Business & Technology
AI confidence gap opens between senior & junior staff
SOFIAH NICHOLE SALIVIO
News Editor
TrustedTech has published research showing a gap in AI confidence and training between senior leaders and junior employees. The survey covered 2,000 employees in the UK and US.
The findings point to a mismatch between corporate investment in AI tools and the support many workers receive to use them. In the UK, 73% of decision-makers said they felt confident using AI at work, compared with 44% of junior employees.
Training appears to be a central issue. More than a third of employees, 38%, said they were largely self-taught in AI, making it the most common way to learn the technology. By contrast, 23% said they had received AI training from their employer.
Many respondents also described weak guardrails around workplace use. Some 41% said their organisation did not provide enough training on using AI safely and securely, while 38% said they had received little or no clear guidance on acceptable AI use at work.
That combination of patchy training and limited policy direction raises concerns for employers trying to widen AI use across their organisations. Staff expected to work with the technology may instead rely on informal experimentation, creating security, compliance and privacy risks if unsanctioned tools or practices spread.
Workplace divide
The survey suggests access to AI knowledge is developing unevenly inside businesses. Senior staff appear more likely to build confidence quickly, while junior workers, who may face bigger changes to day-to-day tasks, are getting less structured support.
Almost half of respondents, 47%, said employers should take primary responsibility for helping staff develop AI skills. Yet the figures suggest many workers believe they are being left to figure it out on their own.
There are also signs that reluctance to use AI is linked as much to uncertainty as to resistance. Among those uncomfortable with AI tools, 24% said a lack of knowledge or understanding was the main reason they had not adopted them, while 22% said fears of being replaced by AI were holding them back.
The picture that emerges is not simply one of uneven enthusiasm for new software. It is a broader workforce issue in which confidence, access to training and clarity over acceptable use may determine who benefits from AI at work and who falls behind.
Julian Hamood outlined that concern in comments accompanying the research. “Employees are being told AI will transform the way they work, yet many have received little training on how to use it effectively, securely or confidently. In many organisations, workers are learning through trial and error while leaders stay ahead. The people who are most confident with AI will continue to build skills and productivity, while others risk being left behind through no fault of their own – and there’s a huge risk of an AI skills divide emerging as a result. Organisations need to treat AI readiness as a people issue, not simply a tech deployment issue. Clear governance, practical training and a structured understanding of where employees are today are critical if businesses want AI adoption to be both effective and responsible,” said Julian Hamood, Founder and Chief Visionary Officer, TrustedTech.
Adoption risks
The data arrives as companies continue to push AI into routine office work, often through writing assistants, search tools and software features embedded in wider workplace platforms. But the survey suggests rollout alone does not guarantee broad or consistent adoption.
For employers, that can mean weaker returns on technology spending if workers do not know when and how to use the tools. It can also increase the likelihood of so-called shadow AI, where staff turn to unauthorised applications because approved systems, training or policies are unclear.
The results underline a practical challenge for management teams. If AI use is left to self-teaching, early adopters may gain a sharper productivity edge, while other employees remain hesitant or exposed to mistakes that better training might have prevented.
The research highlights the need for structured assessments of AI readiness, including clearer governance and a better understanding of current skills levels before organisations expand AI use. The figures suggest many businesses still need to address those basics before AI can become a consistent part of everyday work.
Business & Technology
Merchants urged to check BNPL compliance at checkout
KAREN JOY BACUDO
Finance Editor
Ecommpay has urged merchants to check whether their Buy Now, Pay Later providers meet new UK regulatory requirements as full Financial Conduct Authority supervision begins for interest-free instalment products.
Lenders offering Deferred Payment Credit must now be authorised by the FCA or registered under the Temporary Permissions Regime to continue operating legally. Although the rules apply directly to lenders rather than retailers, they will affect how BNPL products are presented and managed at checkout.
Under the new regime, lenders must carry out affordability checks on every transaction, with the depth of those checks linked to risk. Purchases under £50 are no longer exempt. Lenders must also give customers clear upfront information on payment dates, amounts and the consequences of missed payments.
New arrears rules require prompt contact with customers who miss payments, reasonable notice before enforcement action, and signposting to free debt advice. Consumers with eligible complaints about Deferred Payment Credit agreements can also take their cases to the Financial Ombudsman Service.
Ecommpay warned merchants not to assume they are insulated from the consequences of a lender failing to meet the new standards. Problems involving a BNPL option can still damage the retailer’s customer experience and brand.
“BNPL has always been credit – regulation is simply catching up,” said Alpa Jotangia, Head of Compliance at Ecommpay.
