Connect with us

Traffic & Transport

Schoolchildren without smartphones penalised with higher bus fares | Bus fares

Published

on


Schoolchildren who do not own smartphones face paying hundreds of pounds extra in annual bus fares as cheaper travel passes are digitised.

Critics argue that by only making discounts available through an app, operators are undermining government guidance to keep mobile phones out of schools.

Adele Kightley’s 11-year-old daughter faces paying an extra £546 a year to get to school because a discount scheme launched by Derbyshire county council is only available via smartphones.

The b_line card caps single fares on trentbarton buses at £1.50 for those aged 18 and under. However, users have to register their card with an app to qualify.

“We made the choice not to give our daughter a smartphone, instead opting for a brick phone when she started secondary school this month,” Kightley said.

“In order to get trentbarton’s young person discount, a child has to connect their student card with the app. However, they can’t get the same discount by showing the same student card to the driver and paying by cash or card.”

Trentbarton said its ticketing machines are not configured to read the council-issued cards. “We are working at speed on developing a new physical card to provide the discounted b_line fare for under-19s,” a spokesperson for the bus company said.

“In the meantime, all young people, whether they have a smartphone or not, will continue to receive a range of discounts off our adult fares however they pay.”

Trentbarton says it is ‘working at speed on developing a new physical card to provide the discounted b_line fare for under-19s’. Photograph: Colin Underhill/Alamy

East Midlands combined county authority said it sympathised with parents who did not want their children to have smartphones and would consider how young people accessed discounted fares as it developed the region’s fares and ticketing strategy.

The increasing use of digital-only passes is penalising poorer households as well as undermining efforts to restrict screen time for children, according to Daisy Greenwell, a co-founder of the campaign group Smartphone Free Childhood.

“There is now a huge movement of parents and schools trying to delay smartphones for children but, in many parts of the country, bus companies are making that much harder by charging smartphone-free children up to twice as much for exactly the same journey,” she said.

More than 200,000 parents have signed up to the campaign group’s “parent pact”, which promises to delay getting a child smartphones until at least 14, “yet essential services are still being designed around the assumption that every child has one”, Greenwell said. “For lower-income families in particular, owning a smartphone can effectively become the price of accessing cheaper bus fares.”

More parents are delaying giving their children smartphones. Photograph: djedzura/Getty Images/iStockphoto

Other regional operators, including Stagecoach and Compass, also require children to have a smartphone to access the best discounts.

“My husband and I decided not to give smartphones to our children because of the overwhelming evidence that shows how harmful they are to developing brains,” Kightley said. “When our younger child starts secondary school, it will cost us nearly £1,100 a year more than it would if they had access to the discount through the app.”

A law banning the use of mobile phones in English schools came into force in June. Some schools prohibit pupils from bringing smartphones on site. However, the Department for Education said the legislation did not cover phone use during travel to school and that app-only fare discountswere a matter for individual bus operators.

The government’s stance is sending mixed messages, Greenwell said. “Bus fares shouldn’t be a barrier to schools choosing policies where smartphones aren’t brought on to site. Government and bus companies have a clear opportunity to fix this, so every child can access the same fare whether they carry a smartphone or not.”

Stagecoach and Compass were contacted for a comment.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Traffic & Transport

‘Major milestone’: TfL to launch new public bus operator in London | TfL

Published

on


A publicly owned company, Buses for London, will start running services in the capital next year, Transport for London has announced.

TfL said the launch was a “major milestone” in its plans to improve buses for drivers and passengers.

The new public company will take over a handful of London’s bus routes, which number nearly 700 in total, from late 2027, starting with route 6, which runs between Willesden and Victoria station.

A further four routes to be run by the public company from 2028 are to be announced.

TfL said the creation of a publicly owned bus company would give it greater control over how services were run, allowing it to make buses more reliable and safe, and to reinvest profits into improving the transport network.

At present, TfL contracts bus services to eight privately owned operators.

The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, said: “This is an opportunity to reimagine our bus network so that it provides better value for money, supports our climate goals, makes our roads safer, and overall just works better for passengers and drivers alike.”

London’s buses have been getting gradually slower and passenger numbers have fallen over the past decade, as they battle with congestion and demands on road space in the capital.

Lorna Murphy, TfL’s director of buses, said the public company marked “an exciting new chapter”, with a depot in the Old Oak regeneration area that would be “the first home of a new generation of zero-emission buses … helping us to build on the progress we’ve already made towards a more sustainable transport system”.

Unions welcomed the move but private operators said the taxpayer would foot the bill for investment and take on more risk.

The Unite general secretary, Sharon Graham, said: “Unite has long been calling for London’s bus services to be returned to public ownership. Outsourcing to private companies hasn’t worked well for workers or passengers.

“For too long, bus workers have been subjected to intolerable working conditions and passengers have experienced worsening services, while bus firms and their shareholders rake in huge profits.”

skip past newsletter promotion


The union’s national officer for passenger transport, Wayne King, said it was “only the beginning”. He said Unite expected Buses for London to “lead the way in workers’ pay, terms and conditions and treatment and will hold TfL and the mayor to account on this”.

The Confederation of Passenger Transport, representing bus firms, said it would not fix London’s buses. Graham Vidler, the chief executive of CPT, said: “Passengers don’t need a new public bus operator. They need faster, more reliable journeys and investment should be made where passengers will actually feel the difference: tackling congestion, giving buses priority and getting London moving.

“Regardless of who operates the service, buses typically travel at just 9 mph in London – slower than the average cyclist.”

He said private operators had made significant investment in London’s bus network, including new vehicles and technology, adding: “The uncertainty created by a new publicly owned operator risks making it harder for private operators to make the case for continued investment in London in the future.”

Labour’s bus overhauls since 2025, which push wider franchising and public control of services, have also made it possible for local authorities nationwide to establish new publicly owned companies. A few municipal companies, such as Reading, Blackpool and Nottingham, survived deregulation and privatisation in the 1980s.



Source link

Continue Reading

Traffic & Transport

Tell us: have you been assaulted on Great Britain’s railways? | Rail transport

Published

on


The number of reported assaults on Great Britain’s railways has risen to a record high of almost 25,000 incidents in a year, data published by the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) shows.

There were 13,464 reported assaults against passengers and members of the public on the mainline railway in 2025-26, up 36% on the previous year and the highest number recorded by the ORR since it started tracking the figures in 2004.

Assaults on rail staff were up 12% in a year to 11,289 reported incidents, mainly verbal abuse but including nearly 2,500 physical assaults – an average of about seven every day.

The assaults on members of the public included rises in cases of harassment, up 52% year on year, and common assault, up by 30%.

We would like to speak to passengers and rail workers who have been assaulted on Britain’s railways.

Share your experience

Please share your response in the form below or by messaging us. We will contact you before we publish your submission. 

Your responses, which can be anonymous, are secure as the form is encrypted and only the Guardian has access to your contributions. We will only use the data you provide us for the purpose of the feature and we will delete any personal data when we no longer require it for this purpose. For alternative ways to get in touch securely please see our tips guide.

Does one of the following apply to you?