Connect with us

Traffic & Transport

More than 150 violent offenders granted taxi licences in Midlands city last year | Transport

Published

on


More than 150 people convicted of violent crimes were granted taxi licences last year by Wolverhampton city council, dubbed the UK’s “taxi capital”, data has revealed.

The Guardian obtained data via a freedom of information request that revealed 438 people with criminal convictions were last year granted taxi and private hire driver licences by the West Midlands local authority – which has issued far more taxi licences than any other authority.

This included 158 people convicted of violent offences, 61 convicted of drug offences, 36 of drink offences and four of sexual offences. The council said 16 drivers had convictions in two of the requested categories.

Drivers with licences issued by Wolverhampton council can work, using apps like Uber and Bolt, in other local authority areas.

Between April 2023 and the end of March 2024, the city council issued more than than 42,000 driver licences, compared with Birmingham and Bradford, which had issued the second and third largest number of licences – more than 7,000 each – according to government data.

Wolverhampton’s extraordinary dominance of the taxi licensing system has raised concerns over safety risks to passengers, but the authority has denied claims it is quicker and easier to get a licence there.

A report by the council’s regulatory committee said it appealed to drivers due to its work to digitise its application form and streamline processes.

Several key figures have voiced concerns around inconsistent safeguarding standards in taxi licensing, with the government currently exploring proposals to reduce the number of bodies issuing licences and reduce out-of-area working, which enables drivers licensed in one area to operate in another.

Between April 2023 and the end of March, Wolverhampton council said 96% of its licensed drivers lived outside the city.

The mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, called the figures obtained by the Guardian “truly shocking” and said they “lay bare the fundamental issue with how private hire licensing is managed in this country”.

“We want our taxis and private hire vehicles [PHVs] to be among the safest and most trusted in the country, but we can’t do this with the current broken licensing system, where local leaders have zero oversight over nearly half the PHVs on our streets,” the mayor said.

The Suzy Lamplugh Trust, which works to reduce stalking and harassment, said it has been campaigning for consistent safeguarding standards in taxi licensing since 2014 and called for drivers to be viewed as a regulated activity to ensure stricter background checks.

A spokesperson for the Department for Transport said its statutory guidance is “clear that anyone convicted of a sexual offence should not be granted a taxi or private hire licence”, adding that licensing decisions are taken by individual local authorities with reference to government guidance.

Its guidance also states that a licence should not be granted to an applicant convicted of a violent offence until at least 10 years have elapsed since the sentence was completed.

The chief executive of Wolverhampton council said “safeguarding is such a priority for us”, and each application is “scrutinised and considered” on the basis of local and national policies.

“There is nothing more important to us than the safety of passengers in cars licensed by this council,” Tim Johnson said. “We refuse thousands of licence applications each year.”

He added that Wolverhampton is the only council to carry out Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks on all of its drivers and the only local authority to share data about the convictions of licensed drivers.

“Licences are only approved if our panel – which includes a trained decision maker and solicitor – would be happy for a person they care for to travel alone in a vehicle driven by this person at any time of day or night,” he said. “We know that other authorities have licensed drivers with similar previous convictions.”

Drivers with PHV licences work for companies such as Uber and Bolt, and can only carry out pre-booked journeys. Spokespeople for both companies said the decision to grant a private hire driver licence is made by a local authority and details about a driver’s background checks are not passed on to them.

“Bolt’s own data shows no meaningful link between where a driver is licensed and reported safety incidents,” a Bolt spokesperson added.

Uber and Bolt said they have introduced safety tools for passengers, including providing details about their driver’s identity and vehicle details before they get into the car.

Wolverhampton council, along with Uber and Bolt, said it supported plans to reform the taxi licensing system.

The Guardian also requested data on the number of licences issued to people with criminal convictions to Birmingham and Bradford councils.

Birmingham said it does require applicants to provide enhanced DBS checks at the time of application but “GDPR restrictions prevent us from retaining that information”.

A spokesperson for Birmingham city council said: “Where an applicant has a previous conviction for certain offences involving violence/public order, sexual, dishonesty, serious driving or drug offences, our starting point for all convictions of this nature is to refuse the licence application.

“The onus is on them to convince the licensing authority that they are a ‘fit and proper person’ to hold a licence.”

Bradford council said it did have data on the number of people who had committed violent, drug or drink offences and were granted taxi licences, but the request would “exceed the appropriate cost limit” within a freedom of information request.

A spokesperson for Bradford council said it had implemented a suitability policy for taxi and PHV drivers and its main objective was to “protect the public and to safeguard children and vulnerable people”.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Traffic & Transport

Marriage: more than a paper exercise | Marriage

Published

on


I enjoyed Polly Hudson’s wisdom on marriage (I know it’s taboo – but I’m a big fan of marriage, 9 June). However, I think she was fundamentally wrong when she wrote: “The haters say marriage is ‘just a piece of paper’, which is fundamentally true”. That would be like saying my degree is only the certificate. In both cases the significance is that which it points towards – something no physical object can truly capture.
Rev Martin Joss
Peterborough

Allow me, a number theorist, to lend support to Ian Harley (Letters, 10 June), and make some sense of the phrase “such fun’’ for Steve Lupton (Letters, 11 June). Many scientists start with fun and enjoyment when young, followed by agony and frustration in their research, but always sustained by the beauty and amazement of their discoveries.
Peter Shiu
Sheffield

David Smith concludes that the US president “has too much power for someone with so little connection to reality” (As Donald Trump turns 80, he faces a foe he can never defeat: Father Time. That’s a problem for us all, 14 June). Doubly worrying that the same can be said of the world’s first trillionaire.
Mark de Brunner
Harrogate, North Yorkshire

Further to Sally Goldsmith’s “Is this bus going to Jump” (Letters, 10 June), a Welsh friend who used to visit me in Manchester would say, “I’ve just seen a bus for Sale”.
Julian Dorr
Wymondham, Norfolk

In the 1970s, the Bradford Argus always called David Hockney: “The mayor of Bradford’s brother” (David Hockney obituary, 12 June).
Angela Singer
Cambridge

Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.



Source link

Continue Reading

Traffic & Transport

Puzzled by occult clue’s mysticism solution | Crosswords

Published

on


So Julian of Norwich was table-turning? Since when has mysticism been a synonym for a belief in the occult (Quick crossword, 9 June). Saints’ bones will be turning in their tombs.
Christopher Cook
Deal, Kent

I see an alarming trend in your report (9 June). It seems “children are more likely to be bitten by dogs than adults”. Please can you publish the number of incidents of children being bitten by adults?
Vee Singleton
Framlingham, Suffolk

Unless a valid reason is given for denying the referee Omar Artan entry to the US, the other World Cup referees should go on strike (Top African referee Omar Artan refused access to US and will miss World Cup, 8 June).
Frank Cosgrove
Presteigne, Powys

I read Ian Harley’s letter (10 June) about the nine times table and other number bases carefully. I think I understood most of it. The bit I really could not make any sense of was the last phrase: “Such fun.”
Steve Lupton
Prestwich, Greater Manchester

As a Speke lad, I know that the train to Speke would never speak (Letters, 10 June), because there isn’t one – we don’t have a railway station. However, the joke I grew up with was: “What is the quickest way to get a parrot to speak?” The answer: “On an 82 bus.”
Rev Frank Cain
Liverpool

I had a similar quip after running for a bus, when I asked the driver if he was the No 1, as I hadn’t checked. He replied that his wife thought so.
Ann Spencer
Newcastle upon Tyne

Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.



Source link

Continue Reading

Traffic & Transport

Sole survivor of Air India crash demands ‘honesty and answers’ one year on | Air India Ahmedabad plane crash

Published

on


The only survivor of the Air India plane crash that killed 260 people in June 2025 has called for “honesty, transparency and answers” a year on from the disaster, and spoken about his “significant psychological scars” and financial hardship.

Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, a British national, has previously described his fate as a “miracle” after being the only person to survive the incident, in which a Boeing 787 Dreamliner struck a medical college shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad airport.

The crash killed 241 people onboard the London-bound flight, including 169 Indian nationals and 52 Britons, as well as 19 people who were on or near the site of the incident. A further 67 were seriously injured.

Ramesh, who lost his brother in the crash, demanded answers as investigators are yet to publish their findings. Last month, India’s civil ​aviation minister said the investigation was in the “last stage” and the report would “mostly” be finished by the anniversary of the crash, on 12 June.

Exactly 30 days after the crash last year, the Indian authorities released a preliminary report, which was in line with standard procedure. It found both of the plane’s fuel switches had moved to the “cut-off” position “immediately” after take-off, stopping fuel supply to the engine.

Speaking to the Press Association, Ramesh said there were more “unanswered questions” he wanted addressed, and that his trauma had not ended on the day of the crash. “I live with the significant psychological scars, the loss of my brother, and the constant unanswered questions around how and why this happened,” he said.

“I know those questions are not just on my mind; they are on the minds of every affected family. More than anything, people need honesty, transparency and answers. Nothing will ever change what happened, but families deserve clarity.”

Ramesh has received £21,500 from Air India to support his wife and five-year-old son, according to his representative, Sanjiv Patel, but continues to face financial hardship as well as psychological and emotional.

“We’ve repeatedly asked to meet the chief executive of Air India but that has not happened,” Patel said. “We recently met with executives of Air India and representatives connected to the Tata Group [which has a controlling stake in the business].

“Those discussions were constructive and have resulted in some positive progress, although a number of important issues remain under discussion.”

Patel said that, due to the impact of the crash, Ramesh had not been able to return to work as normal and his family was living on less than £1,000 a month.

Ramesh is also taking civil action. Patel said: “Despite one of the worst aviation disasters involving British citizens in recent years, neither Vishwash nor many of the affected families we have spoken to have received any direct contact or tailored support from the UK government.”

An Air India spokesperson confirmed that representatives from Air India and the Tata Group had met Ramesh, and remained in “close contact” with him and his team. The company said they were “actively working to ensure that appropriate support continues to be extended to him”.

Paul McClorry at Hudgell Solicitors said civil claims were being considered against a number of potential defendants. “We are awaiting the findings of the investigations, and we should finally start to see some clarity as to how and why this awful disaster happened, and, crucially, how it could have been avoided,” he said.

The UK Foreign Office has been approached for comment.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending