Connect with us

Business & Technology

UK launches GBP £500m sovereign AI fund amid doubts

Published

on


The UK government has launched a GBP £500 million Sovereign AI fund, a move that industry figures say highlights tensions between national AI ambitions and reliance on overseas providers.

The fund is intended to support domestic AI infrastructure and models as part of a broader push for so-called sovereign AI across Europe and other advanced economies. Ministers have presented it as a way to strengthen national resilience in strategic technologies and reduce exposure to foreign supply chains.

The announcement has sparked debate among vendors and advisers over how far the UK should pursue AI self-sufficiency. Much of the discussion centres on the dominance of US and Chinese firms in foundation models, cloud infrastructure and specialist chips.

George Tziahanas, vice president of compliance and associate general counsel at Archive360, warned that governments risk overextending national resources if they try to replicate entire AI stacks onshore too quickly. In his view, strategies focused too narrowly on sovereignty could miss advances in commercial tools developed abroad.

“Sovereign AI investments are smart, but countries shouldn’t over index on building fully domestic AI supply chains. Not only will they be difficult to achieve at speed, but they also risk falling behind the ongoing innovations in other countries. In the UK’s case, that’s China and the US, both of which have a large head start.”

“Countries should also consider prioritising flexibility to support the use of multiple AI tools to ensure individuals and companies are not locked into any one model or one tech company. Optionality is likely a stronger long-term strategy than attempting to build a fully domestic AI model,” Tziahanas said.

Archive360 works with regulated organisations on data and AI governance and manages large volumes of cloud-based corporate information. Its clients use third-party AI models for analytics and automation, making data jurisdiction, vendor concentration and model risk central concerns for the firm.

Tziahanas’s comments reflect a broader concern that heavy investment in homegrown models could weaken incentives to adopt global tools that have already reached scale. Supporters of the government’s approach argue that long-term security and strategic control justify the initial cost and delay.

Another line of criticism focuses on how the Sovereign AI fund will benefit ordinary businesses. With many enterprises still in the early stages of deployment, advisers argue that policy must address both adoption and industrial strategy.

Tarek Nseir, co-founder and senior value partner at consultancy Valliance, drew a distinction between building national champions and driving day-to-day AI use inside existing corporations. He pointed to low adoption levels among UK firms and continued dependence on US providers.

“AI sovereignty is a positive long-term ambition and this investment is a good move to that end, but the reality is UK enterprises are still heavily reliant on US-controlled technology – which is far from a bad thing. The UK’s real challenge is working with these providers to make sure the right infrastructure is in place for enterprises, so they can get the maximum value from working with the likes of OpenAI, Google, Anthropic or Palantir,” Nseir said.

Nseir pointed to recent developments involving major AI companies working closely with UK public bodies. He argued that political debates over national control can distract from immediate opportunities to improve productivity through existing services.

“We can’t celebrate more sovereign technology funding without also acknowledging that not enough is being done to put AI into the hands of existing enterprises. OpenAI pulling Stargate UK, and the ongoing debate around Palantir’s work with the NHS, both suggest that independence is distracting from on-the-ground realities. These are the firms who can deliver returns immediately, and we can’t let the pursuit of sovereignty become a blocker,” Nseir said.

Government departments have presented the Sovereign AI fund as one part of a broader industrial and digital strategy. Policy documents refer to domestic compute infrastructure, homegrown models, and support for UK research, as well as work on skills and regulation.

Data from industry groups suggest that only about one in six UK businesses has adopted AI in its core operations. Larger companies and financial services firms report greater use of machine learning and generative tools, while many small and medium-sized enterprises remain cautious about costs, compliance, and return on investment.

Vendors warn that fragmented approaches to sovereignty across jurisdictions could add complexity to compliance and cross-border data flows. They argue that multi-model strategies and contractual controls over data location and privacy may offer a more flexible path than the strict localisation of all AI components.

The UK fund comes as scrutiny of the AI supply chain intensifies, including concentration risks around advanced chips, dependence on a small group of cloud providers and questions over long-term access to leading frontier models. Industry participants expect those structural issues to shape the extent of influence any single national programme can have on the global market.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business & Technology

AI scams erode trust in online identity, Malwarebytes warns

Published

on


Malwarebytes has published research on how artificial intelligence is affecting trust, scams and online identity. The survey found that one in three daily AI users think it is acceptable to create explicit images of people they know.

The report drew on responses from 1,500 adults in the US, UK, Austria, Germany and Switzerland, and pointed to growing uncertainty over whether online material is real and communications are genuine.

One of the clearest findings was a decline in confidence in digital evidence. Some 88% of respondents said it is becoming harder to tell whether online content is genuinely human or real, while 84% said convincing video evidence no longer feels like proof.

Scams were another major concern. Some 85% of respondents said they struggle to distinguish scams from legitimate communications, up from 66% the previous year.

Half of those surveyed said they had experienced some form of AI fraud or scam. Exposure was highest among Gen Z respondents at 67%, compared with 51% of Millennials, 46% of Gen X and 30% of Boomers and older people.

The data also suggested identity-related abuse is becoming more common. One in 10 respondents said explicit AI images had been made of them without consent, while 19% said they had experienced some form of AI-driven identity harm. That figure rose to 30% among Gen Z.

Trust erosion

The research described a broad weakening of confidence in basic online signals such as voice, image and video. It found that AI-generated deepfakes, voice cloning and impersonation are contributing to what Malwarebytes characterised as a breakdown in certainty over what people can trust.

Regional differences also emerged. The US recorded higher exposure to AI fraud and scams at 56%, compared with 48% in the UK and 47% across the DACH region.

At the same time, concern was not always matched by defensive action. While 81% of respondents said they fear someone stealing their family’s likeness, only 13% said they had created a family codeword as a safeguard.

Similarly, 67% said they worry about voice cloning, but only 19% said they had turned off voicemail recordings to reduce that risk. The findings also showed that 74% are concerned about experiencing a deepfake or other AI-generated scam.

The DACH region lagged the US and UK across most protective behaviours measured in the study. The report suggested this may reflect stronger institutional trust in those markets.

Changing norms

Beyond fraud, the survey pointed to a shift in attitudes about what people consider acceptable AI use. It found that 18% of respondents believe it is acceptable to use AI to generate explicit images of someone they do not know.

Among daily AI users, the picture was more striking. One in three said it is acceptable to generate explicit images of someone without their consent.

Another 32% of respondents said it is acceptable to use AI to imitate their voice or appearance, provided it is for personal use. The findings suggest concern about misuse can coexist with tolerance for practices that could enable abuse.

Mark Beare, Head of Consumer at Malwarebytes, commented on the findings.

“AI’s deepest impact isn’t on our devices; it’s on us. When people can no longer trust what they see, hear, or who they’re talking to, the damage reaches far beyond any single scam and into the building blocks of our society,” Beare said.

He also linked the issue to the wider role of cyber protection.

“Cybersecurity has always adapted, and it will again, but only if we recognize that what we’re protecting now is something far more important than data. It’s people’s ability to believe one another,” he said.

The report was based on a survey prepared by an independent research consultant and distributed through Forsta. Respondents were aged 18 and older, with the sample split equally by gender and weighted across age groups, regions and race groups.

Malwarebytes also used the publication of the findings to highlight Scam Guard, a scam-detection feature built into its desktop and mobile products. The tool provides real-time feedback on suspected scams, threats and malware, alongside digital safety recommendations.

It is also intended to reduce the stigma that can surround scam victims by offering guidance before users act on suspicious messages. The wider findings, however, indicate that the challenge may extend beyond technical detection to a deeper loss of confidence in whether online interactions can be trusted at all.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business & Technology

Major UK restaurant chain rescued amid £37m debt administration

Published

on



Las Iguanas, which runs 44 sites across the country but none currently in Oxfordshire, had warned it would “inevitably enter administration” if the deal was not sanctioned.

It previously operated an Oxford branch in Park End Street, which closed back in June 2017, leaving the county without any of the group’s Latin American-themed restaurants.

The chain is owned by Iguanas Holdings Ltd, a subsidiary of The Big Table Group, which also sits behind several familiar high-street brands including Frankie & Benny’s, Bella Italia and Banana Tree.

READ MORE: Staff ‘gutted’ as UK giant cuts thousands of jobs amid £800m administration

In May, the company confirmed it had gone to court to seek approval for a restructuring plan intended to deal with its heavy debt pile.

At the time, bosses said that, without the move, the business would not be able to continue trading and would be forced into administration.

The court has now backed the plan, allowing around £37 million of debts to be cancelled or compromised and giving the chain a financial lifeline.

As part of the rescue, The Big Table Group is injecting £3 million of new funding into the business as part of a wider turnaround strategy.

READ MORE: UK food supplier giant falls into administration owing £1.5m debt

The deal also paves the way for reduced rents at certain sites and agreements with landlords on some outstanding sums, easing pressure on the company’s day‑to‑day cash flow.

Mr Justice Meade approved the scheme at a hearing in London, clearing the way for the restaurant operator to avoid collapse and continue trading.

The group has stressed that the restructuring relates only to the legal entity that holds the chain’s property leases and related costs, and does not involve the wider Big Table business, its suppliers, its employees or any of its other brands.

All 44 restaurants are continuing to operate as normal while the rescue plan is implemented, with the company presenting the deal as a way to secure the long‑term future of the brand and safeguard sites and jobs.





Source link

Continue Reading

Business & Technology

Ssen Transmission joins European cyber security network

Published

on


SSEN Transmission has joined the European Network for Cyber Security as an Information & Knowledge Sharing member, bringing a major UK electricity transmission operator into a European cybersecurity network for critical infrastructure.

The membership gives SSEN Transmission access to ENCS research, technical documentation and knowledge-sharing with European transmission and distribution system operators. Key areas include testing, operational technology security operations and the development of cybersecurity practices for grid infrastructure.

SSEN Transmission operates the high-voltage electricity transmission network across the north of Scotland. Its network covers more than a quarter of the UK’s land mass and includes substations, overhead lines, underground cables and subsea cables.

The decision comes as cyber threats to essential services face growing scrutiny from governments and operators. The UK National Cyber Security Centre reported 204 nationally significant cyber incidents in the year to August 2025, up 130% on the previous year, including cases affecting critical infrastructure.

Shared concerns

ENCS is a non-profit membership organisation that works with critical infrastructure groups and security specialists across Europe. Founded in 2012, it supports members through applied research, technical security requirements, testing, education and training.

Its network includes transmission system operators, distribution system operators and regulators. By joining as an Information & Knowledge Sharing member, SSEN Transmission is entering a forum focused on common cybersecurity issues across energy networks, rather than a bilateral arrangement with a single partner.

That matters because electricity operators increasingly face similar challenges across borders, especially in the operational technology environments that underpin power networks. Utilities must also respond to a regulatory climate in the UK and EU that places greater emphasis on secure systems and formal cybersecurity practices.

“Cybersecurity is a shared challenge across Europe’s energy sector, and collaboration is fundamental to staying ahead of evolving threats,” said Anjos Nijk, Managing Director of ENCS.

“Across both the UK and EU, regulatory frameworks place clear requirements on investment in robust security practices and secure systems. We are pleased to welcome SSEN Transmission to ENCS and strengthen cooperation across the sector,” Nijk said.

Cross-border work

For SSEN Transmission, the arrangement broadens the expertise available to its operational technology and cyber teams. The company is in the middle of a wider investment and build-out programme tied to the electricity network in northern Scotland, where infrastructure upgrades are closely linked to reliability and the transmission of power over long distances.

Operational technology security has become a particular concern for energy operators because these systems control physical assets and industrial processes. Disruption in these environments can have consequences beyond data loss, affecting electricity flows and service continuity.

Participation in the ENCS network will help the UK operator look beyond domestic peers and compare approaches with companies across Europe. That includes exchanging practical experience on security operations and learning from work already carried out elsewhere in the sector.

“Joining ENCS provides an opportunity to collaborate with peers across Europe at a time when regulatory expectations around energy network cybersecurity continue to evolve. With the growth journey that SSEN Transmission is undertaking, it is vital that we look beyond our UK peers to ensure we are tapping into best practice across the continent to solve the shared problems and escalating cyber threats we face as operators of essential services,” said Iain Dougan, Head of Operational Technology and Cyber at SSEN Transmission.

The announcement also points to closer links between UK and European operators on cybersecurity despite differing national systems and regulatory structures. Grid operators often face the same technical risks in industrial control systems, supply chains and field equipment, making sector-wide exchanges valuable even when assets remain nationally owned and managed.

For ENCS, adding a large British transmission operator extends its reach into a strategically significant part of the European energy system for electricity transmission and offshore network development. For SSEN Transmission, the membership places it inside an established network focused on the cybersecurity of critical energy infrastructure.

The backdrop remains a rise in serious cyber incidents affecting organisations that run essential services, with the UK recording 204 nationally significant cases in the year to August 2025.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending