Abir, who is from Hillingdon in London, was last seen at around 3pm on Saturday, April 18.

The 15-year-old, whose surname has not been disclosed, has links to Reading and Oxfordshire.

Police have now released a new image of the missing teen.

READ MORE: Oxfordshire pub crowned UK Greene King Pub of the Year 2026

He is described as wearing black Nike tracksuit bottoms, a zip-up jumper worn over a shirt, and black-and-white Nike Air Max trainers.

Have you seen Abir? (Image: TVP)

Thames Valley Police has released a fresh appeal for people to help find Abir, alongside a new image of the teen.

The force said: “We are concerned for Abir’s welfare.

“If you have seen him or have any information about where he might be, please contact us on 101 or via our website, quoting the reference 43260192980.”

Mr Morris passed away on Sunday, April 19, following a short illness –  he had never spent a day in hospital until that point.

He is known for his groundbreaking book ‘The Naked Ape,’ which explores human behaviour and has sold more than 20 million copies.

Known affectionately as ‘Doc Morris,’ he also authored ‘The Soccer Tribe,’ using material from his interactions with Oxford United fans.

At various times, Mr Morris was a season ticket holder, director, vice chairman, and vice president of the club.

However, his most enduring contribution was the creation of the club’s emblem, the ox head, in 1978.

The logo, based on a fierce Minoan bull, has been used by the club ever since.

Mr Morris spent his later years in Ireland with his son, Jason, and his family, having moved from his Oxford home after the death of his wife of 66 years, Ramona.

A zoologist, author, TV presenter, and surrealist artist, Mr Morris was writing and painting until his last week.

He watched every Oxford United match that he could on TV, including a win against Watford a week before his passing.

Oxford United expressed condolences to Mr Morris’s friends and family, acknowledging that he ‘leaves a legacy with the Club’.

MPs voted to push controversial plans forward but the House of Lords is refusing to back down. That means the battle is still ongoing and no final decision has been made.

At the heart of the row is a simple but explosive question: should the Government have the power to influence how pension funds invest billions of pounds?

What’s actually changing for pensions?

The proposed rules would give ministers the ability to set limits on how some pension money is invested.

The Government says this is tightly controlled and based on agreements already made with major pension schemes.

Critics are not convinced. They warn that even having the power could pressure funds to change how they invest.

Why does it matter for your money?

The plan is designed to push more pension investment into the UK to boost economic growth.

Ministers argue that it could benefit savers in the long run.

But others say it could restrict investment choices and potentially impact returns.

What happens next and what should workers do?

The Commons and Lords are now locked in a back-and-forth battle over the plans.

Peers have already challenged the proposals, and MPs are insisting on pushing them through.

Treasury minister Torsten Bell said the law is “designed to make clear on the face of the Bill that the power can only be used in line with what the industry itself has committed to”.

But, until both sides agree, the reforms remain in limbo, so it’s a wait-and-see time for workers with pensions.

Labour MP and former Treasury minister Liam Byrne said: “The measures the minister has set out this afternoon really are essential if we are to pursue the long-term interests of pension savers in this country, because it is in their fundamental interest that they live and retire in an economy that is growing faster in the years to come.

Recommended reading:

“The only way in which we are going to collectively achieve that is if we raise the investment rate in this country.”

The bill goes back to the Lords again, and the fight continues.

That means uncertainty remains over what happens next and how far these powers could go.

Do you think there should be more government powers over private pensions? Tell us in the comments below.