Student Life
Inarticulacy in part and in whole: ‘Father Mother Sister Brother’ in review
When I heard that Jim Jarmusch had released a new anthology film, I fondly remembered watching Night on Earth (1991) some years ago. It’s a series of conversations between cab drivers and their eclectic customers, and each section contains its own kind of sentimentality, humour, or poignancy. Against the film’s still nighttime streets, one only has words and faces to focus on, and days after watching the film, I enjoyed comparing the feel and details of each neatly parcelled slice of life.
This time, in Father Mother Sister Brother, Jarmusch explores three visits of adult children to their parents. Instead of studying the nature of human contact through charming realist conversation as in Night on Earth, he dwells on the great dearth of things which family members – who ostensibly have known each other so long and well – often have to say to each other after time and distance have estranged them.
For lack of words, images, and impressions convey the predicaments of the fathers, mothers, sisters, and brothers. The opening ten minutes of the first short, Father, are taken up by Emily (Mayim Bialik) and Jeff’s (Adam Driver) drive through a snowy woodland to their reclusive, recovering addict father’s (Tom Waits as Tom Waits) house in New Jersey. I must admit, their conversation was so sparse and dull that I now realise I missed important exposition, but this cannot have communicated as much as the lingering, meandering camera. Close-ups of Emily gazing pensively out the window; Jeff steering too quietly and steadily, and a too-monotonous winter landscape, simultaneously leave much to be imagined and signal entry to a slowed-down foreign world pervaded by their father’s memory.
However, all this calculated vagueness is made much less evocative than it should be by a frankly interminable tranche of kooky dialogue. Upon entry, “Great to see you” and other pleasantries are uttered by Jeff and Emily slowly and with pauses. The father pays a strained compliment to his daughter’s coat. Everyone is at a loss for something to say, a point to make or come to. Awkwardness thus established, the father issues a few sub-par quirked-up gags to fill the silence: “your mother always loved water”, “you were always my favourite son” (to Jeff, his only son). A few arthouse fiends in the seats near mine laughed at these bits, and I almost did too, for Jarmusch starves us of proper comic moments. We understand within a minute the absurdity of the family’s conversational vacuum; of the contrast between prim Jeff and Emily and their demented dad, and how we’ve all been through the kind of incidents which the short caricatures. Why then is the point so insisted on, made so bizarre in its urgency?
Mother is the middle short and far more fun than Father. It is set in Dublin and the English family involved is of a similar eccentric, upper-middle-class milieu to that of Jeff, Emily, and their father The short is enjoyably camped up, however,, by the sisters, Tim (Cate Blanchett) and Lilith (Vicki Krieps), and their mother (Charlotte Rampling) being vibrantly dressed arty types. We have by now adjusted to the aridness of the characters’ conversation, and the short’s rhetoric of contemporary clichés – the novelist mother glibly chats to her therapist before her daughters arrive, while Lilith loves to talk about her career as an influencer – is effectively offset by everyone’s strange demeanour, as well as our stronger sense of the group’s history and dynamics. The mother’s conversational stiltedness makes sense in light of her narcissism, manifest in her garishly sumptuous house.
Krieps’ performance does a lot to prop up Mother and is, by some margin, the most engaging of the whole film: spontaneously licking a cupcake or slighting her sister, she is both frivolous and vicious, and her deadpan lines are animated by her accent, a mix of German and posh English. We see that the mischievous and almost knowingly superficial Lilith is a chip off the old block, while Tim, though similar in outward style to her female relatives, has long felt their casual disdain. Obtuse Father left me cold, but I still ponder Mother’s intriguing tensions.
Unfortunately, the last short, Sister Brother, makes us forget the comedic edge of Mother. In Paris, siblings Skye and Billy (Indya Moore and Luka Sabbat) visit their late parents’ apartment before it is reclaimed. It seems like this would figure nicely as a coda; focus has turned from parents ageing to being grieved, and in the accompanying spirit of looseness and uncertainty, the action takes place in an open-top car and out on the streets, as opposed to the claustrophobic domestic settings of Father and Mother. But not much else is made of Skye and Billy’s situation. Curious questions are posed about their parents’ past and identities, but it is vapid chatter that dominates: “each moment is each moment”, it occurs to Skye, and Billy is thankful he doesn’t “lead a conventional life”.
