Connect with us

Business & Technology

One in five UK firms move AI workloads abroad over power costs

Published

on


One in five British firms have moved AI workloads out of the UK because of high power costs, according to research commissioned by CUDO Compute, adding to concerns about the country’s ability to keep more AI activity on home soil.

The survey covered more than 700 senior AI decision-makers across the UK, US and Europe, including 200 in the UK. Among UK respondents, 33% said energy costs were limiting their ability to scale AI operations, while 43% said cost and performance outweighed sovereignty when deciding where to deploy AI.

The findings suggest the UK’s push for AI sovereignty is running up against infrastructure constraints. Businesses may want to keep workloads in domestic or regional markets, but power prices, available land and access to grid capacity are proving more decisive.

Geopolitics is also shaping deployment choices. Among UK respondents, 46% said geopolitical instability was pushing them to keep AI workloads within home markets, compared with 36% across the full sample.

Even so, commercial pressures remain strong. Almost a third of UK organisations (32%) said they were actively considering relocating workloads due to geopolitical pressures, while 45% said data sovereignty, regulatory compliance, or national security concerns were shaping their AI deployment strategy. At the same time, 31% said they were prioritising sovereign or regionally controlled compute even at a higher cost.

Where Workloads Go

When asked which markets looked most attractive for new AI cluster capacity, respondents ranked the US highest, with 72% viewing it positively. India followed at 62% and Eastern Europe at 58%.

Eastern Europe ranked ahead of Western Europe at 45% and the Nordics at 44%. China scored 55%, ahead of Latin America at 40%, the Middle East at 39%, Africa at 38% and APAC at 29%.

The pressure appears sharper for businesses that depend more heavily on compute. Among AI-first businesses, 32% said they would consider moving workloads overseas because of power costs, compared with 18% of enterprise organisations.

That gap suggests companies running the most demanding AI systems may be quickest to shift work to lower-cost locations when domestic operating conditions worsen. For policymakers, it highlights the challenge of matching AI ambitions with the industrial base needed to support them.

Infrastructure Strain

The findings reflect a broader issue in the AI market: infrastructure supply is constrained not only by access to chips and software, but also by physical requirements such as land, energy, cooling and grid access. In that context, electricity costs become a central part of the cost of compute.

CUDO Compute commissioned the research with Censuswide as part of its Land. Power. Compute report. Respondents included decision-makers responsible for AI workload and infrastructure decisions, budget input, vendor selection or active deployment planning. The sample included enterprise businesses with turnover above GBP £50 million and AI-first companies with turnover above GBP £1 million.

Matt Hawkins, chief executive of CUDO Compute, said the UK risked a widening gap between policy goals and operational reality if it did not address infrastructure constraints.

“AI sovereignty is being hotly discussed as a priority for UK organisations, but it only works if the infrastructure exists to support it,” Hawkins said. “What we are seeing is a growing tension between where businesses want to run AI and where they actually can.”

“AI is not abstract software. It is physical infrastructure that depends on power, land, cooling and grid access. When those constraints tighten, economics take over. If it is cheaper or easier to run workloads elsewhere, they will move, regardless of sovereignty ambitions.”

“Right now, every UK boardroom is talking about AI, but almost nobody is talking about the infrastructure needed to power it. Until we close that gap, there will continue to be a disconnect between policy, ambition and reality. The countries that solve this first will shape the future of AI, and the UK still has a window to lead, but it needs to act quickly.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business & Technology

Oxford pubs closing amid Tommy Robinson ‘unrest’ fears

Published

on


The controversial figure, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, is due at the Oxford Union tomorrow evening (Wednesday, June 17).

Yaxley-Lennon has been jailed multiple times for a variety of offences with his significant recent imprisonment in October 2024 for contempt of court.

Five roads, including St Michael’s Street next to the union, will be closed and police will be on stand-by for any unrest.

The Jolly Farmers Pub in Paradise Street said on social media that businesses were “boarding up windows” ahead of Yaxley-Lennon’s visit.

Staff outside The Jolly Farmers in 2022 (Image: The Jolly Farmers)

It said: “Businesses are going to suffer. Communities are going to suffer. Our reputation as a city is going to suffer.”

A pub spokesman confirmed The Jolly Farmers will not be boarding up, but it will be closed today for the visit.

The White Rabbit in Frairs Entry also said it will be closing early today “in solidarity with other independent businesses”.

READ MORE: Travellers at ‘unauthorised site’ in Oxford park after police notice

The pub said it is a “difficult decision”, but said the safety and wellbeing of visitors is “always a priority”.

“We hope everyone in Oxford stays safe this Wednesday,” the pub added. “Now let’s all have a nice cold pint and wait for this all to blow over.”

Meanwhile, the The Handle Bar Cafe and Kitchen also in St Michael’s Street said its licence to trade from the pavement has been revoked temporarily for the day.

Tommy Robinson (Image: PA)

A spokesman said it is due to the road closure and “likely trouble”, adding it too will shut early from 3pm “to keep staff safe”.

One businessman, who asked for him and his business to remain anonymous, said there is “growing frustration” both in businesses that may be affected and within the university at the timing of the debate, referencing other tensions elsewhere in the country.

“Some businesses in the vicinity of the Oxford Union site are definitely considering what steps need to be taken to prevent damage,” he said.

Anneliese Dodds, Oxford East MP, said: “The Oxford Union’s decision to host Stephen Yaxley-Lennon has already been rightly criticised for ignoring the views of Oxford residents concerned about its impact on community relations.

“Now it appears local businesses are also worried that they could be targeted by supporters of Yaxley-Lennon and the division he promotes.

“When will the Oxford Union’s leadership realise their behaviour is damaging our city?”





Source link

Continue Reading

Business & Technology

AI scams erode trust in online identity, Malwarebytes warns

Published

on


Malwarebytes has published research on how artificial intelligence is affecting trust, scams and online identity. The survey found that one in three daily AI users think it is acceptable to create explicit images of people they know.

The report drew on responses from 1,500 adults in the US, UK, Austria, Germany and Switzerland, and pointed to growing uncertainty over whether online material is real and communications are genuine.

One of the clearest findings was a decline in confidence in digital evidence. Some 88% of respondents said it is becoming harder to tell whether online content is genuinely human or real, while 84% said convincing video evidence no longer feels like proof.

Scams were another major concern. Some 85% of respondents said they struggle to distinguish scams from legitimate communications, up from 66% the previous year.

Half of those surveyed said they had experienced some form of AI fraud or scam. Exposure was highest among Gen Z respondents at 67%, compared with 51% of Millennials, 46% of Gen X and 30% of Boomers and older people.

The data also suggested identity-related abuse is becoming more common. One in 10 respondents said explicit AI images had been made of them without consent, while 19% said they had experienced some form of AI-driven identity harm. That figure rose to 30% among Gen Z.

Trust erosion

The research described a broad weakening of confidence in basic online signals such as voice, image and video. It found that AI-generated deepfakes, voice cloning and impersonation are contributing to what Malwarebytes characterised as a breakdown in certainty over what people can trust.

Regional differences also emerged. The US recorded higher exposure to AI fraud and scams at 56%, compared with 48% in the UK and 47% across the DACH region.

At the same time, concern was not always matched by defensive action. While 81% of respondents said they fear someone stealing their family’s likeness, only 13% said they had created a family codeword as a safeguard.

Similarly, 67% said they worry about voice cloning, but only 19% said they had turned off voicemail recordings to reduce that risk. The findings also showed that 74% are concerned about experiencing a deepfake or other AI-generated scam.

The DACH region lagged the US and UK across most protective behaviours measured in the study. The report suggested this may reflect stronger institutional trust in those markets.

Changing norms

Beyond fraud, the survey pointed to a shift in attitudes about what people consider acceptable AI use. It found that 18% of respondents believe it is acceptable to use AI to generate explicit images of someone they do not know.

Among daily AI users, the picture was more striking. One in three said it is acceptable to generate explicit images of someone without their consent.

Another 32% of respondents said it is acceptable to use AI to imitate their voice or appearance, provided it is for personal use. The findings suggest concern about misuse can coexist with tolerance for practices that could enable abuse.

Mark Beare, Head of Consumer at Malwarebytes, commented on the findings.

“AI’s deepest impact isn’t on our devices; it’s on us. When people can no longer trust what they see, hear, or who they’re talking to, the damage reaches far beyond any single scam and into the building blocks of our society,” Beare said.

He also linked the issue to the wider role of cyber protection.

“Cybersecurity has always adapted, and it will again, but only if we recognize that what we’re protecting now is something far more important than data. It’s people’s ability to believe one another,” he said.

The report was based on a survey prepared by an independent research consultant and distributed through Forsta. Respondents were aged 18 and older, with the sample split equally by gender and weighted across age groups, regions and race groups.

Malwarebytes also used the publication of the findings to highlight Scam Guard, a scam-detection feature built into its desktop and mobile products. The tool provides real-time feedback on suspected scams, threats and malware, alongside digital safety recommendations.

It is also intended to reduce the stigma that can surround scam victims by offering guidance before users act on suspicious messages. The wider findings, however, indicate that the challenge may extend beyond technical detection to a deeper loss of confidence in whether online interactions can be trusted at all.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business & Technology

Major UK restaurant chain rescued amid £37m debt administration

Published

on



Las Iguanas, which runs 44 sites across the country but none currently in Oxfordshire, had warned it would “inevitably enter administration” if the deal was not sanctioned.

It previously operated an Oxford branch in Park End Street, which closed back in June 2017, leaving the county without any of the group’s Latin American-themed restaurants.

The chain is owned by Iguanas Holdings Ltd, a subsidiary of The Big Table Group, which also sits behind several familiar high-street brands including Frankie & Benny’s, Bella Italia and Banana Tree.

READ MORE: Staff ‘gutted’ as UK giant cuts thousands of jobs amid £800m administration

In May, the company confirmed it had gone to court to seek approval for a restructuring plan intended to deal with its heavy debt pile.

At the time, bosses said that, without the move, the business would not be able to continue trading and would be forced into administration.

The court has now backed the plan, allowing around £37 million of debts to be cancelled or compromised and giving the chain a financial lifeline.

As part of the rescue, The Big Table Group is injecting £3 million of new funding into the business as part of a wider turnaround strategy.

READ MORE: UK food supplier giant falls into administration owing £1.5m debt

The deal also paves the way for reduced rents at certain sites and agreements with landlords on some outstanding sums, easing pressure on the company’s day‑to‑day cash flow.

Mr Justice Meade approved the scheme at a hearing in London, clearing the way for the restaurant operator to avoid collapse and continue trading.

The group has stressed that the restructuring relates only to the legal entity that holds the chain’s property leases and related costs, and does not involve the wider Big Table business, its suppliers, its employees or any of its other brands.

All 44 restaurants are continuing to operate as normal while the rescue plan is implemented, with the company presenting the deal as a way to secure the long‑term future of the brand and safeguard sites and jobs.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending