Connect with us

Student Life

The Schwarzman Centre is a commercial venture, not a place of learning

Published

on


The House of Medici, an Italian banking family, donated an enormous amount of their wealth to support the arts in the 15th century, from funding the construction of Saint Peter’s Basilica and Florence Cathedral to patronising some of the most famous Renaissance painters, like Botticelli and da Vinci. Their money indelibly shaped not just their contemporaries, but the groundwork of much of Western canonical art.

This might seem a rather lofty bar with which to judge the contribution of Stephen A Schwarzman.  But, with Oxford University describing his donation as their single biggest “since the Renaissance”, it’s hard not to harken back to the civilisation-defining benevolence of the Medicis. Indeed, the CEO of the private equity firm Blackstone is estimated to have a net wealth of over $42bn, making him one of the 50 richest people on the planet – not a bad place from which to start a new era of Gilded Age-inspired philanthropy.

His donations to Oxford come to £185mn and have produced a new Centre for the Humanities – a single building in which seven faculties and two institutes come together, decked out with state-of-the-art music and theatre venues, a cinema, and exhibition spaces. The two-pronged vision is bold and enticing: an upgraded student experience and a way for the cloistered University to reach out to the public. The ‘Cultural Program’, launching in April 2026, offers an enormous range of exciting shows, giving Oxford a new artistic centre and locals a pleasant benefit from the University with which they (sometimes uneasily) co-inhabit the city. 

The neat concept, however, has in practice led to conflict. Rather than the student and public elements exhibiting a complementary relationship, the commercial side of the venture has dominated, sidelining students and moving the Centre uncomfortably away from the core operations of the University. 

Firstly, whilst the Centre is a substantial building (much of which operates at a subterranean level), its size fails to do justice to the huge number of faculties, students, and academics that it represents. This is evident in a number of ways: the faculties themselves, which circle the RadCam-inspired and proportioned Great Hall, are fairly small in size, and homogenous in design. Whilst a coloured kitchenette is a nice touch, the move for my own department (Philosophy) from the spacious and historic Georgian building on Woodstock Road to a few rooms on the second floor is quite hard to sell as an upgrade. 

Similarly, the Humanities Library, though bigger than it perhaps first appears, fails to adequately compensate for the libraries it supersedes. Books have had to be moved offsite to fit, and the number of dedicated seats in the library itself is less than the previous capacity. There are more if you count the other available seats in the building – but with no sound regulations, they are hardly a substitute when you need to hammer out an essay. Losing books and study space, whilst not quite the fire of Alexandria, is still disappointing for what promises to be an exultation of the Humanities in an age of their belittlement. 

It’s not just the library that is rammed: fewer large lecture rooms means that bookings are more competitive, introducing frictions into already-bureaucratised academic schedules. Indeed, many lectures remain in their old locations, and feel all-the-less pleasant for it. Making the bottom floor open to the public, whilst a charming way to potentially break down the town-gown divide, also necessarily means fewer seats for the students paying (at least) £9.5k a year for access. 

The worst issue, though, is financial. Schwarzman’s historical donation was enough to construct the largest Passivhaus university building in Europe – but as a one-time gift, not enough to keep it maintained. This has made the finances shaky, to say the least. Faculties have been squeezed as they are forced to pay higher rents; money is taken away from students and used to fund a truncated space. Far from being a boon for neglected studies, the Centre looks to be urging the cold free-market logic along. 

Even students lucky enough to be in the University are losing out. Prior to the Centre’s construction, a society of which I am a committee member could use our faculty’s multiple lecture rooms for free, with very little competition. Now, the task to get a room is Kafkaesque. After over 20 emails and multiple booking form requests, I was told that the society would be charged £200 an hour for use of the cinema to do a private film screening for our members. The attempt to charge an academic student society eye-watering amounts to use a room in their own faculty building exemplifies how the commercial imperative has vitiated student experience. 