“And critically it isn’t just a technical change for BNPL providers; it changes the checkout conversation for everyone. The reality is that consumers don’t separate the lender, the payment provider and the retailer in their minds. They remember the checkout experience, the refund experience, and how they were treated when something went wrong. If a BNPL partner falls short, it’s the merchant’s brand that’s likely to be impacted.”
Merchant checks
Retailers using BNPL at checkout should verify that each provider is either FCA-authorised or registered under the temporary regime. They should also review the customer journey to assess how repayment terms are displayed, how affordability checks are handled, and what happens when a customer returns an item or falls into arrears.
Merchants should also ask lenders how they meet their regulatory duties, including disclosure, refund handling and support for vulnerable customers. Ecommpay presented those steps as practical checks for retailers reviewing their existing payment setup.
The changes mark a significant shift for a market that expanded quickly under lighter oversight. BNPL products have become a common feature of online checkout in recent years, particularly for lower-value retail purchases, and the move brings them more closely into line with other forms of consumer credit.
For lenders, the rules introduce operational demands around underwriting, disclosures and arrears management. For merchants, the concern is less about direct regulatory exposure and more about whether a provider’s compliance processes introduce delays, confusion or disruption at the point of sale.
Jotangia said the sector would need to balance consumer safeguards with a simple user experience.
“The payments industry has spent years removing friction from checkout, but friction is not always failure when it comes to offering credit – sometimes it’s protection,” she said.
“The winners in the regulated BNPL market will be the providers that make responsible credit feel clear, intuitive and proportionate, and that’s where payments expertise matters. Payments service providers like Ecommpay can help merchants ensure their payment journeys work smoothly alongside compliant BNPL offers, delivering a checkout that converts. The next phase of BNPL won’t be defined by who has the most prominent button at checkout – it will be defined by trust.”
Business & Technology
UK high street giant in administration owing £59m and shops closed
Administrators shut down the Oxford brand at the Westgate centre in April, one of 33 that shut down nationwide.
Best known for its premium leather footwear and handbags, Russell & Bromley fell into administration earlier this year with debts of £59.3 million and losses reaching £20 million over the past two years.
The historic retailer, founded in Sussex in 1880, operated stores nationwide but its financial pressures proved insurmountable, according to administrators Will Wright and Chris Pole of Interpath Advisory, who were appointed in January.
READ MORE: UK-wide warning as invasive plant species grips country
A spokesman for Interpath Advisory said: “Following the announcement regarding the sale of the Russell & Bromley brand and certain assets to Next plc, the joint administrators can confirm that a phased closure programme for the remaining Russell & Bromley stores is now complete.
“All stores that did not transfer to Next as part of that transaction closed.
“Regrettably, these closures mean that the majority of employees working in the non-transferring stores have been made redundant.
“The administrators and their teams are engaging closely with all affected staff and will be providing support throughout the process, including assisting individuals in submitting claims to the Redundancy Payments Service.”
At the time of administration, Russell & Bromley owed £59.3 million.
A total deficiency of £35.7 million is estimated, with assets totalling £8 million available for preferential creditors and £5.6 million for unsecured creditors.
The company also owed £3.2 million to HMRC.
Administrators described the final years of the business as deeply challenging.
The administrators said: “The group was relatively highly loss-making, with these losses due to a combination of falling sales, increasing operational costs and a relatively high fixed cost base.
“Further to this, the wider UK market has been difficult for retail businesses with challenging trading conditions characterised by high inflation and suppressed consumer demand.”
In an effort to fund continued trading, Russell & Bromley had sold off several freehold properties.
However, even these measures could not stem the mounting losses.
The company had drawn £2.1 million on a trade finance facility before entering administration.
NatWest exercised its set-off rights immediately upon appointment of the administrators, using the company’s remaining cash to clear its outstanding debt with the bank.
Most of the company’s 36 stores did not survive.
Only three stores—two in London and one in Kent—were included in a pre-pack deal with Next, which acquired the brand name and select assets.
The closure resulted in 400 job losses.
Interpath anticipates that a dividend may eventually be paid to unsecured creditors but has not yet determined the potential value.
The administrators said: “Based on current estimates, we anticipate that unsecured creditors may receive a dividend.
“We have yet to determine the amount of this, but we will do so when we have completed the realisation of assets and the payment of associated costs.”
Business & Technology
AI literacy & cyber safety vital for young workers
Technology and learning specialists are urging employers to treat AI literacy and online security as core skills for young people entering work. They argue that human judgment and digital confidence now sit alongside technical knowledge for those starting their careers.
World Youth Skills Day has highlighted how AI and cyber risks are reshaping expectations for school leavers, apprentices and graduates. The focus has moved beyond narrow coding or software skills.
For Frank Jaquez, Head of Talent and Culture at learning company Skillsoft, the shift is as much about human strengths as digital tools. He points to the growing use of AI across roles and sectors, from office work to frontline services.
“World Youth Skills Day is a reminder that preparing young people for the future of work is about more than technical skills alone. As AI becomes embedded in everyday work, young people will need digital and AI literacy alongside the human capabilities technology cannot replicate – critical thinking, communication, collaboration, creativity and, above all, judgment,” said Frank Jaquez, Head of Talent and Culture at Skillsoft.
Jaquez said basic familiarity with AI tools is no longer enough. Early-career workers, he argued, must understand how to question outputs, check sources and weigh trade-offs when using machine-generated content.
He draws a sharp line between automation and responsibility.
“AI can automate routine tasks and help people become productive faster, but it still requires context and human oversight. Judgement matters. Young people entering the workforce need to know not just how to use AI, but when to challenge its outputs, how to apply their own knowledge, and where their perspective adds value that a model cannot,” said Jaquez.
The labour market remains difficult for many young people. Jaquez cited a recent PwC Youth Employment Index showing that one in eight 16- to 24-year-olds in the UK are not in employment, education or training.
“At the same time, young people are building careers in a rapidly evolving and tight labour market, with one in eight 16- to 24-year-olds currently not in employment, education or training. As AI accelerates change, the challenge is no longer simply learning new technical skills but continually developing both the technical capabilities and human strengths that drive performance. Employers have a real role to play here – strengthening the skills supply chain by giving young people clear pathways, honest conversations about how AI may reshape their roles, and stretch opportunities to build capability. Growth doesn’t always look like a promotion; sometimes it looks like a new project, a harder problem, or a skill that opens the next door,” said Jaquez.
Leadership behaviour also comes under scrutiny. Jaquez argues that senior staff must share their own experiences with AI tools so younger workers feel able to experiment and admit mistakes.
“Leaders also have to model the behaviour they want to see. When senior people share how they’re actually using AI – what worked, what didn’t, where they had to apply their own judgment – it creates the psychological safety for younger employees to experiment and learn out loud. And learning has to live inside the moments that already matter: working through a difficult challenge, presenting an idea, collaborating across teams, using AI to solve a problem, or stepping into a responsibility for the first time. When it feels like part of the work rather than added to it, curiosity and continuous learning stop being buzzwords and start becoming habits. That’s how we help young people grow alongside AI – and build careers that can keep evolving with it,” said Jaquez.
Alongside workplace skills, security specialists warn that everyday digital habits can expose young people to fraud and misinformation. AI, they say, now shapes both sides of the online safety equation.
Adrian Podkaminer, Head of Security at digital marketplace G2A.COM, said “digital confidence” is becoming as important as academic or vocational qualifications.
“Today, digital confidence is one of the most important skills young people can develop. World Youth Skills Day is not just about preparing them for future jobs; it’s about equipping them with skills to navigate the online world they’re already part of. From shopping online and using AI to study, create content or apply for jobs, to deciding what information to trust, being confident online is part of everyday life.
“AI is increasingly shaping how young people learn and create, whether that’s using chatbots to summarise revision notes or lecture recordings to generate creative ideas. But the same technology is also making online scams harder to spot, with AI-generated phishing emails, convincing deepfakes and fake messages that can appear genuine at first glance.
“That’s why being confident online today is about more than simply using technology. It’s about questioning what you see, protecting your personal information and building simple habits, such as using strong passwords and enabling multi-factor authentication, that make it much harder for criminals to take advantage.
“At G2A, we see firsthand how AI is transforming both digital commerce and cybercrime. As cybercriminals rapidly adapt to new tools and changing online behaviours, sharing practical advice is just as important as developing effective security measures. Informed users remain one of the strongest defences against online threats. The next generation won’t be defined by how quickly they adopt new technology, but by how confidently they can separate what’s helpful from what’s harmful,” said Adrian Podkaminer, Head of Security at G2A.COM.
-
UK News4 weeks agoUK defence spending plan ‘well short of what’s required’ and harder choices needed, says John Healey – UK politics live | Politics
-
Student Life4 weeks agoHome Office proposes doubling of Campsfield capacity
-
Oxford News3 weeks agoJune heatwave would be ‘virtually impossible’ in 1976
-
Oxford Events3 weeks agoStage Watch: ‘I think we need much more laughter in the world’ says John Cleese
-
UK News4 weeks agoUS to review benefits of having troops in Europe with ‘era of free-riding’ over – Europe live | World news
-
UK News3 weeks agoDriver killed in Bedford train crash named
-
Student Life4 weeks agoOxford Union holds “This House Believes the West is Right to be Suspicious of Islam” Debate
-
UK News3 weeks agoCCTV shows moments leading up to arrest in anti-Muslim attacks probe
