Connect with us

UK News

New Zealand officials reject ‘comfort women’ statue after objections from Japan | New Zealand

Published

on


New Zealand officials rejected on Wednesday an application to install a statue commemorating so-called “comfort women” enslaved by Japan before and during the second world war after Tokyo suggested it could harm diplomatic relations.

Japan forced up to 200,000 women from Korea, China and south-east Asia into sexual slavery from 1932 until 1945 and the issue remains a sore point in Tokyo’s relations with its neighbours.

The Korean Garden Trust had sought to install a statue honouring the survivors at Barry’s Point reserve in the Auckland suburb of Takapuna.

But after public consultation the local council declined an application to install the statue.

“This was a difficult decision, and one we did not make lightly,” the council’s board chair Trish Deans said.

“We carefully considered staff advice and the feedback received from the community through a formal consultation process.”

Among the submissions was a letter from the Japanese ambassador to New Zealand, Makoto Osawa, which claimed it could “cause division and conflict within New Zealand’s wonderful multi-ethnic and multicultural society and between Japanese and Korean communities”.

Wellington’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade said the Japanese government had made “formal representations” about the proposed statue.

Deans said many submitters had supported the statue as an opportunity to learn and reflect on what happened during the war. “We recognise the significance of the history the statue represents, and we acknowledge the survivors whose stories it seeks to honour.”

Some historians say as many as 200,000 women – mostly from Korea, but also China, south-east Asian, as well as a small number from Japan and Europe – were forced or tricked into working in military brothels between 1932 and 1945. They were euphemistically referred to as “comfort women” – a term Japan continues to use, despite survivors having taken issue with the label.

The women were forced to have sex with Japanese soldiers in frontline, makeshift brothels. According to testimony from surviving women, they were forced to have sex with 10 to 30 men a day. Forced abortions were commonplace.

The relationship between Japan and South Korea has become strained since the first survivor went public with her story in the early 1990s. The first “peace statue” honouring the women was erected in Seoul in 2011. Since then dozens more have been erected overseas, prompting Japan to call for their removal.

In 2018, Osaka ended its 60-year “sister city” relationship with San Francisco after the city agreed to recognise a similar statue. In 2020, Japan reacted angrily to statues in South Korea that appeared to depict the former Japanese prime minister, Shinzo Abe, prostrating himself before a young woman. In 2025, a peace statue was removed from Berlin, after a years-long dispute.

Japan insists the “comfort women” issue was settled “finally and irreversibly” by a 2015 agreement reached by Abe – who agreed to provide 1bn yen (US$9m) in “humanitarian” funds to a foundation set up to support the survivors – and then-South Korean president Park Geun-hye, who agreed not to raise the issue in international forums.

Park’s liberal successor, Moon Jae-in, effectively dissolved the fund in 2018, saying it did not take into account the feelings of survivors and the South Korean public.

Successive Japanese administrations have refused to provide official recompense, insisting that all compensation claims were settled under a 1965 bilateral peace treaty.

The proposal for Auckland’s statue received 672 submissions, with 51% of individuals strongly opposing it, and 13 out of 21 organisations also against it, according to the council.

With Agency France-Presse



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

UK News

Supreme court sides with Texas marijuana user who wants to own a firearm in latest case expanding gun rights – live | US supreme court

Published

on


Supreme court backs challenge to ban on gun ownership for drug users

The supreme court has sided with a marijuana user who wants to legally own a gun, the latest in a line of firearm cases from a court that has expanded gun rights.

In a 9-0 ruling, the justices sided with Ali Danial Hemani, a resident of Texas who was charged with felony gun possession after he acknowledged being a regular marijuana user. Hemani wasn’t charged with any other crimes or accused of using the weapon under the influence.

The 1968 Gun Control Act makes possession of a firearm illegal for anyone ⁠who “is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance”.

That gun restriction led to the 2024 conviction of Hunter Biden, who later that year received a pardon from his father, then-president Joe Biden. Prosecutors had accused him of lying about his use ⁠of narcotics in 2018 when he purchased a Colt Cobra handgun.

Hemani argued that a federal law barring gun ownership from anyone who uses drugs illegally violates the constitution’s second amendment.

The decision is a loss for the Trump administration, which had defended the 1968 law despite arguing against other gun restrictions.

Share

Updated at 

Key events

Supreme court releases opinions

The supreme court has started releasing opinions, so far it has issued a ruling backing a challenge to a federal law barring drug users from owning guns.

We’ll bring you any more updates here as we get them.

Share

Updated at 



Source link

Continue Reading

UK News

First Russian shadow fleet tanker enters Channel since Smyrtos boarding

Published

on



Forwarder, a Russian-flagged ship which left port in Primorsk last week, entered the Channel on Wednesday evening.



Source link

Continue Reading

UK News

Royal Ascot 2026, day three: news, tips and more on Gold Cup day – live | Royal Ascot

Published

on


Key events

Greg Wood

Greg Wood

Gosden and O’Brien rivalry crackles in Gold Cup

The rivalry between top trainers John Gosden and Aidan O’Brien is a long way short of a feud – “Aidan and I are big rivals”, Gosden said on Wednesday, “but we get on and we tease each other a lot. There’s no harm in that and it’s a little bit of banter.”

But it still makes for an interesting undercurrent as Gosden’s Trawlerman, bidding to become only the second eight-year-old winner since 1900, takes on the up-and-coming Scandinavia, last year’s St Leger winner, in the feature event of the week.

Gosden’s “teasing” has included frequent references to the big teams of runners that Ballydoyle sends to many Group Ones, and when O’Brien suggested last autumn that he would love to see Ombudsman, the winner of Wednesday’s Prince of Wales’s Stakes, line up for the Irish Champion Stakes, Gosden responded that his stable star would not “appreciate running against multiple entries from one stable on a track with a short straight.”

The possibility that Ballydoyle was employing “team tactics” with its runners was also highlighted after Tuesday’s St James’s Palace Stakes, when Christophe Soumillon, on the O’Brien second-string, Puerto Rico, picked up an eight-day ban for riding “in a manner to benefit” his stable companion and second-favourite, Gstaad.

There is little chance of a dust-up over tactics in the Gold Cup, however, as Scandinavia is O’Brien’s only runner in the race and Trawlerman is likely to make his own running. The regular to-and-fro between the two trainers, though, will add extra spice to the closing stages if Trawlerman and Scandinavia are duking it out in the final furlong.

The Princess of Wales presenting the prize for the Prince of Wales’s Stakes to John Gosden on Wednesday. Photograph: Sam Mellish/Getty Images
Share



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending