Business & Technology
The new UK cyber survey is out, but here’s what the numbers aren’t telling you
The latest Cyber Security Breaches Survey makes for uncomfortable reading for UK businesses. According to the Government’s 2025/2026 report, 43% experienced a breach or attack in the last 12 months – that’s around 612,000 organisations. The findings also estimate approximately 5.19 million cybercrimes over the same period, while the proportion of breaches or attacks resulting in lost revenue or share value has more than doubled, rising from 2% to 5%.
On a surface level, the story is familiar – cyber attacks remain widespread, phishing continues to dominate and businesses are once again being urged to improve resilience. Experts have already described the findings as depressingly familiar, and it’s not difficult to see why. The numbers move slightly from year to year, but the underlying pattern remains largely unchanged, which is the real concern here.
After years of major incidents, boardroom briefings, regulatory warnings and national awareness campaigns, the UK is still stuck in a cycle where risk is recognised, but not consistently governed. Businesses know threat exists, but many still lack the ability to demonstrate, in a structured and reliable way, how that threat is being managed before something goes wrong.
Breach numbers only tell us what has already happened
A breach shows the visible outcome of decisions, controls, gaps and assumptions that existed long before the incident itself. By the time a breach appears in a survey, the more important questions have already been missed: Were the right controls in place and were they being reviewed? Was there clear ownership? The answers to these determine whether an organisation is genuinely resilient or simply fortunate.
The survey tells us a great deal about the scale of cybercrime and reveals too many companies are still measuring risk at the point of failure rather than at the point of control.
The governance gap is hiding in plain sight
Only 31% of businesses have board-level responsibility for cyber security, just 15% review the risks posed by their immediate suppliers and only 6% look at the wider supply chain. The survey also points to small businesses going backwards in some areas of basic preparedness.
Cyber security is still too often treated as a technical function, owned somewhere inside IT and discussed seriously only when an incident takes place. Yet most of the weaknesses exposed by modern incidents are structural, with no clear accountability, no consistent control framework, no live view of risk and no board-level visibility until they are already under pressure.
Small businesses face risk differently from large enterprises
Smaller businesses are often told to adopt better cyber hygiene. Whilst this advice is valid, it can also oversimplify the challenge. SMEs typically operate with less internal capacity, fewer dedicated roles, more informal processes and greater dependence on external suppliers, creating a very different kind risk profile from larger enterprises.
For many, cyber risk is managed through individual knowledge rather than institutional structure. One person knows where the policies are stored, one external provider understands the systems and one senior leader owns the customer assurance process, but that kind of system becomes fragile quickly.
The business needs clear visibility over the data it holds, the systems affected, the suppliers involved, the controls in place, what evidence exists and who is authorised to make decisions. If that information has not been organised in advance, incident response becomes slower and more expensive. This is where governance needs to become more practical.
Smaller organisations don’t need the same level of bureaucracy as global enterprises, but they do need a clear way to map risks, assign ownership, manage controls, maintain evidence and show progress over time. Without that, cyber resilience remains dependent on goodwill, memory and last-minute effort.
Supply chain risk is becoming the unanswered question
Modern companies rely on software providers, outsourced IT partners, consultants, payment systems, logistics platforms, cloud environments and data processors, which means cyber risk rarely sits neatly within the four walls of their organisation. A weakness in one supplier can quickly become a weakness in the business itself.
But as the survey shows, only a small minority of organisations are reviewing immediate supplier risk and even fewer are looking at the wider supply chain. Customers are already asking more detailed questions about security controls, investors are looking more closely at operational resilience, regulators are moving towards stronger expectations around supply chain accountability and insurers are becoming more interested in evidence. In that environment, “we trust the supplier” is not enough.
The Cyber Security and Resilience Bill will raise the evidence bar
The UK is moving away from a model where cyber security is largely treated as voluntary good practice and towards one where resilience must be demonstrated. The Bill is part of that shift.
Demonstrating that the right controls, oversight and processes were in place before a breach happened relies on evidence, ownership and current information. It requires cyber risk to be connected to compliance, operations, procurement and leadership.
This is where many organisations will feel the gap most sharply. They may be doing some of the right things, but if those activities are fragmented, undocumented or disconnected from recognised frameworks, they will struggle to prove it.
The real lesson is not more awareness, but more proof
The UK doesn’t have a cyber awareness problem in the traditional sense. Most business leaders understand that attacks can disrupt operations, damage trust and create financial loss.
But, businesses need to better understand which frameworks apply, which controls are in place, who owns them, when they were last reviewed and where the evidence sits. That means treating compliance as a live management discipline rather than a project that begins shortly before an audit or customer request. Frameworks such as ISO 27001, SOC 2 and Cyber Essentials are becoming more important because they give organisations a common structure for turning cyber intent into demonstrable control. They also help in moving away from reactive reassurance and towards evidence-led governance.
Why the numbers keep looking the same
The real value in the Cyber Security Breaches Survey is in showing why progress remains slow. Too many businesses are using an approach that creates the appearance of activity without the discipline of governance and, until that changes, the annual numbers will continue to look familiar.
To move ahead, businesses need to build the evidence first, connect controls to risk, bring suppliers into scope and give leadership a clear view of resilience before pressure hits. Compliance isn’t a report, it’s a posture – that’s what the latest survey is really telling us.
Blossom Pottery Cafe opened on Friday, August 14 at 18 South Bar, bringing a new artistic opportunity to coffee, tea and cake lovers in the town.
Opening the cafe was a long-standing dream of owner Wendy, who began pottery as a personal hobby and gradually developed the idea of creating a space where people of all ages can enjoy the peaceful pass time.
With every table full on opening weekend and dozens of beautiful pieces newly painted by guests, the owner said her ‘heart is so full’ to see the dream realised.
“So grateful to see so many of you coming to support us on our opening day,” she shared. “Thank you so much.”
Wendy earlier said: “We’re incredibly excited to be opening Blossom Pottery Studio & Café and bringing something new to Banbury.
“We hope it becomes a place where people can take a break from their busy lives, enjoy being creative, and make lasting memories with family and friends.
“The support we’ve received from the local community has been amazing, and we can’t wait to welcome everyone through our doors.”
As part of the grand opening, all customers who visited during the opening weekend or made a pottery painting booking within the next three months received a free cupcake from the cafe.
Blossom Pottery Cafe hosts family-friendly pottery painting sessions from 10am each day, with normal cafe opening hours 8am to 5pm.
Atos highlighted the views of three apprentices entering the technology industry, focusing on apprenticeships as a route into tech as artificial intelligence reshapes workplace skills.
All three work as First Line Service Desk Apprentices and described a jobs market in which technical knowledge alone is not enough. Alongside coding and troubleshooting, they said communication, customer service, problem-solving and adaptability have become central to early careers in IT.
Kyle Brady said he moved into an apprenticeship after studying physics, maths and computer science at A level, then spending time in temporary work, including as a forklift driver, while building his technical skills independently. The apprenticeship, he said, offered a way to gain workplace experience while continuing to learn.
His account points to a common hurdle for new entrants: gaining practical experience before securing a first role. Brady said that challenge shaped his view of what employers value in technology jobs.
“After completing my A levels in physics, maths and computer science, I knew I wanted a career in technology. I’ve always enjoyed solving problems and understanding how things work, but I found it difficult to get my foot in the door. I spent some time in temporary jobs, including as a forklift driver, while building my technical skills in my own time. When the opportunity to start an apprenticeship came along, it felt like the perfect way to gain real workplace experience while continuing to learn.
“One of the biggest things my apprenticeship has taught me is that a career in tech is about much more than technical knowledge. Working on the helpdesk has shown me how important communication, customer service and problem-solving are. Being the first point of contact for users has completely changed how I see the industry and helped me develop skills I never realised I’d need. The experience has also shown me how quickly technology is evolving, especially with AI becoming part of more workplaces. That means the ability to keep learning and adapting is becoming just as important as technical skills. My apprenticeship has helped me build that mindset while giving me hands-on experience with the realities of working in IT.
“It’s also opened up opportunities I wouldn’t have had otherwise. Learning about career paths in cybersecurity and data engineering has shown me the range of opportunities available and given me confidence about where my career could go next. I’d encourage anyone thinking about a career in technology to keep an open mind and not feel like university is the only route. Apprenticeships give you the chance to earn while you learn, develop practical skills from day one and build the confidence to adapt as technology continues to change. In an industry being transformed by AI, that real-world experience is invaluable,” Brady said.
Ryan Cresswell said he studied IT at college and games design at university before working in sales to strengthen his people skills. He later returned to technology, but said employers often wanted practical IT experience as well as qualifications.
His experience reflects a wider issue for people seeking entry-level technology roles. Employers often ask for evidence of workplace readiness even for junior positions, making apprenticeships one way to bridge the gap between education and employment.
“After studying IT at college and games design at university, I began working in sales to hone my people skills before returning to technology. One of the biggest challenges I faced while applying for jobs in tech was that employers liked my qualifications but wanted candidates with hands-on IT experience. That made it difficult to get my foot in the door.
“My apprenticeship has given me the opportunity to earn, learn and gain practical experience at the same time. It’s allowed me to develop my technical troubleshooting skills, but I’ve also learned a lot about communication, problem-solving and handling different types of people. My advice to anyone considering a career in tech is to explore the different paths available. In the past it felt like university was the only choice, but that’s no longer the case. Also, speak to people already working in the industry and stay curious. Apprenticeships are a great way to build skills, confidence and hands-on experience, whether working individually or in a team, while discovering what’s right for you. The most important thing is to keep learning and not be afraid to take a different path if the first one doesn’t work out,” Cresswell said.
Skills shift
Zainab Hussain said she chose an apprenticeship because it offered immediate workplace experience and a path into more senior roles without student debt. She said the role had helped her develop both technical and interpersonal skills, including troubleshooting problems and explaining complex concepts clearly.
Her comments underscore how apprenticeships are being framed by employers and trainees as an alternative to university for some digital roles. In this case, the appeal lies in earning while learning, building professional networks and gaining direct exposure to the daily demands of IT support.
“I’m naturally drawn to tech and have always been IT literate, so I knew it was the right path for me. It’s an industry that’s constantly evolving, and I wanted to be part of that. I chose an apprenticeship because it felt like the best way to gain real experience from day one, and it sets you up to move into higher roles faster than if you go to university. I also wanted to build a career in the industry without taking on student debt.
“My time at Atos so far has helped me develop both my soft and technical skills, such as how to troubleshoot problems and communicate complex concepts clearly. I’ve also had the chance to earn, learn and build my experience, all of which are helping prepare me for the next stage of my career. The apprenticeship path has given me valuable opportunities to network with co-workers from different career backgrounds and skill sets, which you wouldn’t get at uni. The workplace experience has been incredibly valuable, so if you’re interested in tech, I’d encourage you to go for an apprenticeship, explore every opportunity available and keep an open mind,” Hussain said.
Taken together, the three accounts point to a shift in the skills mix associated with junior technology roles. As AI tools become more common in workplaces, the apprentices said the ability to keep learning, work with users and adapt to changing systems is becoming as important as formal technical training.
All three also described apprenticeships as a practical answer to the experience barrier that can prevent candidates entering the sector. They framed the route as a way to gain income, training and exposure to real workplace problems at the same time, while opening paths into areas such as cybersecurity, data engineering and wider IT support.
Liquidators have been instructed to wind down Go Fly Oxford, which provided lessons for commercial and private pilots licences.
Colin Wilson and Emma Mifsud, of Opus Restructuring & Insolvency, have been appointed as joint liquidators for Go Fly Oxford Ltd back in May 2025.
But new records filed by the liquidators have revealed an HMRC secondary preferential claim of £118,132.
Ten unsecured claims have been received by the liquidators totalling £60,314.
Further unsecured creditor claims estimated in the statement of affairs total £88,955, the published documents say.
Over the past year, liquidators say they investigated whether any recoveries could be made from directors or other parties, but concluded there were no further viable assets or claims.
Aircraft shown in the 2024 accounts at a book value of £238,181 had been sold before liquidation. The liquidators found the sales appeared to be at fair value and saw no basis for a claim over the transactions.
The aircraft sales happened about seven months before liquidation, outside the relevant period for a preference claim.
The aircraft were reportedly transferred to creditors and leased back so the company could continue trading.
A purchaser of a PA34-200 aircraft was said to owe £6,000. The liquidators received £4,980; the remaining £1,020 was treated as settled because the purchaser had paid a company liability instead.
Two employees were made redundant on 31 March 2025 and were given information to submit claims to the Redundancy Payments Service.
READ MORE: MOT centre and car shop collapses into administration
The flying school was based at Oxford Airport when it collapsed.
Its website, which has since been shut down, described the business: “At Go Fly Oxford we pride ourselves on offering a personal and tailored approach to pilot training.
“We know that people learn at different paces and in different ways, this makes catering for individual needs our main target.”
Oxford Airport’s main trade is pilot training. Flight schools at Oxford train pilots who go on to fly for more than 100 airlines in the UK and globally, including for British Airways.
Historically, the airport has been Europe’s foremost centre for professional pilot training with well over 40,000 students having started their careers there.
At one point, the airport’s runway was the busiest in the world with more than 235,000 movements a year (a take-off or landing) and up to 1,100 flights in a single day, its website says.
The business’ report says: “Over the course of 2025, the company will be complementing its Diamond DA40 fleet with a new fleet of Elixir aircraft, a safer and more efficient type of aircraft, which will provide a much reduced cost per flight hour.
“This, along with growth in enrolments and full utilisation of the European base will ensure the profitability of the business in the coming years.”
UK government promises disabled air passengers better safeguards | Airline industry
Andy Burnham launches campaign against ‘headphone dodgers’ on public transport | Transport policy
Students join march against the far right at matriculation
-
Oxford University4 weeks agoNew to the Oxford English Dictionary this September
-
Oxford united FC4 weeks agoChris Gunter steps away Wales role to focus on Oxford United
-
Oxford united FC2 weeks agoLIVE: Exeter City vs Oxford United – Jersey Mike's Trophy group stage
-
Traffic & Transport2 weeks agoWhy should I have to pay more for buses if I don’t use a smartphone? | Bus fares
-
Student Life3 weeks agoOxford partnership allows OpenAI to use rare Bodleian texts to train ChatGPT
-
Traffic & Transport3 weeks agoHow poor public transport policy is putting the brake on cities | Road transport
-
Oxford united FC3 weeks agoNorthern Ireland fans laud Oxford United defender Ciaron Brown
-
Oxford united FC2 weeks agoOxford United lose to Exeter City on penalties in Jersey Mike’s Trophy