Traffic & Transport
Heathrow isn’t crowded, it’s travellers walking on the wrong side, boss says | Heathrow airport
Heathrow airport has revealed a crowding problem that a third runway cannot solve: British and foreign travellers walk on different sides, and keep colliding, according to its chief executive.
Thomas Woldbye said that while Heathrow serviced more passengers in a smaller overall area than comparable European hubs, part of the London airport’s trouble was the differing continental sense of direction.
Speaking at an industry event, the Danish boss said one reason people thought Terminal 5, the main terminal used by British Airways, was crowded was that people were “in the wrong place”.
In comments to the Aviation Club UK, he said: “The problem is that all the British people keep to the left and normally Europeans keep to the right. And they do that in both directions.
“So we can be crashing into each other, and I see that from personal experience.”
Woldbye said that while “I have jokes with our people”, it was an issue that could be changed. “We just need to make sure that everybody going this way keeps to the left and this way to the right. I know that’s simplified but that is the sort of thinking that we need,” he said.
Heathrow will build more satellite terminals should it succeed with plans for a third runway, which could add about 40 million extra passengers of varying directional preferences to the mix. The 240,000 extra flights a year will be guided by air traffic control.
Woldbye said even with expansion, backed by the government, rival international hubs would grow faster than Heathrow. “London will lose market share every single year for the next 10 years. I think that should be a serious concern,” he said.
Meanwhile, the airport is attempting to address concerns that a third runway is incompatible with the UK’s 2050 net zero goals by accelerating the use of sustainable aviation fuels (SAF).
It has established an £80m pot – paid from landing charges – to subsidise airlines that choose to use more SAF on top of the minimum required under national mandates.
The mix of aviation fuel in the UK must average at least 3.6% SAF over the course of 2026, but Heathrow expects to hit a self-imposed target of 5.6%, helping airlines to cover some of the additional cost of the more expensive cleaner fuel.
Planes running on SAF – so far largely produced from recycled cooking oil – emit equal amounts of CO2 in flight as those using fossil fuels, but the net carbon footprint is calculated as lower because of the “life cycle”, ie how it is produced compared with normal jet fuel. SAF is regarded as a potential solution to significantly decarbonise long-haul aviation, although many remain sceptical.
Matt Gorman, Heathrow’s director of sustainability, said: “We have looked to use our scale and influence to attract SAF and we’ve shown you can get SAF flowing. The next challenge is stimulating domestic production – from a carbon, but also a energy security and growth perspective.”
Duncan McCourt, the chief executive of industry group Sustainable Aviation, said government pledges to start building five UK fuel plants by 2025 had been “optimistic”, with none yet under construction, but added they were making progress. “There is a real economic growth opportunity, for tens of thousands of jobs in the UK by 2050,” McCourt said.
Provisional figures published this week showed that the 2025 supply met the UK’s first annual fuel mandate of 2% SAF, with high uptake in the final months of the year after fears that the industry would miss the target.
Traffic & Transport
Marriage: more than a paper exercise | Marriage
I enjoyed Polly Hudson’s wisdom on marriage (I know it’s taboo – but I’m a big fan of marriage, 9 June). However, I think she was fundamentally wrong when she wrote: “The haters say marriage is ‘just a piece of paper’, which is fundamentally true”. That would be like saying my degree is only the certificate. In both cases the significance is that which it points towards – something no physical object can truly capture.
Rev Martin Joss
Peterborough
Allow me, a number theorist, to lend support to Ian Harley (Letters, 10 June), and make some sense of the phrase “such fun’’ for Steve Lupton (Letters, 11 June). Many scientists start with fun and enjoyment when young, followed by agony and frustration in their research, but always sustained by the beauty and amazement of their discoveries.
Peter Shiu
Sheffield
David Smith concludes that the US president “has too much power for someone with so little connection to reality” (As Donald Trump turns 80, he faces a foe he can never defeat: Father Time. That’s a problem for us all, 14 June). Doubly worrying that the same can be said of the world’s first trillionaire.
Mark de Brunner
Harrogate, North Yorkshire
Further to Sally Goldsmith’s “Is this bus going to Jump” (Letters, 10 June), a Welsh friend who used to visit me in Manchester would say, “I’ve just seen a bus for Sale”.
Julian Dorr
Wymondham, Norfolk
In the 1970s, the Bradford Argus always called David Hockney: “The mayor of Bradford’s brother” (David Hockney obituary, 12 June).
Angela Singer
Cambridge
Traffic & Transport
Puzzled by occult clue’s mysticism solution | Crosswords
So Julian of Norwich was table-turning? Since when has mysticism been a synonym for a belief in the occult (Quick crossword, 9 June). Saints’ bones will be turning in their tombs.
Christopher Cook
Deal, Kent
I see an alarming trend in your report (9 June). It seems “children are more likely to be bitten by dogs than adults”. Please can you publish the number of incidents of children being bitten by adults?
Vee Singleton
Framlingham, Suffolk
Unless a valid reason is given for denying the referee Omar Artan entry to the US, the other World Cup referees should go on strike (Top African referee Omar Artan refused access to US and will miss World Cup, 8 June).
Frank Cosgrove
Presteigne, Powys
I read Ian Harley’s letter (10 June) about the nine times table and other number bases carefully. I think I understood most of it. The bit I really could not make any sense of was the last phrase: “Such fun.”
Steve Lupton
Prestwich, Greater Manchester
As a Speke lad, I know that the train to Speke would never speak (Letters, 10 June), because there isn’t one – we don’t have a railway station. However, the joke I grew up with was: “What is the quickest way to get a parrot to speak?” The answer: “On an 82 bus.”
Rev Frank Cain
Liverpool
I had a similar quip after running for a bus, when I asked the driver if he was the No 1, as I hadn’t checked. He replied that his wife thought so.
Ann Spencer
Newcastle upon Tyne
Traffic & Transport
Sole survivor of Air India crash demands ‘honesty and answers’ one year on | Air India Ahmedabad plane crash
The only survivor of the Air India plane crash that killed 260 people in June 2025 has called for “honesty, transparency and answers” a year on from the disaster, and spoken about his “significant psychological scars” and financial hardship.
Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, a British national, has previously described his fate as a “miracle” after being the only person to survive the incident, in which a Boeing 787 Dreamliner struck a medical college shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad airport.
The crash killed 241 people onboard the London-bound flight, including 169 Indian nationals and 52 Britons, as well as 19 people who were on or near the site of the incident. A further 67 were seriously injured.
Ramesh, who lost his brother in the crash, demanded answers as investigators are yet to publish their findings. Last month, India’s civil aviation minister said the investigation was in the “last stage” and the report would “mostly” be finished by the anniversary of the crash, on 12 June.
Exactly 30 days after the crash last year, the Indian authorities released a preliminary report, which was in line with standard procedure. It found both of the plane’s fuel switches had moved to the “cut-off” position “immediately” after take-off, stopping fuel supply to the engine.
Speaking to the Press Association, Ramesh said there were more “unanswered questions” he wanted addressed, and that his trauma had not ended on the day of the crash. “I live with the significant psychological scars, the loss of my brother, and the constant unanswered questions around how and why this happened,” he said.
“I know those questions are not just on my mind; they are on the minds of every affected family. More than anything, people need honesty, transparency and answers. Nothing will ever change what happened, but families deserve clarity.”
Ramesh has received £21,500 from Air India to support his wife and five-year-old son, according to his representative, Sanjiv Patel, but continues to face financial hardship as well as psychological and emotional.
“We’ve repeatedly asked to meet the chief executive of Air India but that has not happened,” Patel said. “We recently met with executives of Air India and representatives connected to the Tata Group [which has a controlling stake in the business].
“Those discussions were constructive and have resulted in some positive progress, although a number of important issues remain under discussion.”
Patel said that, due to the impact of the crash, Ramesh had not been able to return to work as normal and his family was living on less than £1,000 a month.
Ramesh is also taking civil action. Patel said: “Despite one of the worst aviation disasters involving British citizens in recent years, neither Vishwash nor many of the affected families we have spoken to have received any direct contact or tailored support from the UK government.”
An Air India spokesperson confirmed that representatives from Air India and the Tata Group had met Ramesh, and remained in “close contact” with him and his team. The company said they were “actively working to ensure that appropriate support continues to be extended to him”.
Paul McClorry at Hudgell Solicitors said civil claims were being considered against a number of potential defendants. “We are awaiting the findings of the investigations, and we should finally start to see some clarity as to how and why this awful disaster happened, and, crucially, how it could have been avoided,” he said.
The UK Foreign Office has been approached for comment.
-
Crime & Safety4 weeks agoWhat happens to Halifax customers if Lloyds makes changes?
-
Crime & Safety4 weeks agoFlock of clay birds set to take flight in special exhibition
-
Oxford News4 weeks agoActor steps down from major role in new Harry Potter series
-
Crime & Safety4 weeks agoOxfordshire bridge closure comes as management ‘weaknesses’ found
-
Crime & Safety4 weeks agoFriends of the Ridgeway appoint Matthew Barber as president
-
Oxford News4 weeks agoNHS fracture service helps support extra 1,000 patients
-
Oxford News4 weeks agoHenley pub once owned by Russell Brand reopens after 6 years
-
UK News4 weeks agoThe race to replace Starmer is on – but he still faces a momentous choice
