SOFIAH NICHOLE SALIVIO

News Editor

D-Wave has published research showing that 41% of large UK enterprises expect quantum computing to unlock more than £100 million in value within a year.

The survey found that 65% of UK businesses are already adopting or piloting the technology.

The findings suggest a shift in how large companies view quantum computing, from early exploration to practical use cases. Of those surveyed, 26% said their organisation is actively adopting quantum computing, while 39% are testing it through pilot projects or proof-of-concept work.

Board-level interest is also rising. One in five business leaders said quantum computing is already a strategic priority for their organisation, while 34% described it as an emerging business tool.

Censuswide conducted the research among 1,003 senior business decision-makers across the UK. The results suggest that businesses with direct experience of quantum computing place a higher commercial value on it than those taking a wait-and-see approach.

Organisations already engaging with quantum estimated nearly twice the commercial value of those waiting for the technology to mature. They were also more likely to say it is already delivering value today, with 37% of active users holding that view, compared with 16% of business leaders overall.

Operational focus

The strongest near-term interest centred on optimisation tasks. Respondents identified workforce scheduling, resource allocation, supply chain management and manufacturing processes as areas where better optimisation could deliver benefits.

Ninety per cent cited workforce scheduling, 89% resource allocation, 88% supply chain optimisation and 82% manufacturing processes. These areas often involve large numbers of variables, time pressure and cost constraints, making them suitable targets for alternative computing methods.

D-Wave linked that interest to annealing quantum computing, which it said is well suited to solving optimisation problems. The company has long focused on that part of the market as it positions quantum systems for business applications rather than purely academic work.

AI pressure

The survey also linked interest in quantum computing to dissatisfaction with current AI returns and concern about the infrastructure needed to support further growth in compute-heavy workloads. More than a third of business leaders said AI had delivered some return on investment but had not met expectations.

Nearly two-thirds said they were concerned that existing energy infrastructure may not support continued growth in AI and other compute-intensive technologies. Against that backdrop, 87% said quantum computing could help optimise AI-related processes and other complex computational challenges.

This suggests some businesses now view quantum not as a distant replacement for existing systems, but as a tool for specific bottlenecks that conventional computing and AI struggle to address efficiently.

Barriers remain

Despite the strong interest, respondents also pointed to obstacles to wider use. Cost was the most frequently cited barrier, mentioned by 46%, followed by a lack of internal expertise at 33% and limited awareness at 30%.

These figures indicate that, even as uptake increases, many businesses still lack the skills and internal understanding needed to assess where the technology could be useful. The findings also suggest quantum computing remains at an uneven stage of adoption, with some companies building familiarity while others are still defining the business case.

D-Wave said broader quantum literacy will need to extend beyond technical teams if businesses are to use the technology more widely in planning, optimisation and decision-making. For many large organisations, that would require senior leaders in operations, finance and strategy to understand where quantum tools fit alongside existing software and infrastructure.

The company, one of the earliest commercial suppliers of quantum computers, has argued that practical business use is emerging now rather than remaining years away. Its latest UK survey reflects a market in which expectations are rising, but commercial adoption still depends on clearer use cases, internal expertise and proof of returns.

“The era of enterprise quantum computing adoption has arrived. Companies are no longer asking if they should explore quantum, but how quickly they can implement it,” said Murray Thom, Vice President of Quantum Technology Evangelism at D-Wave.

“This study shows that UK organisations increasingly see quantum computing as a practical tool for tackling real business challenges, from supply chain optimisation to manufacturing to AI. As a result, we are beginning to see the Quantum Effect take shape across the UK market,” Thom said.

SOFIAH NICHOLE SALIVIO

News Editor

Technology and supply chain executives say gaps in infrastructure, data and skills are slowing sustainability efforts as UK businesses mark World Environment Day. Senior leaders from Fluke, Fluent Commerce and Blue Yonder have identified reliability, orchestration and transparency as critical fault lines.

Electric vehicle infrastructure, retail fulfilment and global logistics are under scrutiny as organisations face rising regulatory and consumer expectations. Their comments suggest a shift from headline climate pledges to deeper operational change across transport and supply chains.

In the UK electric vehicle market, charging reliability is emerging as the main concern. Industry data shows rapid growth in vehicle sales, but use of public chargers remains uneven and often frustrating for drivers.

Theo Brillhart, Technology Director, R&D at Fluke, said charging infrastructure is now falling behind consumer demand despite strong vehicle adoption. He identified reliability, maintenance and standards as the main pressure points.

“The UK was the biggest EV market in Europe in 2024, and adoption is still rising. The momentum is clear, yet at the moment, this cleaner energy option is lagging behind demand. EV charging reliability is not where it needs to be to support the growing number of consumers who are keen to invest in an EV. Instead, charging anxiety is overtaking range anxiety, with a recent Fluke survey underlining this – respondents cited charger maintenance, inoperable chargers, and software incompatibility as major hurdles. Drivers need confidence that a charger will work, and that the infrastructure behind it is dependable. Interoperability efforts are showing great progress, but technical standards alone cannot guarantee reliable access. This is why maintenance is now becoming a strategic priority. Reactive work restores service after vandalism or unexpected failures, whereas preventative approaches take this a step further by using data and analytics to identify issues before they cause outages. Consistency also depends on thoroughly trained technicians being equipped with advanced diagnostic tools and being able to work under consistent standards. Without this alignment, outcomes vary, maintenance costs increase, and the inconsistency translates to consumer frustration. As sustainable organisations try to encourage more people to make the shift, it’s evident that there is still a way to go before we can say goodbye to fossil fuels in the automotive industry. Dependable charging is essential to scaling EV adoption, and strengthening the industry as a whole. If EV charging organisations invest in futureproofing both their workforce and their infrastructure maintenance, EV adoption rates can continue to increase, bringing us one step closer to a more renewable world.”

Retailers and brands face a different tension as they balance consumer demand for fast delivery and easy returns with environmental impact. Technology suppliers say sustainability metrics now feature in most procurement processes.

Abdelkader Keddari, VP, Global Strategic Solutions at Fluent Commerce, said customers and shoppers are pushing vendors and retailers towards stricter environmental criteria, even as expectations for convenience keep rising.

“Many organisations now find themselves stuck between a rock and a hard place when it comes to balancing sustainability with business needs and innovation. Sustainability is no longer optional: all of our clients and prospects are embedding sustainable criteria into their selection of new technology solutions, and expect vendors to demonstrate clear, measurable commitments. Consumers are also increasingly concerned with their green footprint, with a third of those in the UK trying to shop “responsibly”. On the other hand, demand for fast delivery, affordable products and easy returns processes is stronger than ever. At the same time, technologies such as AI are opening up new opportunities to improve both operational efficiency and customer experience, raising expectations further. This means technology providers must not only enable sustainability for their customers, but also lead by example by demonstrating their own initiatives, from green IT practices to responsible infrastructure and more efficient resource usage. So how can businesses manage to fulfil those desires in a sustainable way? In many cases, technology becomes the key enabler to reconcile these competing priorities, especially when it is designed to drive smarter, real-time decision-making across the entire order lifecycle. The real challenge is not just visibility, but orchestration, ensuring that every order is fulfilled in the most efficient and sustainable way possible. Retail businesses that invest in modern order management software, increasingly enhanced by AI, have a much better chance of meeting their customers’ needs while improving sustainability outcomes. This software helps retailers ensure that the right products are available at the right time, reducing overproduction and the risk of waste. Beyond inventory optimisation, it enables a much more intelligent approach to fulfilment. For example, the system can automatically select the most appropriate fulfilment location based on proximity, reducing transport distances and emissions. It can also encourage customers to accept slightly longer delivery times in exchange for consolidated shipments from a single warehouse, helping to avoid split deliveries. In urban areas, fulfilment can be optimised further by enabling low-emission last-mile delivery options such as bike or electric vehicle couriers, while clearly managing customer expectations around delivery windows and availability. Finally, click and collect can be actively promoted as part of the fulfilment strategy, allowing customers to integrate pickup into their existing travel routines and eliminate the need for home delivery altogether. While these kinds of changes can make a huge difference to the sustainability of a brand, they require top-down investment into the technology to make them possible. AI should not be seen as a standalone solution, but a capability that can amplify the effectiveness of core systems. Whilst it may seem like a large investment initially, the long-term dividends in terms of the benefits to the planet and to the brand’s public reputation are invaluable.”

Supply chain leaders see similar pressure from new regulation and the shift towards circular economy models. European rules on product design and emissions disclosure are reshaping investment in logistics and warehouse systems.

Saskia van Gendt, Chief Sustainability Officer at Blue Yonder, said traditional supply chains still favour volume and linear flows, sitting uneasily with efforts to cut waste and track emissions.

“Global supply chains are built for scale, not sustainability, but that model is increasingly at odds with regulatory, environmental and commercial priorities. Overproduction remains a growing and costly challenge for businesses, leading to unsold inventory, markdowns and waste. At the same time, new regulations demand much greater transparency across supply chains, with the focus shifting toward Scope 3 emissions. The EU’s Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), for example, is pushing businesses to increase recycled content and address barriers such as costly reverse logistics. For businesses looking to operate more sustainably, the business case for circular supply chains is becoming increasingly compelling. However, many organisations still lack the infrastructure to collect, analyse and report on sustainability data at scale. Logistics and warehousing processes were designed one-directionally, meaning returns processing for recycling or reuse can be complicated. This, coupled with a lack of full supply chain transparency into where materials come from or what happens to them after disposal, means companies are missing opportunities for recovery and resource optimisation. AI-powered systems can provide end-to-end visibility across all supply chain tiers, enabling companies to trace materials, assess environmental impact and ensure regulatory compliance. These solutions also reduce the complexity and cost of reverse logistics by identifying network efficiencies, supporting the recovery and reuse of post-consumer and post-industrial materials. Technology is driving significant improvements in the way organisations can approach sustainability, getting us closer to a truly circular economy.”

Liquidators for OxStem Limited, which was based on Park End Street in Oxford, has asked for those who claim to be owed money by the firm to prove their debts by June 19.

In particular this call is aimed at ‘unsecured creditors’, meaning an individual or business which has loaned money without taking collateral to secure the debt.

READ MORE: Award-winning UK housebuilder collapses with £1.4m owed and jobs lost

In the latest document on Companies House (dated to May 2025) these are estimated at totalling £15,448, but a further claim worth over £3m from Oxford University is reportedly subject to arbitration proceedings.

This follows the collapse of the company which once raised £16.9m in order to fight age-related conditions such as cancer and neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s.

First founded in 2014, the biotech firm announced the almost £17m investment in 2016, with it representing a record amount for a UK academic spinout – a company designed to commercialise research – at the time.

OxStem was based at Park End Street (Image: Google Maps)

According to Fierce Biotech – which reported on the investment – this followed other firms which were looking to ‘cure old age’, with the money going towards developing small-molecule drugs that can activate repair mechanisms that already exist within the body.

Among those cited as founders of the firm were several Oxford University scientists including Professor Steve Davies and Professor Angela Russell.

Both individuals are associated with the Department of Chemistry.

Professor Davies said in 2016: “We are tackling many of the worst conditions associated with ageing: dementia, heart failure, cancer and macular degeneration, which is the leading cause of blindness in the developed world.”

Oxford University (Image: Other)

In addition a number of subsidiary companies were founded including OxStem Ocular and OxStem Neuro, which have since either been dissolved or are also in liquidation.

In 2019, things seemingly remained positive for the firm with reports indicating that they were looking for funding so their ‘regenerative medicine strategy’ could advance to clinical trials.

However, following that, financial difficulties appeared and in 2022 liquidators from Quantuma Advisory Limited were appointed.

In its financial accounts to June 2021, OxStem revealed creditors falling due within one year of £2.7 million, although it also reported cash at the bank and in hand of £2.4 million.

READ MORE: Leading UK charity collapses with £430K owed and jobs lost

At that time the average number of employees on the books was nine, with all staff having since been dismissed.

Though the company had already collapsed, the liquidation proved more complex in part because of the University of Oxford’s creditor claim and due to complexities around the selling of assets.

As such, the liquidation process is still ongoing.