Business & Technology
Most large UK firms cannot explain overseas AI data use
Harbr Data has published research showing that 61% of large UK firms cannot fully explain how sensitive data is used once it is processed by AI systems overseas. The findings point to a governance gap in cross-border AI data handling.
The survey covered 250 UK IT and data decision-makers, including CIOs, CTOs, Heads of Data, Chief Data Officers and IT Directors, at organisations with 500 or more employees and about £100 million or more in annual revenue.
Nearly three-quarters of respondents said their data is processed by AI systems outside the UK at least weekly, while one-third said this happens daily. The research suggests cross-border data movement has become routine for many large organisations rather than an occasional exception.
That trend is putting pressure on internal governance structures. Boards remain responsible for the outcomes of AI-related decisions and compliance failures, yet only 20% of respondents said boards were ultimately accountable for cross-border AI governance. Instead, 58% said responsibility sat with the CIO or CTO.
Governance gap
The findings suggest many organisations are still struggling to build the staffing, controls and oversight needed to track sensitive data once it leaves domestic systems. Nearly half of respondents, 47%, said their organisations did not have enough qualified staff to manage cross-border AI.
A further 28% cited unclear ownership, saying responsibility was spread across multiple teams. More than 40% were unsure whether their systems fully complied with international regulations, and 38% said they faced difficulties auditing AI-driven decisions that rely on data from multiple regions.
The concern extends beyond internal processes. Half of respondents said limited visibility could lead to breaches of international compliance rules. Some 36% cited potential fines or regulatory investigations, while 35% pointed to strategic or geopolitical exposure. Commercial or contractual disputes were flagged by 31% of organisations.
Regional confidence
Confidence in managing AI-driven data also varied sharply by geography. Seven in 10 respondents said they felt confident handling such activity within the UK, while 62% said the same for the EU and EEA.
That confidence dropped outside Europe. Only 31% said they were confident in North America, and just 12% expressed confidence in Asia-Pacific. The figures suggest legal complexity, differing regulatory regimes and geopolitical concerns are shaping how companies assess overseas AI data processing.
External pressures are also shaping technology decisions. Data localisation laws have influenced AI architecture decisions for 91% of organisations, while 87% said geopolitical factors were affecting how and where data is processed.
The backdrop is a tougher compliance environment for businesses using AI across borders. As enforcement under the EU AI Act develops, companies operating internationally face closer scrutiny over governance, accountability and the movement of sensitive data between jurisdictions.
For large UK organisations, AI governance is moving beyond a narrow technical discussion and into broader operational and board-level risk management. The survey suggests many businesses are still working through how to assign ownership, document decision-making and maintain oversight when data is handled by systems outside the UK.
Harbr Data argues the issue lies less in the use of AI itself than in the difficulty of tracking and governing data once it enters global AI environments. The company works with organisations managing cross-border data ecosystems, with a focus on oversight of data sharing across systems, regions and business partners.
Anthony Cosgrove MBE, founder of Harbr Data, said: “AI systems are global by design, but accountability remains national. Cross-border AI processing is fundamentally an issue of how to govern data sharing. Organisations need a robust operating model for how sensitive data is accessed and used across systems, legal entities and national borders. Without that, boards risk being caught off guard by compliance breaches, fines, or international disputes.”
Business & Technology
Making Tax Digital pushes sole traders to incorporate
KAREN JOY BACUDO
Finance Editor
Taxfix has found that many UK sole traders are changing their business structure or considering a return to salaried work because of Making Tax Digital. The findings suggest the policy is affecting self-employment beyond tax reporting.
According to the tax app company’s data, nearly a quarter of sole traders affected by the rules have already set up, or started setting up, a limited company because of Making Tax Digital. A further 57% said they had considered doing so.
The figures suggest a reform intended to expand digital tax reporting is also shaping decisions about legal structure. For sole traders, incorporation brings a different set of accounting, filing and compliance duties, even if some see it as a way to manage the burden of the new reporting system.
The survey also found that 45% of respondents had considered leaving self-employment and returning to permanent salaried work because of Making Tax Digital. That points to a possible effect on business formation and the size of the self-employed workforce at a time when policymakers remain focused on growth and productivity.
Age appears to influence how people are responding. Among 18 to 24-year-olds, 29% said they had already set up or begun setting up a company at least partly because of Making Tax Digital, compared with 28% of those aged 25 to 34. The share fell to 21% among 35 to 44-year-olds, 20% among 45 to 54-year-olds and 14% among those over 55.
A similar pattern appeared in views on returning to employment. Six in 10 respondents aged 18 to 24 said the tax changes had made them consider going back to salaried work, compared with 48% of those aged 25 to 34, 43% of those aged 35 to 44, 39% of those aged 45 to 54 and 40% of those over 55.
Record keeping
The research indicates that many sole traders are still adjusting to the practical demands of digital record keeping. Four in 10 said they had started keeping digital records but were not confident they were doing it correctly, while 46% said they were using compatible software and felt ready to submit.
That split suggests awareness has improved, but confidence remains uneven as quarterly reporting approaches. For some businesses, the challenge appears to extend beyond software adoption to the wider time and administrative demands of staying compliant.
The survey found signs that the changes are already affecting day-to-day business decisions. While 39% said they felt more on top of their finances, 29% said they had become more cautious about taking on new work, 25% said they had raised or planned to raise prices to cover the extra administration, and 19% said they had delayed plans to grow or invest.
The figures suggest a mixed picture. Some sole traders say digital reporting is helping them manage their finances more closely, while others appear to be limiting activity, passing on costs or postponing expansion.
Employment concerns
For those considering leaving self-employment, moving back into a salaried role is not seen as straightforward. More than a third, or 37%, said they were worried they would struggle to find a job that matched their current income.
The main concerns were lower income, cited by 41%, followed by a competitive labour market at 32%, age discrimination at 31%, spending too long outside traditional employment at 29%, and fears that employers might view self-employment negatively at 24%.
This suggests Making Tax Digital may be putting pressure on workers who do not see an easy alternative in the wider labour market. It also raises the prospect that some may be changing their business structure not because it suits their commercial needs, but to avoid extra administrative strain.
“Making Tax Digital was meant to modernise the system. Instead, our research suggests it’s pushing many to change their business structure or leave self-employment entirely. What’s particularly concerning is that with nearly a quarter (23%) of sole traders setting up, or starting to set up, a limited company, incorporation is increasingly being viewed as an escape route. But incorporation isn’t a shortcut to less admin. Limited companies face their own complex filing obligations, with a broader set of tax, accounting and filing requirements. While closing the tax gap is an important goal, if sole traders respond to MTD by incorporating, the policy could instead push businesses outside the very system it was designed to bring them into. The focus now must be on simplifying the system and making compliance achievable, not something to be worked around,” said Oliver Harcourt, Senior Director, Taxfix.
Business & Technology
UK consumers say 75% of marketing feels irrelevant
SOFIAH NICHOLE SALIVIO
News Editor
Optimizely has published research showing that 75% of UK consumers find the marketing they receive irrelevant, highlighting a widening gap between consumer expectations and marketers’ ability to meet them.
The survey covered 1,000 UK consumers and 100 UK marketers. It found that many consumers are frustrated by generic, repetitive and poorly targeted messages, while marketers say time constraints, fragmented data and disconnected systems are limiting their work.
Among consumers, 69% said the marketing they receive is often generic or not tailored to them. The same proportion said they often receive duplicate messages or emails from brands, suggesting repetition remains a common problem across channels.
Volume is also an issue. Some 61% of consumers said they feel overwhelmed by the amount of marketing they receive, while 56% said it is becoming harder to find brands that communicate in a useful and engaging way.
The findings suggest poor relevance is starting to affect how people respond to brands. Nearly half of consumers, or 42%, said they disengage when content feels irrelevant, and 35% said they are more likely to unsubscribe from emails and other marketing communications after a poor or irrelevant experience.
Marketer pressures
On the marketing side, the research suggests many teams are under pressure to produce campaigns without the resources they need. Six in 10 marketers said they often have to launch campaigns without enough time or data to optimise them.
More than half, or 54%, said they move from one campaign to the next without enough time to evaluate performance properly. Another 66% said managing multiple tools and platforms creates unnecessary work.
This points to a structural problem for marketing departments trying to meet rising demand for more relevant communications. Consumers want messages that reflect their interests and behaviour, but marketers say the systems behind campaign planning and delivery are often disconnected.
In practice, that can leave brands sending more communications without improving quality. Repetition, weak targeting and poor timing can all reduce a campaign’s value, especially when consumers already feel inundated by promotional material.
AI questions
The research also touches on the role of artificial intelligence in marketing. While AI tools have been widely adopted to help teams produce content more quickly, the findings suggest speed alone has not solved the relevance problem.
One executive at the company linked the issue to how the technology is being used. “Consumers can tell when marketing wasn’t made for them, and our research shows they’re tuning it out because of it,” said Tara Corey, SVP, Marketing at Optimizely.
Corey added: “The irony is that AI was supposed to help fix this, but so far, it’s mostly just helped marketers make more of the same. The real opportunity isn’t more content, it’s better content, and that means using AI to clear away the busywork so marketers can actually focus on strategy and creativity again.”
The data comes as many brands try to balance automation with pressure for better customer engagement. Businesses have increased their use of email, mobile alerts and digital advertising, but consumers appear to be drawing a sharper distinction between communications they find useful and those they dismiss.
For marketers, the results suggest the challenge is no longer simply reach or frequency. The more pressing issue is whether organisations can organise their data, tools and workflows well enough to send messages customers consider relevant.
The findings also show that when that does not happen, the commercial risk is immediate: 35% of consumers said they are more likely to unsubscribe from marketing communications after a poor or irrelevant experience.
Business & Technology
Oxfordshire coffee factory refuses to return worker plaques
Dutch coffee-making giants Jacob Douwe Egberts (JDE) announced last year that its plant off Ruscote Avenue in Banbury, would shut.
The factory is home to an honours board made up of plaques honouring those who worked there for 30 or more years.
The long-service Honours Board, with over 600 names of employees who worked for more than 30 years, is a key part of the factory’s history.
JDE is preserving the legacy of its Banbury factory before its closure, including preserving the original plaques.
Campaigners have been working for over a year to get their own plaques back, or their families plaques back.
Now, the company and Cherwell District Council have confirmed plaques will be displayed for the community.
Councillor Lesley McLean, Leader of Cherwell District Council, stated the council’s support for preserving these “historic items” in recognition of the factory’s contribution to Banbury.
Gordon Boffin, partner of Jo Mobley who has been instrumental in the campaign to return the plaques, said the recipients and their families just want them back.
Jo Mobley is attempting to reunite more than 600 others on the board with theirs, as well as her fathers
Ms Mobley has started the Facebook page ‘help reunite 30 years service plaques from JDE’.
READ MORE: Court hears MOD asylum centre costs five times asylum hotel
Workers for JDE coffee plant, which has closed (Image: Contributed)
The Facebook group has more than 230 followers with workers and family members alike trying to retrieve the plaques.
Talking to the BBC, she said: “It started as a very small mission and its ended up very big – it’s snowballed into finding more than 600 names.”
“I would like every person, or as quite a few have passed away, any of their families to be reunited with their plaques,” she said.
The group was working with the Labour MP for Banbury, Sean Woodcock, to retrieve the plaques.
The original plaques from the factory and the Bird’s cockerel gates to the factory are familiar landmarks in Banbury.
The gates will also be displayed to the community following the closure.
The factory, which opened as a General Foods plant in 1964, produced household brands like Bird’s Custard, Kenco, and Tassimo.
JDE Peet’s is also donating over £24,000 to various local organisations, including Banbury Young Homelessness Project, The Sunshine Centre, Banbury Museum, and The Horton General Hospital.
The funds were partially raised by auctioning equipment from the site.
The factory also have an over 18-year long partnership with Katherine House Hospice in Adderbury, which it has donated more than £62,000 to.
The company has pledged to continue providing the hospice with coffee for the next two years.
-
Business & Technology3 weeks agoHSBC UK & Visa test AI shopping with live payments
-
Business & Technology3 weeks agoValarian lands USD $50 million backing for sovereign AI
-
Business & Technology4 weeks agoMouser warns against viral hacks to cool overheating phones
-
Oxford News4 weeks agoNew romantasy bookshop attracts queues of customers
-
Business & Technology4 weeks agoSNP & Palantir launch AI tools for SAP transformations
-
Business & Technology4 weeks agoKane tops England influencer rankings after Mexico win
-
Traffic & Transport4 weeks ago‘I felt my spine and body split’: the woman who was hit by a child on a Lime bike – and denied compensation | Ebikes
-
Oxford News4 weeks agoDWP now checking bank accounts for Universal Credit and Pension Credit
