Connect with us

Traffic & Transport

Passenger of Bedford crash says 90% of people on his carriage were injured | Rail transport

Published

on


A survivor of the Bedford train crash has told how bodies were flung across the carriages, leaving people with broken bones and deep wounds after the rush hour collision on Friday night.

Brett Byatt, a teacher from Bedford, was onboard the East Midlands Railway (EMR) service that rammed into another slower travelling train resulting in a crash which killed the driver, left 89 with injuries and 33 needing urgent hospital treatment.

Speaking to the BBC’s Today programme, Byatt said the train wasn’t going at full speed and estimated they were only about five minutes into their journey when the collision happened.

“The people in first class ended up with stomach and rib injuries, because they went into the tables they have in first class, and EMR trains, the way that they’re structured with seats, was probably the worst way it could have been structured for a train crash.

“They (the seats) face each other in the three by three and the two by three, and … when people flew into one another, the seats that they were on, like, broke backwards into the people behind them.”

Byatt said he believed that 90% of passengers on his carriage were injured.

“I’d probably say from three to four of us were uninjured in a full carriage; everyone else had either a serious wound that was bleeding profusely, or a situation where they couldn’t stand, or they couldn’t move their neck, and I saw a woman snap her leg.”

The trains collided just south of the Elstow interchange between the A421 and the A6. Photograph: Thinzar Ko Ko/The Guardian

Immediately after the collision, Byatt and other passengers began attending to people with first aid until emergency services arrived 10 minutes later. He thought he escaped injury because he was standing near the doors, clutching a stanchion.

Asked how he was feeling in the aftermath of the accident, Byatt said he initially felt shocked but was now “pretty angry”.

“I don’t know at whom, who specifically, but it’s more about the, we’ve got one of the oldest railway networks, and signal failures happen a lot, and now I’m just wondering, why would a train driver lose his life over this?”

Tony Miles, a prominent railway journalist, told Today that the train would have had a black box able to allow investigators to ascertain precisely what happened before the crash.

“The signal system has a data recorder, they will know every switch that was pressed, they’ll know every control that was activated in both of the trains, they will have second-by-second data from the trains as to what was going on, so I suspect that there’s probably people who’ve got a reasonable insight into what happened already, but that doesn’t mean they’ll release it,” said Miles.

Eddie Dempsey, general secretary of the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT), said: “We are devastated to learn that a train driver and former RMT rep has tragically died as a result of (Friday’s) crash between Luton and Bedford.

“The thoughts of RMT are with their family, friends, colleagues and the Aslef trade union at this awful time.”

Dave Calfe, general secretary of the train drivers’ union Aslef, said: “Our thoughts tonight are with the family and friends of the driver who died in the crash near Bedford and with the passengers who were injured in the accident.

“We want to thank the emergency services who responded so quickly to help those onboard.”

A team of rail accident investigation branch inspectors have been sent to the site to gather evidence.

Network Rail said on Saturday morning: “We’re deeply saddened that a railway colleague has tragically died following the incident near Bedford. Our thoughts are with their family, friends and colleagues, and with everyone affected.

“Our teams are on site working closely with the emergency services and industry partners. We want to thank the emergency services and the wider railway family for their professionalism and swift response.

“In the meantime, we ask passengers to please check before they travel.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Traffic & Transport

M60 traffic: Rush hour chaos as 'police-led incident' sparks motorway closure

Published

on




A stretch of the motorway has been closed due to a police-led incident.


Source link

Continue Reading

Traffic & Transport

‘Leicester Square, please guv’: Self-driving taxis cleared for London streets ‘later this summer’ | Self-driving cars

Published

on


The taxi app company Uber and the autonomous technology developer Wayve have been granted the first minicab licences in London, allowing them to offer self-driving taxi rides to paying customers – but with a human safety driver in place, for now.

The companies said they would start trips in the UK “later this summer” before the full public launch.

The San Francisco-headquartered Uber and London-based Wayve are racing against the Google-owned Waymo and its Chinese equivalent Baidu’s Apollo Go to launch self-driving taxi services in London. Their progress is being watched closely because the British capital will be one of the first cities in the world to have American and Chinese tech firms operating on the same roads.

Uber and Wayve said more than 100,000 Londoners were on their waiting list for the self-driving taxis.

Transport for London (TfL), the capital’s licensing authority, granted 15 private hire vehicle licences to Ford Mustang Mach-E vehicles equipped with Wayve’s artificial intelligence driving software, as well as surround cameras and radar. The companies said TfL had confirmed they reached the required safety standards.

A TfL-licensed private hire driver will sit in the driver’s seat during trips to intervene if necessary, although the software is expected to control the car.

The next step, of operating the taxis without a driver, will require Uber and Wayve to seek approval via a new process, known as an automated passenger services permit, with the government’s Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency.

TfL said it would monitor the use of the vehicles, and was ready to intervene if passenger safety was compromised.

A TfL spokesperson said: “Safety is our top priority. Any new vehicle licensed to carry passengers on London’s roads must align with our Vision Zero goal of eliminating all deaths and serious injuries from collisions on London’s streets by 2041.”

Wayve, which was co-founded by the New Zealand-born Alex Kendall, has been testing its tech in London since 2018 with safety drivers. In previous demonstrations to the Guardian the car has navigated most of the obstacles of north London’s busy roads, although the safety driver was forced to intervene at one point.

Sarah Gates, Wayve’s vice-president for global affairs and assurance, said: “This licence is an important step towards giving Londoners the chance to experience autonomous driving technology.

“The responsible deployment of these vehicles will bring us safer, cleaner and quieter streets, and we’re proud to continue working alongside regulators, communities and the public as we take the next steps towards making autonomous rides a reality in the capital.”

Autonomous driving systems usually incorporate surround cameras and radar. Wayve also utilises AI. Photograph: The Lightwriter/Alamy

Driverless taxi services are already operating in several cities around the world, although mainly in the US and China, where most of the software developers are based. However, US companies are essentially blocked from China, and vice versa, meaning they have not had to compete directly.

skip past newsletter promotion


Uber abandoned its own efforts to develop self-driving technology in 2020, but it is working with several partners around the world who are in turn using different systems. That includes the Chinese company WeRide, which is operating driverless taxis in Abu Dhabi, UAE.

Wayve is also working with the Japanese manufacturer Nissan on integrating its tech in private cars.

Uber’s global head of autonomous mobility operations, Annie Duvnjak, said: “This licence is a key milestone in bringing autonomous rides to London on Uber.

“Our interest list has seen an incredible response from Londoners who are excited to experience Wayve’s British-built autonomous driving technology.”

The news came as Uber reported better than expected second-quarter gross bookings of $58.02bn (£43bn), but said earnings for the next quarter would fall below Wall Street forecasts.

Uber said earnings per share would come in between ​84 cents and 88 cents, compared with analysts’ expectations of 89 cents, with foreign exchange costs trimming booking growth.

The company also outlined ‌plans to spend more than $10bn on autonomous vehicles over the coming years, although it did not provide a specific ‌timeline.



Source link

Continue Reading

Traffic & Transport

Gatwick airport to open second runway after legal challenge fails | Gatwick airport

Published

on


Gatwick airport is to start development of its second runway after campaigners lost a legal challenge to the plans.

The court of appeal on Tuesday dismissed a bid by local campaign groups to challenge an earlier high court ruling that the scheme could proceed.

The £2.2bn project, approved by the transport secretary, Heidi Alexander, in September, will allow about 100,000 more flights a year to use Britain’s second busiest airport.

Pierre-Hugues Schmit, the Gatwick chief executive, said the airport was “very pleased that this ruling brings to an end an eight-year planning and legal process which has carefully tested and scrutinised every aspect of our expansion plans on multiple occasions”.

The plans will involve the West Sussex airport slightly repositioning its emergency runway and using it routinely for short-haul passenger aircraft. It is now among the busiest single-runway airports in the world, but hopes to have the second runway in operation as early as 2030.

The government declared the court ruling a “major milestone for Gatwick and for local communities”.

Alexander said: “Around 13 million more passengers and 100,000 more flights will give holidaymakers greater choice and strengthen global links to help make the UK one of the most attractive places in the world to invest.

“We’ll back expansion that supports growth and our climate goals. To drive forward sustainable change, we’re also investing more than £219m for green fuel production to cut emissions from flying and secure the future of aviation.”

Campaigners had sought a judicial review of the Department for Transport’s decision to approve the plans, arguing that the government did not properly assess the scheme’s climate impact.

skip past newsletter promotion


One of the applicants, Peter Barclay, the chair of Gatwick Area Conservation Campaign, said he was disappointed with the ruling but added: “It is time for governments to wake up and realise that saying yes to the expansion of any and every airport will not kickstart the economy … It will further lock in aviation’s climate, noise and air pollution impacts, increase congestion on roads and public transport and blight local communities.”

Meanwhile, Luton Rising, the council-owned company behind Luton airport, announced that all legal challenges to its expansion plans had now been cleared. The supreme court has dismissed any final possibility of appealing a high court ruling last November upholding Alexander’s signoff on plans to increase the airport’s annual capacity from 19 million to 32 million passengers by the mid-2040s.

The airport owner said it would create up to 11,000 new jobs and generate up to an additional £1.5bn in annual economic activity, and pledged strict controls on noise and carbon emissions, air quality and surface access to the airport.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending