The world watched earlier this month as Nasa sent four astronauts around the moon – but to actually land on the surface the US is once again in a space race, this time with China. And China may well win.

Both countries plan to build inhabited lunar bases – the first settlement on another celestial body – as well as searching for rare resources and using the deep space environment to test technology for future crewed missions to Mars.

The well-funded China National Space Administration (CNSA) is pitted against the US’s National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Nasa).

And while Nasa has an advantage from institutional knowledge of having already landed on the moon as part of its Apollo programme, it is attempting to return with just a fraction of the share of the national budget it had in the 1960s.

The US space agency is also vulnerable to changes in government every four years, making it hard to stick to decade-long plans – something Chinese rocket engineers working in a one-party state are not affected by.

To move ahead at speed, Nasa has outsourced critical mission components to private firms, including billionaire-led ventures aiming to capitalise on the burgeoning space economy. Elon Musk’s SpaceX and Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin are both rushing to design and build lunar landers in time for test flights next year.

Unlike the race to the moon between the Soviet Union and the US, the 21st-century competition is shaping up to be more like a marathon, with a gargantuan effort to launch multiple missions over many years.

“What this is really illustrating is that it doesn’t matter who gets to the moon next. It matters who gets to the moon the next 10 times,” said Scott Manley, a Scottish astrophysicist and expert on rocket engineering. “The nation that keeps going is going to be the one that actually starts to win; starts to actually claim space. That’s critical.”

With space being an area with opaque legal consensus, the first country to establish a presence on the resource-rich lunar surface will probably have a head start in defining the rules.

Still, the first return crewed mission will no doubt be a major symbolic win, both domestically and as an expression of power overseas. This competitive element is regularly played up by Nasa, which has an interest in creating a sense of urgency to encourage Congress to fund it. The Nasa chief, Jared Isaacman, said this week that there was a global power competition for the “high ground of space”, adding: “When you do have a competition, you do not want to lose.”

It is a tight race: Nasa plans to land in 2028, although it will possibly be delayed, and Beijing plans to land by 2030, but that could arrive sooner. “The difference between winning and losing will be measured in months not years,” said Isaacman.

China’s human spaceflight programme was established in the 1990s but in the past 25 years it has accelerated, and also partners with the military and local business. While China has never sent a taikonaut beyond low Earth orbit, Beijing already has its own space station, and, unlike Nasa, has an impressive record of adhering to its own timeline.

“When they put a flag in the sand, they tend to be pretty good at hitting that date,” said Manley, who is based in the US. Having “eclipsed Russia in almost every single way in terms of their space capabilities”, he said China is now running a “very deliberate, but not necessarily that fast, space programme”.

A decade ago, James Lewis, a former US diplomat, testified to a committee in Congress that the US, having won the race to the moon against the USSR had “largely lost interest in space”, while China was ramping up its programme. “What we don’t want is a tortoise and hare scenario where a slow-moving China passes the United States,” he said.

Over the past 10 years, Nasa has reinvigorated its crewed space programme, which is called Artemis after the Greek goddess of the moon who is the twin sister of Apollo. That culminated this month in the first crewed mission to the vicinity of moon since 1972.

At the same time, China – which calls its lunar exploration missions Chang’e after the Chinese goddess of the moon – has made formidable progress in catching up, and has broken other records. In 2024, China became the first nation to retrieve samples from the lunar far side with the Chang’e-6 probe. Chang’e-7 is scheduled for late 2026 to hunt for water ice at the south pole, a vital component for a sustained human presence.

“Overall, progress appears to be proceeding smoothly,” said Xie Gengxin, a professor at Chongqing University and a prominent Chinese scientist who has led key experiments in Beijing’s space programme, including the groundbreaking test in 2019 in which a green leaf was grown on the moon for the first time. In another of his experiments a butterfly hatched in space.

Beijing is regularly testing its equipment for crewed missions, which will use a Long March-10 rocket to launch the Mengzhou, or “dream boat”, space capsule with three astronauts. A nine-metre lunar lander called Lanyue, meaning “embracing the moon”, will then take two down to the surface, where they will hop around in a new Chinese spacesuit. The Wangyu suit (“gazing into the cosmos”) has been designed for more flexibility, allowing astronauts to bend down to the rugged terrain.

In the US, SpaceX and Blue Origin are racing to finish their landers in time for Nasa to test their docking capabilities next year. Blue Origin plans a test flight for an iteration of its Blue Moon lander later in 2026, while few details have been released on SpaceX’s 52-metre tall lander, which dwarfs other models. Neither lander is complete, raising questions over Nasa’s ambitious moon-landing timeline.

Within the scientific community, the hope is that the moon will encourage cooperation for the benefit of all, perhaps replicating a situation like Antarctica, which operates as a neutral, science-focused territory under the 1959 treaty that prohibits military activity, mineral mining or new territorial claims.

Yet this is a time of fierce rivalry between Washington and Beijing. Nasa was in effect banned under US law in 2011 from collaborating with China’s space agency, and relations have only soured since then.

In China, their space mission is not framed so much as a race with the US, but instead focuses on achieving domestic aims. “We are not setting a goal of comprehensively overtaking the US,” said Xie. “That would neither be realistic nor necessary.” But he added, landing humans on the moon “will undoubtedly inspire a strong sense of national pride and fulfilment”.

While the US has banned cooperation with China, the European Space Agency (Esa) and individual governments have not. Italy, France and Sweden sent payloads aboard China’s latest lunar probe, the Chang’e-6 mission.

Pierre-Yves Meslin, a researcher at France’s Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie, worked as the scientific manager of the Dorn experiment, which analysed the moon’s very thin atmosphere and was carried onboard the Chinese Chang’e 6 lander.

“As Europeans, we don’t have the tools to go to the moon ourselves … So we rely on international partners to deliver our instruments,” he said. “Mostly the US. But now China is definitely another very serious partner.”

Working with China has given him insight into their space programme. “They have a very clear and very logical step-by-step programme to go to the moon,” he said.

The impact of massive domestic investment from China in the space sector is being felt worldwide, he said. Two decades ago, Meslin did not see so many Chinese people at space science conferences but their halls are now filled with young Chinese scientists.

What has been critical from a researcher perspective, said Meslin, is a reliable partner to take experiments into space, something he said China has proved it can be. “When they decide something, it’s decided and it will be done.”

Lawmakers and journalists were in shock after a Washington media tradition turned violent on Saturday night, halting the White House correspondents’ dinner while the first course of burrata and greens sat on their plates.

“We thought that some of the plates for the dinner fell, and next thing you know, we all went under the table screaming,” said Jamie Raskin, a Maryland congressman who was among the 2,000 attendees gathered to celebrate press freedom. It was the first time that Donald Trump chose to attend the annual Washington event.

CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer said that he was “a few feet away” from the shooter.

“The first thing that went through my mind: is he trying to shoot me?” Blitzer said in a CNN interview. “I don’t think he was trying to shoot me, but I was very close to him as the gunshots were fired and he was very, very scary. But I’m OK, now.”

Kerry Kennedy, a lawyer and human rights activist, said in a post that Raskin had whispered “you’re OK, you’re OK, you’re OK” to her from beneath their table.

Another guest estimated that he waited about five to 10 minutes under the table before Secret Service corralled the black tie attendees out of the dinner hall.

Trump and the first lady left the venue uninjured just before 10pm. The president gave a press briefing at the White House, and said that the event would be rescheduled in 30 days.

“Please get on your knees and pray for President Trump and for our country right now,” said Representative Nancy Mace on X amid mixed reports from the ballroom. “We are hearing reports the shooter has been apprehended,” she said.

Secret Service spokesperson Anthony Guglielmi said that an individual was in custody following Saturday’s event but did not release additional details about the suspect.

“It is a bit surprising because this is supposed to be the most secure place in Washington DC with cabinet members, president, vice-president, everybody here,” said Marcin Wrona, US correspondent for TVN Poland, who was attending the dinner. “Yes, we had attempts on President Trump’s life in Butler, Pennsylvania, in Florida. Am I very surprised? Unfortunately not.”

Nancy Pelosi, the former Democratic House speaker, commended the Secret Service and local law enforcement for their swift action to secure the scene in the aftermath of Saturday’s shooting.

But other conservative guests and commentators quickly cast blame on media responsible for organizing the White House correspondents dinner.

Political commentator Debra Lea recorded a vlog from outside the Hilton, criticizing the precautions taken for such a high profile event. “There were no pat-downs, no metal detectors, nothing going on,” she said.

Kari Lake, another conservative media figure and former TV anchor, derided the security as “lax”, saying that no one asked for her ticket or a photo id at the door.

“When you consider you are entering a roomful of fake news media —90% of whom hate the President you would think they would have better security,” she said on X.

Laura Loomer, a rightwing influencer who did not attend the White House correspondents’ dinner, told guests to leave. “It’s not worth letting someone kill Trump in front of the media. The media would enjoy that too much.”

Trump used the discussion of the Hilton’s security as an opportunity to highlight the merits of his new ballroom during an impromptu press conference. The president survived an assassination attempt at a political rally in July 2024.

“This is why we have to have all of the attributes of what we’re planning at the White House. It’s actually a larger room, and it’s much more secure … They’ve wanted the ballroom for 150 years for lots of different reasons. But today’s a little bit different, because today we need levels of security that probably nobody’s ever seen before,” Trump said.

Trump closed his press conference by assuring reporters, many dressed in tuxedos and gowns, that their gala would be rescheduled. “It was a little different evening than we thought. But we’re going to do it again.”

A YouGov survey of more than 2,300 British adults, published this month, found that while voice notes have become slightly more popular in the last year, still only 15% communicate via voice note regularly (i.e. a few times a week). Across men, women, and across every age group – including Gen Zs – voice notes were the least popular method of communication.