Connect with us

Business & Technology

Europe firms in dark over AI cyberattacks, ISACA finds

Published

on



SOFIAH NICHOLE SALIVIO

News Editor

ISACA has published research showing that 35% of European organisations cannot say whether they have been hit by an AI-powered cyberattack, highlighting weak visibility over a fast-growing security risk across the region.

A survey of 681 digital trust professionals in Europe found that 71% believe AI-powered phishing and social engineering attacks are harder to detect. Another 58% said AI has made it significantly harder to authenticate digital information, while 38% reported declining trust in traditional threat detection methods.

The findings add detail to broader concern among businesses and policymakers about the effect of artificial intelligence on cyber risk. ISACA’s data suggests many organisations are struggling to keep pace not only with AI-enabled attacks, but also with the internal controls needed to oversee the technology’s use in day-to-day work.

Detection gap

Misinformation and disinformation emerged as the top AI-related risk in the survey, cited by 87% of respondents. Privacy violations followed at 75%, while 60% identified social engineering as a major concern.

At the same time, respondents reported that AI is helping defensive work. Some 43% said it has improved their organisation’s ability to detect and respond to cyber threats, and 34% are already deploying AI specifically to support cybersecurity efforts.

That contrast runs through the results. Businesses are adopting AI tools at scale, but governance appears to be lagging, leaving gaps in oversight and raising concern over misuse.

Across European workplaces, 82% of organisations said they expressly permit AI use and 74% permit generative AI in particular. The most common uses were creating written content, cited by 69%, increasing productivity at 63%, automating repetitive tasks at 54%, and analysing large datasets at 52%.

Many also reported practical gains. Time savings were cited by 77% of respondents, while 40% said AI had increased capacity without additional headcount.

Policy shortfall

Despite AI’s spread in routine operations, only 42% of organisations said they have a formal, comprehensive AI policy in place. The survey also found that 33% do not require employees to disclose when AI has contributed to work products.

That lack of formal controls is feeding concern among professionals responsible for risk, governance and cybersecurity. According to the poll, 87% are worried about employees using AI in an unauthorised capacity. Another 26% said their biggest challenge with AI at work is a lack of trust that it adequately protects intellectual property and sensitive information.

Chris Dimitriadis set out ISACA’s view of the trend.

“AI has fundamentally changed the threat landscape. Attackers can now hack at the speed of intent, and too many organisations don’t even know whether they’ve already been on the receiving end. The fact that so many businesses are operating without the governance to see where AI is being used, let alone how, makes that exposure significantly worse.”

“Ungoverned AI doesn’t just create operational risk. It actively hands an advantage to those who want to cause harm. Closing that gap starts with professional development and advancing the expertise needed to build and embed AI governance that stands up under pressure. Doing so is now a security imperative,” said Dimitriadis, Chief Global Strategy Officer at ISACA.

Skills pressure

The survey suggests the burden of responding to this shift is falling on staff who do not feel fully prepared. More than half of respondents, 54%, said they need to upskill within the next six months to retain their job or advance their career. Over the next year, that figure rose to 79%.

Skills were also identified as a strategic risk. Some 41% named the growing skills gap as one of the biggest risks posed by AI, yet 21% said their organisations still provide no formal AI training.

Regulation is another area where implementation appears uneven. The EU AI Act was the most widely referenced governance framework in the survey, cited by 45% of organisations. NIST followed at 26%.

Even so, 26% of organisations said they do not yet follow any framework. That points to a gap between awareness of regulation and the practical steps needed to embed governance, training and oversight.

Dimitriadis said the challenge is not a departure from established risk management principles, but a test of whether organisations can apply them quickly enough in a more complex environment.

“The fundamentals of good risk management have not changed. What has changed is the complexity and speed of what practitioners are now being asked to govern. AI risk requires professionals who can evaluate exposure, embed oversight across the full lifecycle, and advise on regulatory best practice. Organisations that invest in that capability now will not only be better protected; they will also be better placed to fully realise AI’s benefits. That is the shift credentials like ISACA’s Advanced in AI Risk credential are designed to deliver,” Dimitriadis said.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business & Technology

£7 billion East West Rail Oxford to Milton Keynes row reignites

Published

on


The dispute that halted the much-anticipated introduction of new trains to Milton Keynes looked to be coming to be coming to an end.

The Government has been pushing for ‘Driver-Controlled’ or ‘Driver-Only Operation’—a cost-saving method introduced widely on London commuter lines in the 1980s, a move widely condemned by trade unions.

The Department for Transport’s (DfT) plan for trains to be staffed by a driver and a customer service inspector seemed to solve the dispute.

But this did not meet the The National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT)’s demands.

The union has been opposing plans to use driver-only trains between Oxford and Milton Keynes Central.

Although the line between Bicester and Bletchley has technically been open since 2024, it has only been used by freight, charter, and test trains.

Chiltern Railways was chosen as the operator and has been advertising for customer service inspectors, instead of guards.

However, these inspectors would not be considered ‘safety-critical,’ meaning the driver would be responsible for opening and closing the doors.

Chiltern Railways stated it has made significant progress in preparing for the line to open to scheduled passenger trains, but no date has been announced.

READ MORE: Cruz Beckham pokes fun at brother Brooklyn amid bitter family fallout

East West Rail Action Group protesting outside Bletchley stationEast West Rail Action Group protesting outside Bletchley station (Image: Diana Blamires)

The company said it is continuing to work closely with the The Department for Transport, trade unions, and industry partners.

The National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers general secretary Eddie Dempsey insisted on the necessity of a guaranteed safety-critical second person aboard trains, citing their essential role in handling a wide range of duties and responding appropriately to ‘dangerous and fast-moving’ situations.