In an almost paradoxical way, what should have been a desperately-needed and generous contribution to the Humanities, and the wider University, has actually reinforced the sense that Humanities students are unwanted money-suckers. Not long after the opening of the Centre, the Life and Mind Building, which hosts the Departments of Experimental Psychology and Biology, also opened its doors. If you looked at both buildings without any context, you’d be hard-pressed to tell, based on size alone, which was the home of two departments, which the home of more than three times as many. Rather than facilitating interdisciplinary study, locking all the Humanities students into a cramped part of OX2 and charging them more for it looks like another act in the long history of shunning artists and thinkers. It might be time for the music students to start busking outside.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Student Life

Oxford’s women fight back to win first Boat Race in almost a decade

Published

on


The Boat Race’s recent history has proved to be a morbid affair for Oxonians. Cambridge, boasting triumphant form, has returned year after year to defend a long streak of dominance on the Thames. Oxford’s Women’s Blue Boat have not won a Boat Race since 2016. Oxford’s men also suffer this streak of defeat – the last time they returned with a trophy was in 2022. None of Oxford’s four major crews have tasted victory since 2024, when the men’s reserve boat Isis won a narrow victory over Cambridge’s second boat, Goldie, on the Championship Course.

The Lightweight Races on Friday, 3rd April, did not forecast any change of fortune for Oxford, either. Cambridge’s men and women romped home to double-victory, whilst the light blues secured a narrow victory in the Veterans’ Races to top it all off. 

Conditions on race day were worse than last year, with high winds on the river producing the same choppy conditions the lightweight and veteran’s crews had battled the day prior. Intermittent breaks in sunlight did little to dissuade the heaving crowds who packed out the banks of the Thames to watch England’s two oldest universities battle it out. From Putney to Chiswick, the Tideway was roaring. 

The south and north sides of this stretch of the Thames are respectively referred to as Surrey and Middlesex, reflecting the historic county borders on either side of the river. Important when it comes to racing, free speed can be picked up by a boat that holds its stream well through the river corners, particularly around Hammersmith.

The first crews to take to the water were the women’s boats at 2.15pm. Off the bat, Oxford established a two-three lengths lead – one they would hold until they came across the finish line. Cambridge put in a valiant effort, but Oxford’s steady progress meant they were able to pull in front of the Cambridge boat and hold the ideal line, leaving Cambridge’s cox with no choice but to take what several watching Oxonians termed a ‘rogue’ line if they were to have any chance at all of closing the distance between themselves and their competitors. 

Nevertheless, Oxford’s women finished roughly ten seconds clear of Cambridge, marking the first time an Oxford blue boat has returned from the Thames with silverware in four years. Oxford thrashed the Thames with dominance as commentators proclaimed their victory, avenging last year’s defeat. For crew members Sarah Marshall and Annie Anezakis, the statistics accompanying this victory must have been particularly felt: this was the first time they had sat in a winning boat in their four years of Boat Race competition.

Between the Women’s and Men’s first boat races, the Reserve crews – Osiris and Isis from Oxford, Blondie and Goldie for Cambridge – took to the water. These crews stand out for the number of their rowers who began rowing within the Oxbridge collegiate system, a testament to the importance of intercollegiate competition, the strength of both towns’ rowing traditions, and the depth of talent rowing for each university. 

Despite spirited efforts from both Oxford crews, Blondie came across the finish a full nine lengths clear of Osiris, whilst Goldie walked away with the Men’s Reserve cup, putting a full 19 lengths on Isis. All crews confronted tricky conditions, with the tide turning over the course of the day and the wind whipping up waves that hammered at the sides of all the shells. 

Finally, the Men’s Blue’s boat’s took to the water. From the start, this was clearly a different affair from last year, when Cambridge took an early lead and never showed any sign of losing it. Spectators were treated to brilliant side-by-side racing, with marshals repeatedly warning both crews to leave space for the other, or risk a clash. 

Cambridge maintained a narrow lead, but for the first half of the race, Oxford refused to let their rivals put clear water between them, sitting squarely on Cambridge’s stern. This contest was possible due to Oxford maintaining a higher rate – taking more strokes per minute – than Cambridge. The light blues appeared instead to focus on clean, powerful rowing. At last, Oxford’s high rate saw the men befall the same fate as Cambridge’s women had just an hour earlier, tiring after the first half of the race and allowing the gap they had established between their opponents to stretch away from them: with a three and a half lengths lead, Cambridge crossed the line to secure a fourth straight victory in the men’s race.

Cantabridgians in the crowd were understandably jubilant at the victories their crews continue to walk away with. Yet, Oxonians did not leave the banks of the Thames crestfallen. Instead, the air was full of respect as the rivals acknowledged the results as an accurate reflection of the current capabilities of both clubs. A mixture of joy and relief was felt, for Oxford had walked away with at least one of the main trophies.

Cambridge University Boat Club continues to boast strong form, certainly. Oxford University Boat Club showed up on the Thames Saturday last to remind Cambridge that it can never be counted out of contention.



Source link

Continue Reading

Student Life

Oxford’s women triumph in historic 80th boat race

Published

on


An historic sporting challenge

The stakes were high for Oxford going into this year’s annual boat race against Cambridge, who have proved dominant over much of the past decade.

A truly memorable and spirited contest on the river today. I could not be prouder of all our crews and coaches.

The University of Oxford’s Vice-Chancellor, Professor Irene Tracey CBE FRS FMedSci

An event harking back to 1829, this year marked the 171st men’s boat race, and the 80th women’s race. Since 2015, both races have been held on the same day and the same Championship Course. The 4.25-mile stretch of the river Thames is more than three times the distance of a standard Olympic rowing course, running through west London between Putney and Mortlake.

Oxford dominate the 80th women’s boat race

Olympic bronze medallist Heidi Long led the Oxford women’s crew as stroke, joined by fellow veteran rowers Annie Anezakis and Sarah Marshall who have rowed as Oxford blues three times previously. For the first time since 2004 the race featured a sibling rivalry, with Oxford rower Lilli Freischem going head-to-head against her sister Mia representing Cambridge.

Cambridge’s women won the coin toss and, in a departure from their previous year’s strategy, chose Surrey station, seeking the strategic advantage it would confer of being on the inside bend at Hammersmith Bridge.

But Oxford’s seasoned cox, Louis Corrigan, together with stroke Heidi Long, knew exactly how to respond. Seizing the opportunity of the calmest waters at the start of the course, they erupted from Middlesex station at great pace, stealing an early lead from Cambridge, and swiftly putting their rivals on the backfoot.

Both teams battled to take advantage of the fast-flowing central tidal waters, but three minutes into the race, Oxford were clear of the Cambridge boat, clocking 36 strokes per minute, with Long keeping up the ambitious pace for her crew.

Going into the first mile point, Cambridge trailed Oxford by 4.5 seconds. They raised their stroke rate to 38 per minute going under Hammersmith Bridge, determined to regain a leadership position going into the Hammersmith bend, but Oxford pulled clear and held the most efficient line.

Coming out of Surrey bend, strong winds clashed with the incoming tide, creating white-capped waves. Going into the eleventh minute, Cambridge’s cox set a bold route for his crew, using his local knowledge of the Thames to seek a more wind-sheltered route, sacrificing the faster-flowing tidal current in pursuit of flatter surface water. But Oxford responded defiantly, with cox Corrigan steering in front of the Cambridge boat and taking control of the inner path.

Oxford held the advantage approaching the three-quarter mark at Barnes Bridge. The rowers’ faces showed the tenacity required to keep Cambridge at bay. Turning into the final stretch, both crews faced a long slog against strong headwinds.

Having reduced Oxford’s lead to eight seconds, Cambridge launched another attack, crossing the river once again to take a tight inside line. But Oxford held their nerve, and sustained their unrelenting pace. Pulling three boat lengths clear of Cambridge they secured a decisive victory, ending a nine-year dry spell and reclaiming the trophy.

Cambridge claim victory in the men’s race

Cambridge were regarded as the favourites going into this year’s men’s race, having recently beaten the British and Dutch national eights in development team fixtures.

Oxford’s men chase Cambridge in the 2026 Boat Race. Image credit: The Boat Race

Winning the coin toss, Cambridge’s men similarly chose to start from Surrey station, forcing Oxford once again onto the less-favoured Middlesex launch.

With expectations high, Cambridge fired out of the blocks at 47 strokes per minute. But Oxford’s men responded in kind, defying expectations and keeping pace with their rivals.

The umpire called on both crews to hold their lines and avoid oar clashes as both crews chased the fast water. Oxford’s men held on tightly, trailing by just two seconds at the five-minute mark, and still in close pursuit of their rivals crossing the half-way point.

Going into the eleventh minute, the Cambridge crew successfully manoeuvred ahead of Oxford, consolidating their lead and going on to claim victory. Oxford’s crew kept Cambridge under pressure throughout, finishing less than four boat lengths behind. This marks the seventh win for Cambridge’s men out of the past eight Boat Races.

A globally-watched tradition

With an estimated 200,000 spectators watching from the banks of the river Thames, and millions of people viewing broadcasts around the world, the Oxford and Cambridge Boat Race is one of the most renowned and historic amateur sporting events.

The University of Oxford’s Vice-Chancellor, Professor Irene Tracey CBE FRS FMedSci, said, ‘A truly memorable and spirited contest on the river today. I could not be prouder of all our crews and coaches. It’s been a long time coming but how thrilling to see Oxford’s women securing an historic victory today – huge congratulations to one and all. The physical and mental grit on display today was so inspiring alongside the technical skill they showed in the face of ever-challenging river conditions. Thanks to all the supporters, and my warmest congratulations go also to the winning Cambridge crews and coaches.’

The records now stand as 89-81 in the favour of Cambridge Men and 49-31 in the favour of Cambridge Women.

Find out more about The Boat Race 2026.

See also: Men’s Boat Race results and Women’s Boat Race results.



Source link

Continue Reading

Student Life

New RAI donation to fund Oxford’s first US politics postgraduate course

Published

on


The Rothermere American Institute (RAI) has announced a major donation to fund a new Associate Professorship in US Politics and support the launch of a specialist postgraduate course in the field.

The post, known as the “Churchill Chair”, will be the University of Oxford’s first permanent academic position dedicated to US politics. The role is intended to expand Oxford’s teaching and research in an area that has previously lacked a dedicated postgraduate offering.

Alongside the new chair, the RAI plans to use the anonymous donation to introduce a one-year Master’s degree in contemporary US politics and government. If launched, it would mark the first time Oxford has offered a specialist postgraduate course focused solely on American politics.

A spokesperson for the Institute told Cherwell that the development would be key to Oxford’s broader strategy for strengthening its study of US politics and international relations. The spokesperson added that: “We have a high profile in the US and a long tradition of studying America ‘from the outside in’.” The Institute regularly hosts public events and runs the podcast The Last Best Hope?, positioning itself as a hub for debate and analysis on the United States.

The decision to launch a new postgraduate course comes amid renewed focus on the US’s global role. In a comment to Cherwell, the Institute explained that recent political developments have made “more explicit the underlying reality of the asymmetrical nature of the UK-US relationship”, adding that “everyone thinks they know America because it is culturally so dominant” but that this can obscure the need for more “clear, evidence-based” academic analysis. Professor Adam Smith, Director of the RAI, described the donation as an “extraordinary vote of confidence” in the Institute’s work.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending