Traffic & Transport
Introducing Ulez was my hardest decision as mayor of London – but now we know its astonishing impact | Sadiq Khan
When I introduced London’s clean air zone – the ultra-low emission zone (Ulez) – more than seven years ago, no city had ever attempted anything quite like it. At the time, the scheme in central London provoked fierce opposition. When I decided to expand it – first in 2021, to inner London, and then again in 2023 to the whole city, making it the biggest clean-air zone in the world – my detractors were louder still. I had, they claimed, declared war on drivers in blind pursuit of a policy that may not even work. All the mainstream political parties, including my own, were opposed. In recent years, though, those critics have gone quiet.
There is now a mountain of evidence to show that the Ulez has slashed air pollution and improved air quality across London, and research published by Imperial College London earlier this year showed that this is already saving lives. Between 2019 (when I first introduced the Ulez) and 2024, estimated deaths associated with air pollution in the capital fell by around 40%. But a new, independent study published by Queen Mary University of London today goes further still, showing how – by helping to clean up the capital’s air – the Ulez is improving the lungs and lives of London’s children.
Young children are the first to feel the impact of air pollution. They breathe faster than adults, and more often through their mouths, allowing more pollution to pass into their bodies. Their heads are lower to the ground, too, meaning they’re closer to vehicle exhausts pumping out poisonous chemicals. And, because they’re still growing, long-term exposure to air pollution can do lasting damage to their development, leading to problems such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer when they’re older.
One of the first places I visited when I was elected mayor 10 years ago was the Sir John Cass’s Foundation primary school in Aldgate, now known as The Aldgate school. On the school’s roof, I joined children who were growing a garden. As they proudly showed me what they’d planted, the kids told me about how much they loved spending time outdoors. But, speaking to their teachers, it was obvious that they were worried about the air the children were breathing. The school was next to one of inner London’s busiest roads and, while an air-quality monitor had been installed in the playground, they were powerless to stop toxic fumes from the traffic passing by. As a father of two daughters myself, I remember trying to imagine how those children’s parents must have felt, knowing that every day their kids were being exposed to a danger that they couldn’t control.
I’ve never forgotten that day. Because, for me, meeting those kids confirmed what the fight for cleaner air was really about: not punishing motorists or making money, but protecting the lives of London’s most vulnerable people.
The Ulez has already had an astonishing impact on London’s air. According to research done by King’s College London, without additional action, it would take almost two centuries to get levels of one of the most toxic chemicals in our air – nitrogen dioxide (NO2) – within legal limits. But, last year, we announced that we’d done it already – 184 years earlier than predicted. Now, we’re beginning to see what our success means for London’s children.
The independent study published by scientists at Queen Mary today is one of the most comprehensive of its kind. In it, researchers tracked the lung growth of more than 3,400 children in Luton and central London, beginning in 2019 and concluding five years later. The results are remarkable.
Before we introduced the Ulez, London’s filthy air meant that children in the capital had significantly poorer lung function than children in Luton. But, across the five-year period when the Ulez was in force, children’s exposure to NO2 fell twice as fast in London as it did in Luton. And, when scientists measured lung function again at the end of the study, young Londoners’ lungs had caught up. This shows that cutting air pollution doesn’t just help Londoners being born today – it can help children whose lungs have already been stunted by toxic air to recover, proving that it’s never too late to act. Over the course of the research, the proportion of children in London with clinically impaired lung function fell from 14% to 9%.
Introducing and expanding the Ulez involved some incredibly difficult decisions. I never took them lightly, but I knew that – as mayor – I could not stand by while Londoners young and old lost their lives to a problem it was within my power to solve. For years, politicians and pundits opposed to the Ulez have cynically sought to turn questions of public health into a crude culture war. Today, though, it’s clear that we’re winning the battle against toxic air in the capital – and it’s London’s children who are reaping the rewards.
Two months ago, I returned to the roof garden of The Aldgate school. It was just over 10 years since my first visit and, getting ready to garden with a group of smiling children, I felt a strange sense of deja vu. This time, though, something was different. Back in 2016, the air-quality monitor in the playground showed that levels of nitrogen dioxide in the air were exceeding legal limits. But, when they were measured again last year, they’d fallen by 48%. As a result, the kids I met didn’t have to think twice about what a game of football outside may mean for their health, and their parents didn’t have to worry about whether walking to school may stunt the growth of their lungs.
after newsletter promotion
Today, you’ll find stories like this in schools across the capital: kids who are breathing easier and parents who are sleeping better because they no longer have to worry about the damage being done by toxic air. The Ulez has been the toughest fight of my political life, but I have no regrets. Though there’s more to be done, it’s clear that cleaning up the capital’s air has changed young Londoners’ lives for the better – and nothing could matter more than that.
-
Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
Traffic & Transport
Seeing red when cyclists decide not to stop at traffic lights | Cycling
Simon Jenkins is right that traffic rules can feel bureaucratic, but using Hans Monderman’s “shared space” to justify running red lights misses the entire point of Monderman’s philosophy (I’ll admit it: I’ve cycled through red lights. But Britain’s traffic laws are to blame, not me, 21 August).
Monderman didn’t champion anarchy so individuals could cherrypick which laws to follow; he suggested infrastructure be removed precisely to force collective cooperation, eye contact and mutual caution.
The moment cyclists ignore that negotiation process while vulnerable pedestrians are left unprotected, the delicate psychological balance collapses. Freedom without universal accountability isn’t shared space. It is just a system that rewards the most aggressive road user.
That is precisely why high-profile implementations like London’s Exhibition Road faced a fierce backlash and were reversed, and why the UK government eventually halted new level-surface shared-space projects: when compliance breaks down, it is blind and elderly people, and vulnerable pedestrians, who pay the price for an idealised view of human nature.
Gary Ogin
London
As a lifelong cyclist may I point out an alternative view to that of Simon Jenkins? I don’t mind red lights; they offer unplanned fartlek opportunities on a training ride, skill development in maintaining a track stand for an unpredictable length of time, and stomp intervals in getting away from them. And if I’m knackered, a nice unplanned rest and chance to take a drink. I’m not sure Jenkins’ anarchic behaviour and justification for it does much to help the case of cyclists.
Peter Anderson
Barwick-in-Elmet, West Yorkshire
I ride a bike and a motorbike, and drive a car, and on all three I stop at red lights. Cyclists who ignore traffic lights contribute to the growing antagonism towards the rest of us. Simon Jenkins should know better.
Edward Collier
Cheltenham, Gloucestershire
Four years ago, aged 83, I was knocked down by a young man on a bike. Damaged wrist. He rode away quickly after making sure I wasn’t dead. April this year, aged 87, I was knocked down on a pedestrian crossing by a black ebike. Deep wound on leg, police, ambulance, hospital. Four months later, the leg is still being treated. The rider rode off after making sure I wasn’t dead. Shame on you, Simon Jenkins.
Joan Grabham
Cambridge
Traffic & Transport
UK petrol prices hit highest level in almost four years as bank holiday getaway looms | Petrol prices
UK petrol prices have hit their highest level since 2022, piling more financial pressure on motorists before the bank holiday weekend.
The average cost of petrol has reached 161.6p a litre, while diesel costs an average of 183.4p a litre, according to the AA breakdown company.
The last time the petrol price was so high was in November 2022, when it soared in the aftermath of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
It comes as millions of people prepare to make car journeys over the bank holiday weekend, which will be marked in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. The RAC estimates that the UK’s motorways and major roads could have the most traffic since its records began in 2015.
The services company has predicted Friday is likely to be the worst day for heavy traffic, with more than 4.1m cars expected on the roads.
Luke Bosdet of the AA said the rise in petrol prices showed that “UK pump pricing is back to its worst”. It is “too often overpriced and uncompetitive, with too many communities denied road fuel at a reasonable price”, he said.
The UK’s competition regulator told fuel retailers this year that it would step up its monitoring of pump prices amid concern over profiteering as the US war with Iran drives up wholesale costs.
Before the US-Israeli attack on Iran in February, Brent crude – the international benchmark for oil prices – traded at about $72 a barrel. It hit a peak of $126 a barrel in April, before dipping to $71 at the start of July on hopes of a peace deal. It now trades at $89.63.
The Competition and Markets Authority found this summer that many petrol stations were too slow to pass on falls in wholesale energy prices to their customers.
A government scheme called Fuel Finder allows drivers to compare the cost of fuel offered by petrol stations across the UK. The AA found that in some areas, petrol was sold at about 10p below the national average cost for a litre on Thursday night, at stations in areas such as Aylesbury, Wembley and Gloucester.
after newsletter promotion
Bosdet said just one competitively priced forecourt “can often pull down the price of fuel locally, including at nearby supermarkets”.
He said: “Drivers just need to find them and go to them.”
Earlier this month the CMA said it had sent out more than 1,000 warning letters to retailers who had failed to share their prices with the Fuel Finder service.
Traffic & Transport
How Britain’s railways are struggling in the heat – and can they be fixed? | Rail industry
Britain’s railways have faced a string of heat-related problems this summer, including a derailment near Lewes in East Sussex two weeks ago that injured 30 people, and another the next day when the rear carriages of a Greater Anglia train derailed “in an upright position” at Wickford railway station in Essex, with no reported injuries.
The problems came during one of the hottest and driest summers on record, with a series of heatwaves, and drought declared across large parts of England and Wales. Britain’s railways, built for a cooler, wetter climate, have been put under pressure. Network Rail said the summer had “presented exceptional challenges to the railway”.
Here’s what we know about how heat affects the rail network and what can be done to tackle it.
What happens to railways in the heat?
Steel expands when it gets hot, and the long, welded steel sections that make up modern railway tracks are no exception. “The classic concern for railways with hot weather is that the track might buckle,” said William Powrie, a professor of geotechnical engineering at the University of Southampton.
As temperatures rise, the rails expand, but their continuous design means there is little room for movement. “If they haven’t got anywhere to go, they end up generating compressive stresses,” Powrie said. “The problem with any sort of structure which has got a compression in it is that it can fail by buckling.”
The consequences can be serious. Just two days of record heat in 2022 led to almost 7,700 cancelled trains and an estimated £30m in costs, according to a taskforce set up by Network Rail after that heatwave.
On a hot day, the rail can reach much higher temperatures than the air. Network Rail says most of the network can operate when track temperatures reach up to 46C, roughly equivalent to an air temperature of 30C. But rails have been recorded at temperatures as high as 51C.
The sleepers and ballast that rails sit on can help stop them from buckling, keeping the track in place – but long periods of heat and drought can dry the soil beneath them. That soil can shrink when it dries, a problem given it “is essentially the foundation for anything on top of it”, said Manu Sasidharan, an assistant professor of infrastructure asset management at University College London.
The weight of passing trains makes the problem worse, putting pressure on the weakened soil and causing it to settle unevenly. Whatever sits on top, including the track, “will follow suit”, Sasidharan said.
While tracks and stations have been continually updated over the decades, some embankments, tunnels and other structures date to the 1800s, when much of the network was first laid.
How do hotter countries cope?
To stop rails from buckling, engineers lay them slightly stretched, a process called pre-stressing. It means the rail has some give in it before it starts expanding in the heat.
In the UK, rails are stretched so that they do not undergo compression until the air temperature passes 27C. That figure sits between the UK’s highest and lowest seasonal rail temperatures, protecting against buckling in the summer and breaking under tension in the winter.
Other countries set that figure differently. In parts of Australia and the US, the so-called stress-free air temperature can exceed 35C. In southern Europe too, where winters rarely get as cold as in the UK, rails are designed for more heat, since there’s less risk of the rail snapping in the cold.
“If you’re looking at Italy, where you don’t really get very low winter temperatures, then you can afford to increase the stress-free temperature,” Powrie said. “The problem is the range of temperatures that we have [in the UK] … in the winter, they go into tension and that can cause the rails to break.”
One option, in theory, could be to re-stress rails between seasons, loosening and retensioning them so the stress-free temperature is set higher for summer and lower for winter, rather than fixed year-round.
Network Rail says: “In Britain, the variations in short-term weather and long-term climate mean that it is neither practical nor cost-effective to implement these measures permanently.”
Another option is to lay track on solid concrete slabs, as in some countries, rather than the more common bed of sleepers and ballast. However, slab track costs about four times as much to install as standard ballasted track, which is why it remains rare across most of the UK network.
What can be done?
One idea under discussion is raising the temperature British rails are built to withstand. The post-2022 taskforce said that on modern, well-supported track the stress-free temperature could rise from 27C to 30C.
“You might say we should actually have a different stress-free temperature in the south of England compared to, say, the north of Scotland,” Powrie said. However, higher stress-free temperature also leaves rails more vulnerable in a cold snap.
Simpler measures are already in use. Some sections of track are painted white to reduce how much heat they absorb. Network Rail says a rail painted white is typically 5-10C cooler.
Both tactics may be necessary as summers get hotter – something that will be increasingly normal amid the climate crisis. All five of the UK’s warmest summers on record have happened since 2000, according to the Met Office.
Monitoring for faults remains difficult, though. The Network Rail taskforce found that fewer than half of the track buckles recorded in 2022 had been identified before they happened.
Part of the issue is the sheer amount of data modern trains generate. Many now carry sensors that pick up rough riding or unusual vibrations, but sifting through it all is a challenge that needs to be automated, experts say.
Much, therefore, still relies on judgment rather than data – for example, a train driver detecting rough riding on one part of the line and reporting it.
As a temporary measure, speed restrictions were imposed on trains in southern Essex in the aftermath of the Wickford derailment.
Did the Lewes derailment happen because of the heat?
It’s impossible to say for sure. An interim report by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) found that a “track geometry irregularity” existed before the derailment, and said investigators had since received reports of rough riding from passengers on that stretch of line.
Sasidharan said early evidence pointed to the track itself. “The initial indication of the derailment … is that it’s a track infrastructure fault, most likely,” he said.
At the site of the derailment, the embankment is built on clay, which shrinks more than other types of soils as it dries out. The RAIB said the clay was “sensitive to variations in water content”, and there was evidence it had shifted before the derailment, though not enough to amount to a significant slip.
Powrie said the location had several things working against it at once, making it a case of what safety experts call the “Swiss cheese” theory of accidents, where one only happens when several small failures line up together.
The derailment happened on a bend – where more force is exerted on the track – and close to where the track leaves a bridge and moves on to the embankment.
Powrie said these transition points were a natural weak spot because the track had to cope with a sudden change from something rigid to ground that could shift, especially when it was dried out. “It wouldn’t surprise me if the defect turned out to be related to the dryness,” he said, “but I don’t really want to speculate.”
Network Rail has said it is “fully committed to supporting the continuing investigation and acting on any lessons that emerge from its findings”.
It said: “Safety is and will always remain our highest priority. While Britain’s railway is one of the safest in the world, when incidents like this occur it is essential that we understand exactly what happened and identify any lessons that can be learned.
“Given the complexity of the issues being examined, it is important that the independent investigation is allowed to reach its conclusions. We will continue to cooperate fully with the RAIB throughout this process.”
-
Oxford News3 weeks agoTrain cancellation alert amid ‘fault’ near London Paddington
-
Oxford News2 weeks agoMuseum evacuated and Oxford University closed amid incident
-
Business & Technology4 weeks agoMuscle Food at risk of closing after entering administration
-
Business & Technology4 weeks agoBritish Business Bank backs PhysicsX with USD $25 million
-
Business & Technology4 weeks agoNuggit launches GBP £5 million fund for UK YouTubers
-
Business & Technology4 weeks agoHistoric town faces series of high street shop closures
-
Student Life4 weeks agoMy year of rest and rustication
-
Student Life4 weeks agoAcademic tourism: Oxford University and its summer schools
