Connect with us

UK News

Melania Trump says she ‘never had a relationship’ with Jeffrey Epstein – US politics live | US politics

Published

on


Melania Trump denies any relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell

First Lady Melania Trump told reporters on Thursday that she “never had a relationship” with the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell. In a televised statement, it was unclear which specific accusations the first lady was responding to exactly.

“I never been friends with Epstein,” she said in her public rebuke. “I am not Epstein’s victim. Epstein did not introduce me to Donald Trump.”

The first lady went on to say that she and the president were invited to the same parties as Epstein “from time to time” as “overlapping in social circles is common in New York City and Palm Beach”.

Share

Updated at 

Key events

In her statement, the first lady elaborated that she only met Epstein for the first time in 2000, at a party she attended with her husband. At the time she was known as Melania Knauss. “I had never met Epstein and had no knowledge of his criminal undertakings,” she said. “Numerous fake images and statements about Epstein and me have been calculating on social media for years now. Be cautious about what you believe.”

As my colleague Robert Mackey reported earlier this year, a trove of files released by the justice department from the federal investigation into Epstein includes a friendly email that was apparently sent to Maxwell in late October 2002, signed “Love, Melania”.

Although the email addresses of both the sender and the recipient are redacted, a second copy of the same email text also appears in another document released on Friday, which includes a reply from “G. Max”.

The first email, sent on the evening of 23 October 2002, with the subject line “HI!” begins “Dear G!”. The sender says there is a “nice story about JE in NY mag” before asking the recipient about their travels and to call them when they’re back in New York.

In their reply, “G. Max” wrote that while they are already on their way back to the city they will not have time to see the sender, but they would “try and call”.

The email exchange was sent the week that New York magazine published a flattering profile of Jeffrey Epstein that included a photograph of Maxwell with Epstein. While the article was in the 28 October 2002 edition, new issues of the magazine are published one week prior to the cover date.

While the redactions in the documents mean that there is no proof that the exchange was with the future first lady, in her statement today, Trump appeared to reference these emails, although it is unclear if she was definitely referring to this batch of communication.

“My email reply to Maxwell cannot be characterized as anything more than casual correspondence,” the first lady said. “My polite reply to her email doesn’t amount to anything more than a trivial note.”

Maxwell had socialized with the future Melania Trump in Palm Beach prior to the email exchange. Just over two weeks later, on 11 November 2002, they were photographed together in New York, along with Donald Trump and Naomi Campbell, at a Dolce & Gabbana event.

Just over two months later, in January 2003, Maxwell would present Epstein with a bound volume of 50th birthday greetings from friends and associates, including a crude drawing and enigmatic message in the name of Donald Trump.

Share

Updated at 



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

UK News

Roy Hattersley, former Labour deputy leader, dies aged 93

Published

on



Paying tribute, Sir Keir Starmer said Lord Hattersley “was a giant of the Labour movement”.



Source link

Continue Reading

UK News

A £350 swimming pool fee ruined our easyJet holiday | Consumer rights

Published

on


My partner and I paid £2,150 for a week’s all-inclusive break in Marrakech with easyJet Holidays.

We chose the Jaal Riad Resort Hotel because of its pool and spa. When we arrived, we were told that use of the heated pool cost £24 a person an hour, the Jacuzzi £24 for 20 minutes, and the hammam was £16 for 20 minutes.

Nowhere were these extra fees listed when booking. EasyJet Holidays rejected my complaint and referred me to a line buried at the bottom of the list of facilities that said charges may apply. We were planning on using the pool regularly but could not afford it. If we had known, we would have booked elsewhere.
DP,
Cambridgeshire

Hidden charges can hugely inflate the cost of holidays. Resort fees are the most pernicious – some hotels charge up to £50 a person a day for facilities whether or not they are used.

Then there’s the daily tourist tax levied via the accommodation provider during the stay in some countries, and ancillary fees for upgraded wifi for sun loungers.

EasyJet Holidays makes a big deal of the pool – it’s a prominent photo on the webpage for the hotel.

No asterisk refers potential bookers to the crucial caveat that a couple, wishing to avail themselves once a day during a week’s stay, would have to pay almost £350 extra.

Even the eagle-eyed who alighted on the paragraph of small print at the bottom of the page, would be none the wiser.

Enjoy the pool! (T&Cs apply, may cost £24 an hour per person, please read small print) Photograph: Maria Korneeva/Getty Images

Only after declaring that the facilities are subject to height and weight restrictions, seasonal availability, opening times, and age and dress code, does it mention that they “may” attract additional charges. These are not listed.

This is potentially unlawful, according to consumer lawyer Gary Rycroft.

“The facilities were prominently marketed as part of the holiday experience, and extra charges were not clearly disclosed before purchase,” he says. “Under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers (DMCC) Act 2024, businesses must not omit material information that would influence a consumer’s decision about whether to enter into a contract.”

EasyJet is defensive. “We always strive to make it clear that use of hotel facilities may incur additional charges,” it told me.

The company said then that it was reviewing the description to “further highlight that the use of the spa facilities is chargeable”, although, at the time of writing, three weeks later, the webpage remained unchanged. It has also now offered a £500 goodwill payment.

As the holiday season begins, you need to read the small print to avoid nasty surprises.

We welcome letters but cannot answer individually. Email us at consumer.champions@theguardian.com or write to Consumer Champions, Money, the Guardian, 90 York Way, London N1 9GU. Please include a daytime phone number. Submission and publication of all letters is subject to our terms and conditions.



Source link

Continue Reading

UK News

Summer strikes averted at Glasgow Airport as pay deals struck

Published

on



Nearly 400 workers at Glasgow Airport have accepted offers from bosses at ICTS and Menzies Aviation.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending