Traffic & Transport
Does Bedford train crash raise wider questions about safety? | Rail transport
The crash between two East Midlands Railway trains on Friday was shocking not only for the large number of casualties but also for its nature and circumstances – occurring on an upgraded main railway line with new trains, modern signalling and none of the apparent external factors such as extreme weather or leaf fall that have contributed to recent notable accidents.
Specialist investigators from the Rail Accident Investigation Branch and British Transport Police are yet to release any details and have cautioned against speculation.
Network Rail has said the “current indications are that this was a tragic, isolated incident”. Whether that statement means a specific factor has emerged, or simply reflects the rarity of such a terrible event, is unclear.
Investigators will be examining what could have allowed the collision given the multiple failsafes in modern signalling and trains.
Why did the first train stop?
The southbound East Midlands Railway (EMR) train from Nottingham to London St Pancras came to a halt on the track just south of Bedford. According to unverified reports in the Telegraph, the driver may have made a stop to report a fault with the automatic warning system, linking the train to the signalling. The train was a brand-new Aurora class 810 model built by Hitachi, brought into service within the last six months on EMR.
Why did the second train fail to stop?
The EMR Luton airport express from Corby had stopped at Bedford and switched to the fast track, and collided with the Nottingham-London train a couple of miles south of the station at Elstow. A functioning signalling system would normally display a red signal when a train was stopped in front. If a driver fails to spot the red light – a signal passed at danger – automatic train protection systems should apply the brakes. Images from the crash suggest that the train was not going anywhere near full speed.
What was the context of the crash?
This is a heavily used part of the UK’s rail network, with Thameslink commuter trains running on the main line alongside EMR services. Years of work has taken place across the Midland main line to upgrade and electrify the track for more capacity and faster services between St Pancras and the East Midlands. Only last year did Network Rail complete the work to allow the new Hitachi bimode trains to run at a higher top speed of 125mph south of Bedford to London.
Temperatures last Friday were hot but well below the mark where Network Rail limits train speeds in case direct sun causes rails to buckle – although such restrictions could follow in the later phases of the heatwave forecast for this week.
Are there now wider questions about safety?
The last crash in Britain where a passenger train hit the back of another service on the same line occurred in Clapham in 1988, killing 35 people. In the darkest times from then through the years immediately after privatisation, when Railtrack was in charge of failing infrastructure, the railway’s culture appeared to be a petri dish for disaster.
But renewed investment and a laser focus on health and safety helped Britain maintain a pre-eminent safety record in Europe: after 2007, no passenger died in a UK train accident for more than a decade.
In the last six years there have been four particularly serious accidents: in Stonehaven in Scotland, where three people died after a landslide sent a ScotRail train over an embankment; collisions between passenger trains in service at Salisbury in 2021, and in Talerddig, Powys, in 2024 where one person died; and now the Bedford crash.
Traffic & Transport
M60 traffic: Rush hour chaos as 'police-led incident' sparks motorway closure
A stretch of the motorway has been closed due to a police-led incident.
Source link
Traffic & Transport
‘Leicester Square, please guv’: Self-driving taxis cleared for London streets ‘later this summer’ | Self-driving cars
The taxi app company Uber and the autonomous technology developer Wayve have been granted the first minicab licences in London, allowing them to offer self-driving taxi rides to paying customers – but with a human safety driver in place, for now.
The companies said they would start trips in the UK “later this summer” before the full public launch.
The San Francisco-headquartered Uber and London-based Wayve are racing against the Google-owned Waymo and its Chinese equivalent Baidu’s Apollo Go to launch self-driving taxi services in London. Their progress is being watched closely because the British capital will be one of the first cities in the world to have American and Chinese tech firms operating on the same roads.
Uber and Wayve said more than 100,000 Londoners were on their waiting list for the self-driving taxis.
Transport for London (TfL), the capital’s licensing authority, granted 15 private hire vehicle licences to Ford Mustang Mach-E vehicles equipped with Wayve’s artificial intelligence driving software, as well as surround cameras and radar. The companies said TfL had confirmed they reached the required safety standards.
A TfL-licensed private hire driver will sit in the driver’s seat during trips to intervene if necessary, although the software is expected to control the car.
The next step, of operating the taxis without a driver, will require Uber and Wayve to seek approval via a new process, known as an automated passenger services permit, with the government’s Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency.
TfL said it would monitor the use of the vehicles, and was ready to intervene if passenger safety was compromised.
A TfL spokesperson said: “Safety is our top priority. Any new vehicle licensed to carry passengers on London’s roads must align with our Vision Zero goal of eliminating all deaths and serious injuries from collisions on London’s streets by 2041.”
Wayve, which was co-founded by the New Zealand-born Alex Kendall, has been testing its tech in London since 2018 with safety drivers. In previous demonstrations to the Guardian the car has navigated most of the obstacles of north London’s busy roads, although the safety driver was forced to intervene at one point.
Sarah Gates, Wayve’s vice-president for global affairs and assurance, said: “This licence is an important step towards giving Londoners the chance to experience autonomous driving technology.
“The responsible deployment of these vehicles will bring us safer, cleaner and quieter streets, and we’re proud to continue working alongside regulators, communities and the public as we take the next steps towards making autonomous rides a reality in the capital.”
Driverless taxi services are already operating in several cities around the world, although mainly in the US and China, where most of the software developers are based. However, US companies are essentially blocked from China, and vice versa, meaning they have not had to compete directly.
after newsletter promotion
Uber abandoned its own efforts to develop self-driving technology in 2020, but it is working with several partners around the world who are in turn using different systems. That includes the Chinese company WeRide, which is operating driverless taxis in Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Wayve is also working with the Japanese manufacturer Nissan on integrating its tech in private cars.
Uber’s global head of autonomous mobility operations, Annie Duvnjak, said: “This licence is a key milestone in bringing autonomous rides to London on Uber.
“Our interest list has seen an incredible response from Londoners who are excited to experience Wayve’s British-built autonomous driving technology.”
The news came as Uber reported better than expected second-quarter gross bookings of $58.02bn (£43bn), but said earnings for the next quarter would fall below Wall Street forecasts.
Uber said earnings per share would come in between 84 cents and 88 cents, compared with analysts’ expectations of 89 cents, with foreign exchange costs trimming booking growth.
The company also outlined plans to spend more than $10bn on autonomous vehicles over the coming years, although it did not provide a specific timeline.
Traffic & Transport
Gatwick airport to open second runway after legal challenge fails | Gatwick airport
Gatwick airport is to start development of its second runway after campaigners lost a legal challenge to the plans.
The court of appeal on Tuesday dismissed a bid by local campaign groups to challenge an earlier high court ruling that the scheme could proceed.
The £2.2bn project, approved by the transport secretary, Heidi Alexander, in September, will allow about 100,000 more flights a year to use Britain’s second busiest airport.
Pierre-Hugues Schmit, the Gatwick chief executive, said the airport was “very pleased that this ruling brings to an end an eight-year planning and legal process which has carefully tested and scrutinised every aspect of our expansion plans on multiple occasions”.
The plans will involve the West Sussex airport slightly repositioning its emergency runway and using it routinely for short-haul passenger aircraft. It is now among the busiest single-runway airports in the world, but hopes to have the second runway in operation as early as 2030.
The government declared the court ruling a “major milestone for Gatwick and for local communities”.
Alexander said: “Around 13 million more passengers and 100,000 more flights will give holidaymakers greater choice and strengthen global links to help make the UK one of the most attractive places in the world to invest.
“We’ll back expansion that supports growth and our climate goals. To drive forward sustainable change, we’re also investing more than £219m for green fuel production to cut emissions from flying and secure the future of aviation.”
Campaigners had sought a judicial review of the Department for Transport’s decision to approve the plans, arguing that the government did not properly assess the scheme’s climate impact.
after newsletter promotion
One of the applicants, Peter Barclay, the chair of Gatwick Area Conservation Campaign, said he was disappointed with the ruling but added: “It is time for governments to wake up and realise that saying yes to the expansion of any and every airport will not kickstart the economy … It will further lock in aviation’s climate, noise and air pollution impacts, increase congestion on roads and public transport and blight local communities.”
Meanwhile, Luton Rising, the council-owned company behind Luton airport, announced that all legal challenges to its expansion plans had now been cleared. The supreme court has dismissed any final possibility of appealing a high court ruling last November upholding Alexander’s signoff on plans to increase the airport’s annual capacity from 19 million to 32 million passengers by the mid-2040s.
The airport owner said it would create up to 11,000 new jobs and generate up to an additional £1.5bn in annual economic activity, and pledged strict controls on noise and carbon emissions, air quality and surface access to the airport.
-
Business & Technology3 weeks agoHSBC UK & Visa test AI shopping with live payments
-
Business & Technology4 weeks agoMouser warns against viral hacks to cool overheating phones
-
Business & Technology3 weeks agoValarian lands USD $50 million backing for sovereign AI
-
Oxford News4 weeks agoNew romantasy bookshop attracts queues of customers
-
Business & Technology4 weeks agoKane tops England influencer rankings after Mexico win
-
Business & Technology4 weeks agoSNP & Palantir launch AI tools for SAP transformations
-
Oxford News4 weeks agoDWP now checking bank accounts for Universal Credit and Pension Credit
-
Oxford Events4 weeks agoHenley Festival 2026 highlights: Five nights of unforgettable performances and festival moments