More egregious than this, though, is the bizarre schmalz of the siblings’ relationship. As if drugged, Skye comments on how “dependable” her brother is, and no siblingly banter whatsoever counterweighs this. In fact, what Matt Zoller-Seitz finds to be ‘warm, natural chemistry’, comes across, plainly and appallingly, as sexual tension: affectionate hands on thighs, Billy’s mock-incredulous “Nooo!” at Skye’s suggestion that another woman is hotter than her, and many warm, lingering looks besides, all make for queasy and confusing viewing.
Worst of all, though, the saccharine tone of Brother Sister – never mind the suggestions of incest – spoils any sense of coherence between the three sections of the film. For me, this extreme incongruity underscores the main issue with Father Mother Sister Brother: whether you like its style or not, it’s undeniable that it is ultimately inconsistent, both in content and in quality. This is why I find myself reviewing the shorts as if they were three different films. Perhaps I missed an obscure through-line. In his defence,Jarmusch does try to tie things up by planting motifs – water, a Rolex watch, and colour-coordinated clothes – through the three segments. In spite of this,, I still far prefer the plain, pleasing fragmentation of Night on Earth.
Student Life
How an Oxford undergraduate made a name in choral music
For most undergraduate composers, a debut album remains a distant ambition. For Christopher Churcher, a music student and finalist at Lady Margaret Hall, it has already become a reality. His album Moonrise, a collection of choral works recorded with Somerville College Choir, has earned national attention, including being selected as BBC Radio 3’s Album of the Week.
The path to Moonrise began long before Oxford. Christopher started composing at the age of ten or eleven, shortly after beginning piano lessons. But rather than sitting down to compose, Christopher’s primary catalyst for writing music was a reluctance to practise scales. Instead of working through assigned exercises, he found himself improvising melodies and chord progressions at the piano. Eventually he began writing those ideas down.
Music entered his life through several different routes. Growing up in Birmingham, he joined Birmingham Cathedral Choir as a child chorister, learning to sight-read and performing music several times a week. Later, after his voice broke, he moved away from singing and towards orchestral performance, taking up the bassoon and playing with youth orchestras. When he arrived at Oxford, he expected his future to lie primarily in orchestral music. Instead, it was choral music that transformed his direction.
That redirection, sparked inside Somerville’s chapel, is the thread that runs in a more or less straight line to Moonrise. The turning point came towards the end of his first year. Christopher attended one of the college’s contemplations, reflective services that combine music, poetry, and readings. Listening to the Somerville College Choir perform, he experienced what he describes as an epiphany.
“I just had this sort of epiphany that I’d been missing choral music from my life for so long,” he recalls. “I realised that that was where I needed to be.” Although he had spent years pursuing orchestral performance, the artistic language that ultimately felt most natural was the one he thought he had left behind. Through Somerville College Choir and its director, Will Dawes, he rediscovered a musical tradition that had shaped him as a child.
That relationship would eventually become the foundation for Moonrise. The choir provided a collaborative environment in which Christopher’s compositional voice could develop, serving as his “most kind of significant collaborators to date” who have “have hugely inspired the way that [he] write[s]”. Looking back, he is clear that the album would never have existed without Oxford. “This album only happened because I was in the right place at the right time with the right choir and the right director”, he says.
Yet Oxford’s influence extends beyond performance opportunities. Christopher speaks of the university as a creative ecosystem whose value lies in its intellectual diversity. Although he studies music, much of the poetry featured on Moonrise came through conversations with friends studying English and modern languages. The degree itself, meanwhile, exposed him to ideas that challenged his assumptions about what composition could be.
While rooted in the choral tradition, Christopher’s music draws inspiration from far beyond the classical canon. He speaks enthusiastically about artists ranging from Joni Mitchell to contemporary popular musicians. Rather than treating classical music as a sealed cultural category, he approaches it as part of a wider musical landscape. Oxford, he says, “removed any sort of prejudices that [he] had internalised from studying GCSE music”.
But, of course, Oxford isn’t all positive for composition. Christopher is careful not to romanticise the experience. “Oxford really gets in the way of composing,” he says bluntly at one point. The Music degree (like any Oxford degree), he explains, leaves little uninterrupted time for sustained creative work. Unlike a conservatoire education, his course does not centre composition itself. Despite this, he views Oxford as a productive tension, rather than a mere obstacle. The demands of the degree may limit the time available for composition, but they also expose him to ideas, texts, and people that continually enrich his creative work. “Whilst sometimes I can feel like I’m fighting against the degree a bit to find time to write and compose”, he reflects, “it’s so great because the degree is so stimulating”. Oxford, in his view, has been a place where academic study and artistic practice constantly inform one another.
The result is a compositional style that balances sophistication with immediacy. His creative process is surprisingly architectural. Before writing notes, he sketches large visual timelines on sheets of A3 paper, mapping emotional trajectories, climaxes, textures, and harmonic developments. He compares the process to designing a building.
Describing his composition process, he says: “I’ll sit there and think, okay, I’ve got five minutes. Where do I want the high point of the piece to be? How can I create a sense of catharsis for the listener?” The language is telling. Even when discussing structure, Christopher returns repeatedly to emotional experience. Composition becomes a carefully planned emotional journey, which leads him to reject the idea that composition is inherently intellectual. Instead, his music is fundamentally personal and autobiographical. “I think actually that does make me quite different to some classical composers”, he says. While some composers prefer distance between their work and their personal lives, he actively embraces vulnerability. His music functions almost as a form of emotional testimony.Nowhere is that clearer than in the third Pride Motet. Christopher says, “I put my heartbreak and my love and my humanity into that piece”.
For Christopher, the goal when composing music is to create music that anyone, regardless of their background in classical music, can listen to and appreciate. Asked how he would describe Moonrise to someone without a classical background, he avoids technical language entirely. Instead, he speaks about emotion. The album, he says, is an attempt “to express human emotion” and to create atmospheres that listeners can inhabit regardless of their musical experience. The words he chooses to describe the music – “warm, comforting, atmospheric, emotional, sensitive” – reveal a composer less concerned with intellectual display than with human connection.
As he prepares for the next stage of his career, including a move to Germany and new commissions for choir and orchestra, that commitment remains unchanged. The success of Moonrise has given him confidence that audiences are responding to the values that matter most to him: emotional truth, accessibility, and connection.
Moonrise emerged from precisely that conviction. Beneath its carefully crafted choral textures and ambitious artistic vision lies a simple idea: that music is at its most powerful when it communicates something real. It is an idea Christopher has cemented in his professional repertoire because of Oxford – because of a choir he wasn’t looking for, a director who became a collaborator, and a degree that left him fighting for time even as it gave him plenty to write about. That belief, and that drive to make music accessible, seems likely to remain at the centre of whatever comes next.
Student Life
‘Scenes With Girls’ and complicated female friendships
Scenes with Girls deserves to be seen as one of Labyrinth Productions’ (Rosie Morgan-Males and Emily Cullinan) most impressive accolades. It displayed the tension inside a female friendship to such a believable extent that at points the audience were silenced entirely. It felt particularly relevant given this year’s right-wing coverage of an emerging “angry woman” who refuses to conform to established beauty ideals, creating the concern amongst men that she may, horror-of-horrors, renounce them entirely.
The play centres the friendship of flatmates Tosh (Juliet Taub) and Lou (Sanaa Pasha), and their ex-flatmate Fran (Georgina Cooper), and forces the audience to consider what it means to live as a feminist in today’s day and age. Each character symbolises a varying degree of conformity to the standard “narrative” – the conventional life path ascribed to women which lacks space for female platonic intimacy, and foregrounds the pursuit of heteronormative romantic relationships. Lou persistently seeks sex with men, but wishes she could leave her body as it happens, Tosh chooses not to associate with men at all, and Fran becomes the object of their ridicule as she, in their eyes, allows herself to be dominated by her boyfriend.
The play questions whether following the narratives we’re fed makes us flawed. Underlying the flatmates’ attempts to define a new feminist consciousness is a sense of sexual competitiveness written into their psyches since “girls’ school”, and ironically it is Tosh who chooses the “desire to be desired” over forging an alternative lifestyle with Lou, briefly doing a “really good impression of a girlfriend” before the two reunite. This production was remarkable for its ability to use laughter to make the audience think. Lines which were instantly funny, such as Taub begging her boyfriend to repeat himself and him saying “you’re so fit”, prompted reflection on the reality of women allowing men’s assessment of their physical appearance to dictate their happiness. Hearing conversations after the performance’s end made me certain that this production will have an enduring impact on viewers’ understanding of heterosexual romance.
The actors’ versatility prevented the physically intense emotional scenes from losing pace, and Rosie Morgan-Males’ stellar directing allowed the audience to observe when each friend was craving the other’s approval. In such an intimate relationship, tension was physical. Blocking made evident to everyone but Lou that Tosh wanted her undivided attention. Lou’s incessant mentions of sex made Tosh’s shoulders visibly slump, and her dissatisfied expression at times where Lou seemed more focused on her phone gave context to later anger. Later, having been persuaded that she ought to renounce men entirely, Lou is placed behind Tosh so that the audience can notice her hopeful looks as she asserts to Fran that she no longer wants to talk about boys: in a weak imitation of Tosh’s all out separatism, Lou murmurs that she now finds them “gross”.
Cooper as Fran was a comedic highlight, and Morgan-Males’ choice to push her over-enthusiastic reactions to extremity was well enacted. Cooper’s focus was commendable: the audience could see that while constantly smiling, Fran was also constantly listening, never looking away from the relationship between the two women. This made her later assertion that she “is not stupid” and sees herself worthy of pursuing their feminist lifestyle believable.
Pasha too is a fantastic emotional actor and it was in her character’s moments of defeat that she shone most. After Tosh confronts her and explains that she is obsessed by “the shit version of love they [men] give you”, her physicality destabilises and for much of the rest of the play she appears untethered, at one stage collapsing on the floor. The sense that she is struggling to avoid a total breakdown was impressively acted, her eyes glazing with tears as she tells Fran that she feels “mad”.
Taub was impossible not to watch, especially in moments of climactic anger. Her ability to move between a cynical “dead-inside” attitude and brutal anger was phenomenal. In particular, her dogged confrontation of Pasha had the audience visibly uncomfortable.
The embodiment of the joy as well as pain within Tosh and Lou’s platonic relationship was a highlight. No holds-barred descriptions of Tosh’s sex life, in which the men were always viscerally denounced – “the conversational equivalent of a nosebleed in a swimming pool” – were interspersed with tableaus that convincingly represented the pair as two friends placed firmly in our generation. Non-sensical jokes were thrown at each other while sat apart engrossed in their phone screens. In the parts of the script where their friendship was strongest they sprawled their limbs across each other. It was these unspoken moments that made their friendship seem most real: jokingly poking each other’s legs, or wrestling each other to the ground.
The actors’ boldness and commitment to every movement gave the play its glowing quality. Their hugs – most memorably after Tosh demands that Lou “dig into this” – successfully transferred an appearance of platonic passion. Alongside whole-hearted physical intimacy, the toilet at the back of the stage was an effective way to demonstrate the lack of boundaries between the characters. The lack of bodily privacy between the two was reflected in its openness to the audience, with some of the most compelling dialogue delivered by Tosh from the toilet seat. In an extremely powerful exchange taking advantage of this set-up, a visibly defeated Taub asked “am I mentally ill?”.
The “messiness” of the physical intimacy was well complimented by the set, with clothes strewn across the floor. It felt like an illusion to Tracey Emin’s My Bed in an era where women’s lack of total cleanliness is no longer seen as shocking. The simplicity of the costumes (relaxed tops and tracksuits, designed by Clara Woodhead and Mimi Finney) were another indicator of the friend’s closeness.
The script, like female friendships themselves, is complicated, but the actors tackled it with professional quality. It is rare that a student production is capable of making an audience both laugh out loud, and fall completely silent. To use a cliche, it was jaw-dropping.
Student Life
Jacinda Ardern and eight others awarded with honorary degrees
William Hague, Chancellor of Oxford, conferred nine honorary degrees in today’s Encaenia ceremony. The recipients include former New Zealand Prime Minister Dame Jacinda Ardern; actress and theatre director Adjoa Andoh MBE; and literary critic and host of Finding Your Roots Henry Louis Gates Jr.
The other honorands are tennis player Billie Jean King; electronics engineer and inventor of blue LED Shuji Nakamura; Nobel Prize-winning economics professor Daron Acemoglu; Birmingham Royal Ballet director Carlos Acosta CBE; biochemist Katalin Karikó, whose mRNA research contributed to the COVID-19 vaccines; and former CEO of GSK Dame Emma Walmsley.
The procession of recipients and senior members of the University walked from Exeter College to the Sheldonian Theatre, where the ceremony took place, around 11.20am. Earlier this year, the Chancellor conferred eight honorary degrees in a Special Honorary Degree Ceremony intended to commemorate the beginning of his Chancellorship.

Encaenia takes place on the Wednesday of ninth week of each Trinity term, and sees the conferral of honorary degrees on recipients selected by the Congregation, a body of over 5,000 staff and academics. The University website describes these awards as “the most prestigious awards the University can confer”. The ceremony is traditionally followed by a lunch, hosted by All Souls College for over 100 years, and a garden party. It has been a constant feature in the Oxford calendar since the 1470s.
Dame Jacinda Ardern GNZM is one of the most prominent honorands this year. As the Prime Minister of New Zealand from 2017 to 2023, she was praised by international media for her leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic. Last year, Ardern joined the Blavatnik School of Government as a member of the World Leaders Circle, alongside former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.
Adjoa Andoh MBE is another recognisable face among the recipients. An actress from Bristol, she has performed with the National Theatre and the Royal Shakespeare Company, and is an honorary fellow of the Royal Society of Literature. In recent years, she has played Lady Danbury in both Bridgerton and Queen Charlotte: A Bridgerton Story, the latter of which included a wedding scene filmed in Merton College Chapel.
Dame Emma Walmsley DBE is the only recipient to also be an alumna of the University. She studied for an MA in Classics and Modern Languages at Christ Church, later working at L’Oréal. From 2016 to 2025, she was the CEO of GSK, one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies, and is the first woman to lead an international pharmaceutical company.
Professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. is one of the several Americans awarded today. An academic at Harvard University, he rediscovered the manuscripts of the earliest known African-American novels and is the director of the Hutchins Center for African and African American Research. Professor Gates has also built a successful television career as the host of Finding Your Roots, in which celebrities are presented with their ancestral histories.
Past notable honorands include Nelson Mandela (1996), Dame Judi Dench (2000), and Sir Tim Berners-Lee (2001).
-
Crime & Safety4 weeks agoAll contestants taking part in Strictly Come Dancing 2026
-
UK News3 weeks agoUK defence spending plan ‘well short of what’s required’ and harder choices needed, says John Healey – UK politics live | Politics
-
Oxford News4 weeks agoCo-op full list of stores with late night World Cup hours
-
UK News4 weeks agoJohn Healey resigns as defence secretary in disagreement with Starmer over spending – UK politics live | Politics
-
UK News4 weeks agoTwo arrests and three police officers injured in protest at asylum hotel
-
UK News4 weeks agoGermany v Curaçao: World Cup 2026 – live | World Cup 2026
-
Crime & Safety4 weeks agoEngland transplant team lift the Four Nations trophy
-
Crime & Safety4 weeks agoKing Charles and Camilla absent from Oxfordshire royal funeral
