Oxford News
State Pension age 68 plan could affect millions born in the 1970s
Under current law, the State Pension age is due to rise from 67 to 68 between 2044 and 2046.
However, it’s been shown that new Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) documents assume the increase will instead happen between 2037 and 2039 as part of the Government’s current policy position for its economic forecasts.
If that timetable were ultimately adopted, the increase would come around seven years earlier than current legislation provides.
Who could be affected?
An earlier increase could affect around five million people, particularly those who are currently aged between 49 and 55.
Instead of becoming eligible for their State Pension at 67, they could have to wait until they turn 68.
For many people, that would mean working for another year or relying on other sources of income before becoming eligible for the State Pension.
Why is an earlier rise being discussed?
The OBR says delaying the increase would add significantly to Government spending.
Its latest documents state: “If the state pension age were to rise to 68 in 2044-45 in line with legislation, rather than the Government’s stated policy that the rise to 68 will happen in 2037-39, this would cost an average additional £6 billion in today’s terms in each of the years the state pension age rise is delayed.”
Ministers say no decision has been made
Despite the OBR’s assumption, ministers have stressed that the Government has not announced any change to the law.
Responding to reports about the OBR documents, Pensions Minister Torsten Bell said on X that the reports were ‘just wrong’. He added: “We have not announced any change of policy – and certainly not this specific one. There is currently a review of the State Pension age underway – that is simply because legislation (the 2014 Act) requires the Secretary of State to conduct such reviews on a fairly regular basis.”
He also referred to previous changes to the State Pension age, saying: “If you want to see what we’ve actually said – not least about the 2011 disaster of raising the State Pension age in a rush that gave some people only 5yrs notice – you can read the (long) evidence I gave to the Select Committee recently.”
This story is just wrong https://t.co/RJkBkgcf98
— Torsten Bell (@TorstenBell) July 14, 2026
Experts urge caution
The prospect of bringing forward the increase has prompted concern from experts, who warn many older people are already struggling to remain in work until they reach State Pension age.
Dr Carole Easton OBE, Chief Executive of the Centre for Ageing Better, said: “It is extremely worrying if the Treasury is thinking of making the next rise in state pension age in just over a decade’s time.
“The government needs to be very careful about making this change.
“During the rise to 66, it doubled the poverty rates for 64-year-olds.
“A recent parliamentary committee report warned the impact is likely to be even bigger now for the current rise to 67.”
She said it was difficult to see the case for accelerating the timetable: “Other than the substantial savings the Treasury will make from making people wait longer for their State Pension, it is hard to see what evidence could be used to justify introducing the next rise sooner.”
Can everyone work until 68?
Dr Easton said many people already face significant barriers to working later in life.
She said: “Working until you are 68 is very far from the norm. Only one in five people currently do so.
“It is not viable for everyone to work this long for a range of reasons – health, ageism, caring responsibilities, inflexible employers freezing many people out of work.”
She also highlighted differences in healthy life expectancy across the country.
“There are places in this country where the healthy life expectancy is more than a decade below the current state pension age.
“Progress on this issue has stalled, we cannot just assume we are all going to be living longer and healthier lives.”
Recommended reading:
What happens next?
No legislation has yet been introduced to bring forward the increase in the State Pension age.
The Government is carrying out the latest statutory review of the State Pension age, which is required under existing legislation.
Once that review concludes, ministers will decide whether to recommend changes to the timetable before any proposal is put before Parliament.
For now, the legal position remains that the State Pension age will rise to 68 between 2044 and 2046, unless Parliament approves a change.
Oxford News
A34 partially blocked due to ongoing traffic incident
There are severe delays on the A34 between Oxford and Junction 9 for Bicester due to a traffic incident this afternoon on the Bank Holiday Monday.
Source link
Oxford News
Police chief issues warning over early release of prisoners
Speaking to LBC on Monday, August 31, Jason Hogg, Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police, warned that monitoring offenders released under the Government’s early release scheme would be “difficult” for forces across the county without additional funding.
The scheme aims to ease overcrowding in prisons by releasing certain inmates ahead of schedule.
Mr Hogg said: “The police haven’t received any additional funding for this additional work, so I’m going to be having to move resources away from one area of business to another to seek out, arrest, and bring before the court individuals who don’t follow the restrictions that they will be set.
“For example, their tagging restrictions. We don’t quite know what the demand will be on that, but I think it’ll be reasonably high, so it’s definitely more work for us.”
The early release scheme, introduced to address rising prison populations, initially included up to 6,000 inmates.
Following public outcry, the Government reduced that number to 5,000 and exempted rapists, “serious” child sex offenders, and other high-risk individuals.
PC Andrew Harper (Image: PA)
The death of Thames Valley Police officer Andrew Harper brought renewed attention to the policy.
His killers, Albert Bowers and Jessie Cole, were initially eligible for early release from next year, but fresh changes announced on Sunday (August 30) mean anyone convicted of unlawful killing, including all forms of manslaughter, members of grooming gangs and death by dangerous driving, will be excluded.
Jessie Cole and Albert Bowers (Image: PA)
Mr Hogg said the announcement came as a “relief”. He said: “It will be welcomed not just by me but by police officers in Thames Valley as well, because there’s been such a strength of feeling about this issue.”
To create more space in the prison system, Mr Burnham said the Government would focus on deporting foreign prisoners and releasing inmates who are serving imprisonment for public protection (IPP) sentences.
These sentences, which were abolished in 2012, were given to offenders deemed to pose a significant risk to the public.
However, the Prime Minister cautioned that changes to IPP sentences would require a “very careful” approach, as some individuals may still present a danger.
He also confirmed that reforms to IPP releases would take years to implement and would not be part of the immediate measures to relieve overcrowding.
Ministry of Justice data shows that as of June 30, 856 IPP prisoners remained in custody, with another 1,415 recalled to prison after release.
On Monday, justice minister Alex Davies-Jones insisted that “release does not mean freedom” for those let out under the early release scheme.
She also told BBC Breakfast: “When these offenders come out of prison, the presumption will be that they will all be placed on a GPS monitoring tag.
“We’re introducing for the first time ever a world first restriction zone to limit the freedom and location that the offender can go, and we are also banning them from things like pubs, concert public spaces, taking away their driver’s licence, mandatory work placements.
All of this being carried out to ensure that the victims are put front and centre, that they do have consideration, because previously they weren’t considered.”
Oxford News
Richard Hammond on future of Top Gear and Grand Tour
The former Top Gear star, 56, said he believes there is still a place for motoring shows and would welcome a return of Top Gear, amid rumours comedian Jimmy Carr could be involved in a reboot.
Speaking to the Metro, Mr Hammond reflected on the enduring popularity of the BBC programme, which he fronted alongside Jeremy Clarkson and James May.
He said: “I think there’s room for car shows looking back at what a wonderful machine the car has been and will continue to be.”
Mr Hammond also backed the future of The Grand Tour, which he presented with Clarkson and May after leaving Top Gear.
The trio are set to make a cameo appearance alongside the show’s new presenting team of James Engelsman, Thomas Holland and Francis Bourgeois.
He said: “We had our time with it. That’s great. That was our Grand Tour, but The Grand Tour can go on with other people doing it, and I wish them all the very best with it. Of course, I do.”
Looking beyond The Grand Tour, Mr Hammond said he would even consider returning to another of his former programmes, Total Wipeout, if given the chance, exclaiming he “loved it”.
Reflecting on Top Gear’s legacy, Mr Hammond said: “It’s really satisfying to have been part of a show that had that effect, that becomes that touchpoint for people.
“We never thought for a second that it would. We set out to make a car show all those years ago.
“It just grew into something that nobody foresaw, and I was really privileged to be a little part of that.”
He added that meeting fans who grew up watching the show makes him proud.
“It makes me mostly proud when people refer to it or come up to me and say they’ve watched it since they were a kid,” he said.
“It makes me feel old because often they’re fully fledged adults in their own right. But there we are.”
During the interview, Mr Hammond also spoke about his daughter Izzy Hammond’s crash in a Formula E car earlier this year.
The 25-year-old crashed into a wall at the Jeddah circuit but walked away unharmed.
The incident drew comparisons with Mr Hammond’s own near-fatal 2006 crash while filming Top Gear, when he crashed a jet-powered dragster at almost 300mph.
He admitted he felt “a little uncomfortable” watching from the sidelines.
“I’m a father, like any other father. I don’t want to see my little girl hurt, but I don’t want to hold her back from opportunities that present themselves,” he said.
“She’s carving her own career, so I can sit back and watch her do that and only applaud.”
-
Oxford News3 weeks agoTrain cancellation alert amid ‘fault’ near London Paddington
-
Oxford News2 weeks agoMuseum evacuated and Oxford University closed amid incident
-
Business & Technology4 weeks agoMuscle Food at risk of closing after entering administration
-
Student Life4 weeks agoMy year of rest and rustication
-
Student Life4 weeks agoAcademic tourism: Oxford University and its summer schools
-
Business & Technology4 weeks agoHistoric town faces series of high street shop closures
-
Business & Technology3 weeks agoCurrys rolls out NiCE software to unify customer service
-
Oxford Events3 weeks agoWilderness Festival 2026: four days of music, food, art and wild escapism
