Connect with us

UK News

Hegseth right to mock Royal Navy, says ex-army chief as he backs claims over military underfunding – UK politics live | Politics

Published

on


Hegseth right to mock Royal Navy, says ex-army chief as he backs claims over military underfunding

Good morning. When Keir Starmer gave evidence to the Commons liaison committee before the Easter recess, and when he made a statement to MPs yesterday on the first day after it was over, he was repeatedly asked when the government will publish its defence investment plan (DIP). On both occasions, he could not give a timetable and would just say it would be published as soon as it was ready.

His critics are furious because the DIP, a 10-year plan explaining how the government will fund its commitment to get defence spending up to 3% of GDP by the end of the next parliament, with total national security spending reaching 5% of GDP by 2035, was due to be published last autumn.

In particular, the DIP will explain how the government will be able to fulfil the goals set out in the strategic defence review it published last year. The review was led by the Labour peer George Robertson, a former defence secretary and former secretary general of Nato. And he seems to have finally lost patience with the government.

He is giving a speech in Salisbury tonight, but Lucy Fisher from the Financial Times has already written up some extracts and in them Robertson is withering about the Treasury. According to Fisher’s report, Robertson will accuse “non-military experts in the Treasury” of “vandalism”, adding: “We cannot defend Britain with an ever-expanding welfare budget.”

He will criticise Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, for devoting just 40 words to defence in her budget speech last year, and saying nothing about the topic at all in her spring statement last month. He will say:

double quotation markThere is a corrosive complacency today in Britain’s political leadership. Lip service is paid to the risks, the threats, the bright red signals of danger — but even a promised national conversation about defence can’t be started.

He will also say Britain is not safe.

double quotation markWe are underprepared. We are underinsured. We are under attack. We are not safe . . . Britain’s national security and safety is in peril.

Robertson is not a defence loudmouth. He is a quintessential establishment figure who for most of his career has avoided being provocative, or rocking the boat. If he feels minded to speak out like this, it must be serious.

Olivia Lee has a full write-up here.

This morning General Sir Richard Barrons, who along with Robertson was one of the three experts who wrote the defence review (the other was the former White House adviser and Russia expert Fiona Hill), gave an interview to the Today programme. Barrons, a former commander of Joint Forces Command, fully supported what Robertson will be saying in his speech. And he said that Britain’s armed forces are so diminished that he had to accept that Pete Hegseth, the US defence secretary, was right when he mocked the Royal Navy last month.

“Last time I checked, there was supposed to be a big, bad Royal Navy that could be prepared to do things like [clear the strait of Hormuz] as well,” Hegseth said.

Asked how he felt hearing that, Barrons said:

double quotation markLike many others I hung my head in sorrow. But I couldn’t argue with him because although the Royal Navy and the Royal Air Force and the army are, in their bones, outstanding institutions, they are simply too small and too undernourished to deal with the world that we we now live in. And the review says this.

Here is the agenda for the day.

Morning: Keir Starmer chairs cabinet. There will be a political session, as well as the usual government meeting.

10am: South East Water executives give evidence to the environment, food and rural affairs committee, followed by Ofwat chief executive Chris Walters at 11am.

10am: Education experts give evidence to the Commons education committee about the proposed changes to Send (special educational needs and disabilities) provision.

10.30am: Executives from TikTok, Meta, Sky TV and Paramount TV executives give evidence to the culture committee about children’s TV and video content.

Morning: Kemi Badenoch is on a visit in south London.

11am: Ed Davey, the Lib Dem leader, holds a press conference focusing on health.

11.30am: Wes Streeting, the health secretary, takes questions in the Commons.

Noon: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing.

Afternoon: Starmer meets his Dutch counterpart, Rob Jetten, in Downing Street.

If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (between 10am and 3pm), or message me on social media. I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.

If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary.

I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.

Share

Updated at 

Key events

Reeves condemns Trump’s decision to launch war against Iran as ‘folly’

Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, has described Donald Trump’s decision to go to war against Iran as “folly”.

She used the comment in an interview with the Daily Mirror, ahead of her trip to Washington for IMF meetings where she will discuss the global impact of the war with her counterparts.

Reeves has already said publicly that she is “angry” about the war, but she was blunter speaking to the Mirror. She said:

double quotation markThis is a war that we did not start. It was a war that we did not want. I feel very frustrated and angry that the US went into this war without a clear exit plan, without a clear idea of what they were trying to achieve. And as a result the strait of Hormuz is now blocked.

Asked why she was so angry, she explained:

double quotation markBecause of the impact it’s having on families and businesses in our country. When I presented the spring statement at the beginning of March, it showed that inflation was coming down, interest rates were projected to fall further after having been cut six times since I became chancellor of the exchequer.

Borrowing and debt were falling and the economy was set to grow. It was already the fastest growing G7 economy in Europe last year, and that was projected to continue

Obviously no sensible person is a supporter of the Iranian regime, but to start a conflict without being clear what the objectives are and not being clear about how you are going to get out of it, I do think that is a folly and it is one that is affecting families here in the UK but also families in the US and around the world.

Sometimes politicians make the news when they say things that are unusual or controversial. This is an example of the opposite sort of news; a politician making a statement of the bleeding obvious, but one that is still unexpected because, for reasons of tact or diplomacy, most of her colleagues would never say it in public.

In private, “folly” may be one of the milder things being said by government ministers about Trump’s war. But Reeves’s comment is still stronger than anything anyone else in the government has said openly.

Keir Starmer and his team have spent much of their time in office trying to avoid saying anything at all critical of Trump, for fear of offending him. But increasingly Trump’s conduct, and domestic political considerations too, are making that policy impossible to sustain.

Share



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

UK News

Mark Rutte says Nato needs ‘more forces, more resources’ ahead of defence ministers meeting– Europe live | World news

Published

on


Morning opening: G7 commits to ‘unwavering support for Ukraine’

Jakub Krupa

Jakub Krupa

Despite some early concerns about Donald Trump’s position, the G7 leaders meeting in France have agreed on a statement declaring their “unwavering support for Ukraine in defending its freedom, sovereignty, and territorial integrity.”

G7 leaders pose for a family photo during the G7 summit, in Evian, eastern France.
G7 leaders pose for a family photo during the G7 summit, in Evian, eastern France. Photograph: Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images

The statement, published overnight, says:

“We commend Ukraine for its resilience and progress on the battlefield in recent months and emphasise there is now a new momentum.

To support and accelerate this new momentum, we agree to increase the delivery of air defence capacities, additional systems and interceptors, and long-range capabilities.

We are also ready to consider extending to Ukraine the benefit of licenses to allow for an increase in Ukraine’s military production.”

In a classic Trump-era move, the statement on Ukraine also includes some pointed praise of the US president in a pointed attempt to keep him on side:

“We commit to increase the pressure on the Russian war economy. In this context, we will strengthen our sanctions, including those on the oil and gas sectors. We consider this the right moment to proceed with additional measures, as president Trump has delivered a deal that we support in reopening the strait of Hormuz.

I guess, whatever works, right?

The leaders will continue their talks today discussing economic growth and AI, with the latter session likely to get some attention as they will meet with the bosses of OpenAI and Anthropic.

Later tonight, France’s Emmanuel Macron will host the US president at the Palace of Versailles to mark the 250th anniversary of the US independence. Unusually enthused Trump said last night that it was “a real deal,” and that he was looking forward to it.

US president Donald Trump and French president Emmanuel Macron prior to a family photograph before a gala dinner as part of the G7 summit, in Evian, France.
US president Donald Trump and French president Emmanuel Macron prior to a family photograph before a gala dinner as part of the G7 summit, in Evian, France. Photograph: Jeanne Accorsini/SIPA/Shutterstock

Separately, we will hear from Nato’s secretary general Mark Rutte this morning ahead of tomorrow’s meeting of the alliance’s defence ministers – and less than a month before the much-dreaded Ankara summit, which once again will be all about keeping Trump on side.

Lots to cover today.

It’s Wednesday, 17 June 2026, it’s Jakub Krupa here, and this is Europe Live.

Good morning.

Share

Key events

Potential reopening of dialogue with Russia ‘clearly debated among allies,’ Rutte says

Rutte gets asked about potential reopening of channels with Russia, as advocated by some leaders, including Finland’s Alexander Stubb.

He says “clearly it is something debated among allies,” primarily through the EU, but it’s not something that came up at the Nato level so far.

“It’s really a discussion playing out in the EU at the moment, and of course we are following that, and will be supportive wherever we can.”

Share



Source link

Continue Reading

UK News

PM warns Burnham against immediate leadership challenge if he wins by-election

Published

on



Keir Starmer says Labour should focus on a subsequent Manchester mayoral race if Andy Burnham wins in Makerfield.



Source link

Continue Reading

UK News

World Cup 2026: England kick off in Dallas after big-hitting trio make mark – live | World Cup 2026

Published

on


Key events

Max Rushden and friends are coming in your ears with all the latest from the tournament.

Share



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending