Connect with us

Traffic & Transport

Funding bus fare cap from aid budget will hit world’s poorest, Burnham told | Transport policy

Published

on


The world’s most vulnerable people will be put at risk by Andy Burnham’s decision to use the aid budget to pay for cheaper bus fares in England, charities have said.

The prime minister announced on Wednesday that he would reduce the fare cap from £3 per journey to £2 for next year, funded mainly by changing international climate donations into repayable loans.

The switch allows the government to borrow more against those loans without violating its borrowing rules. But experts say it will also leave people in the poorest parts of the world more vulnerable to the effects of the climate crisis.

It comes after the government indicated the new aid minister, Kirsty McNeill, would not attend cabinet as her immediate predecessors had done, causing concerns it was downgrading its commitment to international development.

Andrew Mitchell, the former Conservative development secretary, said: “It’s a blow to the sector that the PM has not seen fit to put Kirsty McNeill – who knows a great deal about international development – into the cabinet, let alone attending cabinet.

“As I well know from having done the job as a full member of the cabinet and as a member attending cabinet, it would give her more clout at home in Whitehall battles and overseas.”

Joanne O’Neill, the co-director of advocacy at ActionAid UK, said: “The prime minister’s fare cap scheme is a welcome initiative but his funding proposal throws global south countries under the bus, penalising those most impacted by a climate crisis they did not create.”

She added: “Delivering international climate finance as loans instead of grants pushes countries deeper into debt and forces them to divert funding away from essential public services such as education, health and social protection – which disproportionately impacts women and girls.”

Monica Harding, the Liberal Democrat spokesperson for international development, said Burnham’s decision would “further undermine the UK’s standing as a reliable global partner”. She said: “Swapping crucial climate grants for loans will ultimately fall on the backs of the world’s poorest, racking developing nations with more destabilising debt. This will only harm Britain’s security in the long run, fuelling more migration and instability abroad.”

Romilly Greenhill, the chief executive of Bond, which represents aid organisations, said: “It is disappointing that the new prime minister is picking up where the previous one left off, by continuing to raid the diminished UK aid budget to prop up much-needed funding for the cost of living crisis here in the UK.

“The cost of living crisis in the UK needs to be urgently addressed, but robbing Peter to pay Paul is not the answer and pitches marginalised communities here in the UK against marginalised communities in lower income and climate-vulnerable countries.”

Danny Gross, a climate campaigner at Friends of the Earth, said: “With the UK already doing far below its fair share on international climate finance, funding [the fare cap] by replacing climate grants with loans is nothing short of a travesty.”

Burnham made the bus fare cap his second major policy announcement in office, a day after he said he would cut VAT on electricity bills.

During a visit to Bath, the prime minister said the move would “really help people with the cost of living pressures they’re facing”. He added: “It’s there for the whole of 2027, and I think it will put money in people’s pockets.”

Downing Street said on Wednesday the cap would cost more than £500m next year, £400m of it funded by switching international climate investment to loans.

skip past newsletter promotion


Officials said the switch would enable the money to go to international financing schemes such as the Tropical Forests Forever Facility, an anti-deforestation initiative set up last year by the Brazilian president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.

Changing donations to loans, however, means money is likely to go to countries that can repay them – which are more likely to be middle-income countries such as India or Brazil than some of the world’s poorest.

The switch could reduce the amount of money the UK gives as international aid, which the previous government promised would stay at 0.3% of national income after cutting it in half to pay for more defence spending.

Though loans can count towards overseas development spending, that will depend on the terms on which they are given. Only loans given at a significant discount to market rates will count.

Experts say some of the money is likely to have been allocated already, leaving ministers having to renege on agreed donations.

A government spokesperson said: “We are committed to spending 0.3% GNI on official development assistance. International climate finance supports a range of projects such as protecting forests and development of clean power.

“Switching a small proportion of that spending from grants to loans give us more flexible ways to tackle the climate crisis while making the best use of taxpayers’ money.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Traffic & Transport

Transport secretary ‘100% sure’ new cap on bus fares in England is fully funded – UK politics live | Politics

Published

on


Key events

My colleagues Kiran Stacey and Peter Walker take a closer look at the questions on how the government will finance its spending pledges:

double quotation markOn his first full day in power, the prime minister faced questions about how he would fund the removal of VAT from electricity bills and an expected uplift in defence spending – an issue that led his new chancellor, John Healey, to resign as Keir Starmer’s defence secretary last month.

Downing Street said on Tuesday that the tax cut was funded for the next financial year, but money would have to be found in future years from existing departmental budgets, suggesting spending cuts to come. No 10 has also ruled out using defence bonds to pay for higher military spending.

The Guardian has also learned Burnham plans to accelerate the timetable for implementing his promise to roll out a national care service, a move that could cost further money before the election.

Read the full report here:

Share



Source link

Continue Reading

Traffic & Transport

Burnham announces bus fares across England to be capped at £2 | Transport

Published

on


Single bus fares across England will be capped at £2 from January, the prime minister, Andy Burnham, has announced.

The nationwide cap is currently set at £3 until the end of March 2027 although some areas – including London and Greater Manchester, where Burnham set a £2 limit as mayor – have lower top rates for single tickets.

The measure, which will apply across England except London, is backed by £454m of funding, including money to allow devolved governments to take similar action.

About £400m of that funding will come from switching investment in international climate finance to loans, with the rest from savings in the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero budget.

The total cost of the scheme is expected to be more than £500m, with the rest coming from Department for Transport funding already allocated to buses.

The £2 cap will be in place throughout 2027 and reverses an increase put in place by Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves in 2024.

A £2 cap had been in place between January 2023 and December 2024 but the incoming Labour administration argued it was not affordable, although some metro mayors, including Burnham, decided to fund an extension of the lower limit in their areas.

Burnham said: “Good, affordable transport links are an essential. No one should be priced out of those and left behind.

“But for too long people have said that cheaper transport isn’t an option. I don’t accept that. I’ve done it before and I will do it again now: a £2 cap on bus fares for millions across the country.

“Lower fares will help people get to where they need to – giving them breathing space to help with the cost of living.”

The measure is backed by £454m of funding, including money to allow devolved governments to take similar action.

The chancellor, John Healey, said millions of people would benefit from fares being slashed by a third and insisted the measure could be paid for. “This action to ease the cost of living is funded by savings made elsewhere, so there’s no burden to British taxpayers, just pounds going back into their pockets,” he said.

The transport secretary, Heidi Alexander, said the move would make “everyday journeys easier and cheaper”.



Source link

Continue Reading

Traffic & Transport

‘A guy did a runner in a Jaguar’: the petrol theft scandal – and the garage owners struggling to stop it | Crime

Published

on


A petrol station tucked away in the suburbs of Birmingham seems an unlikely place for a crime spree. But this garage has become a prime target for thieves. Some fuel runners are easy to spot, approaching the petrol pumps in face masks, but after a recent spate of fill-and-dashes by less conspicuous drivers, no motorist is beyond suspicion. “It could be anyone,” says Shailesh Parekh, who is on high alert, as always.

The 62-year-old owns six forecourts across Birmingham, and today I’m visiting his station in Erdington, a residential area about five miles from the city centre. Parekh remembers a time when a motorist speeding off with an unpaid-for tank was rare. So much so, it would be the talk of the station for months. Those days are long gone. Now, it’s a weekly and sometimes daily occurrence. “In the last three years, it’s been very bad,” Parekh tells me from the back office, where a monitor beams CCTV images from every inch of the forecourt.

Thefts have grown worse since the start of the war in Iran in February. In the first week of July, the station saw three fuel runners, and in June, 12 people drove off without paying. Across his six garages, says Parekh, fuel theft cost him more than £40,000 last year, and predicting who will drive off is becoming impossible.

In his experience, fuel theft used to be carried out by organised thieves or criminals on the lam, who might have stolen a car. Not now. “I had a guy all suited and booted do a runner in a Jaguar,” he says. Sometimes, thieves will wear hi-vis jackets to impersonate workmen. The day before my visit, at another of his forecourts, a man who “looked like a farmer” filled up his tank with £140 worth of petrol and “buggered off”. Parekh says thieves are becoming casually audacious. “They come right in front of you, because they have no fear.”

‘In the last three years, it’s been very bad’ … petrol theft has risen dramatically in Birmingham. Photograph: Fabio De Paola/The Guardian Photograph: Fabio De Paola/The Guardian

The issue isn’t confined to Parekh’s garages. Petrol stations have seen a 23% rise in fuel theft since the start of the Iran war, with incidents soaring from 9,089 in January and February to 11,170 in March and April, according to Forecourt Eye, a company that collects payments on behalf of about 1,000 garages around the UK. The Times estimates that more than £1.2m of fuel is being stolen from forecourts each week. Gordon Balmer, executive director of the Petrol Retailers Association, a trade body representing forecourts, says “first-time offenders” are becoming more common, with many “trying it on” due to a “combination of rising household costs and a bit of opportunism”.

The soaring levels of theft come amid rising fuel prices, which have shot up after the successive crises of Covid-19, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the Iran war. According to the RAC, prices reached a high of 199.09p for a litre of diesel in 2022, before subsiding again. From mid-February to June 2026, the cost of petrol rose from 131p to 155p per litre, while the cost of diesel rose from 141p to 176p per litre. This means that filling a 60L tank with petrol went from £79 to £93, while filling it with diesel rose from £85 to £106.

Parekh’s forecourts are fitted with “more CCTV cameras than Birmingham airport,” he jokes, but pursuing a fuel thief is usually pointless. “Half of the runners, we don’t even report them. It’s such a mission,” he says.

With CCTV footage and a licence plate number, catching the thieves should be easy, but in reality failing to pay for fuel ends up in a legal grey zone. While intentionally driving off without paying for fuel is a criminal offence, convictions are rare, especially for one-off offenders. If a motorist drives off by mistake or discovers after filling up that they cannot pay, the unpaid amount is generally treated as a civil debt rather than a criminal offence. Unless it’s pretty blatant, it’s difficult to prove that a motorist didn’t drive off in error. And if a driver has filled up and then can’t make the payment, it’s up to the forecourt owner to do what they can to recover the amount. Still, bilkers who are caught and prosecuted face up to two years in prison and a fine. One prolific fuel thief in Kent was jailed for 16 months after pleading guilty to stealing fuel from nine forecourts in 2024.

‘Half of the runners, we don’t even report them’ … fuel theft cost petrol-station owner Shailesh Parekh £40,000 last year. Photograph: Fabio De Paola/The Guardian

Not all the thieves Parekh encounters dash off after filling their tanks. Some use the pump, then come in and declare themselves penniless, leaving him with few options, because “we can’t retrieve our fuel from their tank”. Balmer says a lot of first-time offenders are doing this, because many “see it like a payday loan”. Regardless of how unpaid fuel is taken from his forecourt, Parekh says when he has reported incidents to the police, they often tell him “it’s a civil thing”. This is something Balmer has encountered too. Another station he is in contact with reported an intentional drive-off to police, who incorrectly told them it was a civil offence and there was nothing they could do.

In November 2024, Supt Fran Harrod, a senior Lincolnshire police officer, told the BBC that somebody who has driven off without paying for fuel might not be “having a great day” and the incidents don’t always constitute a crime. She recommended that forecourt owners try to recover money through a civil route instead of “using huge amounts of officer hours to go round and ask people to pay up, because the police’s time isn’t free either”. Parekh says this approach adds insult to injury: “You can’t go into Asda and say, ‘I’m leaving with this trolley full of items but I’ve got no money to pay for it.’”

In March this year, the Times reported freedom of information data first revealed by the Forecourt Trader website. It found that in 2024, five police forces across the UK closed a fuel theft investigation without identifying a suspect in nine out of 10 cases.

‘We have more CCTV cameras than Birmingham airport’ … cars suspected of fuel theft at a petrol station in Erdington. Photograph: Fabio De Paola/The Guardian

West Midlands police, the force Parekh deals with, did not respond to the Times, but a 2022 freedom of information request revealed that, of the 1,150 reports of “people driving off without paying for fuel” between January and March 2022, 1,126 (98%) had a recorded outcome indicating that no further action was taken. Of these, 1,106 involved no identified suspect and 20 involved an identified suspect; the outcomes of the remaining 24 reports were left “blank”. Parekh says officers “take the view that this is a totally preventable crime”, telling him he should install prepaid pumps to stop thefts. This, he says, is a non-starter because “the whole trade has to move to that system, otherwise people will get annoyed and go elsewhere”.

West Midlands police say it investigates reports of “bilking, and people need to be clear that driving off without paying for fuel is theft and the consequences are very serious”, adding it would “encourage businesses to take steps to minimise the likelihood of them becoming a victim – such as operating a prepay policy and installing good-quality CCTV”.

Balmer says he has also faced police indifference. He recalls one incident in which “two guys broke into a forecourt, filled up with fuel and filmed it all for TikTok”. Despite this incident being raised with the relevant police force, the culprits weren’t brought to court because police “didn’t think it was something that they should criminalise them for”, says Balmer. “Even though they had committed a crime.”

Parekh has faced similar challenges with getting police to take this crime seriously, including an instance on his forecourt that turned violent. One of his cashiers approached a van driver who he suspected of stealing fuel and stood in front of the vehicle to stop it driving off. The van began advancing towards the cashier, and a tyre went over his foot; luckily he managed to escape with only bruises. A customer helped track down the perpetrator, and the incident was reported to the police. There was also CCTV footage of the vehicular assault. “I pursued the police for 14 months,” says Parekh. “They didn’t go and arrest that man – they didn’t do anything. In the end, I left it.” The West Midlands force says it “won’t tolerate any type of theft” and will “always seek to identify, detain and pursue prosecution against anybody involved in theft offences”.

‘Police take the view that this is a preventable crime’ … petrol stations are advised to install prepaid pumps. Photograph: Fabio De Paola/The Guardian

Parekh recalls one time when police did act. Officers were grabbing a coffee from the garage shop and telling Parekh about a notorious fuel thief they were after. On the forecourt, a van parked next to a pump caught their attention. Officers went to inspect it. Inside the van, they found a man surrounded by containers, in the process of filling them with Parekh’s fuel. After being caught in the act, the thief was arrested.

Can-fillers such as this, who sell containers filled with stolen fuel, are becoming more common. Christmas and Easter used to be the worst seasons for fuel theft, but recently it has become a year-round phenomenon, especially since fuel has “become a more sellable item,” says Parekh.

The losses to Parekh are having an even greater impact given rising national insurance contributions and business rates, the latter of which, he says, rose from £16,000 to £43,000 last year. And it isn’t just fuel theft he is contending with: he says his forecourt shop is often ransacked by thieves. It’s so bad that at one point there were 20 pictures of shoplifters in the window. He blames this, in part, on people with addiction issues and prison leavers being placed in houses in multiple occupation (HMOs) in the area.

Parekh says this has led to a number of violent encounters at the station. Garry Backhouse was manning the till when a regular customer “snapped” and “flashed a massive blade” at him, before being apprehended by a police officer who was in the shop at the same time. On another occasion, the 51-year-old cashier was attacked on the forecourt, while off duty, when trying to stop a shoplifter. Backhouse, who started working at the forecourt 11 years ago, quit after the first incident, but returned after a stint in a tile shop. Now, as a protective measure, none of Parekh’s staff work alone, which further adds to costs, and the door to the shop is kept locked after 8pm.

Attacked … Garry Backhouse, 51, has been the subject of violent crime at a petrol station in Birmingham. Photograph: Fabio De Paola/The Guardian

Another tool for the garage is VARS Technology, an automatic number plate recognition system and debt recovery service, used at one in eight petrol stations around the UK. It flags up “blacklisted vehicles” that have previously driven off without paying for fuel at a member forecourt. “If the registration flashes up, we don’t start the pump,” says Backhouse. But this technology, and other similar products, have been accused of issuing “false” fuel debts. In one case, this meant that a family who had been accused of driving out of a petrol station in Manchester without paying for £20 of fuel was effectively banned from more than 1,300 forecourts. Any visit they made set off an alarm.

Some fuel thieves steal or clone licence plates to hide their tracks, which can pose further difficulties for those falsely accused of fuel theft. Balmer says he has heard of cases where “perpetrators get a stolen vehicle, go online and look up a similar car in make, model and colour” and print out plates before stealing fuel, leaving the innocent original owners to receive letters falsely accusing them of stealing petrol. For forecourts, this means no chance of recovering their money. “They’ll just have to write it off,” he says.

While a petrol station forecourt might not be the first place that comes to mind as a community asset, Parekh says they are important. “Petrol stations are no longer just purveyors of fuel. We have everything,” he says. They are one of the few businesses that remain open into the early hours. “You can come at midnight and put £10 on the gas – we keep things going for people.”

But after decades in the trade, Parekh is doubtful about the future. “I’m 62 years old,” he says. “I’m beginning to think: why am I doing this?”

Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending