Traffic & Transport
Tube strikes: how disruptive will action by London Underground drivers be? | London Underground
A strike by London Underground drivers will severely disrupt transport in the capital over the next four days.
The RMT union and Transport for London (TfL) said that the strike would go ahead from midday on Tuesday 21 April, with no last-minute talks planned on Monday.
How disruptive will the strike be?
Just under half of London’s tube drivers are in the RMT union and expected to join the strike, with a slight majority – members of Aslef – still working as normal.
The RMT has called the action in two 24-hour tranches from midday on Tuesday and Thursday for maximum impact over four days.
On Tuesday and Thursday afternoons, services will be significantly reduced and may not run later than 8pm on most lines.
On Wednesday and Friday morning the first trains are not expected to begin running until 7.30am, and services are likely to be worse than usual in the afternoon.
Some lines, where the RMT is heavily represented, will probably not run at all during the strike periods: the Piccadilly, Waterloo & City and Circle lines are expected to have no service. Parts of the Metropolitan line, between Baker Street and Aldgate, and the Central line, between White City and Liverpool Street, will also have no trains.
Are there other ways to get around?
Yes. The London Overground, national rail services, the Elizabeth line, the DLR and trams will be running as usual but are likely to be extremely busy.
London buses should be running as normal but are likely to be very crowded, and are liable to be disrupted and delayed by the added numbers of passengers boarding and by congested roads if people turn to private cars.
TfL advises that people may find it easier to walk or cycle on some journeys. During the last tube strike, which took place in September 2025, the number of cycle and e-bike hires rose significantly. At least the weather promises to be fine.
So why are drivers striking again?
Not all drivers. And nobody else. This dispute is something of a head-scratcher and may strain the patience of the relatively sympathetic public in London more than usual. The RMT went on strike last year to press for a 32-hour working week, which TfL said was unaffordable. Now drivers are being offered a four-day week, which the Aslef drivers’ union supports but the RMT opposes.
TfL says its proposals would bring London Underground in line with the working patterns of other train operating companies, improving reliability and flexibility at no additional cost. It said the changes would be voluntary, there would be no reduction in contractual hours and those who wish to continue a five-day working week pattern would be able to do so.
The RMT general secretary, Eddie Dempsey, said TfL was making no concessions, adding: “The approach of TfL is not one which leads to industrial peace and will infuriate our members who want to see a negotiated settlement to this avoidable dispute.”
Aslef says it is surprised that the RMT is taking action. It views the voluntary four-day week as a winner: giving tube drivers who wish to do it an extra 35 days off every year, in return for minor changes to working conditions and using electronic, rather than paper-based, systems.
Will it definitely go ahead, and are there more strikes planned?
The first set of planned strikes in this particular dispute, in March, was called off by the RMT to allow talks to go ahead. But that pause was announced six days before action was due, and there are no signs of further negotiation now, with the RMT at the weekend accusing TfL of “reneging on promises” and making strikes inevitable.
If there is no resolution, further strikes over the same four-day pattern are scheduled by the RMT in May and June.
Traffic & Transport
Marriage: more than a paper exercise | Marriage
I enjoyed Polly Hudson’s wisdom on marriage (I know it’s taboo – but I’m a big fan of marriage, 9 June). However, I think she was fundamentally wrong when she wrote: “The haters say marriage is ‘just a piece of paper’, which is fundamentally true”. That would be like saying my degree is only the certificate. In both cases the significance is that which it points towards – something no physical object can truly capture.
Rev Martin Joss
Peterborough
Allow me, a number theorist, to lend support to Ian Harley (Letters, 10 June), and make some sense of the phrase “such fun’’ for Steve Lupton (Letters, 11 June). Many scientists start with fun and enjoyment when young, followed by agony and frustration in their research, but always sustained by the beauty and amazement of their discoveries.
Peter Shiu
Sheffield
David Smith concludes that the US president “has too much power for someone with so little connection to reality” (As Donald Trump turns 80, he faces a foe he can never defeat: Father Time. That’s a problem for us all, 14 June). Doubly worrying that the same can be said of the world’s first trillionaire.
Mark de Brunner
Harrogate, North Yorkshire
Further to Sally Goldsmith’s “Is this bus going to Jump” (Letters, 10 June), a Welsh friend who used to visit me in Manchester would say, “I’ve just seen a bus for Sale”.
Julian Dorr
Wymondham, Norfolk
In the 1970s, the Bradford Argus always called David Hockney: “The mayor of Bradford’s brother” (David Hockney obituary, 12 June).
Angela Singer
Cambridge
Traffic & Transport
Puzzled by occult clue’s mysticism solution | Crosswords
So Julian of Norwich was table-turning? Since when has mysticism been a synonym for a belief in the occult (Quick crossword, 9 June). Saints’ bones will be turning in their tombs.
Christopher Cook
Deal, Kent
I see an alarming trend in your report (9 June). It seems “children are more likely to be bitten by dogs than adults”. Please can you publish the number of incidents of children being bitten by adults?
Vee Singleton
Framlingham, Suffolk
Unless a valid reason is given for denying the referee Omar Artan entry to the US, the other World Cup referees should go on strike (Top African referee Omar Artan refused access to US and will miss World Cup, 8 June).
Frank Cosgrove
Presteigne, Powys
I read Ian Harley’s letter (10 June) about the nine times table and other number bases carefully. I think I understood most of it. The bit I really could not make any sense of was the last phrase: “Such fun.”
Steve Lupton
Prestwich, Greater Manchester
As a Speke lad, I know that the train to Speke would never speak (Letters, 10 June), because there isn’t one – we don’t have a railway station. However, the joke I grew up with was: “What is the quickest way to get a parrot to speak?” The answer: “On an 82 bus.”
Rev Frank Cain
Liverpool
I had a similar quip after running for a bus, when I asked the driver if he was the No 1, as I hadn’t checked. He replied that his wife thought so.
Ann Spencer
Newcastle upon Tyne
Traffic & Transport
Sole survivor of Air India crash demands ‘honesty and answers’ one year on | Air India Ahmedabad plane crash
The only survivor of the Air India plane crash that killed 260 people in June 2025 has called for “honesty, transparency and answers” a year on from the disaster, and spoken about his “significant psychological scars” and financial hardship.
Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, a British national, has previously described his fate as a “miracle” after being the only person to survive the incident, in which a Boeing 787 Dreamliner struck a medical college shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad airport.
The crash killed 241 people onboard the London-bound flight, including 169 Indian nationals and 52 Britons, as well as 19 people who were on or near the site of the incident. A further 67 were seriously injured.
Ramesh, who lost his brother in the crash, demanded answers as investigators are yet to publish their findings. Last month, India’s civil aviation minister said the investigation was in the “last stage” and the report would “mostly” be finished by the anniversary of the crash, on 12 June.
Exactly 30 days after the crash last year, the Indian authorities released a preliminary report, which was in line with standard procedure. It found both of the plane’s fuel switches had moved to the “cut-off” position “immediately” after take-off, stopping fuel supply to the engine.
Speaking to the Press Association, Ramesh said there were more “unanswered questions” he wanted addressed, and that his trauma had not ended on the day of the crash. “I live with the significant psychological scars, the loss of my brother, and the constant unanswered questions around how and why this happened,” he said.
“I know those questions are not just on my mind; they are on the minds of every affected family. More than anything, people need honesty, transparency and answers. Nothing will ever change what happened, but families deserve clarity.”
Ramesh has received £21,500 from Air India to support his wife and five-year-old son, according to his representative, Sanjiv Patel, but continues to face financial hardship as well as psychological and emotional.
“We’ve repeatedly asked to meet the chief executive of Air India but that has not happened,” Patel said. “We recently met with executives of Air India and representatives connected to the Tata Group [which has a controlling stake in the business].
“Those discussions were constructive and have resulted in some positive progress, although a number of important issues remain under discussion.”
Patel said that, due to the impact of the crash, Ramesh had not been able to return to work as normal and his family was living on less than £1,000 a month.
Ramesh is also taking civil action. Patel said: “Despite one of the worst aviation disasters involving British citizens in recent years, neither Vishwash nor many of the affected families we have spoken to have received any direct contact or tailored support from the UK government.”
An Air India spokesperson confirmed that representatives from Air India and the Tata Group had met Ramesh, and remained in “close contact” with him and his team. The company said they were “actively working to ensure that appropriate support continues to be extended to him”.
Paul McClorry at Hudgell Solicitors said civil claims were being considered against a number of potential defendants. “We are awaiting the findings of the investigations, and we should finally start to see some clarity as to how and why this awful disaster happened, and, crucially, how it could have been avoided,” he said.
The UK Foreign Office has been approached for comment.
-
Crime & Safety4 weeks agoWhat happens to Halifax customers if Lloyds makes changes?
-
Crime & Safety4 weeks agoFlock of clay birds set to take flight in special exhibition
-
Oxford News4 weeks agoActor steps down from major role in new Harry Potter series
-
Crime & Safety4 weeks agoOxfordshire bridge closure comes as management ‘weaknesses’ found
-
Crime & Safety4 weeks agoFriends of the Ridgeway appoint Matthew Barber as president
-
Oxford News4 weeks agoNHS fracture service helps support extra 1,000 patients
-
Oxford News4 weeks agoHenley pub once owned by Russell Brand reopens after 6 years
-
UK News4 weeks agoBurnham seeks to calm markets by committing to fiscal rules