He said: “We need a clear commitment from Chiltern that East West Rail services will not be Driver Only Operation and that a second safety-critical member of staff will be guaranteed.”

Chiltern Railways is set to be renationalised on September 20, when it will be taken over by DfT Operator in preparation for Great British Railways.

45 drivers have been recruited for the new service, but no guards.

The project delays have already taken a significant financial toll.

Six two-carriage trains have accumulated £2.6m in costs due to delays in their lease.

Currently idle in a Bletchley depot, these units are costing the Department for Transport money without generating any fare income.

The Government previously said trains from Oxford to Milton Keynes are being lined up to appear in the December rail timetable.

In a written statement, rail minister Lord Peter Hendy said: “Chiltern worked with Network Rail, the Department for Transport and other operators on the December 2026 timetable and services have been timetabled between Oxford, Winslow, Bletchley and Milton Keynes.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Business & Technology

Tech firms back Boycott Your Bed sleepout across UK

Published

on



SOFIAH NICHOLE SALIVIO

News Editor

More than 100 technology companies have signed up for Boycott Your Bed 2026, a charity sleepout expected to bring together more than 500 participants across four UK cities.

Participants from companies including Accenture, PwC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Siemens and Barclays are due to spend a night outdoors as part of the annual fundraiser for Action for Children. The event will take place in London, Glasgow, Manchester and Leeds.

Now in its 29th year, Boycott Your Bed has become a longstanding fixture in parts of the UK technology sector. Organisers say it has raised GBP £14.6 million for Action for Children since launching in 1998.

The sleepout aims to raise both money and awareness for vulnerable children, young people and families across the UK. Action for Children operates 342 services in communities, schools and online, and says it helped more than half a million children, young people and families in the last year.

Recent government figures cited by organisers show that more than four million children in the UK are growing up in poverty. Against that backdrop, the event asks participants to spend one night outside as a reminder of the insecurity some families face.

Although the fundraiser is open to individuals and teams from any industry, it has attracted strong backing from the technology community for nearly three decades. This year’s participating businesses also include Capgemini, Red Hat, Burberry, Specsavers, Irwin Mitchell, Kier Group and Sparta Global.

Organisers present the event as both a fundraising effort and a meeting point for people across the sector. Its mix of senior leaders, partners, customers and technology professionals has helped give the sleepout a profile beyond that of a conventional charity initiative.

Sector gathering

The level of corporate involvement suggests companies still see value in cause-led events that also create space for professional networking. In a market where firms face pressure to show social impact while maintaining industry ties, Boycott Your Bed has carved out a role that does both.

That dual purpose appears to be part of the event’s staying power. With registrations still open for a limited period, organisers expect further sign-ups before the sleepout takes place.

For Action for Children, the event provides a significant fundraising channel linked to a business audience with long-standing ties to the charity. For participating companies, it offers a visible way to support a national children’s charity while bringing staff and contacts together in an informal setting.

The format is simple: individuals and teams commit to one night outdoors in organised sleepouts staged simultaneously across the four cities, with fundraising tied to participation.

Long record

Boycott Your Bed began as a campaign to raise awareness and funds and has grown into one of the larger recurring charity gatherings associated with the UK technology industry. Organisers say more than 100 companies have already registered for this year’s edition.

The range of names on the participant list points to support from consulting firms, financial services groups, industrial businesses and software companies. That gives the event a broader corporate base than a niche sector fundraiser, even though its roots remain closely tied to the technology industry.

Ken Deeks, vice president and founder of Boycott Your Bed, commented on the scale of support and the purpose behind the event. “Understanding the reality of these challenges has been both eye-opening and deeply moving. Boycott Your Bed raises awareness of issues that can often remain hidden from view. The response from the technology community continues to be incredible, with more than 100 companies already signed up and many more expected to join before October. We anticipate more than 500 sleepers on the night, creating a fantastic opportunity for people from across the sector to come together. Importantly, sleepers will play a direct role in supporting Action for Children’s work with vulnerable children, young people and families across the UK,” Deeks said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business & Technology

Morrisons to clean up overgrown land at Bicester store

Published

on


The UK supermarket chain is working to clean up land at its Bicester store in Villiers Road, after residents raised concerns about overgrown vegetation and litter.

The issues were highlighted by local resident Jamie Jessett, who said parts of the property appeared neglected and in need of maintenance.

Concerns focused on the permeable paving area at the front of the store, where weeds have reportedly spread across much of the surface.

Morrisons Daily to clear overgrown vegetation and litter at a ‘below acceptable standards’ Oxfordshire site (Image: Jamie Jessett)

He also raised issues about the rear yard and garage area, including overgrown brambles and weeds, as well as accumulations of litter and debris.

He said: “There is a duty to keep land clear of litter and reasonably tidy and the current condition falls well below acceptable standards, affecting public safety.”

Further concerns were expressed about discarded needles, suspected drug use and anti-social behaviour in the rear area, which borders a public play area used by children and families.

“I am very concerned”, he added, “Families and their young children are leaving or entering the play area behind the shop, which is about 20 footsteps into the tree area where I found a needle in 2023. The safety of the public needs to be taken more seriously.”

The freehold of the Morrisons Daily premises is held by Alliance Property Holdings Limited, a subsidiary of Morrisons.

Responding to concerns about the site, a Morrisons spokesperson said action was already underway.

They said: “We are already working with our maintenance team to clean up the land owned by Morrisons.

“Please note that the area behind the shops is private property and strictly off-limits to the public.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending