrod, a senior Lincolnshire police officer, told the BBC that somebody who has driven off without paying for fuel might not be “having a great day” and the incidents don’t always constitute a crime. She recommended that forecourt owners try to recover money through a civil route instead of “using huge amounts of officer hours to go round and ask people to pay up, because the police’s time isn’t free either”. Parekh says this approach adds insult to injury: “You can’t go into Asda and say, ‘I’m leaving with this trolley full of items but I’ve got no money to pay for it.’”

In March this year, the Times reported freedom of information data first revealed by the Forecourt Trader website. It found that in 2024, five police forces across the UK closed a fuel theft investigation without identifying a suspect in nine out of 10 cases.

‘We have more CCTV cameras than Birmingham airport’ … cars suspected of fuel theft at a petrol station in Erdington. Photograph: Fabio De Paola/The Guardian

West Midlands police, the force Parekh deals with, did not respond to the Times, but a 2022 freedom of information request revealed that, of the 1,150 reports of “people driving off without paying for fuel” between January and March 2022, 1,126 (98%) had a recorded outcome indicating that no further action was taken. Of these, 1,106 involved no identified suspect and 20 involved an identified suspect; the outcomes of the remaining 24 reports were left “blank”. Parekh says officers “take the view that this is a totally preventable crime”, telling him he should install prepaid pumps to stop thefts. This, he says, is a non-starter because “the whole trade has to move to that system, otherwise people will get annoyed and go elsewhere”.

West Midlands police say it investigates reports of “bilking, and people need to be clear that driving off without paying for fuel is theft and the consequences are very serious”, adding it would “encourage businesses to take steps to minimise the likelihood of them becoming a victim – such as operating a prepay policy and installing good-quality CCTV”.

Balmer says he has also faced police indifference. He recalls one incident in which “two guys broke into a forecourt, filled up with fuel and filmed it all for TikTok”. Despite this incident being raised with the relevant police force, the culprits weren’t brought to court because police “didn’t think it was something that they should criminalise them for”, says Balmer. “Even though they had committed a crime.”

Parekh has faced similar challenges with getting police to take this crime seriously, including an instance on his forecourt that turned violent. One of his cashiers approached a van driver who he suspected of stealing fuel and stood in front of the vehicle to stop it driving off. The van began advancing towards the cashier, and a tyre went over his foot; luckily he managed to escape with only bruises. A customer helped track down the perpetrator, and the incident was reported to the police. There was also CCTV footage of the vehicular assault. “I pursued the police for 14 months,” says Parekh. “They didn’t go and arrest that man – they didn’t do anything. In the end, I left it.” The West Midlands force says it “won’t tolerate any type of theft” and will “always seek to identify, detain and pursue prosecution against anybody involved in theft offences”.

‘Police take the view that this is a preventable crime’ … petrol stations are advised to install prepaid pumps. Photograph: Fabio De Paola/The Guardian

Parekh recalls one time when police did act. Officers were grabbing a coffee from the garage shop and telling Parekh about a notorious fuel thief they were after. On the forecourt, a van parked next to a pump caught their attention. Officers went to inspect it. Inside the van, they found a man surrounded by containers, in the process of filling them with Parekh’s fuel. After being caught in the act, the thief was arrested.

Can-fillers such as this, who sell containers filled with stolen fuel, are becoming more common. Christmas and Easter used to be the worst seasons for fuel theft, but recently it has become a year-round phenomenon, especially since fuel has “become a more sellable item,” says Parekh.

The losses to Parekh are having an even greater impact given rising national insurance contributions and business rates, the latter of which, he says, rose from £16,000 to £43,000 last year. And it isn’t just fuel theft he is contending with: he says his forecourt shop is often ransacked by thieves. It’s so bad that at one point there were 20 pictures of shoplifters in the window. He blames this, in part, on people with addiction issues and prison leavers being placed in houses in multiple occupation (HMOs) in the area.

Parekh says this has led to a number of violent encounters at the station. Garry Backhouse was manning the till when a regular customer “snapped” and “flashed a massive blade” at him, before being apprehended by a police officer who was in the shop at the same time. On another occasion, the 51-year-old cashier was attacked on the forecourt, while off duty, when trying to stop a shoplifter. Backhouse, who started working at the forecourt 11 years ago, quit after the first incident, but returned after a stint in a tile shop. Now, as a protective measure, none of Parekh’s staff work alone, which further adds to costs, and the door to the shop is kept locked after 8pm.

Attacked … Garry Backhouse, 51, has been the subject of violent crime at a petrol station in Birmingham. Photograph: Fabio De Paola/The Guardian

Another tool for the garage is VARS Technology, an automatic number plate recognition system and debt recovery service, used at one in eight petrol stations around the UK. It flags up “blacklisted vehicles” that have previously driven off without paying for fuel at a member forecourt. “If the registration flashes up, we don’t start the pump,” says Backhouse. But this technology, and other similar products, have been accused of issuing “false” fuel debts. In one case, this meant that a family who had been accused of driving out of a petrol station in Manchester without paying for £20 of fuel was effectively banned from more than 1,300 forecourts. Any visit they made set off an alarm.

Some fuel thieves steal or clone licence plates to hide their tracks, which can pose further difficulties for those falsely accused of fuel theft. Balmer says he has heard of cases where “perpetrators get a stolen vehicle, go online and look up a similar car in make, model and colour” and print out plates before stealing fuel, leaving the innocent original owners to receive letters falsely accusing them of stealing petrol. For forecourts, this means no chance of recovering their money. “They’ll just have to write it off,” he says.

While a petrol station forecourt might not be the first place that comes to mind as a community asset, Parekh says they are important. “Petrol stations are no longer just purveyors of fuel. We have everything,” he says. They are one of the few businesses that remain open into the early hours. “You can come at midnight and put £10 on the gas – we keep things going for people.”

But after decades in the trade, Parekh is doubtful about the future. “I’m 62 years old,” he says. “I’m beginning to think: why am I doing this?”

Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Traffic & Transport

Ministers to target ‘wild west’ of e-bikes blocking pavements | Ebikes

Published

on


Ministers are seeking to end the “wild west” of parked e-bikes blocking pavements, as they attempt to crack down on antisocial behaviour such as cyclists jumping red lights.

The consultation, led by the Department for Transport, will aim to establish national standards on issues including parking, ending the current patchwork of agreements between individual bike companies and councils.

While some areas enforce rules that mean shared bikes – such as those operated by Lime, Forest and Voi – can only be left in designated parking bays, elsewhere the rules are looser, prompting complaints about bikes blocking pavements, particularly for wheelchair users, people with pushchairs and those with impaired vision.

It will also look at antisocial and illegal riding, for example, people jumping lights or the use of bikes by those who are underage or drunk.

The plans will also examine guidelines for fleet sizes to ensure certain areas are not overcrowded and possible requirements for operators to have insurance, so someone hit by a rider on a hired e-bike can claim compensation.

Another part of the consultation will look at whether councils and mayors should be given powers over the fees charged to rent bikes, and whether companies should share data to improve enforcement and transport planning.

Since arriving in the UK in 2018, shared e-bike systems, of which Lime is by some way the biggest, have expanded rapidly, especially in London. More than 2.6 million Britons used an e-bike share scheme in the year to September 2025, according to one estimate.

There is evidence that shared e-bikes are used by a broader demographic range of riders than traditional bikes, in part because of the electric assistance, but also because they do not require somewhere secure to park.

The DfT argues that the bikes are growing in importance for urban transport, but that the lack of any central oversight has created difficulties, noting that the companies themselves have called for more regulation.

The proposed changes would be “a small but important everyday fix to make our streets safer”, Andy Burnham said. The prime minister added: “E-bikes can make getting around that bit easier, but when they block pavements or are used irresponsibly they can be a real frustration.

“I want to sort that by giving communities more control over where they are parked and making sure companies and riders play by the rules.”

Heidi Alexander, the transport secretary, said: “Shared e-bike schemes have revolutionised the way people travel around our towns and cities. They are easy to use, get us active and help reduce emissions, but we need to make sure they work with the communities where they operate.

“That’s why we are taking decisive action to give local leaders the power to stop nuisance parking, tackle antisocial behaviour and make journeys safer.”

There are parallel efforts in London under which the DfT would devolve power to the mayor, Sadiq Khan, and Transport for London to unify e-bike regulations, which are currently the responsibility of individual boroughs and vary significantly.

Khan said: “The ‘wild west’ approach to dockless e-bikes cannot continue. While these services are helping thousands more Londoners to cycle, their rapid growth has also brought challenges around safety, inconsiderate parking and the lack of data needed to properly manage them.

“I’ve been calling for powers to better manage dockless e-bike schemes since 2017, when the first schemes arrived in London, so I welcome the government’s plans to give cities the powers they need to do this.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Traffic & Transport

John Taylor obituary | Transport policy

Published

on


My partner, John Taylor, who has died from cancer aged 74, was a leading figure in the field of community, rural and accessible transport. He made practical improvements in the lives of many people affected by privatisation, poor planning and reduced public funding of transport services.

While volunteering in Manchester in the 1970s John found minimal resources available for those who needed help to access his community buses – makeshift steps and ramps of milk crates and wooden planks were the norm. Plugging this gap became the foundation of his work.

He co-founded Manchester Community Transport (MCT) and in 1984 was founding director of Community Transport Services, later Community Transport Association UK (CTA), the national advisory body for transport-related charities. In the 90s he was instrumental in devising MiDAS (the Minibus Driver Awareness Scheme). In 1994 MiDAS was adopted nationally as a training scheme for volunteer minibus drivers; 30 years later, CTA UK issued its one millionth driver assessment certificate.

Born in Cambridge, John was the youngest of three children of Reginald Taylor, a civil servant, and his wife, Winifred (nee Stamford). The family moved to south London when John was a few weeks old. He was a gifted student at Whitgift school, Croydon, where his love of a challenge and wide open spaces led him to embrace mountaineering and climbing. He subsequently climbed in the UK, the Alps, Pyrenees and Himalayas; his final “big” expedition was an ascent of Ama Dablam, in Nepal, in 2007.

In 1971 he went to New College, Oxford, to study philosophy, politics and economics, followed by a year as an articled clerk in London, with the intention of pursuing a legal career. He then moved to Manchester to do postgraduate study in the sociology of law at Manchester University and stayed in the north for the rest of his life. Voluntary jobs led him into the transport sector, first with MCT and later as a freelance transport consultant, which is when I first met him, working together in Levenshulme.

We moved to Lancaster in 1995, and around this time John became co-director of the TAS (Transport Advisory Service) Partnership. He would often take on far too much and his reports were invariably delivered at the last minute. But once finished, he loved to communicate his ideas; his colourful shirt and tie combos gave him a standout presence during presentations.

Outside work, he enjoyed his vast music collection, which covered classical, jazz, blues and his beloved Grateful Dead. When the children expressed interest in Meccano, he drove to Hampshire to collect a huge quantity bought on eBay.

A loyal fan of Morecambe FC, he was active in the Shrimps Trust supporters’ society, leading the post-match litter-picking team and helping them acquire MiDAS certification for their away travel.

He is survived by me, our sons, Robin and Jonathan, his stepson, Ashley, and his sister, Fran, and brother, Francis.



Source link

Continue Reading

Traffic & Transport

No 10 defends flight to Caribbean going via Manchester to pick up Burnham | Andy Burnham

Published

on


A government-chartered plane taking Andy Burnham to a Commonwealth summit in the Caribbean made a stop-off in Manchester to collect him, Downing Street has said.

The decision, which will have been more financially and environmentally costly than if the prime minister had travelled to London, leaves him open to accusations of hypocrisy after Labour repeatedly criticised Rishi Sunak for his use of private planes and helicopters for domestic travel when he was the prime minister.

The plane, which the government leases for prime ministerial travel, left Stansted airport outside London at about 6am on Monday en route to Antigua and Barbuda, where the Commonwealth heads of government summit begins on Tuesday.

It carried officials and a handful of pool media reporters, but not Burnham. He and his wife were picked up at Manchester about 30 minutes later. The plane stayed on the ground for an hour before setting off via Canada for a refuelling stop.

Asked why the travel logistics had worked this way, and how much it had cost to add an extra leg to the trip, Burnham’s official spokesperson said: “Decisions related to travel are made on security and operational grounds, neither of which we comment on. We are transparent about travel costs. They will be published in the usual way.”

Burnham had been in Scotland on Friday, before going to Manchester to work from No 10 North that evening, the spokesperson said. Burnham, whose family home is in Greater Manchester, routinely works in the city on Fridays and spends the weekend there.

Asked if this represented value for money, the spokesperson said: “I’ve just set out our position, and I’ll just refer you back to that.” Asked if Burnham simply did not want the effort of returning to London, he replied: “I don’t accept that.”

Prime ministerial flights usually leave from Stansted, where there is a section of the airport for private flights that allows for extra security.

As prime minister, Sunak regularly used helicopters to travel to events in places for which rail travel would have been almost as quick, including Southampton, Dover, the West Midlands and Essex.

When Labour took office it cancelled the £40m helicopter contract used for the travel as part of what Keir Starmer’s government said was an effort to undo “14 years of rot” under the Conservatives.

skip past newsletter promotion


Labour also questioned why Sunak used an RAF jet to fly to Scotland when scheduled flights were available, given the ministerial code says private planes should only be used when there is no alternative.

The shadow Cabinet Office minister, Mike Wood, said on Monday: “Labour promised a crackdown on private jet use. Yet when it comes to Air Miles Andy, it seems to be one rule for him and another for everyone else.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending