UK News
USA v Australia: World Cup 2026 – live | World Cup 2026
Key events

Alexander Abnos
Paris Hilton is, for some reason, leading the USA chants pregame.

Pablo Iglesias Maurer
The atmosphere here at Lumen Field (excuse me, Seattle Stadium, how dare I) is positively electric a full 30 minutes before kickoff. This was predictable — the stadium has a well-earned reputation for being among the loudest in the United States — but it is still a sight to behold. The place is nearly full, and there are no shortage of Aussie fans as well, very prominently sat behind the goal at the south end of the stadium. Truly incredible atmosphere.
Pre-anthem mailbag
Sorry I can’t get to everything, but please keep writing!
Any suggestions for a US nickname akin to “Socceroos”?
“Although I think the nickname ‘The Yanks’ is pretty great, it’s no ‘Socceroos’. And the best I can come up with is ‘Soccer Moms’ and I’m ashamed I’m even writing that down.” – Joshua Reynolds
“Soccerillos, of course, because of the armadillos.” – Kirk Allbright
“I’m sorry to trash my country, but looking at the three host mascots, USA clearly has the worst. 1. Tiger 2. Moose 3. Eagle. As far as a good nickname, the Minutemen?” – Zach Neeley
That might add a bit of spice the next time the USA face England.
An Australian perspective (and please, if you’re awake in Australia right now, send me a note!):
“Australia needs a draw from this game. We cannot lose and leave it until the last minute against Paraguay to get a point. I’m excited for this game – I think Australia can repeat their performance against Turkey barring Popovic not going back into defensive and negativity mode. Keep throwing players up on the counter and get the ball forward when we have to. No Pulisic, Irakunda and Metcalfe out could be a sign for 0-0.” – James Pareskevas
On nomenclature:
“Football or soccer? It is all about who you are communicating with. When I am on a Premier League MBM I use football. Mainly because the blowback is tedious. When I post on The Athletic I say soccer, once again because it is simpler. For those UK football fans for who the term soccer is an irritant you should not have invented it.” – Mary Waltz
I’m often astounded that so many of the people who take the USA (or Australia, or Ireland, etc.) to task for the word “soccer” don’t realize that the etymology runs through England.
And we have to get a word from Peter Oh: “Are any of the US players wearing kangaroo leather boots?”
Australian lineup: Head-scratcher or tactical brilliance?
Australian Associated Press reports …
Socceroos coach Tony Popovic has dropped goalscorers Nestory Irankunda and Connor Metcalfe to the bench for Australia’s blockbuster clash with the United States.
Veteran Mathew Leckie, playing for the first time at his fourth World Cup, and Nishan Velupillay are the two inclusions in attack for the game that could determine who finishes top of group D.
Irankunda, who was electric in the 2-0 win over Turkey, including scoring a brilliant opener, and Metcalfe, who delivered a wonderful second-half goal, loom as impact substitutes.
“Impact substitutes” could be an understatement if Australia’s five-man backline can contain the US attack early.
Which is one reason why the US punditocracy may be just a tad overconfident, perhaps?
The rivalry?
Is there bad blood between the USA and Australia? Alexander Abnos notes the feisty undertones in a relatively recent friendly:
A couple of players-turned-commentators have fanned the flames a bit, as Jack Snape relates:
The slandering began late last year when the USA were drawn against Australia. Former professional player and now TV pundit Mike Grella said the Socceroos represented a “lay-up” for the hosts.
Grella addressed the backlash to his comments on Wednesday: “I’ve got tell you something, I don’t think they’ve ever been more united as a football side. If they do something in this tournament – which they won’t – if they do something in this tournament, they should make a statue of me there in Australia, because I’ve unified an entire country.”
The barbs didn’t stop with him. Former USA player Landon Donovan also dismissed the Socceroos’ chances after the draw, and took aim at Australia’s “smug” coach. “You can get on the Qantas airplane and head back home,” he said.
I feel obliged to note that Grella and I went to the same college. Many years apart.
But Snape also notes that the countries and their soccer cultures are similar – youth participation has been strong, but building professional success is a work in progress.
Starting XIs: Pulisic out
The injury that was downplayed during the opening game against Paraguay is apparently more serious than first indicated. Throughout the week, the driving force of the US attack was limited in training, raising questions about his availability today.
He is indeed not available. Ricardo Pepi will take his place.
Australia will have five at the back, so it’ll be important for Jordan Bos (Feyenoord) on the left and Jacob Italiano (Grazer AK) on the right to get forward. The USA lineup includes two players who’ve spent time as wingbacks, and left back Antonee “Jedi” Robinson (Fulham) is likely to play that role, but the broadcasters’ graphics are insisting that Sergiño Dest (PSV Eindhoven) will be in midfield, not at the back.
The full lineups:
Australia: Beach; Bos, Burgess, Souttar, Circati, Italiano; Velupillay, Okon-Engstler, O’Neill, Leckie; Toure
USA: Freese; Robinson, Ream, Richards, Freeman; Dest, Adams, Tillman, McKennie; Pepi, Balogun
Neither of Australia’s scorers from the 2-0 win over Turkiye, Nestory Irankunda and Connor Metcalfe, will start.
What’s at stake …
The US men are out to do what no US men’s team have done in 96 years.
Win a second consecutive World Cup match.
Only twice have the US men followed a World Cup win with anything other than a loss. In 2002, they kept enough momentum from their opening win against Portugal to get a draw against South Korea, then lost to Poland and needed a Portuguese meltdown in another group game to advance to the famous 2-0 win over Mexico in the Round of 16. In their credible run in 2014, they followed the exorcism against Ghana by snatching a draw from the jaws of victory against Portugal, then bowing out with two dignified defeats against Germany and Belgium.
More commonly, a US men’s World Cup win is followed by a game fans would rather forget. In 1950, the famous win against England preceded a 5-2 defeat by Chile. In 1994, the last time the Cup was on US soil, they followed their rousing win against Colombia with a loss to Romania that reminded the casual US sports fan why they didn’t really care for soccer. In 2010, the “Howard to Donovan to Altidore to Dempsey to wow this is really happening DONOVAN SCORES ON THE REBOUND AHHHHHHHHH!! BAR CELEBRATIONS GO VIRAL” win over Algeria sent them to a second straight elimination at the feet of Ghana. Then in 2022, the Flying Pulisics avenged a 1998 loss to Iran but ran into the Netherlands.
Australia won two straight World Cup* games in 2022, beating Tunisia and Denmark to reach the knockout rounds, but they can also make history. The Socceroos have never finished first in a World Cup group. The first tiebreaker is head-to-head results, so if Australia win this game, it would take a convoluted series of results (Paraguay over Turkiye, Paraguay over Australia, USA over Turkiye) to complicate matters.
Before the 2022 Cup, the Socceroos had only won two World Cup games in their history – one in 2006, when they also got a draw to advance to the knockouts, and one in 2010.
(*) – pointing out once again that the term “World Cup” refers to the entire tournament including qualification, so what I’m describing above is technically based on results from World Cup finals, which is the term for the 32-team … I mean, 48-team … tournament we’re watching now.

Jeff Rueter
With Christian Pulisic out, Mauricio Pochettino opts for a big man/little man strike partnership with Ricardo Pepi slotting in alongside Folarin Balogun. Pepi is the pool’s best hold-up forward, willing to drop into midfield to help in possession sequences and a consistent contributor to a frontline press. He can now do all kinds of off-ball work with Balogun able to stretch the backline and keep Australia from clamping into too tight a defensive block.
Malik Tillman, Tyler Adams and Weston McKennie offers adequate balance in midfield, with width coming via Sergiño Dest and Antonee Robinson.
Christian Pulisic is out
The lineups are out, and Christian Pulisic is not only not among the starters, but he’s not listed among the subs either. Mauricio Pochettino has told the Fox pregame broadcast that the US star is unavailable.
Pulisic has been dealing with a calf injury since before the first game against Paraguay, which was aggravated in the first half. Pulisic exited at half-time of the 4-1 win.
Ricardo Pepi comes into the XI in his place, which will presumably change the look considerably.
Preamble
Welcome to a matchup between two countries united by one vital fact …
Both countries refer to this sport as “soccer” rather than “football.”
Actually, most English-speaking countries commonly use the word soccer. Consider Canada, New Zealand, Ireland and South Africa.
Australia is unique in the sense that the word is incorporated in their nickname – Socceroos. Which raises an important question: Why doesn’t the US team have a cool nickname like that?
Feel free to send in your ideas while waiting for this one to start. In any case, this is a vital game, with each team poised to advance to the knockout rounds.
Beau will be here shortly. In the meantime, here’s a look at what Australia and the USA will each need to do to win Friday’s clash in Seattle:
Australia
Back Nestory Irankunda: the 20-year-old was expected to be an impact player at this World Cup, coming on as a substitute to affect matches against tiring opposition. A player of the match performance when starting against Turkey showed how Irankunda has become one of the Socceroos’ most important players. While still learning his wing-craft, his speed and determination without the ball are vital in a Socceroos outfit seemingly happy to give their opponents’ possession, and his ability to make the most of transition and direct opportunities – as seen for his opening goal against Turkey – can be a superpower.
United States
Midfield rotations are key: this is the kind of thing that any USMNT fan would have known before last week’s fantastic opener, but the nature of the US’s play in that game made it especially so. Paraguay head coach Gustavo Alfaro took time in his presser to specifically compliment the starting trio of Weston McKennie, Tyler Adams and Malik Tillman, whom he described as “floating” and a key part of a “pentagon” of play. For as well as Australia played against Turkey, they did not dictate the tempo, conceding more than 70% of possession and getting overrun in the centre of the park. If the US are going to do something with similar levels of possession, they’ll need their midfield to continue rotating effectively to help pull the Socceroos’ back two lines out of shape, manufacturing gaps in what had proven to be an airtight defence.
UK News
PM under pressure from Labour MPs and ministers to set timetable for exit
The BBC has been told that the transport secretary is among those advising Starmer to set out a timetable.
Source link
UK News
'Prioritise love': Kate writes essay reflecting on Italy tour as new pictures released
The Princess of Wales reflects on an “increasingly digitalised world” in a new essay, written after her return to overseas visits following her treatment for cancer.
Source link
UK News
‘I’m not a Labour fan but I like Burnham’: relief in Makerfield among left, right and centre | Makerfield byelection
The morning after Andy Burnham secured a landslide byelection victory in Makerfield, returning him to Westminster after nine years as Manchester mayor, it is hard to avoid the large, red placards bearing his face.
But Burnham’s win was not just thanks to Labour loyalists. Instead, it appears that a coalition of voters from the left, centre and even the right united to back him at the ballot box.
Burnham achieved his victory with a majority of 9,231 votes over the Reform UK candidate, Robert Kenyon – bigger than that enjoyed by his predecessor. Labour won 55% of the vote to Reform’s 35%, while the hard-right party Restore Britain secured 7%. Turnout was 59%, six percentage points up on the general election, with 45,510 votes cast.
Both the Liberal Democrats and the Green party ran subdued campaigns, allowing Labour to absorb a broad range of voters, while the right wing vote was divided between Reform UK and Restore Britain.
“Two years ago the Liberal Democrat and Green candidates won 11% of the Makerfield vote,” veteran pollster Peter Kellner noted in his analysis of the byelection result. “Yesterday they won just one per cent, setting new records for vote-shedding while they helped to ensure that Burnham beat Kenyon.”
In Orrell waterpark, three friends – Mal, 64, Peta, 48, and Barb, 64 – said they were all Green supporters usually but backed Burnham on Thursday, who they believed had the best chance of defeating the “divisive” politics of the right.
Mal, a former social worker, said he had been angered by the immigration-focused campaigns of Reform UK and Restore Britain in Makerfield, a constituency whose population is 95% white British.
“It’s nothing to do with migrants – they’re the people treating us in hospital. Reform are coming in causing so many problems and that’s why we don’t want that,” he said.
Peta said the byelection had been “hugely” divisive “between family, neighbours, people you speak to in the street”, adding: “I don’t know if people realise how far right they’ve fallen.”
Barb said she hoped the area would be able to come back together after its polarising and high-profile time in the spotlight, noting that many Reform UK and Restore Britain activists had come from farther afield: “There will need to be work done to bring ordinary decent people back together again,” she said.
Some of Burnham’s borrowed supporters also appeared to come from the right, including voters who have backed Reform in the past.
In the 2024 general election, Joseph, 50, a heavy goods driver, voted for the Reform candidate, Robert Kenyon.
“I’m not a Labour fan but I like Burnham and I think this is bigger than just us here,” he said. “I voted for him this time, because at least for the next few years I think he’s the best chance we have.”
Ellen, 63, said that any fondness she and her peers had for Farage had waned over the past year, and she was eager to stop Reform from winning in her constituency.
“I don’t trust him [Farage] any more. I think he’s backwards, and the man who they chose to stand here, I think he’s an odd one,” she said. “I don’t like the stuff he said about women, and I get a bad sense from him. I’m not pro-Labour but if he [Burnham] was the other option I was happy to vote for him.
“I’m happy he won and I’m really happy that it’s over.”
Amber, 37, is one of only 308 people who voted for the Green candidate, Sarah Wakefield, but said she had considered backing Burnham instead.
“I live on a very pro-Burnham street, so I’ve been seeing a lot of red recently, I would have been shocked if he’d lost,” she said.
“I was tempted and I’m glad he won because I’d have felt awful if Reform had got in. I know other people who usually vote Green who backed him and I understand it. I think it was something a lot of people who don’t like Labour did.”
-
Crime & Safety4 weeks agoRyan Bridge speaks of London arrest after Oxford incident
-
Crime & Safety4 weeks agoNew video call system to help domestic abuse victims
-
Oxford News3 weeks agoOxfordshire families invited to free day of fun in Bicester
-
Oxford News4 weeks agoOxfordshire Lib Dems lose another councillor amid ‘serious concerns’
-
Crime & Safety3 weeks agoPhotos as 1979 Pontiac Firebird ‘bursts in flames’ at Tesco
-
Business & Technology3 weeks agoNew ‘high-quality’ mushroom business launched in Oxford
-
Business & Technology4 weeks agoNHS IT outages disrupt 274,620 patient interactions
-
Student Life3 weeks agoTransgender rights protest in central Oxford following updated EHRC guidance
