Traffic & Transport
‘People can see – but can’t use it’: mystery of completed East-West Rail line that has no passenger trains | Rail transport
The rumbling noise in the night, still enough to waken the unhabituated, is what really goads some people living in Winslow, Buckinghamshire. Freight trains running through the new station since late 2024 prove this stretch of railway is operational. But the long-promised passenger services have yet to appear – and there is no sign of any arriving soon.
Welcome to East West Rail, open or not. For well over a decade, ministers have talked up a new railway linking Oxford to Cambridge via Milton Keynes to accelerate the drive for housing, jobs and growth – an arc of tech industry hailed as the UK’s answer to Silicon Valley.
With the first phase from Oxford to Milton Keynes built, it was highlighted again by the chancellor in January 2025: Rachel Reeves, laying out her economic vision, cited it as the “transport link needed to make the Oxford-Cambridge growth corridor a success”. She looked forward to the start of passenger trains in the coming months, with Chiltern Railways officially taking over in March 2025.
Instead, with little or no explanation, the services failed to run, and the planned start date was shunted to autumn and then the end of 2025. Today, no target for opening is offered at all.
The extraordinary delay has left local MPs and would-be passengers ever more frustrated – not least those living in the new-build homes next to Winslow station, sold on the promise of commuter services via Milton Keynes or Oxford to London.
Callum Anderson, the MP for Buckingham and Bletchley, has been pushing for an answer from his Labour colleagues and campaigning for the line. “It’s unfortunate,” he said. “People can see it and hear it but they can’t use it.” It was, though, “important not to speculate or lay blame at any one door”.
But in the absence of convincing explanations, many people do. A dispute with unions over whether the two-carriage trains require guards is widely believed to be the crucial stumbling block, though the Department for Transport (DfT) and the RMT union deny it is the main reason. Chiltern had planned to start running trains with only a driver, opposed in principle by the RMT and Aslef, the drivers’ union. Many driver-only operations already exist.
A letter from Peter Hendy, the rail minister, to Anderson in March said the primary reason services had not started was that negotiations over contracts with Chiltern were “interrupted by the unexpected general election of July 2024”.
Hendy said trains would need to have been modified and driver training completed, and the new station at Winslow “fully handed over”, but added that “future staffing arrangements also remain to be agreed”.
In a recent statement to the House of Commons, Heidi Alexander, the transport secretary, said Chiltern was “pursuing rolling stock modifications, the completion of the intermediate station, and staffing and training for service introduction”.
The partial explanations, whispers and refusals to give adequate explanations have infuriated those seeking answers.
Diana Blamires is an independent councillor in Winslow, where 4,500 people remain stuck, trainless, halfway between Oxford and Milton Keynes. She has organised petitions and a protest last weekend at Bletchley station, and describes the DfT’s reasoning as “nonsense, pathetic, laughable … How come they could set up a freight train service?”
She said people were angered by the lack of progress. “There’s fury,” she said. “People came to places like Winslow thinking they’d be able to get a train to a job in London, or Milton Keynes or Oxford, or even Bicester. Young people wanted to work at Bicester Village. Now it’s two buses in the morning to get there.
“Rush-hour traffic to Oxford is terrible and it’s extremely expensive to park. People want to get the train and open it up as a place to work. It’s disrupted people’s lives – people move here for jobs and now they are really struggling to get to that job.”
Olly Glover, the Liberal Democrat transport spokesperson and MP for Didcot and Wantage, said any problems with the station were a “red herring” and the election was a “ridiculous” excuse, with the RMT dispute the only possible issue.
“Ultimately the government and the DfT are the ones who made the decision late, they have not resolved this impasse and they have no plan to do so,” Glover said. “They clearly have no plan – and not enough people are holding them to account.
“How are we going to deliver the Oxford-Cambridge growth corridor and all the housing and science facilities, if we have this brand new shiny railway and it’s not open for passengers after a year?”
Compared with, say, the travails and cost overruns of HS2, the story so far of East West Rail is a minor hiccup. But the failure to open even a short and far from ambitious railway – unelectrified and largely running on reclaimed or existing lines – has anguished observers.
The multiple players make accountability more slippery. At the outset is East West Railway Ltd, a private company set up by Chris Grayling, a former transport secretary, 10 years ago so the line could “happen quicker”. The company says it handed the line and station over completed for Network Rail’s sign-off in 2024. “We absolutely understand the frustration that local people in Winslow feel about the delay,” said Natalie Wheble, its external affairs director.
Chiltern Railways has cited unspecified problems with the station. One, according to the RMT, was that an emergency exit backed on to private land – an issue that is understood to have been resolved.
A Network Rail spokesperson said: “We have completed construction works at Winslow station and we are working to support Chiltern as they prepare to operate train services and manage the station.”
A Chiltern Railways spokesperson said it had made “significant progress” and the station was “now in the testing and commissioning phase”, but there was “work still to finish to prepare the trains, on Winslow station and on the operating arrangements for the new route”. They said Chiltern would “provide further updates when we are able to”.
The DfT would only say: “We are supporting Chiltern Railways as they work with unions and other industry partners to get these services up and running as soon as possible. The East West Rail project will unlock thousands of jobs and homes and kickstart hundreds of thousands of pounds of economic growth across England, but we need services to be allowed to start before we can start seeing those benefits.”
Clarification on whom the DfT – which dictated Chiltern’s contract and will soon nationalise its operation – is waiting on for “services to be allowed to start” has yet to be given.
An RMT spokesperson said: “It is simply inaccurate to blame delays to East West Rail on our dispute when the project has been held back for years by indecision, rising costs and unresolved planning issues. The industrial dispute only affects one part of the route and the biggest delays sit squarely with those in charge of managing the project.”
They said the union was opposed to driver-only operation “because it is vital there is a second safety-critical person onboard”, adding that RMT members would “not accept being used as cover for failures in project management”.
The longer story of the Oxford-Cambridge line stretches further into the distance, with yet more consultations ahead for the second and third phases. The development of the Universal Studios theme park in Bedford will bring more passengers – potentially resulting in bigger trains, longer platforms and perhaps another station but delaying construction. The route that finally hits Cambridge is yet to be nailed down, although the latest proposals from East West Rail Ltd are to hasten the building of a station at Tempsford where it crosses the east coast main line, ready for the planned new town.
Hendy’s letter suggested the creation of Great British Railways, including the nationalisation of Chiltern, would “make the process of implementing change on the passenger rail network much simpler in future”. If it does indeed take the advent of GBR to see the government force the line into action, as some locals fear, the wait for a train in Winslow could last some time yet.
Traffic & Transport
Number of cloned number plates on UK roads at record high, data shows | Transport
The number of reported “cloned” vehicles involved in offences on UK roads has reached a record high, official data shows.
More than 11,400 drivers contacted the DVLA last year after being issued with fines for offences they said they did not recognise or accept responsibility for – most of which are believed to be down to cloning, where a number plate is copied fraudulently on similar vehicles to avoid enforcement cameras.
The number of complaints about misattribution was 9% higher than in 2024 and almost double the figure recorded in 2018, according to the RAC motoring organisation, which analysed data obtained under freedom of information requests.
The rising figures underscore concerns about the number of illegal number plates in use, allowing criminals to evade detection and dangerous drivers to avoid being caught.
Although drivers should provide number plate suppliers with the V5C vehicle logbook and proof of identity, an investigation last year uncovered more than 130 official suppliers in the UK willing to sell cloned versions, which allow drivers to dodge police and congestion charges.
Cloning vehicles has left many innocent car owners having to struggle to prove they were not responsible when enforcement camera images apparently caught their vehicle committing offences.
A parallel concern is the use of “ghost” plates which are designed to be unreadable by the UK’s 18,000 automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) cameras, which enforce safety measures such as speed limits or lane closures on smart motorways.
The RAC said the UK needed to overhaul an outdated and poorly regulated number plate system. Its head of policy, Simon Williams, said: “If number plate suppliers were carrying out all the checks they’re supposed to, it would be much harder for dodgy drivers to buy cloned plates in the first place. It’s only when a fine arrives at a vehicle keeper’s home address that they realise someone else is driving around using their vehicle’s number plate illegally.”
He said that more also needed to be done to catch drivers with ghost plates, “whether that’s more police officers being equipped with handheld devices that can detect if plates are unreadable, updating ANPR cameras and introducing higher security standards for number plates and for those who produce them”.
The government last month said there would be a new nationwide crackdown on illegal number plates, with funding from the Department for Transport for a new roads policing team. A new National Roads Policing Coordination Centre would share intelligence as well as trialling new technology such as specialised goggles to detect number plates that have been designed to be unreadable by cameras.
after newsletter promotion
Drivers using an incorrectly displayed number plate can be fined up to £1,000.
A Department for Transport spokesperson said: “We’re cracking down on illegal number plates with significant investment in a new roads policing team and innovative tech to stamp out the scourge of cloned numberplates.
“Illegal number plates help facilitate crime, and we are supporting the police to work with the DVLA to make it easier to report these crimes and support victims through a new digital tool.”
Traffic & Transport
‘A big responsibility’: Clifton Suspension Bridge master hails £7.6m renovation | Bristol
The job does not give the holder age-old perks such as the right to drive sheep across the great structure, but the title “bridge master” does have a certain ring to it.
“I don’t tend to say I’m the bridge master when I’m at a party,” said Tristan Ralph, the current holder of the title. “But people do seem to know and bring it up. It’s a job less ordinary, isn’t it? It’s a Victorian sounding title and people are really, really interested.”
There is, however, nothing ceremonial about the title. Ralph is in charge of maintaining and running the Clifton Suspension Bridge, a UK feat of engineering, without any public money.
“It does feel a big responsibility,” said Ralph. “When the chairman of the trustees rang to say we’d like you to do it, you suddenly feel the pressure. It’s so famous and people in Bristol, quite rightly, are proud and almost possessive of it. Bristolians think: ‘It’s our bridge.’”
The bridge master – and the not-for-profit charity the Clifton Suspension Bridge Trust – have the task of maintaining the bridge “in perpetuity”. “I’m a temporary custodian,” Ralph said. “When I’m finished, I have to make sure it is handed on in just [as] good a condition or better than I inherited it.”
Ralph, a bridge engineer by profession, was speaking to mark the conclusion of a large refurbishment project that has taken two and a half years and involved hand-painting more than 4,000 original iron chain links and installing an energy-efficient lighting system. It has cost about £7.5m. “It’s been a big job,” he said. “But it’s come pretty much bang on budget, which is rare these days.”
That is important because, to many visitors’ surprise, the bridge does not receive public funding. “The upkeep of the bridge, the running of it, the salary costs and everything are all paid only by our toll money,” said Ralph. “People think that we might get something from local or central government. But, no, it’s just the toll money.”
Motorised vehicles – including motorcycles – pay £1 to cross the bridge. There is no charge for pedestrians, cyclists or horse riders. As well as being a beautiful structure, it is also a vital part of Bristol and North Somerset’s transport system.
Ralph said: “It draws the tourists in. We get visitors from hundreds of countries every year but primarily, it’s still a vital piece of local infrastructure. If the bridge wasn’t here, the difference it would make to Bristol traffic would be incredible. We average over 8,000 vehicles a day still. Maintaining it as a transport link is utterly vital.”
The end of the refurbishment does not mean Ralph can rest on his laurels and spend more time hobnobbing with members of the Bridge Owners Forum.
“In a few years, we’ll need to paint the underside of the bridge. The under-bridge gantry unit itself will be replaced over the coming years. So there’s always something. We need to keep on top of things. It’s like your house or your car. If you just ignore it, don’t do things for a couple of years, they start breaking down.”
As in most walks of life, the climate emergency is a challenge Ralph and the trust are having to face. “We were monitoring the bridge daily in the summer with the very hot weather. And maybe if the bridge was being designed today, there would be a little bit more robustness around wind.”
The prevailing south-west wind is not usually a problem and the bridge rarely has to close but if it blows directly through the Avon Gorge it can be more difficult. “We need to keep an eye at both the magnitude of any wind events but also their frequency,” Ralph said.
The engineer admires the bridge’s designers, including Isambard Kingdom Brunel. “It’s remarkably advanced for its time.”
And there is no sign that its days are numbered, largely because the Victorians did not skimp. Ralph said: “There are three layers of chains. The original Brunel design only had two, but because it went from a timber design to a cast-iron deck, they upped it to three.
“There’s a little bit of comfort in there. Today there might be pressure to say, well, can you keep it to two, but in Victorian times they did like to add a little bit of meat on the bones.
“It doesn’t have a finite life. There’s no end date in our plans. We all just keep it going in the highest standards as we can. It’s in really good condition as long as we keep doing what we need to do, keep our attention on it and don’t let things drift. Forever is a long time but there’s no reason why we have any need to worry at the moment.”
Traffic & Transport
Uber begins self-driving robotaxi trial in Manchester | Uber
Uber has begun a trial of autonomous vehicles on the streets of Manchester as it looks to bring robotaxis to cities around the UK.
The first self-driving cars are operating, using the technology of its partner firms Pony and Verne, with whom Uber recently launched Europe’s first autonomous taxi service in the Croatian capital, Zagreb.
Uber said it was “excited to take this first step toward making this technology accessible to people across the UK”.
In social media posts, Verne said it had “started our autonomous vehicle testing in Manchester”, while Pony said there were “plans to bring robotaxis to the city” and that testing was under way.
The tests involve the company mapping the streets of the city in north-west England with a safety driver behind the wheel and no passengers.
Limited passenger services started last month in London, but with a safety driver in the front seat of cars supplied by Wayve under Transport for London’s licensing rules for private hire vehicles.
The next steps are unclear. Opposition from Uber drivers, their unions and the capital’s politicians to the rollout of robotaxis is mounting. The GMB and ADCU unions have both said thousands of drivers jobs will be lost and have called for help for those affected.
A critical report from London assembly’s transport committee this week called for the government to devolve authority over autonomous taxi services.
It said there was “considerable uncertainty about many of the claimed benefits of autonomous passenger vehicles”, and fears over the impact on public transport and congestion, as well as safeguarding and accessibility for disabled passengers.
There has been no official application to launch passenger services in Manchester so far, and the vehicles are operating under government licence via the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) and the Department for Transport.
A spokesperson for Transport for Greater Manchester said it wanted the city’s taxis to be the safest in the country.
after newsletter promotion
“New technologies play an increasingly important role in the growth of our city region,” they said. “But they need to be introduced responsibly, safely and with real thought about what it means for our residents.
“Although no applications have been made to operate driverless taxis in the Greater Manchester, we’re aware of potential interest from companies to do so.
“Safety will always be our top priority, and we will need strong assurances that no vehicles will operate on our roads that pose any risk to residents.”
Uber said it expected to offering robotaxi trips in as many as 15 cities worldwide by the end of 2026, mainly in the US and the Middle East.
-
Oxford united FC4 weeks agoChris Gunter steps away Wales role to focus on Oxford United
-
Oxford University3 weeks agoNew to the Oxford English Dictionary this September
-
Traffic & Transport2 weeks agoHow poor public transport policy is putting the brake on cities | Road transport
-
Student Life3 weeks agoOxford partnership allows OpenAI to use rare Bodleian texts to train ChatGPT
-
Oxford united FC1 week agoLIVE: Exeter City vs Oxford United – Jersey Mike's Trophy group stage
-
Traffic & Transport2 weeks agoWhy should I have to pay more for buses if I don’t use a smartphone? | Bus fares
-
Oxford united FC2 weeks agoNorthern Ireland fans laud Oxford United defender Ciaron Brown
-
Oxford Events3 weeks agoFour days of equestrian spectacle at 2026 Blenheim Palace International Horse Trials
